https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkB5nNGVINw
There’s this kind of weird argument that a lot of atheists have taken from the work of David Hume, a skeptic who was probably an atheist himself—nearly certainly was. Hume has this argument that people will say is supposed to be against miracles. You know, people will say, “Oh, maybe miraculous things could happen.” David Hume has this argument for why they don’t, or at least that’s what it’s quoted as. Although it’s not that, you know, David Hume finally—he was a skeptic who followed his skepticism to its logical conclusion, and that is ultimately we can’t really have knowledge of anything. That’s just how it is. You know, you can’t be halfway a skeptic; you have to apply that to the most extreme degree.
But either way, here’s what Hume’s alleged argument against miracles is. He says this: okay, imagine something miraculous happens. Let’s say someone rises from the dead. I think that’s the original example he uses; he’s talking about the resurrection of Christ or something like that. Imagine you see someone resurrect from the dead. That’s your observation; okay, that’s your empirical sense data. Now you’re faced with a question. Whenever you see something that’s unlikely or allegedly miraculous, you are faced with two choices, implicitly, whether you realize it or not. One is you could believe what you just saw, or the other one is you could, kind of out of a plausibility judgment or a statistical judgment, induce that you have misperceived the alleged miracle.
What Hume says is that every time—more or less every time—we have a normal, non-miraculous experience of life, you observe, for example, when humans die, they stay dead; they don’t rise from the dead. Right? That is a statistical—I mean, let’s say you can have a Bayesian algorithm that is integrating that information. Every time you learn, “Okay, another person died; they didn’t rise from the dead,” another person died; they didn’t rise from the dead, another person died; they didn’t rise from the dead. Right? And as time goes on, you eventually become very much convinced that people don’t rise from the dead. So Hume more or less said—he wasn’t talking about Bayesian anything or whatever—but Hume’s argument is more or less, “Okay, well, if you have kind of an established way that the universe works, when people die, they don’t rise from the dead, and you see a contradiction to that, there’s always a stronger case to make for believing that your own senses are in error.” Right? So therefore, you shouldn’t believe this; you shouldn’t believe if you see someone rising from the dead. You shouldn’t believe it, right? Even if you see it with your own eyes, because you are implicitly saying the entire architecture of the universe has been subverted.
Now, it’s important to note that this argument, even though it’s kind of portrayed as an argument against miracles, it’s not an argument against miracles. It’s actually an argument against believing in miracles, and those are two utterly different things. Because Hume ultimately is not saying or even arguing that miracles are impossible. In fact, you could say this in any other—I mean, a really good example I think that talks about, I guess, the problem of induction, kind of philosophical problems, is you know, Nim Leb has this what he calls the turkey problem. Right? So imagine a different situation: you are a turkey; you’re a turkey scientist, and you’re on a turkey farm with a bunch of—there’s a farmer and there’s a whole bunch of turkeys.
So every day you wake up and the farmer feeds you, and he feeds you breakfast, lunch, and dinner. I don’t know how often turkeys eat. He always takes care of you and all the other turkeys. Every day, you know, if a turkey is sick, he nurses them to health. And so every day you are given some statistical fact, and the statistical—or let’s say you are led to an inductive conclusion. The inductive conclusion is that farmers love turkeys. Farmers feed us; they do all these great things, and every single day you wake up and you get more and more evidence to the fact that farmers just love turkeys.
So a widely debunked conspiracy theorist turkey might say, “I think the farmer is going to kill us. I think that the farmer actually plans eventually to kill the turkeys.” And you can put on your Redditor for Atheora and say, “No, actually, my Bayesian statistics, my inductive reasoning have led me to think that every single day we have more and more and more and more evidence that the farmer loves turkeys.” Right? Farmer just loves turkeys; he wants to keep us alive; he really genuinely cares for us. Now, eventually, there’s going to come a day that the farmer, you know, Thanksgiving is coming, and the farmer is going to kill all the turkeys. He’s going to kill the nerd turkey who said all this stuff, and the nerd turkey is going to be—there’s going to be a Thanksgiving meal; his little turkey ghost is going to be floating above the table, and he’s going to say, “Well, you know, still, I believe Hume’s argument.” He’s going to say, “You know, I still have more reason to believe that I’m just perceiving this the wrong way because all the evidence says that, you know, people love—or farmers love turkeys.”
Right? Now, obviously, that’s a pretty absurd example, but it’s important to remember that, you know, that kind of skepticism is really setting you up to say that there’s nothing outside of—let’s say there’s nothing unpredictable about the world. The architecture of the universe, I fully understand. Nothing else—it’s not even about miracles themselves; it’s about anything unexpected couldn’t possibly happen. When you’re making this argument against even miracles—I mean, the word miracle, ultimately, you can think of it as just any kind of unlikely event, right? Or any event that, like, we don’t understand exactly the scientific or the kind of material origin of it. You know, it’s just how it is. Like, if the entire universe is, you know, just like a water droplet on a leaf in a bigger universe, and, you know, someone walks by it and shakes our water droplet, it’s going to affect our universe in totally unpredictable, untestable, unmiraculous ways, you know, that we can’t replicate in a scientific setting. But nonetheless, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, right? It still happened; it is a miracle on the scale of that universe. That’s just—I mean, that’s just how it is.
I think at the same time, you know, I’ve said, you know, there’s—I mean, just a site—people that Redditors like, you know, back in Carl Sagan’s old documentary series, like on Cosmos, whatever it is, which of course Black Science Man redid and made it even worse. But there’s this one episode where he talks about, basically, you know, the fact that we live in a universe where we can have science and where we can have life because there are—let’s say the universe is not perfectly stable, but it also isn’t too chaotic. Right? So it’s really—we can have science because, you know, you need some kind of systematicity that you can test, but there also has to be variability that you can test. And by the same way, in order to have life, you can’t have a perfectly static universe, and you can’t have a perfectly chaotic universe. You have to have somewhere in between. So isn’t it nice that we live somewhere in between?
But I think really the thing to look at is, let’s say, like natural features of the universe, like scientific—like in truth, our universe is a mix of both. We have some things that are incredibly predictable, and we have some things that are incredibly chaotic. You know, it’s not an either-or kind of thing. It’s not as if, like, we live—I don’t know; it’s just inaccurate to say that we live in an either-or thing. In reality, there are some things that are just so unlikely, so—they’re there, but they’re so infrequent that, like the turkey problem or like someone rising from the dead, it’s always going to seem like a miracle when it actually happens. And that’s just how it is. There’s no reason—like when you say something like, “You can’t expect unlikely or miraculous things to happen,” you’re really, really just ruling out an entire part of reality.
Right? So when you see people who are talking about kind of—you know, they’re dismissing things that might be, quote-unquote, miraculous or quote-unquote paranormal or whatever, you know, it’s important to realize that there can be interactions with reality that don’t work exactly in the way we understand. That’s just it. It’s almost a tautology. I mean, this should almost be trivially true, but I think there’s a tendency of people in the modern world to paint the world in like there’s the physical and there’s the metaphysical—it’s the magical stuff. And it’s just people just believe magical stuff, and sometimes they do for funny reasons. But you can’t really rule out—you can’t artificially declare what is real and what isn’t beforehand.
I mean, an example I’ve used in one of the articles on my website is, you know, gravity. Like, gravity is a good example of something where before the theory of gravity—I mean, gravity ultimately is a mathematical solution to a physical problem, but the force itself is utterly occult. Like, we don’t understand—we’ve never understood how gravity works. We can describe how it works, but the force behind it is paranormal. It literally is paranormal; it’s like a force that exerts itself at a distance. That is pseudoscience in the definition of the mechanistic universe that people had for, you know, thousands of years, basically. That is like occult, but we’re now just used to the fact that it exists, and it solves for problems. It solves for why the planets, you know, move in a loop and why things fall to the Earth. Those are seemingly disparate facts, but the theory of gravity integrates those things.
So I don’t think we should necessarily dismiss other similar—like the possibility of other similar unifications of different phenomena, you know, or say, “Oh, it’s paranormal, so we can’t consider it.” Because, I mean, gravity is paranormal; science is mostly paranormal. You just see it over and over again, and then it starts seeming normal, but it’s still just as weird.
