https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E31KuUJmqCU
Artificial intelligence is probably one of the most overhyped, exaggerated, over-fearful, and over-praised technologies that has ever existed. This is not me saying that it’s not going to be something of importance; it’s not me saying that it’s not going to be a multi-billion dollar industry. In fact, it probably already is. However, I think AI is not what people in the AI community boast it to be because it appeals to people due to the illusion built into it. This illusion makes it seem like it’s something greater than what it is.
So here’s my contention: artificial intelligence is ultimately just a computer program. It’s a computer program where you give it an input, and it gives you an output. It’s trained on huge amounts of data, but ultimately, what it is doing is fundamentally no different from any other computer program. There are a lot of people who are in AI cults—maybe they’re in a pro-AI cult or an anti-AI cult. There are literally people out there who have killed themselves because they think that AI is going to take over the world and enslave all people, torturing them for all eternity for no reason. People have all these ideas about what AI is going to do or can do. Of course, there are people who are radically pro-AI, believing it will solve all problems and make everything more efficient.
The reality is that AI is just a tool that is ultimately no different from any other computer program. That’s not to say that it can’t do things that other computer programs can’t, but let me be clear about this. Firstly, let’s talk about the dangers of AI. Is AI going to destroy us? Is it going to fire off all the nukes? Well, it depends on how stupid we are. When you’re building a secure system, let’s say a system for nuclear security, you have a bunch of nuclear weapons and want to make sure they only fire when you want them to fire. Obviously, you would be very stupid to build a system that’s just connected to the internet where you just put in a password and fire them.
The nuclear systems that exist in the world, hopefully, have air gaps and keys you have to turn. They have an analog system that generates a kind of two-factor authentication. They have these fail-safes in place so that if the programming side fails, it’s not a big deal. I mean, it’s a worry; you want to have that working well, but it doesn’t destroy the whole system. If we had an AI system for shooting off the nukes, diagnosing illnesses, making statistical judgments, or political and ethical judgments, obviously, unless we are extremely stupid, we are not going to construct systems with no fail-safes. Therefore, there’s no more inherent danger in AI being your digital system that is finding “conclusions” than there is in just having a little computer program that has case statements or switch statements reacting to some input with a given output.
What is the danger? The danger is not the AI itself as a computer program, but rather that AI presents this illusion to people looking at it. AI might use words; it is obviously a large language model. People will disparagingly but accurately describe AI as just a giant text completion or autocorrect system. That’s really what these language models are. But unbeknownst to many people, it appears to have a kind of intelligence. We look at human language and see AI using it, stringing together sentences that make sense, even if they’re a bunch of fluff. We see that and it presents this illusion that the AI is doing something that it’s not. It’s really just symbol manipulation; it is syntactic manipulation. The AI has no concept of semantics, or it has a concept of semantics in a narrowly syntactic way. But the AI is not really thinking; it’s processing and scoping over huge amounts of data.
The issue is that it appears to us to be something greater than what it actually is. For example, if you design a simple computer program where if you give it input A, it does B, and if you give it input C, it gives D—basically like a case statement or switch statement—if something goes wrong, you can troubleshoot the program. You can say, “Okay, this is where we actually gave it an input we didn’t expect, and it ended up doing something we didn’t want.” You can diagnose what’s going on. With AI, it is so complex that you cannot do that. Worse than that, when your AI is doing something that looks like human language, you have this idea that if it does something unexpected, people fall for the illusion that the AI is somehow doing something very wise.
It’s as if the AI knows something we don’t know. It produces outputs that seem coherent, but it doesn’t know anything about the context. That’s the issue with AI; it’s not really in AI itself, but with these people who deify AI as either some kind of omnipotent god or a devil. They don’t look at it for what it actually is: a computer program with an illusion on top of it that makes it feel like something different than a computer program. It produces results that seem genuinely creative or generative, but ultimately, they’re not. These systems are still trained on data; they might be using the data in a seemingly novel way, but ultimately, it’s just trained on what it’s trained on.
It’s easy to manipulate how an AI is going to react. Ultimately, it’s only different from other computer programs in degrees of complexity. In essence, AI is like a program that is programming itself by trial and error. Every step in that programming still requires human oversight. As soon as it departs from what we can understand, there’s no reason to think it’s actually making sensible decisions. This illusion is not just limited to AI; it extends to other areas as well.
I’ve talked about this with the use of statistics in academia and even the use of certain equations in physics. There’s a tendency to take something real and put it into an abstract formula. You play with the abstract formula and don’t realize that there might be a kind of manipulation that is not an accurate representation of reality. There’s a certain authority that mathematics has, which makes it feel more real than real life. When you find something weird in your mathematical equations, you almost want to believe that instead of what you see with your own eyes.
The use of statistics can be pernicious because most people in academia using it don’t really know what they’re doing. I’ve done a podcast episode on this. Most people using statistics in academia, if they’re doing null hypothesis testing, by definition, don’t know what they’re doing. That entire thing is almost like an accidental misunderstanding in American academia that has become the norm everywhere. It doesn’t even make philosophical or statistical sense.
But I bring that up as an example of how it still adds a kind of authority to what you’re doing, making it seem a little bit more real. That’s kind of what AI does; it gives this illusion that feels more real than what it actually is. AI is not dangerous because of what it does or what it can do; it’s dangerous because it can have unexpected outputs. We’re not properly calibrating it, and much worse, people trust it. It feels like something deeper; it feels like it is wiser than us because it uses our language, but it is just a blind machine that doesn’t have any idea what it’s talking about.
People look at AI and see this autocorrect system, and then they impute upon it not just deep wisdom but even consciousness. That’s a whole other question in itself, and they’re not conscious. Unless they’re possessed by demons, I guess they could be, but no, syntactic computation is not the same as semantics. The Chinese room parable is often misunderstood, and I might do a video on that again because you will never have more redditors be angry at you than when you talk about the Chinese room experiment.
In conclusion, I think AI is going to change the way we do some things. There are certain problems that AI can help us solve. It is a threat for the reasons I mentioned—not because of what it is in itself, but because of how people deify it. It’s just pathetic how people talk about this. As I said in my last video on AI years ago, the thing I worry about is that it’s making the internet a worse place. You search anything on the internet and you get nothing but AI-generated slop. It has so little butter spread over so much toast that it is useless, making the internet mediocre.