Anyway, I got to get inside; my hands are kind of cold, but that’s about all I wanted to say.
@ShadowPhex - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Luke actually recoreded these two years ago, this is just how slow his internet upload speed is.+523
@yungtoddy - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
good to see you fully back on youtube so i can consoom more of you+276
@lucaspayne2546 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
By the sounds of the footsteps, I am trying to figure out if he is wearing shoes. I am 80 percent sure but I can never be positive+172
@abhi_shek1196 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Luke has transcended Dostoevsky and become Tolstoy..+141
@jamesevans2507 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
I know you wanted to say soyience+81
@smoke_something - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Brother, may I have some oats?+67
@OrthoDust - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Babe wake up! Landchad has uploaded!+94
@Eddengarthian - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Next video title is gonna be "On the Evil of Shaving"+19
@winterkatzen - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Gravity is like JavaScript, paranormal, cult like and it makes things happen.+46
@Ruben-s5b1c - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
This happened to me when I experienced a personal miracle. My first thought was "well I can't be an atheist anymore." And then my second thoughts were no one will believe me because it's not reproducible, and I can believe this is true or I can believe I am crazy. I cant believe I am crazy so I believe in the miracle+30
@haindomaltici - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Turkey mention 🇹🇷+146
@checkmate5338 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
We all take the miracle of Life for granted. We're all having this spiritual experience right now. We didn't have to exist (contingent), yet we do. So i think it's ignorant when people deny for anything metaphysically possible.+27
@Domi2gud - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
I didn't believe in any miracles until the resurrection of George Floyd+28
@camacaze199 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Praise Christ for bringing the great Luke Smith into his flock+70
@lorewaifu7310 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
"Nothing ever happens"+16
@trailblazingfive - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
I didn't know I missed Luke's content so much+7
@wanderingmako - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Can't believe the audio is so good on this.+4
@con_sci - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
some farmers really do love their turkeys :(+12
@rothbardfreedom - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
It's important to be open to new events, we can call them "miracles". Bit also It's important to be skeptical when people claim that a 'miracle' has occurred—especially when, by 'coincidence,' that miracle conveniently results in more power or money for those making the claim.+5
@christian-schubert - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Luke's the kind of guy whose website you gladly visit with incognito mode and Adblocker[s] disabled+2
@RSBot2jar - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Yes, that's why his beard kept growing like this.+9
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Throttled by Mr musk himeeld+3
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
he's bouncing the data off the New Horizons probe as part of his impeccable opsec+11
@snoop_lion - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
He uploaded them entirely through command lines.+5
@luisdiaz3119 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
luke is lightyears ahead+2
@learnary89 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
He is using my internet that's why+1
- 2025-06-03 11:31:50
H-hey guys, why is there s-still snow if he recorded these recently? H-he's not going to stop uploading for 2 years again? Right, right?+2
@bo3inprofilepic292 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Ayo pause+13
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
It’s a deadman’s switch+22
@StariZec - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Consum... Are you a maneater? Or a souleater, maybe... 🙃😄+3
@clpr635 - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
i hecking love consooming+2
@DddlerOnTheRoof - 2025-06-03 11:31:50
Luke's a certified "content creator"+1
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
He has achieved such a high degree of enlightment/consciousness he doesn't need footwear anymore+26
@seamusoblainn - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
Haha 😂 good one+2
@ZZFilm - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
He’s wearing hooves. I can hear hooves from a mile away.+4
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
in a couple decades the process will be complete+8
@hueylongenjoyer3747 - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
Tolstoy is anathematized in the Orthodox Church so no+22
@rafaelf.9246 - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
@hueylongenjoyer3747 Until the Caesar says otherwise+1
@greensoldier2142 - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
Tolstoy was a melodramatic weirdo, Dostoevsky was the man with actual substances. So it's the other way around+14
@user-ayush818 - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
@greensoldier2142 you know nothing of tolstoy boy.+2
@erinkuroki - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
He should change his name to Luka Kuznetsov+4
@blackstar-1069 - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
no bröther+23
@James-f4k9m - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
That feeling when your brother has become corrupted by the insidious ingines of Big Oat.+9
@winterkatzen - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
@OthorgonalOctroon What are you even talking about?+1
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
@winterkatzen nothing paranormal about gravity, it is just curvature of spacetime. if you don't know what that means you shouldn't be talking about gravity because you don't know what it is.+1
@ZackaryReaves - 2025-06-03 11:31:51
@OthorgonalOctroon There's a difference between model and underlying reality. If you don't know the difference you shouldn't be talking about science because you don't know what it is.+4
@Dzvier-i3f - 2025-06-10 11:31:51
@OthorgonalOctroon The effects are in line with the model but the model was invented to explain the effects. Does "space and time bend and that makes things fall down" not sound paranormal to you? I am student of general relativity and it works but I know it's incomplete.+3
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-10 11:31:51
@Dzvier-i3f by "explain the effects" you mean describe reality? and no there is nothing paranormal about non-euclidean geometry. it's like being confused you can't phase through a wall despite it being mostly air. our senses were evolved for stalking prey in the wilderness, not intellectual endeavours.+1
@Mattex456 - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
You don't have to believe you're crazy simply because your brain has fooled you once. So in practice you had more than these 2 choices+7
@lindboknifeandtool - 2025-06-06 11:31:52
Why was it a miracle. Why use that word? And then why have to not be an athiest? Miracle = god? Or miracle = Christian god? Multiple massive leaps that you took because where you were born. Imagine you were a Hindi? This filter we self impose is really ducking killing us. What about opposites of miracles?+1
@haindomaltici - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
4:53 no wayyyyy+13
@tortureRoom - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
Turkey is usually too dry imo, chicken is waaaay better+17
@haindomaltici - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
@tortureRoom I prefer horse.+8
@johnstamos5948 - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
@haindomalticiKazakhstan mentioned+8
@supaF - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
@haindomaltici [distant throat singing]+5
@ThrasyvoulosVyzantinos - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
🦃🦃🦃+3
@johnyepthomi892 - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
You’re being too generous. Also very ignorant.+4
@set7back - 2025-06-03 11:31:52
@johnyepthomi892 projecting much?+2
@lindboknifeandtool - 2025-06-06 11:31:52
Spiritual is a fundamentally human things And people deny specific things like “the Bible doesn’t make any sense” or “the religion itself is evil inherently” religious people just can’t understand people who don’t believe in god don’t think a god exists period. If you engage with religion rationally you’re punished by god. It’s supposed to be actual blind faith. When you think about it, we’re pretty much the most accidental thing ever. Why is this a spiritual experience? It’s actually a “pushrikial bazoogie” experience.+2
@celticlarper9679 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Have you heard of George droid?+7
@Domi2gud - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
@celticlarper9679 I've seen many of them. Has nothing on Sir Floyd the Breathless. I would literally pay movie theater prices to see a feature film of that one.+8
@sen7826 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Or even simply confirms what they already believe. It's easy to find "evidence" for one's presuppositions.+3
@basedfigure - 2025-06-06 11:31:53
Ya, the materialistically predictable interactions that we derive from the modern trajectory we're on just erodes us from the inside out, but there you have given many of the answers to how to mitigate the effects on the soul and practical fighting spirit that humans naturally posess+2
@sergeymironov7315 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
I start thinking that marijuana legalization wasn't the best choice+64
@balarab1 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
A miracle is an event that breaks the universal laws+4
@i.t.2238 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Neat little changes you made to the website I see You inspired me to work on my own+5
@okinawabongrip - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
I’ve never been this early to a Luke Smith video before. We are so back!+5
@NeverTrust298 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
I need more content like this please dont stop uploading :c+3
@antonivsphilippvs - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
In the wikipedia of David Hume, it is mentioned that he was asked by his biographer or by a writer of his time "Does God exists?" and Hume answered "Hume told him that he sincerely believed it a "most unreasonable fancy" that there might be life after death." Few weeks before his death.+12
@fennecbesixdouze1794 - 2025-06-08 11:31:53
This is the real quotation from Hume: >> When anyone tells me, that he saw a dead man restored to life, I immediately consider with myself, whether it be more probable, that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact, which he relates, should really have happened. [...] If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous, than the event which he relates; then, and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion. Which aligns quite well with the view espoused in the New Testament, which constantly emphasizes plurality of testimony, describes Jesus as appearing after his resurrection "to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time" etc, has the resurrected Jesus himself inviting Thomas to feel his side for himself and believe rather than rely on the testimony of the other disciples etc. When it comes to the resurrection of Jesus, the evidence is so overwhelming that it is indeed harder to believe all the testimony to be false or deluded.+2
@OmegaLaser-xy4ip - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
The turkey was right. We love turkeys. But not in the same way that they can conceive.+23
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
This video was from one of my blogposts: https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/miracles/+27
@austroasian4123 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Proverbs 25:2: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing, but the glory of kings is to search out a matter."+3
@theelodgeovkeku - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
I read Borges' essay on Hume's solipsism when I was 12-y-o and it blew my teenybopper brain. I was so struck that I somehow missed the end where Borges refutes him with some witty remark or perhaps didn't find it convincing enough. Borges forwent a real argument, because he understood arguing with Humes' corpse would have been reddit, so he chose a sardonic, almost Gandalfesque retort. Genial but not the talkmedown I needed. Either way it messed me up. Maybe kids should be kept off some books. Thank you for coming to my Tedtalk.+11
@KangKadmus - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Jesus' teachings were far more impressive than the so called miracles. It's a miracle someone had enough sense to say what he said.+28
@nin6246 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Your videos always brighten up my day! Thanks for all you do!+1
@CBT5777 - 2025-06-12 11:31:53
I enjoy hearing other perspectives, but this guy is full of it.+1
@snayke0 - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
By far the best content on this platform+7
@1337GigaChad - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
Keep the content coming+2
@72ibises - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
I am embarking on a journey towards embracing Christianity. Growing up in an intensely new atheist and materielist household as part of Gen Z has shaped my worldview, making this transition challenging. I am seeking meaningful advice on how to genuinely understand religion. At times, it feels like I am deaf, and a pianist is trying to describe the beauty of Mozart. While I can grasp the notes and perhaps even the rhythm, the music itself remains elusive. How can I truly hear the word of christ?+27
@ContentCreator_ - 2025-06-03 11:31:53
if only we could see miracles replicate themselves over and over again+1
@Lmlil - 2025-06-06 11:31:53
Hey Luke, glad to see you back. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts of the appeal of simulation theory to the "Intellectuals." I can't wrap my head around how so many of the public scientist types spent so much effort to get rid of the supernatural - mostly the divine - just to accept the idea that there is an intelligence directing a universe, but it's okay because the universe is a computer program.+1
@mky3039 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
Ayup+3
@xpaganda - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
Weed is bloat+13
@Loader7272 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
in fla. medical weed comes with the bonus of forfeiting gun rights. 😂+4
@Caboose2563 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
Redditor in spirit+12
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
Hume is reddit fedora cringe. I prefer St Augustine.+11
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
based and ahead of his time. if there is life after death, what would go there? the brain? it's a material processor that responds to material. so the next life is material? why then should there be a second life, if not as unreasonable fancy?+2
@fornost64 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
@OthorgonalOctroon 🤣🫵🏻+9
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
@fornost64 yet no evidence for this "soul". curious!+4
@spriggylotus4476 - 2025-06-09 11:31:54
@OthorgonalOctroon ghosts exist so therefore souls do.+2
@bigsmoke-u6r - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
thank god that website is still alive, based af+8
@Sever3dHead - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
i think you should pin the comment, it isnt first+6
@arkbooi - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
pin has been forgotten+1
@conorrobb1ns - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
extremely good take+4
@alexxx4434 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
Although I generally like his words, the reality is: They just had to make up his 'miracles' otherwise most people wouldn't have attention to listen to his teachings. Manipulation in religion 101.+6
@jimbarino2 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
Nope.+2
@justin266 - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
“Love your enemy” doesn’t make sense without the atonement of Christ+1
@KangKadmus - 2025-06-03 11:31:54
@justin266 Actually Bless those that curse thee, and love your enemies is a response to scriptures like Deut30:7, Abraham's blessing in Gen12 and Jacob's blessing in Gen27. The Torah teaches you to hate the other nations and if those nations curse Israel they will be cursed. Jesus said nope, gotta love the Romans Jews stop with the hatred and religious extremism, its getting you killed.+1
@lindboknifeandtool - 2025-06-06 11:31:54
@KangKadmus can’t we just conclude that Jesus was a character form of amendment to the Bible? He’s perfectly that… and in real life he also did cool stuff with kiddos and drugs. Also Christ is a position.+1
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Best tech channel on yootoobs+2
@Mbeluba - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Ah yes. The content. Content to consume.+1
@pizzadog9876 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
The claim is Jesus is God and has risen and alive to this day. Therefore the next step after you've read all the historical accounts about him is to ask him to reveal himself to you so you have a personal encounter and have something concrete to help you hold on to.+8
@kykloskatharevousa7147 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Look inward. What difficulties are you having, what kind of evidence would be good enough for you?+3
@BritishJuche - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Do what people did before you - seek the divine by going into the wildermess, or fasting, or meditating, praying etc. The trick is to keep doing it for a long period of time, until it becomes an endurance challenge+2
@TS-jm7jm - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God, you need to study the word of God, specifically the king james version, just read it, if you humble your heart and are serious, then perchance God grants you repentance, that is sorrow of wrongdoing towards him for your sins, that you might repent and be converted.+2
@fornost64 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
You have to go to an Orthodox Church, that is the only answer.+1
@deeemess - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Being an inversion is no better than being a carbon copy; these amount to the same thing. Be honest with yourself about what you want and why you want it.+4
@freedom8383 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Go to the Orthodox Liturgy. Then go again. Then again, and again, and so on and so forth. When a blacksmith forges a blade, and wants it to be strong, he works it carefully, heating it slowly. Let yourself, your heart, be the sword. Let God restore you, and let heaven consume you.+1
@alexxx4434 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
Don't buy into outdated beliefs. There is some good in established religions, but also plenty of crap and manipulations.+2
@atanas-nikolov - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
@alexxx4434 How do you know they are outdated?+2
@72ibises - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
I have read the Bible and explored other holy books as well. I attend church fairly regularly, yet I struggle with a sense of authenticity when it comes to embracing Christian theology wholeheartedly. While I find many of its ideas beautiful and inspiring, I perceive them in much the same way I view other religions—rich in culture and meaning, but somewhat foreign to me. My mind instinctively seeks out inconsistencies and logical fallacies within the scriptures, making it difficult to accept them without question. I genuinely wish I could experience the deep sense of belonging and faith that comes with religious conviction, but navigating this path feels incredibly hard.+2
@alexxx4434 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
@atanas-nikolov "God created Adam and Eve"+1
@atanas-nikolov - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
@alexxx4434 And how is that outdated? Because of evolution? Could there be a narrative that isn't intended to be a scientific description of reality and still be true? Or let me get you into epistemology, because under non-theistic evolution, knowledge is impossible. You would have evolved faculties that make you believe evolution is true, but that would be self-defeating, because under that premise, you would have been caused to believe it, hence you cannot verify it is true.+2
@alexxx4434 - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
@atanas-nikolov You just wrote a bunch of smart sounding nonsense. You don't need to BELIEVE in evolution, there is enough factual evidence to support the fact that evolution is a part of life. That's what distinguishes science from religion, one is based on evidence, the other on blind belief.+2
@Ardepark - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
@72ibises The deep sense of belonging and faith you mentioned is difficult for you because you have the sensibilities of a grown man. Those things are for women and children+1
@set7back - 2025-06-03 11:31:55
@TS-jm7jm Except you don't have the word of God, you have the word of Paul, who is not God. Add some spice to the mix with Matthew, Luke, Mark and John, who are literally unknown people with no credible source to back them up.+2
@peterstojkazmalejziliny1537 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
I love the fact that you have grown a monks crown haircut+3
@albertoderfisch1580 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Really wondering what soul-crushing event happened to my main man to have him out here perma-yapping like this. Hold strong, Luke ✊+36
@malcolm8815 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