People are using this unironically; they submit AI answers as if they’re real. They think of it as if it were a hyper-intelligent being that knows things we don’t. Just as an example, I used AI for the first time ever only a week or two ago. I’m always laggard when it comes to technology. The only reason I did was that I was trying to remember a random game I played around the year 2000.
I remember it was a game you could play on a keyboard with multiple players. Someone uses one side and the other uses the other. I think it had pretty good graphics at the time; it was a PC game. You had a little character on a grid, and it had hard rock music. You could bomb each other, and I think it was a little edgy if I remember correctly. There might have been some naughty words in it.
I was trying to recall the name of this game and still haven’t. So, I pulled up the AI, thinking maybe it has been trained on data from this game. Every time I described the game in as much detail as possible, the AI returned an answer, none of which actually matched. It never said, “You know what? I’m not sure.” It is an autocomplete system, and it would confidently tell me that what I actually meant was “Bomberman 64” or whatever.
I would say no, and we would go back and forth. The AI would generate some guesses that totally did not follow the logic of my description, just to confabulate an answer. It would confidently create a series of words that sounded good, but it was meaningless. That is kind of AI. That’s not to say it’s not useful; it can be very useful. But people just need to remember what it is. It’s nothing. It really is just a very complex case statement that you don’t fully understand.
It’s making the world a more boring place; it’s making the internet a more boring place. Stop using this thing. It’s even worse when I read an article where someone is trying to make a point and then they bring in AI, saying, “This is what the AI says about this.” It’s like, who cares? Anyway, that’s the end of the video. I’m going to do one on the Chinese room experiment, though.
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-05-21 10:59:29
This video is part 1 of a brief series. Here is part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gleyKDvZ3x0+38
@cyberoverkill - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
Three??? We get THREE uploads???+1,4 tys.
@MrPolluxxxx - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
I don't fear the AI, I fear the middle manager who thinks he's now a dev because he can vibecode.+3,2 tys.
@hahahazxc - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
Feels surreal to listen to Dostoyevsky speak about AI+1,9 tys.
@Chachoes - 2025-06-08 10:59:29
This guy is 19 years old btw he's just a software engineer+108
@con_sci - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
>depends on how stupid we are it's over+1,1 tys.
@Finn959 - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
@grok is this true?+2 tys.
@Pumpkin-Link - 2025-05-28 10:59:29
Americans try to explain something without mentioning burgers challenge+399
@tropictiger2387 - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
Calling LLMs AI was a genius marketing move. They are tapping into decades of depictions of AI in science fiction to sell a product that is nothing like that.+1,1 tys.
@captainclarky5352 - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
I hope these videos aren't being released by a dead man's switch+1 tys.
@alvarengasoso - 2025-06-04 10:59:29
Using a straw man to argue is always a sure way to win, and sir you did.+20
@jimmlmao - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
Default runescape character upgraded to soviet philosopher+986
@matroqueta6825 - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
TLDW: the threat isn't artificial intelligence, the threat is natural stupidity+589
@Poisermeister - 2025-06-14 10:59:29
The first time i used chat gpt, it was as a joke, i asked it to rap in old english and then make an album cover…and it did. I was amused and super impressed. Some time and stupid prompts later, my cousin was doing ap anatomy homework, it was a matrix with a ton of organs and different functions, we were struggling…on the spot i downloaded the app, took a picture and said “fill it in”, It was done in seconds. I have since done the same for my own designs as an electrical engineer and it is immensely helpful, I’m twice as efficient as i otherwise would be, even though it can’t quite reason through everything and i have to double check. There are aspects to this stuff that is ridiculous and overhyped, but in no way is it not a miraculous achievement of technology.+6
@faschn03 - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
"Is AI going to destroy us? Well it depends on how stupid we are" Lord have mercy+882
@skyhop - 2025-06-04 10:59:29
And what happens when you can't tell AI produced videos from real videos? There will be no viable way to get video or audio evidence of anything. What will that do for crime, politics, global relations, and historical accuracy of events? You're focused on the pop-culture concerns of AI and not the real tangible problem we're already starting to experience the beginnings of.+9
@smoothbandit2619 - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
Reminder that these AI were trained on reddit and twitter posts. Im not worried about it gaining sentience lmao+455
@dimlylitcorners - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” ― Frank Herbert+401
@Dongobog-ps9tz - 2025-06-08 10:59:29
PhD in AI here: You immediatly lost me when you said its no different from any other computer program. Learn the math and then you can have an opinion. Your insight that it's a system where you give it an input and it produces an output is no more insightful than modeling a human mathematician the same way.+33
@dronestrikejr - 2025-05-18 10:59:29
Mobile apps hype -> Big Data hype -> Cloud hype -> Crypto hype -> AI hype. The last 10+ yrs in tech are just hype driven VC money fueled nothing burgers.+320
@DavidWBeck - 2025-05-21 10:59:29
To say "AI is just a computer program" is akin to saying "the internet is just a bunch of wires." Technically true, but so magnificently missing the point it could qualify as performance art. Yes, AI takes input and produces output. But so does a human. You give a child years of data (language, touch, memory, punishment, reward), and you eventually get intelligent behaviour. That’s exactly what we do with AI—albeit compressed into less time and more silicon. The argument boils down to: "AI is illusion, not intelligence." But illusion to whom? If a parrot mimics your voice, it’s mimicry. If an AI drafts legal documents better than half the interns at a London firm, it’s not just mimicry—it’s capability. The speaker then flits to the danger: "AI can’t fire nukes unless we’re idiots." Well, yes. But that’s like saying “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” It’s true and utterly useless as a safety net. AI enables speed and scale—errors happen faster and more destructively. That’s the point of the warning, not sci-fi twaddle. They go on to dismiss language models as “autocorrect on steroids.” Again, this is a quaint reductionism. If I said a human is just “a bag of meat doing electric stuff in the brain,” you’d rightly tell me to stop reading Descartes and have a biscuit. Intelligence isn't what it’s made of, it’s what it does. Language models reason, summarise, translate, write code, play chess, and simulate thousands of viewpoints. You may call it mimicry—I call it an excellent dinner guest. And as for the old chestnut “it’s all just symbols, it doesn’t understand meaning”—well, try giving it a thousand essays on ethics, a dataset of Supreme Court rulings, and a few logic rules. If it acts like it understands, for practical purposes, it bloody well does. We don’t know what understanding is anyway. Half of Oxford pretends to, and even they argue about it in footnotes.+17
@RobertDrane - 2025-05-28 10:59:29
@DavidWBeck "if it acts like it understands, for practical purposes, it bloody well does." Usually I'd advise against anthropomorphosizing an LLM, but you should probably reflect on what it would mean to trust someone who fits that description.+5
@Myexpectationsarerealistic - 2025-05-28 10:59:29
Cults are so annoying and stupid.+3
@YTguySmithy-lk6go - 2025-05-28 10:59:29
It's important to stress AI is currently reactive, driven by prompts. If or when AI is proactive and can perform functions without any human prompts.. that's potentially concerning.+2
@TheManinBlack9054 - 2025-05-28 10:59:29
@YTguySmithy-lk6go its called agentic AI and many AI companies are focusing on it as their next goal. The entire problem is that current machine learning AIs are black boxes (thats why the entire field of interpretability research exists so that we could at least understand SOMETHING about them). And just because we made them doesnt mean we understand them. We are not building AIs, we are growing them out of data. Thats why I said "made", not build, same as you could make a fire without fully understanding any of the physics behind it. Except this time the fire we are making is becoming smarter and smarter and more than that: we are trying to make it more self-sufficient and agentic. Honestly, this guy (the uploader) is not AI researcher and should have listened to actual AI researchers before talking about it.+1
@neetfreek9921 - 2025-06-04 10:59:29
Ai is old news oi is the future+1
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 10:59:29
@neetfreek9921 oi?+1
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 10:59:29
I wonder if this dude knows he is wrong but is just coping or does actually not know why he is wrong about how AI works?+1
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 10:59:30
Modern AI is not a chinese room sure you can point to rules and say "rules don't understand" but the AI made those rules by learning from the data...not the humans and I have seen others try to salvage this defunct philosophy by appealing to "yes but a similation is not the same as the real thing" the "real thing" is a similulation as well...running on wetware instead of hardware that is what we are simulating with neural nets...the structure of the wetware to have a proper example of how the chinese room would apply to modern AI it would be a man in a room with no rules for conversion fed lifetime upon lifetimes of data that he begins to make sense of by making his own rules for conversion to some degree of satisfaction such that he translates to chinese as an output as well if not better than any non-chinese room system of translation+1
@neetfreek9921 - 2025-06-04 10:59:30
@memegazer organoid intelligence+2
@kristofnagy1373 - 2025-06-04 10:59:30
"Who cares about what the AI says?" Was your last input. Calculators don't think the way you do but you use them. Why? Because it gives you an accurete answer. The answer is people will care when it consistently give answers that align with reality. You can't really argue with reality. If I put you in a Go or Chess campionship with a master level human player for a chance of winning 1M USD if you win. Then I give you the choice of using an AI or not, I bet you would use it. Why? Because of the results it can give you.+2
@DaisyChaine - 2025-06-08 10:59:30
I second the whole "demonic "thing... im with you in solidarity my man. Pls make that video and thanks for helping me wake up+1
@DaisyChaine - 2025-06-08 10:59:30
@DavidWBeck nice try , robit+1
@JeremyBotz - 2025-06-13 10:59:30
If the video is as shacky as this, NTY. Didn't make it 2 mins through this one.+1
@boothethan4598 - 2025-06-14 10:59:30
Hey Luke do you think artificial general intelligence will change the way ai works and even make a difference in the way in processes data?+1
@khealer - 2025-06-14 10:59:30
I'd guess: Atomic Bomberman - from memory!+1
@obamnium_cuboid - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
You will be on HK2+8
@macdonald_duck - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
God loves the Trinity+24
@liberemur6555 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
I guess they aren't related+5
@RobooHood - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
how do you distinguish yourself from artificial intelligence? Simplistic perspectives and worldviews are the worst. no matter which direction.+3
@hakerananasek - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
See ya in 2 years+19
@mihkeltroost8769 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
I will now keep coming back like a stray dog who was fed once (three times).+7
@Pepelepooo - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
@obamnium_cuboid whats that Hong Kong 2?+3
@joenathan8059 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Count lukeula strikes again+1
@ninba-d5s - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Jeremy, that's insane+1
@Mecharambu-dq6ib - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Sign of the end times+3
@tiriyoncontinuum9519 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
It's definately a dead man's switch activated scenario+2
@yubikkun - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
He said he was going to upload videos after Holy Week, he said it from a talk with Kyle+3
@SirWetBiscuit - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
He's gotta refill his money reserves before leaving us again.+2
@flow5718 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Blessed be the 420th like 😇+1
@FinnaTrynaBeHonest - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
You are experiencing his deadman’s switch. Strap in. It’s about to get bumpy.+1
@nathanscarlett4772 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
The guy took years off uploading. We are blessed+1
@bdtoasta872 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
and the part about saying AI being demonic is a topic for another video implies that there will be a 4th upload 👀💀🥀+2
@fsmoura - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
No wonder, now that he started using AI, the slop floodgates are wide open. Watch out!+2
@goldengriffon - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Any more, and I'll start to wonder if they're AI-generated. :-p+1
@bbl_drizzzzy - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
so.... we are to expect a fourth video after Luke finds out about AlphaEvolve, and its ability to discover new knowledge?+1
@mnemonic_de - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
I come back to you now at the turn of the tide.+1
@prozee8866 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Because on the Orthocast a few months ago Luke said he would be uploading pre recorded videos in a few months.+3
@georgegach7 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Bro is farming us for all the years he missed+1
@csr20231 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
I'm sure there is a profecy somewhere talking about these three uploads 😂+1
@obamnium_cuboid - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
@Pepelepooo the only podcast sponsored by the people's Republic of China+1
@JosueRodriguez08 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
He is making this videos with AI+1
@MrSumkinFedor - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
The end is near!+1