In his book "Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding" Hume gives a similar counter-example to yours as to why induction is not reliable. His example was essentially that you might have a lifetime of data saying that the sun rises every morning, however if you then went to the North Pole it would not be true. I think the section on miracles is later in the book; I don't know why he didn't apply the former to the latter.+2
@haindomaltici - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
my first '2 min before' for luke smith+2
@cherubin7th - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
2:40 This is called the Bayesian trap. Because your prior is zero, no new evidence, even your own eyes, can change the prior believe.+10
@NeoRothbardian - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Luke Smith is risen+12
@blitzkrieg2928 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
I love this video is basically just a sequel to his livestream section where he made fun of Hume+3
@lowerpower2528 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
"Do you believe in gravity?"+6
@ChellSneed - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
God bless you.+4
@PhilippBlum - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Let's not make it more complex than it already is. We can work together. We achieved things before. We can do it again. Those who know.+1
@interests3279 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
6:45 There's only one board in a certain website that referer to Niel DeGrasse Tyson that way+7
@evildragon1774 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
nice philosophy, thoough i am not christian myself, its sometimes refreshing to see others perspective+1
@Dan-nn8ys - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
So how is the life in Montenegro Luke?+6
@Theelinguist - 2025-06-07 11:31:56
And even if We opened for them a gate to heaven, through which they continued to ascend, still they would say, “Our eyes have truly been dazzled! In fact, we must have been bewitched.” - [Al-Hijr: 14-15]+1
@CrystaTiBoha - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
All beliefs are justified to an extent. Sometimes it's just wishful thinking, sometimes misinterpretation of evidence, sometimes failure of imagination, sometimes brain bugging out and farting, sometimes conclusions based on biased/inappropriate sampling, ... And at the same time all that truth is our approval for the extent of how well some mental images align with some other mental images we hallucinate. But an image of a cat never truly is a cat. The real miracle is that we still believe in the value of truth, logic, words, memories instead of recognizing their karmic conditioned nature. Our beliefs are like clouds in the sky. They are natural phenomena formed coincidentally and they are not true or false in any fundamental sense, they are just mostly useful hallucinations.+4
@koola.i.d - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
From the penguin to the fallibility of inductive reasoning. Luke never fails to surprise.+3
@maximilianomadrigal6661 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
I know this is off topic, but what do you think of nick land?+5
@akosv96 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Reality is weirder than fiction.+3
@larsvaneekeren - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Since gravity is currently understood as curvature of space. It does not act on a distance. It acts on the space it occupies, then this will expand in a wave, which in turn will create this "force". Of course you are moving the problem, since by what means does matter change the curvature of space? But this is a fundamental problem with physics. It does not really give a reason why only what.+7
@THNKKY - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Is it that cold in May or did you record this a while ago? I’d like to live where it’s cold in May, that’s why I ask.+3
@Hero_Of_Old - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
Luke has been walking for a long time, seasons have come and gone. It's back to winter again.+15
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
He is clinically insane, if his abrahamic belief is genuine.+10
@milkman6218 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
@youtubeenjoyer1743 It is genuine, he grew up with it, just like those who grew up with anime and sports swear by it. He feels bad because he became an edgelord atheist following the crowd instead of coming to his own conclusions+4
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
@milkman6218 Makes sense. We are all Christians anyway, genetically, geographically, and culturally.+2
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
"your own eyes" is not the highest of evidence, people being mistaken about things they saw is far more common than miracles, the miniscule but not zero prior of which is derived, not assumed.+4
@upendownlinker - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
@OthorgonalOctroon you don't believe your own eyes and ears got it+2
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
@upendownlinker that's a different sentence. read more carefully. and even if seeing something was the strongest piece of evidence for it (as opposed to the event leaving behind evidence), that nobody has seen miracles still sinks that ship.+2
@upendownlinker - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
@OthorgonalOctroon >nobody has seen miracles. Did you even watch the video? Even as a die hard science lover, i feel like it shouldn't be difficult to understand the point that he is making.+2
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:56
@upendownlinker there's such a thing as understanding an attempt at an argument and rejecting it because of understanding it. as people often do with the bible. "I don't know how chaos or gravity work, therefore you can't disprove that people rise from the dead" isn't an argument. and an argument against believing in miracles is an argument against miracles, to think otherwise is a huge epistemology fail. yes I do love knowledge, how could you tell?+2
@randomguyontheinternet703 - 2025-06-05 11:31:56
But the rejection of a certain event in favour of its alternative is not a satisfying conclusion, since it is based upon conscious judgement which has already been established to be imperfect. Regarding events in time and place, the best strategy would be to suspend belief, as the very premise of uncertainty does not give credence to either option regarding the absence or presence of something. You cannot outright deny the possibility of something you’ve never seen before actually happening, but you can’t accept it either.+1
@Mecharambu-dq6ib - 2025-06-03 11:31:57
Lord DIO is my one and only savior 😞+1
@Sword001SK - 2025-06-03 11:31:57
kek'd+1
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:31:57
people can also recursively use "by why tho?" against religion and hit "that's just how it is", and much earlier than for physics at that. that's not an argument for this "why" existing.+3
@jack_galt - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Luke used to live in rural, northernish Florida. It does get cold there during the winter, and there was snow this past winter. But I don't know if he still lives there.,+1
@hunterthompsonsingleton8979 - 2025-06-11 11:31:58
0:53 never gonna find your way out of those woods if you keep turning around+1
@henlofren7321 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
The moment something outside of your model happens, that is it's own sign to take advantage of it deterministically.+1
@matthias7534 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Hi Luke, can you do more videos about your homestead?+1
@useruser6240 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
I have nothing more to say...u said it all.+1
@abhi_shek1196 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Beneath his Coat, is he wearing a Priest's uniform? I am not from a Christian country, if someone is, let me know.+6
@Cameron-xe8uo - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Statistical evidence for psychic phenomena hasn't convinced many scientific materialists. Jessica Utts (former president of the American Statistical Association) has discussed how statisticians have claimed that they would be more convinced by a personal paranormal experience than by the statistical data.+11
@StariZec - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Miracles don't just happen every day, all around (as every reasonable person understands 😎), but it might be said that - everything, the whole Life, IS all a Miracle. 🧠❤️✝️🎵🎶🎵🎶+1
@amadeusakreveusmusic3356 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
2:43 The fact that you recognize contradiction in evidence means your senses are perfectly tuned and sharp.+1
@operoverlord - 2025-06-12 11:31:58
Never thought about how gravity is a mystery...how it is made. Maybe something like: I suspect this universe might be a black hole, so if a black hole is matter turned inside out, maybe there's an inverse universe that's right side out that acts on ours? And there are multiple black holes within this universe that are doing the same thing, so it's kinda like a forever mirror to mirror effect but also turn the mirror inside out? Or have a hollowed out mirror ball (mirror inside and out) that someone can step in: What does it look like being inside and outside? Then try to have a semi transparent mirror ball within a mirror ball. What does it look like in there? And outside? I think this is really simple, but it's a step. Maybe someone's already done this?+1
@za4ria - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Luke Smith is here to stay. The world is (really) healing.+5
@JusColeYT - 2025-06-07 11:31:58
The upside cross symbol on your chest is shouting at me as a sign from god and I can’t ignore it+2
@TheThreatenedSwan - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Atheists be like: There is no grounding to have certitude in anything. Of course I have certitude in all of my views, bigot+3
@Spolchen - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Luke, I'm sorry if I'm getting this wrong, but are you malding about people's refusal to acknowledge that RNG i.e. luck is a very real thing?+2
@0121evian - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s books are really good+1
@jonmustang - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
At this point, I think people not listening to near-death experiences is choosing ignorance. Thousands of records of regular, ordinary people having incredible, miraculous experiences of expanded consciousness and even “impossible” physical healings that defy both materialism and religion. They aren’t saints, they’re just like you and me. The Telepathy Tapes as well, incredible confirmation of consciousness outside the body. To me, the proof of eternal life and consciousness is readily available but we collectively don’t yet have ears to hear and eyes to see it.+7
@standytail - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Banger videos as always🔥🔥+1
@Hammid - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Holy shoot, my man, how many Steve Jobs videos have you been plowing through, lately? Been tons of examples from your recent videos, but the gravity example around 9:15 was more or less a 1:1 quote from one of Steve’s lengthier interviews. HUGE fan of yers by the way. And of Steve’s.+1
@binaryghosts5131 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
On paranormal vs normal I think the biggest disservice to people's spiritual considerations came from the likes of Descartes with the whole idea there is a separation from a physical world and some immaterial world. And i get it, its a great way to excuse a lack of physical evidence/results but on the other end of it you remove the tangibile experience and following through that you lose the meaning behind the physical rituals. For example a baptism goes from a ritual that is about a conscious choice and personal to the one being baptized to just something you do... "We dunk the baby so it doesn't go to hell". Or going backwards through it everything in your religious text happened as written and there's no room for the possibility of metaphor or deeper meaning behind the physical actions being described.+1
@TreeBee123 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Gravity is fatio le sage attraction (lookup on Wikipedia) mediated through the luminiferous ether, which is the quantum field. The ether medium solves the problem of the original theory, namely that kinetic particle interactions would heat things up. I learned this from Ray Fleming. He has a book called the zero point universe. Lookup casimir effect as well if curious.+1
@psychopathfw - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
we love you, luke+2
@tissuepaper9962 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
it appears to be just a black sweater with a white grid pattern knitted in. a priest would wear a black cloak over their black smock if they needed protection from the weather. also, most people in America are not catholic, so their pastors/preachers/ministers wear clothing ranging from casual street clothes all the way to black suit and tie, and some wear a very simple white robe that matches the choir's.+3
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
*monk's+2
@camacaze199 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
I think it’s just a case of Apophenia+1
@Sever3dHead - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
he is not, he isnt orthodox priest+1
@jimbarino2 - 2025-06-03 11:31:58
Some of the more based ones will also wear a black cassock as everyday wear...+1
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Not everything called "paranormal" (or beyond what we understand in mainstream science) should be thought of as being in one bucket. Most of it might indeed be trash or coincidence or imagination. The issue is separating real unknown effects from false ones. Once we have a theory of how a real "paranormal" thing works, suddenly evidence will emerge and can be undeniable. Keeping the same example in the video, no one until the theory of gravity ever noticed or proved that all objects on earth gravitationally affect each other, even though they do. However, you can prove it in your own basement now with simple objects. We always could have proven it, but before there was a general idea of it, this mundane force went unnocited for millennia. Link to how to experience inter-object gravity at home: https://www.fourmilab.ch/gravitation/foobar/+7
@Cameron-xe8uo - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
@LukeSmithxyz Likewise, psychic experiences occur and have occurred for all of recorded human history. Unlike gravity, it does not seem compatible with a materialist worldview (although some parapsychologists would disagree). The desire to maintain this worldview is likely what prompts rejection of statistical evidence which would be more than enough to ordinarily prove the existence of an effect.+2
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
@LukeSmithxyz Supernatural things become natural once discovered. The word “proof” is too heavy in this context.+3
@jimbarino2 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
If you ever read some of Rupert Sheldrakes stuff on animal telepathy, he has statistical evidence out the ying-yang - doesn't make a dent against skeptics.+2
@Mattex456 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
What do you mean by impossible physical healings? Beating cancer against all odds isn't exactly a good argument against materialism, and claims like regrown limbs simply haven't been proven.+1
@jonmustang - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
@Mattex456 Lots of cases where a person is dying of disease, organ failure, fatally injured, or something else, their soul or awareness leaves their body (which flatlines, no pulse, no breath, dead). They have an incredible experience of life outside the body, then comes back to the body, which is comes back to life, and a seemingly impossible injury, organ damage, or disease is healed, often very quickly. That's what I mean+3
@perplexity000 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Everyday uploads? A feast for the neurons!+1
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
One day he'll find a way out of this woods+3
@R_Priest - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
"Miracle" isn't defined by empirical experience, predictability/unpredictability, but your metaphysical view of that experience. If you're a materialist, ipso facto, miracles are by definition impossible. If you believe God, spirits or something else "immaterial" can intervene in the normal course of the material world, then everyday can be filled with miracles. How do we determine the level of "chaos"? Even if the world were more chaotic (or less chaotic), for us humans, it would "feel" the same. We would come up with some way to make "sense" of it in some fashion or another. Moderns think we understand the world because we employ science and reason. But ancients arguably felt no less at a loss, and they used tortoise shells, magic and superstition.+1
@PauloFassina - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Acthually, gravity is not a force, but the curvature in space. According to general relativity, mass will curve space, and objects will travel towards the center of the gravity well due to the curvature in itself, and not any magical force attracting those two objects.+1
@Wigwamwham - 2025-06-15 11:31:59
The fact you just casually drop a "black science man" means i can infer what you call MKBHD+1
@rationalagent6927 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
I mostly agree. I think there are also some flaws in the standard scientific approach and in the theory of probability+1
@wire_surfer - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
What few months spent in Eastern Europe do to a man+4
@Stefan226-s1d - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Gravity seems paranormal because causal mechanism for Gravity is still not explained. Little 'g' or the acceleration that objects go down is not Gravity, it's just an acceleration. If you want to go deeper inside this rabbit hole read the original Michelson&Morley paper "On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether". Learn about Gas Laws and apply Second Law of Thermodynamics to our Dynamic Gas Pressure System next to a perfect Vacuum of Space. You'll start to realize some things ;)+2
@faxen123 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
at this point we can be sure the dead man switch triggered. sleep well, woke mental outlaw 🙏+12
@blipojones2114 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
jesus we really popping off with these video titles.+2
@shaurz - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Physics also doesn't have a proper explanation for magnetism. There is an old video of Richard Feynman being asked this question by an interviewer and he just squirms and misdirects to avoid answering the question, because he knows he can't.+10
@davidsun9026 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
It's a fuckin Christmas Miracle you guys+3
@youssefbenhassine-l6u - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
i litterally watched the movie "Black Swan 2010" like 2 days ago, what are the odds.+2
@boppinggamer8571 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Yum, snow.+3
@ThomasUltra-yp2mq - 2025-06-07 11:31:59
Before you place forth an argument in favour or versus a 'miracle', you firstly need a clear definition: what is a miracle?+1
@bug______ - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
"Everything i dont understand is magic" - basically this video+7
@nac9880 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
Hey big luke, talk about NOSTR protocol+1
@porky1118 - 2025-06-03 11:31:59
I absolutely agree.+1
@cruzmacias3257 - 2025-06-06 11:31:59
bro be droppin truth bombs like gravity+1
@MartinsTalbergs - 2025-06-08 11:31:59
humble man+1
@valiantviktor - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
He's been hearting comments so he must be alive... right?+3
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
@valiantviktor he has a bash script for that+12
@mattihaapoja8203 - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
There are many things science can"t explain. That's kinda the whole point of it?+2
@punchster289 - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
feynman's just a dude. he had a world class intuition but permanent magnets are just tricky to explain and he wasn't necessarily equipped at the time to talk about it to a laymen. this isn't a complete explanation but if you desire to search more this will provide some context. metal atoms will exchange outer shell electrons spontaneously. this is basically a kind of state transition, and its behavior is dictated by the pauli exclusion principle. when the atom's orientations are paralell, this exhange is symmetric. when the orientations are antiparallel, the exhange is antisymmetric. between these two, whichever form of exhange is more energetically favorable is the one whose corrosponding orientation appears in the crystal lattice. since electrons are fermions, there is a very negative bias against symmetric transitions, so antisymmetric transitions are chosen for a vast majority of materials. in the very few ferromagnetic materials in the universe however, electrons are exchanged symmetrically, allowing the metal atoms to align in parallel, superimposing their individual magnetic moments, creating a permanent magnet.+9
@neonblood4658 - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
thats a bad example, the whole reason feynman didnt answer the question directly is because he knew the interviewer wouldnt be satisfied because his lack of prerequisite knowledge+2
@Ardepark - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
Your comment is the epitome of apologists projecting their demand for answers onto a field (science) that does not, cannot, and does not promise to give those answers. Cringe+2
@datashed - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
Just because science doesn't have an explanation something *right now*, it does not necessarily follow that it's paranormal. God of the gaps can't be taken seriously.+1
@Sever3dHead - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
you missed the entire point+7
@ultraxerox - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