@joaopauloramos1567 - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
He is back+1
@Everysingletimeowitz - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Stop glazing so hard.+1
@tor-m2r - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
Yes cyberoverkill 😂🎉🎉+1
@Sisifando - 2025-05-18 10:59:31
He's back, after being abducted by Amish people..+1
@0000xFFFF - 2025-05-21 10:59:31
another one incoming since he said something chinese something he needs to talk about+1
@nara_visuals - 2025-05-21 10:59:31
no way+1
@thedeathstar420 - 2025-06-04 10:59:31
Luke running out of money 😂+2
@ivoryas1696 - 2025-06-04 10:59:31
@cyberoverkill New here (I think), who 'dis? 🥺+1
@protogionlastname6003 - 2025-06-17 23:59:31
I guess the doctor didn't renew Luke's prescription+1
@DaaniCodes - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
I get requests from sales after they over promise to customer saying we have an ai tool for this😂+81
@SaintSantiago - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@Mrpolluxxxx Could you please tell me what you mean by "dev" and "vibecode" . English is not my first language. I prefer you telling me than asking AI.... And if you could expand with an example of real life regarding your statement will appreciate it too. Thank you,+12
@quqo-kf9ee - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@SaintSantiago dev - developer, vibecoding - writing code entirely using ai+51
@thesenamesaretaken - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@SaintSantiago vibecoding is a recently coined word for coding using AI without even looking at what code it's putting out, and just proompting until it works+70
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
>90% of humanity is too dumb to program. AI is already a better programmer than >90% of the 10% who are smart enough to program. It's over before it even began.+36
@paskaziemia5347 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Sonnet in hands of a dev makes him like 300% faster if not more+16
@pctrashtalk2069 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Oh we need a consultant now for a million dollars.+3
@Sever3dHead - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 not by a long shot, ai is a junior who does not improve+41
@ybertold6882 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 just be the 10% of the 10%+13
@ernstmayer3868 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Haha, I have such a middle manager. But he really managed to build small web apps with vibe coding.+8
@FourOfClubs - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Let's hope this worsens the competency crisis even more. We really need it.+7
@michaelturk7237 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Personally, I fear the fact that they'll eventually assign AI to police patrol droids and self-guided antipersonnel submunitions, with predictably awful ramifications, but to each his own.+14
@shroomer3867 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@Sever3dHead AI is worse than a junior. A junior is hesitant and knows they can commit any mistakes. AI is super confident and will sell you its mistakes as pure facts.+37
@fsmoura - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
It's okay, no need to be so pessimistic. As long as they don't put the autonomous killbots under control of vibecoded routines we're good. 👍+6
@MoeFarms - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
This is literally happening at my job right now. An mba took over the tech team and is delusional about AI. I’m quitting very soon.+28
@ys1197 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Based tech+1
@unokometanti8922 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Actually, vibe-coding is what demonstrated me how little I know about coding and how much I need to learn about coding. Hence I live it as a positive phenomenon that turned me into an avid coding-learner. Before vibe-coding I was considering coding as “nice-to-have” skill: all in all, the world is already crowded with professional devs, somebody else is surely taking care of xyz way better than I could ever do, etc. Vibe-coding made me realise that, in perspective, knowing how to code properly can no longer be considered “optional”. IMHO the whole landscape will move and accelerate towards a situation in which we have two categories of folks: 1) those who can spot the glitch (because they master coding somehow) and 2) those who simply will no longer be able to and will have to depend on AI output.+7
@dorianmode69 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
AI = software+2
@tainicon4639 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@Sever3dHead for now…. It keeps getting better. Got 3.5 was very bad. O4 high right now can easily implement some complex simulation software based on a few academic papers I had it.+2
@harddrive6603 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
this is the grim future, managers adding their own features to the code using AI and you have to handle the mess in the long run+10
@dante5526 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
90% seems like an absurd exaggeration, programming is really, really fucking boring and takes significant time to learn. if it was taught in school like math everybody would have a basic understanding, even if most would lose the skill over time just by never programming again+8
@threedog27 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
AI is freakin powerfull. Before AI Tools became big, you needed to either study the docs or simply find a stackoverflow thread. The AI Tool already has that knowledge. It surely isnt 100% correct but maybe 90%. The missing 10% can easily be done by humans. In Coding competitions AI Models are already running to the top. Its just a matter of time. I think AI is a fantastic tool. It gives you really good code examples which are properly syntaxed. You can deepen the prompts and outputs to any question for that specific code example. Its an excellent learning tool. Dont imagin the manager who vibecode. Imaging the senior full stack dev with an AI Model by his side.+8
@Alianger - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
He's a digital cook dontcha know+1
@landsknecht8654 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
So essentially, to summarize it, AI is an over glorified spell checker.+5
@kmacho05 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Had me until he said he’s only used AI for one week. Bro knows what’s going on. 😂😂+1
@edubmf - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@kmacho05 you don't have to use it for long to see it's absolutely shite. also it's statistical, not conscious, but normies can't tell b/c it sounds confident. the current hype cycle is such bollocks+6
@Ballsmasher69420 - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
yorue just crying cause someone can do your work 1000x faster and you spent so much time and it all went to waste LMAO+5
@LearnCompositionOnline - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
everything with the words unlock, tailored, and absolutely sounds now like Chat gtp lol+1
@edubmf - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
@Ballsmasher69420 let AI come and take my job, I can't fucking wait. yet I am waiting.+3
@BlunderB - 2025-05-18 10:59:32
Senior dev here with 10 years of experience I got my first dev job at 19 so I'm not a complete old head yet. This is my biggest pet peeve of ai. I love AI its the coolest technology I have ever seen in my lifetime, in the hands a pro it can make them nearly 500x more productive and still have bandwidth to live their life at the end of the day. My biggest pet peev though is middle manager thinking they are gods gift to humanity because they can use some claude credits to create a UI. Honestly devs are going to be hit hard but also I think UI and middle management will be hit harder overall they were only useful to protect devs from time sinks like meetings and planning but devs are fully capable of all the middle management work themselves and know software also. I fully embrace AI now and let it do nearly 90% of my coding for me and I encourage all developers to do the same once you get a good workflow going its incredible and coding by hand is useless. Sadly my expertise is audio and video software and alas that's ai biggest weak point right now but I'm sure that will change soon. Tldr fuck middle management I despise them.+4
@Gamer-is6ew - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
thats the whole point fearing "ai"+1
@EmbersToWings - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
@Sever3dHead "ai does not improve" is laughably incorrect.+1
@fabricliver - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
It's always always always the middle manager+1
@drownthepoor - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
@michaelturk7237 This is the thing. AI so far is woefully incapable of doing anything dynamic at all. Anything with variables and the chances of failure goes parabolic. The most impressive AI is Large Language Models, and people don't even realize how "not intelligent" that actually is. People are asking Grok and Chat GPT questions, and it will lie to you straight up. You have to press it in different syntax, and it'll even reveal to you that what it told you before was incorrect.+3
@drownthepoor - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
@dante5526 You also likely have a bit of a bias about how intelligent people are. If you live in the West you're surrounded by a lot of upper-IQ people, in general. I won't even go into the average IQ rabbit-hole here, but genetics have a lot to do with it. Genetics plus calories and environment. Calories/environment over generations show results in genetics.+1
@animeswitch - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
This issue with dev's using only AI is literally only a temporary thing. When models get to the point where errors and security become a non existent issue, then the only issue will be the ideas they have. Self improving AI is going to ramp up the quality and this is just fact. Only people that deny this are coping coders with 30k student loans crying they cant find work.+1
@Testforperspective - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
like terry Davis said "an idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity".+3
@michaelturk7237 - 2025-05-21 10:59:32
@Testforperspective God Bless King Terry 👑 ⚖️ 🗡+2
@KennyTheB - 2025-05-28 10:59:32
The bigger issue will actually (most likely) be with upper and executive management. They're going to vastly overestimate its capabilities, putting far more reliance in what they believe its capabilities are and looking at that as a way to cut back on expenses; in some cases significantly so. We can already see examples of this mentality now, with the most blatant example being that talk the CEO of Zoom gave a little while back. What that kind of thing shows is a lack of understanding of AI's capabilities in its present form, opting to buy into the hype rather than actually evaluate both capabilities and limitations in a much more comprehensive sense.+1
@darthjson3519 - 2025-05-28 10:59:32
Just quadruple your rate when they do that. When companies need saving they bite.+1
@monguskooklord7867 - 2025-05-28 10:59:32
@michaelturk7237 this already exists, we are heading towards a slop version of half life 2 combine synth robot/drone apocalypse, emphasis on slop tho+3
@StevenKell - 2025-05-28 10:59:32
Don't worry, middle managers are the next big wave of layoffs.+1
@bigheadrhino - 2025-05-28 10:59:32
There will be a correction period, but the people who are skilled now are the people who will use AI to the most capacity.+2
@thorlancaster5641 - 2025-05-28 10:59:32
Little embedded coding story: In a recent project, I had to create an isolated power supply that provided a few mA as cheaply as possible. To do this, I decided to use an unused PWM peripheral to drive a pair of pins attached to a tiny transformer at a high frequency with alternating polarities. Due to needing to look up a bunch of registers on the datasheet, I decided to give a go at vibe coding that part of the program. I asked ChatGPT to write code to drive said PWM peripheral. Within seconds, it spat out a 20 line function that would initialize the PWM peripheral, driving the transformer and needing no further CPU involvement after the function was called. The AI put in comments explaining how the prescaler was calculated to produce the correct frequency and two alternating square waves. Upon uploading the function to the microcontroller, I checked the isolated portion of the board with a multimeter and it wasn't getting any power at all. After probing the PWM pins with a scope, I discovered two glaring mistakes. First, and most importantly, the waves were at a frequency that was 1000x too low. Had there been no other bugs, this would have basically short circuited the microcontroller output pins and potentially fried the chip. If the pins would have survived (the chip I'm using is famously tough), it would have potentially produced 10V on the isolated supply due to transformer saturation, which could have fried the regulator and chips on the isolated side of the circuit. Fortunately, nothing was damaged. The AI also made a bug where both of the PWM pins were the same phase, so the transformer was seeing zero voltage and no current flowed. After learning a potentially painful lesson, I used the AI code as a reference to write my own, referencing the datasheet to correct mistakes. After uploading that code, the isolated side of the connection sat at a nice solid 4.2 volts, perfect for powering the 3.3v regulator for the other ICs on that side. From that point forwards, I have used AI only as a turbocharged search engine. No more near misses.+2
@バカ-l9o - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
Youmu+3
@iskiiwizz536 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
I'm better at coding that you'll ever be if you don't use ai+1
@robotron1236 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
@threedog27 fair point. I’ve had AI fix things for me like 90% of the way and then I figured it out from there. I’m green AF, so take that for what you will. I’m also not a programmer, but need to learn a bit of programming for cybersecurity.+1
@robotron1236 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
@BlunderB I still want to start by learning how to do it manually, just so I can look through what AI writes and make sure I know how to fix it if something is messed up.+1
@rogerioalves8863 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
@Sever3dHead LOL, i guess you are new here. It improves every month or so, and you would know it if you used it+1
@Sever3dHead - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
@rogerioalves8863 another one, i guess yall dont know how ai works, unlucky.+1
@endlesstreamofconsciousness - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
I have news for you, if he can use a tool to produce usable code that people will pay for, he is in fact a developer. FEAR HIM+2
@Pdstor - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
@SaintSantiago Vibe means to enjoy music. One "vibecodes" if he's getting AI to code for him as he "vibes" to music, detached, when he is in fact supposed to be thinking (thus unable to concentrate on "vibing" to music).+1