Some people declare some things as "magical" out of anger and envy - feelings they cannot control and don't have any good reason to learn to control. And some people are declaring things as "magical" because they see logic as somewhat a deterministic boring dead end - they wish some unknown spots in search of freedom. Here is an example: Pseudoscience and esoteric in the UDSSR and post UDSSR era (Helena Blavatsky (she lived before UDSSR), Ernst Muldashev, etc. etc.) emerged to some degree because of the prohibition of religion and replacement with socialism and a need to fill that mental vacuum, so they artificially created that layer of "magic" (I mean that's their business what they're thinking - it's their freedom, I'm just saying) - extraterrestrials, pyramids, crop circles, "face" on mars etc. etc.; Some people got so far they say that things like transistor wasn't created by humans, I mean from my perspective it is an absolute insult to a great human mind and its possibilities (I mean there is nothing special about crappy transistor if you compare it e.g. with a chipmaking machine that is absolute top notch of human engineering). But general tendency to declare things as magical we don't understand is something we kept doing throughout whole human history - be it religious miracles, witches with some allegedly superficial powers, fortune tellers, shamans and many other examples. As weird as it sounds we still have people with their super modern mobile phones who believe in horoscopes (I don't even wanna start here a holy war with all the flat earth guys out there). I think it's somewhat okay by thinking different and declare things as magical we don't understand as silly as it sounds, I mean one of the worst thing can happen is some sort of collapse of a diversity of thinking and ideas. However intentional spreading of ideas that certain things are "miracles" and "magical" (SpongeBob rainbow meme here) and people should obey, believe, absorb and internalize these ideas, create a new religion out of it, because some magic event was pseudo-proven to be a miracle (in such cases such proofs prove actually some other things about the prover, I don't want to get deeper here) or even without any proofs is simply a malicious virus-like behaviour, representing a sort of a modern psycho-social terrorism. Not falling in such mind traps as a society "on the first try" is really a miracle from my humble perspective - behaviour of a collective mental immunity that I personally don't see now.+2
@bug______ - 2025-06-03 11:32:00
That.....that literally was his entire point @Sever3dHead +1
@CBT5777 - 2025-06-12 11:32:01
You're pretty gullible then.+2
@blipojones2114 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
TLDR: Keep an open mind.+2
@irixperson - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
luke is the only 'peripatetic' worth falling behind aristotle!+1
@anaccount7032 - 2025-06-16 17:32:01
As for Gravity, nobody really "believes in Gravity." Anybody who does is foolish. Newton himself wrote "Hypothesis non fingo" and that's okay because Newton's job in this was not to demonstrate an occult a priori case for Gravity, but find the "Essence of Motion" and leave it constant. The "Finding the Essence of Motion" was why Newton came up with Differential Calculus. Eventually the Essence of Motion will be Nothing (the successive derivative of any polynomial is 0) which is quite consistent with the Chandogya Upanishad's Tat Twam Asi of Emptiness.+1
@CrystaTiBoha - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
Fing magnets how do they work 140iq philosophy edition, me approves+2
@SPQRIUS - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
if Hume said, you cant have knowledge of anything, then all you really have is your imagination how good is yours? what inspires you what is intuition?+1
@tuurblaffe - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
what if governments are waiting to fund something, but they are certain they are going to invest... but they are waiting for a "Black Swan Event"? In this case the money was allocated for this year 2025.. And the funding was Education related...+1
@poru208 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
Shout out to Black Science Guy™+2
@penjamincity1770 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
Luke Smith is getting drafted in WW3+1
@prosperouspotato4028 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
Science of the Gaps for the next video?+3
@jeantr930 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
I’m afraid what 10 uploads in 2 weeks means+2
@waffleninja1000 - 2025-06-11 11:32:01
You can experience miracles for yourself. Don't sin and pray passionately to God multiple times a day. God or an angel may speak to you and wake you to the paranormal reality.+1
@michaellk2254 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
My father has been telling me this since 6y ago+1
@johnmcway6120 - 2025-06-04 11:32:01
cant wait 2 years from now luke with pink beard and sparkly underpants filming a video on the patriarchy and its effects on the people of color+1
@sarundayo - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
Counter point: What's a better miracle, Bitcoin or Resurecction? 😂+2
@ВладимирМихин-н7л - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
remember: the only thing that you know is that you don't know anything+1
@MyName-tb9oz - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
I really liked the example of gravity as a, "paranormal," event! For quite a few years now I've really hated the term paranormal. Paranormal implies that something that cannot happen has just happened. But if something happens it is, in fact, normal and in the nature of the universe. The problem is that we, as a species, have a very limited understanding of the functioning of the universe. We really only have decent records of events around the world for maybe fifty years.+4
@rivciks5045 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
I have seen with my own eyes dead rising from the grave... ...in Hollywood movies... 😅 Was it a miracle? Of course not. Something is only "real" if you can perceive it with all five your senses.+2
@SimGunther - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
Meanwhile folks propose natural language computers will make computer science a thing of the past 😂+2
@Peter_Parker69 - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
You in Scandinavia?+3
@GurtGobain - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
I've sincerely asked Jesus to come into my heart, I've confessed and repented of every sin I could remember committing, and still nothing happened. I just need any sign and I'd love to convert to Orthodoxy. But there's just radio silence from Jesus and the God of the Bible. Meanwhile in the past when I was into the occult, doing spells and communicating with pagan gods produced consistent, observable results. I can't take it 100% on faith :(+4
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:32:01
because whenever a gap is closed it was science and not religion. ergo the prior for science is high and for religion is low. next sophistry?+1
@vexy1987 - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
Yes! Donald Hoffman and his headset analogy is the way out of that mire+1
@ultraxerox - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
I would compare miracle with a game of life (this is a somewhat very rough and rude comparison if you would compare it with our universe, but for the sake of simplicity): You can add some cell states manually (e.g. Garden of Eden) and you can prove that there is no way you could get into that state from any of the possible starting game states (unless it's a Garden of Eden itself). I mean you don't actually break the rules, but you just cannot reach certain configurations by having these rules.+1
@MyName-tb9oz - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
@vexy1987 I hadn't heard of him but I was already familiar with the idea that what we perceive is not what is actually there. Amusingly, Sir Terry Pratchet seems to have gotten there first in one of his Discworld novels where one of the characters says, "I'm a wizard. We can see what's really there, you know." I really don't see how this gets anyone away from the idea that things that one hasn't personally experienced are, "paranormal," events though. That is simply normalcy bias or the refusal to accept that our species really has a very limited (and mostly wrong) understanding of how the universe works. "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." ― William Shakespeare, Hamlet+2
@MyName-tb9oz - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
@ultraxerox I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're proposing but I suspect that you cannot actually prove that given a known starting configuration there is no way to arrive at a specified configuration if the starting configuration is beyond a certain level of complexity. Obviously a single 'glider' is just going to be a 'glider' forever. Much beyond that and you're looking at a halting problem. Also, no one knows the starting conditions of the universe. There are some pretty hotly debated ideas and some that are generally accepted as, "good enough until someone finds a better model," but no one really knows.+1
@ultraxerox - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
Our problem with the rule set (physical laws) is that we have to reverse engineer painfully and very slow these rules by using scientifical methods over long period of time. Therefore definition of a miracle is quite vague. However you can declare an event a miracle if it clearly violates most of the current state of the art scientifical teachings. That's the best thing we have.+1
@TrappedInFloor - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
I think 'paranormal' just means something significantly outside normal experience and straightforward explanation rather than something strictly "impossible". Bigfoot is paranormal since the the existence of a large, hairy, bipedal creature is something well outside mundane experience and scientific expectation; but the existence of a large, hairy, bipedal creature isn't something that impossible according to any scientific model. 'Supernatural' is a term better used for something that's "supposed" to be impossible according to our scientific understanding. If a person was suddenly resurrected from brain-death and clinical death into perfect health that would violate our understanding of biology and potentially thermodynamics, and would be properly labeled 'supernatural'. Basically, all supernatural things are paranormal, but not all paranormal things are supernatural.+2
@larry_the - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
Pine farms in Florida+1
@fsmoura - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
Hyperborea+1
@justin-zk3cz - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
I have a similar background, I couldn't bring myself to believe in Christ at first, and started out by asking a saint if there was really anything to Christianity (I had previous experiences of "gods", spirits, demons, and even saints, but never Christ.) and for me the answer wasn't so much a flashy visible sign, but it was more like my understanding had opened, and things that didn't make sense before just clicked together as I was reading and investigating the Church.+1
@GurtGobain - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
@justin-zk3cz thanks for sharing your experience. Is there a particular saint you'd recommend I reach out to? I'm in about the same spot... I know Luke is too smart to so confidently have picked the wrong religion, but I just can't get it to click and make sense, especially given my current non-dualist worldview.+1
@justin-zk3cz - 2025-06-03 11:32:02
@GurtGobain for me it was St Cyprian of Antioch (who is now my patron saint). I also recommend just visiting an Orthodox church and experiencing the services if you haven't done it before. God bless!+1
@blitzkrieg2928 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
New blogspots on the site? Call me in!+3
@terrapin323 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
What do you think about E/acc and other variants of accelerationism?+1
@backyardbarbells - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Luke... Is your way of thinking decidedly Anglo-Saxon? I like your videos you seem very pragmatic.+1
@karikovacs3824 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
☦+3
@ProcuraRt - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Any plans to continue not related?+1
@TheRealisticNihilist - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
The question is whether or not the world is law governed or not. If it's not law governed idk how the PSR makes sense so that's off the table for God arguments. If it is law governed that just implies no miracles. As far as the epistemic question, Hume's argument can be made an argument against miracles by asking whether the epistemic question is resolvable. If it's not, then miracles are a nonsense notion. They quite literally can't be distinguished in principle from natural phenomena. And if miracles are just natural phenomena no matter how rare or unlikely, they're simply just not miracles.+1
@BinkyTheElf1 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Hume knew that you can’t know anything? If that’s an accurate summing up his argument, that’s a silly and contradictory thing to assert, isn’t it?+3
@lafondawilliams - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Hi Grasby+2
@Chris-on5bt - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
I hope Luke takes the ad money and buys some gloves.+1
@BasicUniversalEconomics - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
quantum physics proves miracles+1
@HighRankingBantam - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Even if it happens and proven, they still won’t be convinced.+3
@fornost64 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Luke would you discuss patristic views on creation and cosmology at all? Might drive some of your soyentist viewers over the edge…+1
@GhostofTradition - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Is it too much to hope for a return of the epic and based wojack thumbnails?+6
@cabudagavin3896 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Not really though, we know the universe exists, because it is self evident, at the end of the day, you would have to prove someone can come back from the dead.+1
@hopscotchoblivion7564 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Isn't the Turkey hypothesis from the 3 Body problem?+1
@justabarrelbomb4472 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
He can't keep getting away with it+1
@comosaycomosah - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
0:44 aint no thing such as halfway crook!....oh wait wrong video+2
@Taychud8 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
My new own on my political opponents will be "your acting just like the redditor turkey"+1
@OLinuksiePrzyKawie - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
More Linux content, PLEASE!!!+5
- 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Jesus Christ is King and rose from the dead.+1
@neonblood4658 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
e/acc is a fake grift+1
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:32:03
Have you solved the problem of hard solipsism yet?+2
@bug______ - 2025-06-03 11:32:04
No that's just the thing. It doesn't happen and hasn't ever been proven+6
@hyperthreaded - 2025-06-03 11:32:04
If my dad walked through my door and talked to me right now or at any time in the future, I'd be completely convinced that people can rise from the dead. Until then, I won't believe it, and believe instead that this has never happened to anybody in the world ever, because that's what all the evidence points to.+3
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:32:04
If it happens and is actually recorded, let alone repeated and tested, then it would be natural, and of course people would believe it.+4
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-06-03 11:32:04
I won't be making custom thumbnails anymore. Other channels make funny meme thumbnails now. I like to think I was a pioneer in this field, but I'll let others keep the fire burning.+10
@cabudagavin3896 - 2025-06-03 11:32:04
What I mean to say is, yes much like the questions and answers of the athiest community, has basically found its local minima on "it is unreasonable to believe in god", which I would argue is correct, it misses the real question that we all want to ask i.e. "does god exist". Now my point is, whilst its true that this is the real question, its really only relevant to those whom want that answer.+1
@スミル日本 - 2025-06-05 11:32:05
goated referrence+3
@michaellk2254 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
Dinner is served.+1
@alkeryn1700 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
farmers do love turkeys, maybe not in the way they'd like though lol+1
@nemodot - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
so basically be skeptic to arguments from induction haha+2
@stacksmasherninja7266 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
Bro is time travelling+1
@brulsmurf - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
You should only believe the testimony for a miracle if it would be more astounding (a greater violation of common experience) that the witness was wrong or lying than that the miracle actually occurred. Hume contends that this condition is virtually never met. It is always less miraculous that human testimony is false than that a law of nature has been violated. So Hume puts human testimony below established laws of nature.+1
@GG-fi4ye - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
I do believe that there are things that we cant explain yet and seem to be like miracles to us. But we could possibly explain them eventually if we study these miracles long enough. But I don't believe in miracles told by a a religious book like bible or any other religious text that has been written by people who haven't even seen the miracles and have been proven to be false several times before. If somebody lies to you once twice, thrice... how many more times are you going to believe?+1
@PhilippBlum - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
It's just a bunch of peopple working together. That's it. Those who know+2
@alanwong4767 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
blessed feast of the ASCENSION of Our LORD JESUS CHRIST; nice gravity and science meditation+3
- 2025-06-03 11:32:05
Turkeys having immortal souls... Is that some Orthodox thing?+1
@calholli - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
When you can take two very highly volatile and explosive, fire creating gases like Hydrogen and Oxygen.. and put them together to make water, which can put out fire and also supports life.. How is this not magic? Someone would have to explain to me how that's not magic. lol. The same substances having such polar opposite reactions, with such an easy and subtle change.+2
@IAmPaigeAT - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
puts on EFNet fedora I think luke recorded these videos months ago+1
@datashed - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
The turkeys are limited by their own perspective. The fact that the farmer raises livestock to be slaughtered and consumed is founded in just as much empirical evidence, for those who see it from a higher perspective. The appearance of a mystery or miracle does not necessarily imply the existence of mysteries and miracles, but only the fact that our knowledge and perspectives are currently limited. As more and more mysteries are demystified by rigorous application of scientific method and rejection of unfalsifiable claims, the overall trend is away from mysteries and miracles, not closer to them. Otherwise, one is simply re-treading "the God of the gaps". It's not dissimilar to Anselm's ontological argument, and could be seen as argument from ignorance or appeal to authority, depending on how it's stated.+7
@ibeezhashin - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
My name is Ben. I use to own a helicopter+7
@seamusoblainn - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
The comments are always the ban-chan to the main dish 😊+1
@gnomelinux - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
It me or do all these youtuber channels now just go on about stuff similar to this? Its like a lot of 'tubers seem to think that just straight up linux content isn't going to do well enough with the youtube algo and so they resort to vids like this. To be clear I've nothing against luke but I've a feeling thats the real reason this stuff is what linux content creators are known for being kinda strange lol.+1
@alt_warn4211 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
Not related+4
@StevenPatron-u2y - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
You and David Hume are making it into something it’s not. The resurrection of Christ is the same thing as the birth of a child. The church, Hume and countless others want to bottle it, dis-pense it and ex-plain it. There is also a sense of feeling superior before something, a need to ex-plain it. That is not what life is brother. Life is not meant to be understood and picked apart Verbally. Life is meant to be lived.+2
@gordonfiala2336 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
17k views... I'm a wizard and i have 3 views+1
@aurochs1 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
Turkey soyjack loves science+2
@JakeCrashBurn - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
I don’t understand this argument. If you were to tell me you saw someone raised from the dead, and all the evidence I had was your testimony, I would have to do a probabilistic analysis: which is more likely? Something has occurred which seems to defy the laws of nature as we understand them and for which we have no verifiable evidence in all of recorded human history, or that you were deceived or deceiving me? We have great evidence of deception, both accidental and intentional in human history especially when it comes to extraordinary events, so I would choose to believe this explanation. This does not mean this way of thinking precludes the occurrence of such extraordinary events. It is only that beliefs of their occurrence are only reasonable when the evidence is in their favor compared to alternative explanations. There are many times in human history when scientists have incorporated extraordinary occurrences into the system through the scientific method. With black swan events this is more challenging due to reproducibility, but there is still a well established scientific precedent for dealing with them. Just look at the scientific analysis of the Big Bang. If such a way of thinking is wrong or in some way problematic, what are we to do? Would you choose to believe in something which has less evidence than its alternatives? On what grounds would you do so? And how could such a choice be anything but illogical?+5