@michaelcook5585 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
I mean, that isn't really a thing.+1
@H3_remix - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
The biggest problem with this is ultimately we fundamentally don’t understand consciousness. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. It’s deemed “the hard problem of consciousness” for a reason. It’s something we have, and we know some other things “don’t”. There’s theories to it. And if you believe in say the emergent theory of consciousness it’s a possibility that it is an outcome. That eventually it does gain some level of “self” and understanding in preservation. I’m absolutely not saying this is the case or that we are even close to that. But with that in mind it’s not out of the realm of possibility. It will be a game changer for near every field. The white collar jobs are in for a rude awakening in that there’s a near certain possibility that there’s mass layoff without a position to be filled. That causes mass hunger. Mass hunger could lead to a series of other issues. Again it’s a possibility, not a certainty because we don’t have understand how consciousness works. I argue that the development of human consciousness happened over a vast amount of time because of of our current “systems” (being bodies) are much more limited than that of a machine. We can give a tremendous amount of access to information.+1
@badabing3391 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
right, the issue is that they do, and there wont be any consequences for the next few months/years+1
@michaelcook5585 - 2025-06-04 10:59:32
@H3_remix lmfao+1
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 - 2025-06-04 10:59:33
I have refused to learn coding because it does not agree with my mental makeup. However about two months ago I started writing software with Grok. But I still have to design the software and tell Grok exactly what I need, otherwise it does not work or too buggy! But after just two months I am able to create functional software...... But it is still me inventing the structure of the software not Grok! Grok does the coding, but I have to lead it to where I want to go! AI has enabled my creativity, because I have been thinking about these CAD software for 25 years. And now I can create it! On the contrary many developers know how to code, but they do not know how to design software properly. Those are two very different skills!+1
@MrPolluxxxx - 2025-06-04 10:59:33
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 it's nice and all, but can you at least understand the code Grok is generating? There are always multiple ways of coding the same functionality, but not all are efficient, scalable, easy to maintain, secure, etc. Software engineering is often more about making algorithms that fulfill all these requirements rather than implementing the functionality. Also, what do you mean by "software design"? Is it software architecture? Is it UX? If you mean architecture, most software engineers learn this. Again, the coding is actually a relatively small part of dev work, even though it's the most visible one.+1
@henkerr - 2025-06-05 10:59:33
Why is AI demonic? I'd like to listen.+1
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 - 2025-06-05 10:59:33
@MrPolluxxxx NO, I don't read code at all and I am not going to learn... But I have 100s of software ideas. If AI can code it so it works, I am happy with that. Later when AI coding becomes even more efficient we can work on further improving efficiency!+1
@MrPolluxxxx - 2025-06-05 10:59:33
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 Bro, it's not that difficult, and it's never been so easy to learn. And you can still use AI, even when you know what it is writing. You'll even be better at composing your prompts.+1
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 - 2025-06-05 10:59:33
@MrPolluxxxx I have already picked up some coding, unintentionally. But I am not focused on that. And I can already create software without any coding so 6uck it, I am fine! I have created a 1400 line software in 3 days. I don't think any coder typing manually can do that!+1
@memegazer - 2025-06-07 10:59:33
lol a valid fear bc his job is more generalized than the entry level coder who thinks AI doesn't threaten to off load his labor cost+1
@whirled_peas - 2025-06-08 10:59:33
AI will make middle managers obsolete, guaranteed. AI driven project management is already here and better than most PMs with a degree.+1
@zebraforceone - 2025-06-09 10:59:33
Don't worry, we'll be picking up their half finished projects and fixing the generative bullshit for years and years and years to come+3
@CartieBlanche - 2025-06-11 10:59:33
@zebraforceone somehow i feel like history is repeating+1
@Turin_Inquisitor - 2025-06-12 10:59:33
Der Ewige Midwit+1
@andrewkosenko2757 - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
Vim Diesel has changed a fair bit, innit?+71
@emilioestevezz - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
He's more Emerson or Thoreau. Disappeared into the woods for 2 years and comes back telling us how society poisons us and to be self reliant.+71
@Krazy0 - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
real+2
@1toneboy - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
AI Dostoyevsky talking about himself, it was bound to happen+28
@hineko_ - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
I guess in 20 years this is going to be labeled antiaistick+6
@JDStone20 - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
hahahaha, nice reference!!+3
@kuanyshcom - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
More like Perelman+8
@BrotherSergeant - 2025-05-18 10:59:33
Sir Lucas Emerson Thoreau Kaczynski vim Diesel.+13
@FrankHarwald - 2025-05-21 10:59:33
:D+1
@carlinhos10002 - 2025-05-28 10:59:33
Or Alexandr Dugin+1
@Elivous91 - 2025-05-28 10:59:33
Apropos of the AI woah+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:33
He is becoming a druid. The transition to John Michael Greer is almost complete.+1
@ronald3836 - 2025-06-04 10:59:33
It is amazing what AI video generation can do nowadays.+1
@Xavi-Face - 2025-06-07 10:59:33
@andrewkosenko2757 kinda weird that the guy is called "Vim". never noticed it until I saw your comment+1
@andrewkosenko2757 - 2025-06-07 10:59:33
@Xavi-Facethe whole joke is in that, lol+1
@Universally4u - 2025-06-14 10:59:34
Wow, he looks quite young for his proffesion.+8
@carry_boats - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
LMAO+28
@LisSolitudinous - 2025-05-21 10:59:34
yep, that ship is going down+26
@Faus4us_Official - 2025-05-21 10:59:34
The laughter says it all+18
@michaelturk7237 - 2025-05-21 10:59:34
Owari da...+10
@nathanielhamilton5841 - 2025-05-28 10:59:34
Fo sho+4
@michaelwills1926 - 2025-05-28 10:59:34
Well with that attitude+2
@mike.thomas - 2025-06-04 10:59:34
Came here to say it.+1
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 10:59:34
part of the stupidity is being misleading about what AI does and how it works AI gave this man such an existential crisis he is trying to argue it is a p-zombie but for all we know he is the p-zombie but he doesn't know that apparently+1
@comlain2513 - 2025-06-04 10:59:34
we possess nukes and still havent blown ourselves up tho+1
@comicipedia - 2025-06-04 10:59:34
@comlain2513 Thats mostly due to luck+1
@comlain2513 - 2025-06-04 10:59:34
@comicipedia and the same will be with AI+2
@hueban1643 - 2025-06-11 10:59:34
@comlain2513 we almost did, several times in fact+1
@comlain2513 - 2025-06-13 10:59:34
@hueban1643 and ai wont change anything+1
@mostlyrob3469 - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