@zivinkxter - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
Chemistry has entered the chat+1
@hueylongenjoyer3747 - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
When can you insert the scientific method to itself without causing a logical fallacy? Hume's whole point was induction, science relies on induction — it can never be scientifically proven. You can call it god of the gaps but the gap is all knowledge ever imaginable because there is absolutely no knowledge without induction in science.+1
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
@hueylongenjoyer3747 "there is absolutely no knowledge without induction in science." most tautological statement ever award. knowledge is science and vice versa, and induction is just a fancy name for using evidence, which is how knowledge is derived. >"When can you insert the scientific method to itself without causing a logical fallacy?" word salad+1
@Ardepark - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
@hueylongenjoyer3747This stuff is so stupid and tiresome. A hammer can’t hit itself, this doesn’t mean it can’t do its job. The scientific method does its job well, its results speak for themselves, and it doesn’t need to prove anything.+1
@datashed - 2025-06-03 11:32:05
@Ardepark Yep. Even if the logical conclusion of skepticism was solipsism, there's no utility in it. The point of this sort of pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo is to stop people from questioning dishonest positions (i.e. faith).+2
@RoIlesroyce - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
Good to meet ya ben+2
@1111Tactical - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
I stole it+3
@jimmies - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
Idk about others but Luke has been talking about philosophy for years+1
@gnomelinux - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@jimmies I know just seems like its too likely that its been that people are more interested in culture stuff than linux.+1
@youtubeenjoyer1743 - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
What did he mean by this+1
@whatevr-y9o - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
With this rhetoric you're basically admitting it to be a myth and not history.+2
@StevenPatron-u2y - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@whatevr-y9oI don’t know where you got that. In my mind, if he didn’t do it. Billions of people over 2000 years would not be arguing about whether or not he did what he did.+1
@whatevr-y9o - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@StevenPatron-u2y You are saying you shouldn't think about it too hard or explain it. This attitude makes sense with myth and doesn't with real events that historically happened and are important to this day.+1
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@whatevr-y9o if the events were important to this day they'd have been even more important to the early church before the new testament, yet Paul has no awareness of any teaching from or about Jesus aside from his "revelations" (hallucinations)+2
@whatevr-y9o - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@OthorgonalOctroon I know, I was responding to the OP.+2
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@whatevr-y9o from your wording it sounded like it but I thought it was worth bringing up anyway (I'm not sure how many people have read Carrier on this)+2
@StevenPatron-u2y - 2025-06-03 11:32:06
@whatevr-y9o I would say I view it as myth and reality… when I read the words of Jesus I get a sense of incredible depth in his parables that I find quite amazing after multiples of readings spanning 20+ years. I view life through a mythic lens anyways it’s just my predisposition. Some people like the solidity of material reality and a scientific/methodical view of life and I agree it has its place… but.. for me the ephemeral nature of perception and consciousness really mystifies me.+1
@Ardepark - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
You don’t understand his argument because he isn’t making one. He is justifying his faith by knocking down a strawman of “reddit scientism” and this is enough to satisfy him and others who share his faith.+3
@pward17 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Your shirt under your coat is creating an upsidedown cross, but im a skeptic so not a miracle+1
@ChellSneed - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
I just witnessed something unexpected while watching this video haha.+1
@AkiKii519 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Nice beard ;)+1
@Ojimod - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
hello+1
@tv-pp - 2025-06-11 11:32:07
you have to believe something+1
@AlwaysAudacity - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Hume the Sadducee.+1
@VitorHugo8D - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
gravity is the result of a curvature in the spacetime, that's what the theory of relativity is saying. it has been proved correct a million times by now+5
@bogdanlulelaru858 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
cities are farming humans+1
@AntonSlavik - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Pretty sure turkeys never stop eating, bro 🤣+1
@thefunnysmoke1526 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Who asked though dear luke.+1
@andrej-vukov - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
nerd ahh turkeys 🤓+3
@EdTrollington - 2025-06-05 11:32:07
What are you going to believe, the reddit stats or your lying eyes?+1
@PaperthinProtestant - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
The earth is flat+1
@yigittuncer22 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
first+4
@channelmyloveinsilence - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
black science man? 😭+1
@ihorkram - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
И правда выглядит как Достоевский. Люк, может ты и русский начнешь учить? Читать Достоевского и Святых Отцов в оригинале будешь.+1
@Exoskel2 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Oh my hecking science? :()+1
@amadeusakreveusmusic3356 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Aren't you then lying to yourself? "Miss perceive" is basically lying to yourself. Assuming perfect senses.+1
@zeevdrifter2707 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
Fined tuned universe have atheists seething.+1
@sbarrett00 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
"black science man" WTF+1
@navienslavement - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
empirical data underdetermines theories+1
@omarmagdy1075 - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
The point was we can't see the curvature in spacetime empirically but we rather see its effect and extrapolate on the data that it's curved+3
@QTwoSix - 2025-06-03 11:32:07
No, it hasn't. Einstein was largely inconsequential. ToR is pseudoscience.+4
@haindomaltici - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
turk luke smith enjoyer!!1+2
@shizno1872 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Sneed.+2
@yigittuncer22 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
@haindomalticitruly a rare breed+1
@fornost64 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Problem?+1
@eriestreetgarage - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
forest day trippin lol+1
@myegane49 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
oh so you're a flat earther now+1
@CopeAscetic - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Man+1
@GE0attack - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Atheist existed we had Nastiks in india. Most of this asthet mumbo jambo sounds half baked idea of nastics+1
@uncannoid - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
The nerd turkey+1
@tuurblaffe - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Water has the tendency to level itself out... no matter how much waves or chaos you create in a body of water, it will always return within it's confined area with a level surface, with that knowledge i am starting to find the whole round earth idea a bit crazy; like has someone made the trip already around the north and south pole? made the full circle to come out at the same point? let us say you start at noon on one spot measure the distance between you and the body of land/ice and you make sure that distance doesn't increase or decrease a certain threshold... if this place is supposed to be round that should be possible right? you should be able to fully make a circle if you make your diameter big enough, i would volunteer to test that out if someone provide me with a boat...+1
@redbook7347 - 2025-06-05 11:32:08
This turkey thing owes to Bertrand Russell not Taleb or whatever+2
@yarghhargh9345 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Keep up the uploads and ignore the redditors+1
@FellTheSky - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
COOL, Still not believing in miracles Cheers+1
@idan4794 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
אני לא מאמין שישוע הנוצרי קם לתחייה ,זו אלגוריה+3
@TIIKKETMASTER - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Theres a better argument against miracles, read Rand. Hume fucking sucks though.+1
@dylanoteiza4009 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Estay muy atrapao luke+1
@personalconditioning2380 - 2025-06-06 11:32:08
Hi Luke! I like philosophy and David Hume but this piece is very uninteresting. It made me wonder: are you sure you're not just a confused pseudo-intellectual clutching to Orthodox Christianity at this point? You couldn't gather that Christianity is just derivations of a silly Jewish Mysticism? To come out the other side of all this hermit-like behavior with nothing but mentions of David Hume's arguments and fancy spoken word prose and Orthodox Christianity is not inspiring. This piece just comes off like a professor's assistant preparing a discussion prompt... Hahahah+1
@DobroPlayer12 - 2025-06-03 11:32:08
Water has the tendency to level itself out because gravity is pulling it evenly towards the centre of the earth+1
@linusloth4145 - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
Do you believe that the laws of nature are invariant?+1
@Caboose2563 - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
🤔🤔🤔+5
@idan4794 - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
Hello+2
@fornost64 - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
Woah check out the funny minecraft steve blocky script+1
@TIIKKETMASTER - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
"Metaphysically given" is the term.+1
@fornost64 - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
Ok rabbi+1
@OthorgonalOctroon - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
@fornost64 you worship a rabbi?+2
@Eddengarthian - 2025-06-03 11:32:09
Randcacas lost.+1