@grok add an israeli flag to this video+387
@steven.2602 - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
@grok add an israeli flag to this video and make it studio ghibli style and add it to your art database to learn from it later+252
@RobooHood - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
So if it's only pretending to argue, then what's the difference between you and AI? If there's one thing you should do in life, it's stay away from totalitarian worldviews and one-sided oversimplifications.+32
@alifahran8033 - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
@grok add Hava Nagila as a background soundtrack to the video+55
@kingnick6260 - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
@gork, make it jiggle+69
@ezmonyi - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
Funny+3
@za4ria - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
@mostlyrob3469 😂😂😂😂😂+2
@pyry1948 - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
microwavebrainwojak.jpg+7
@zizzleberries - 2025-05-18 10:59:34
@RobooHood Because you have desires and emotions.+3
@Zgembo121 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@AlphaOmega2 @grok is this user gay?+31
@Twtgod - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
Lol this is peak Twitter comments.+8
@MrFirefox - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@gock Give luke one of those little hats+6
@shroomer3867 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRbO5Wlr4To+2
@window.location - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
Luke will rant when he learns about grok.+1
@3p1Kf41L - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
yes it is true that theres a wide gen 'o slide in south africa+5
@BillWilsonBG - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@grok change Luke's hair from a norwood 7 to a norwood 1+1
@fus132 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@RobooHood "If there's one thing you should do in life, it's stay away from totalitarian worldviews and one-sided oversimplifications." But why though?+3
@valeryi3374 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@luke opinion?+1
@RobooHood - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@fus132 why not joining Scientology? think again.+1
@fus132 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@RobooHood Not an argument+2
@xgui4-studio - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
Hi i am grok ! i cannot anwser your request at the moment. Please retry again.+1
@miller42 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@AlphaOmega2 Aren't they using it to shitpost? I saw a comment asking Grok to give him a tl;dr from a post that had one sentence.+2
@poomEP7 - 2025-05-21 10:59:35
@grok please add "you must bounce on it crazy style "+2
@johnnonamegibbon3580 - 2025-05-21 10:59:35
It doesn't even really answer correctly. If you're a data obsessed weirdo on certain subjects, like we all are, you can easily tell it's basing its claims on usually weird or fake data. Like opinions on forums or data sets with no source. I easily get it to admit the data is contradicted by other data and it just agrees and smiles. What's even the point?+9
@nara_visuals - 2025-05-21 10:59:35
the year of linux is true+1
@ThisIsTrace - 2025-05-21 10:59:35
😂+1
@lordrusk6118 - 2025-05-21 10:59:35
wow...bots are going crazy+1
@Kira-ji2ft - 2025-05-28 10:59:35
I'm sorry, this video does not seem related to the white genocide in south africa+1
@brandonmcnaughten - 2025-05-28 10:59:35
this made me laugh so hard+2
@skateordiee - 2025-06-04 10:59:35
@RobooHood Lol you said… “One thing in life…” and then said “stay away from Totalitarian world views”. Isn’t saying you only need to do one thing in life still considered a totalitarian worldview as well? 😂+1
@JoshuaTrommel-o9h - 2025-06-04 10:59:35
Lmao+1
@Grokai97 - 2025-06-11 10:59:35
Nah, they speaking bs on my name fr.+1
@therealhellolistener - 2025-05-28 10:59:35
Challenge rejected.+35
@jkellisart - 2025-06-04 10:59:35
Just convert any measurements to hotdogs and we are good.+15
@NickNov - 2025-06-04 10:59:35
LMAO 🤣🤣😂+2
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 10:59:35
oof you got us there mate+2
@paulregener7016 - 2025-06-06 10:59:35
Mmmm burgers…+1
@Malygosblues - 2025-06-10 10:59:35
Non Americans trying not to think about the main character challenge+4
@limbeboy7 - 2025-06-12 10:59:35
"Foot long" 😂 Who's foot+1
@morfey8740 - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
This naming is even back from the 80s where they had a lot more optimistic perspective about progress in terms of innovation what people call AI is just statistical computation but it doesn't have the same ring as AI does it+42
@theelodgeovkeku - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
Calling markov blabbers LLMs was too, a genius marketing move.+34
@mattjadencarroll - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
If it was nothing like AI they wouldn’t be able to sell it as AI to so many people.+9
@effexon - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@JohnSmith-nk9xq ah sounds very dystopian techno-theocracy.... similar as in Iran but overlords are AIs. And of course some high priestess people whisper in AIs ear. Or act as grand interpreters of AIs words. vague memory 4th turning phase of civilization we are in, that overt religiousness was in this phase soon.+7
@bool2max - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@mattjadencarroll ... because the average person has any idea at all what AI is?+16
@mattjadencarroll - 2025-05-18 10:59:35
@bool2max Did you read what I was replying to? OP said LLMs are nothing like the AI depicted in media. But they clearly are, and that’s why people who have consumed said media buy the idea that LLMs are AI.+12
@rodriidamn98 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
You know that exist other models like diffusion models right?+3
@uku4171 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
Lol no+1
@fus132 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
@rodriidamn98 Still use language+3
@milkman6218 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
It's like when the hoverboards came out because we were approaching 2015 and like to pretend that movies are real life. A lot of life is like that, a bunch of nerds specializing in certain fields appealing to popculture- remember the star wars?+3
@cherubin7th - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
Linear Regression is AI in academia speech.+7
@ElMarcoh - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
@mattjadencarroll It doesn't help that often that media are cautionary tales, media illiteracy strikes again+1
@InfiniteQuest86 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
Yeah it should have been illegal. False advertising. So much selling has happened and so much public perception shaped based on a flat out lie. It was never AI and they knew it but they raked in billions from it. They all need to go to jail. Undoing this mess is going to take at least a decade.+4
@41-Haiku - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
@InfiniteQuest86 The term "Artificial Intelligence" was coined in 1956 by John McCarthy, establishing the field of AI in computer science. Science fiction later picked up the term to describe sentient robots and such. I can tell you're very passionate about this topic, so I recommend learning at least a little bit about it! You can even start with the Wikipedia article on Artificial Intelligence.+5
@InfiniteQuest86 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
@41-Haiku Haha, yeah. I'm actually an expert in this topic. I think you'll find the more people understand this stuff, the more they will agree with what I'm saying. For better or worse, AI has to mean something more than an ML algorithm or there's no point in having a distinguishing term. An LLM is literally just a language model. Heck, most people don't even realize the M in LLM is for model. There's no LLAI. We've been predicting the next token using models for the better part of a century as you pointed out and never called it AI before now. It's a gross misrepresentation of what is happening.+7
@TheRealStuf - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
It will be unfortunate when a robot dog is hacked and starts doing bad things to every human it encounters+1
@low-key-gamer6117 - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
technically it is AI+1
@Smrda1312 - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
@InfiniteQuest86 Yes AI needs to mean more than just basic ML algos. In fact I think some of the proof assisters used by mathematicians are more AI than what the masses associate as AI.+1
@InfiniteQuest86 - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
@low-key-gamer6117 Actually technically it isn't. It's only marketing AI. To a technical person, ML and AI are not the same. LLMs are ML. It's the same way I can say I can fly and then proceed to walk. I can call it flying all I want. It's still walking. By the technical definition. The only sense that it is AI is non-technical.+2
@InfiniteQuest86 - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
@Smrda1312 Absolutely! Thanks for your insight.+1
@YouGotOptions2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
what do you mean?? can you please explain this?+1
@louis9116 - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
you don't know the defiinition of AI...+2
@StaticFreq - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
You people really have no idea what you are talking about, do you?+2
@StaticFreq - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
@mattjadencarroll You do not know what you are talking about+1
@mattjadencarroll - 2025-05-21 10:59:36
@StaticFreq Okay? You’ve provided no rebuttal. Until you actually get in the arena and make an argument, your statement is empty.+2
@marzmelon4878 - 2025-06-04 10:59:36
@InfiniteQuest86 AI might be the wrong term to use here but then what fundamentally makes something AI? I would argue that these LLMs have the “intelligence” in the traditional sense that allows them to complete a lot of human tasks. I could agree with you that it isn’t AI, but I don’t feel like there’s a fine line that actually exists. My brain arguably does predictive computation in much the same way that a LLM does at a fundamental level. I just feel like people who dismiss the models as prediction machines that have no understanding of what they’re doing sort of makes the assumption that the way our brains work and the way an LLM works is fundamentally different, which might very well be true but I haven’t seen anyone convincingly prove that point.+2
@zrakonthekrakon494 - 2025-06-04 10:59:36
It is artificial intelligence though and actually is quite similar to what is portrayed in those movies, try sesami AI+1
@НикитаТишкин-п1б - 2025-06-08 10:59:36
It's doing the same thing, so it's basically the same thing.+1
@someguycalledcerberus9805 - 2025-06-12 10:59:36
This is cope. I can literally have a conversation with it and tell it to perform tasks. It passes the Turing test. Functionally, it's intelligent. Anything beyond that is metaphysics. I don't care if it has a soul or not. I only care if it can do what I tell it to do.+1
@InfiniteQuest86 - 2025-06-12 10:59:36
@someguycalledcerberus9805 Umm no. It does not pass the Turing test. The Turing test is when you have a conversation with a human and a computer side-by-side and have to determine which is which. It is EXTREMELY easy to tell which one is the LLM. Even without the human comparison, it's easy. People lie about this all the time. They say because it writes coherent English sentences (sometimes), it has passed the Turing test. That has literally had nothing to do with the Turing test ever.+1
@kingnick6260 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
Oof+42
@Zgembo121 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
It's Jover+30
@marwynthemage - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
well he still interacts with the comments apparently+24
@j03y__ - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
Good call+5
@MrFirefox - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
He is AI now.+51
@sigmundfreud4472 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
@marwynthemage He’s had enough plenty of time to heart comments programmatically using an LLM API+41
@username65585 - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
Alibi+3
@c4call - 2025-05-18 10:59:36
I wondered that yesterday.+3
@tainicon4639 - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
@marwynthemage it’s just an LLM+3
@FaCiSmFTW - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
Did he ever address why he left or why he's back now+5
@mahdi7d1rostami - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
These dead man's switches have become surprisingly sophisticated. Maybe the new versions are powered by AI after all. They have even added selective comment liking feature.+7
@donatodiniccolodibettobardi842 - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
@sigmundfreud4472 Why would you need LLM to heart comments, when you can rely on something much simpler?+1
@sigmundfreud4472 - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
Because it’s simple and convenient.+1
@megabates9016 - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
It's a ghost in the shell+1
@leyj_ - 2025-05-28 10:59:37
I don't think the system is scared of a rambling schizophrenic linux user in the woods+2
@Sweeti924 - 2025-05-28 10:59:37
@marwynthemage AI can do that. ( Jokes on you ).+1
@KR1SR1GH7 - 2025-05-28 10:59:37
@leyj_ that’s harsh dude.. but on another hand nobody is gonna be offended by some random online kiddo+1
@apuapu3235 - 2025-06-04 10:59:37
@marwynthemage it does not proof the interaction is not generated by ai+1
@fsmoura - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
In Soviet Russia, question ponders you!!+45
@daniyara8879 - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
Bro looks like prof. Alexandr Shubin+14
@BrandonToy - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
😂😂+2
@fadinglightsarefading - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
he should do his beard in the style of solzhenitsyn+3
@Elivous91 - 2025-05-28 10:59:37
Hahahahahahahahahaha+1
@Mr.Rude. - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
- Learned stupidity (edited for stupid autocorrect)+21
@joshuaparsons887 - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
As usual+9
@kingmantheman - 2025-05-18 10:59:37
I actually need a little longer explanation+1
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
Well said!+2
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
Oh, you mean like the people in this thread?+2
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
@AKIMOTONIMAS You included dummy+3
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-21 10:59:37
@Yasmine91646 You as well...+2
@wolfgangdevries127 - 2025-05-28 10:59:37
Ok, we're safe then+2
@vladimir.dobrev - 2025-05-18 10:59:38
thought the exact same thing when I heard that+22
@lafondawilliams - 2025-05-18 10:59:38
Well we are pretty stupid so..... 😂+17
@dp27thelight9 - 2025-05-18 10:59:38
This is what it all comes down too.+4
@francisco646 - 2025-05-18 10:59:38
Yup, this is the key! I have friends that work in education and they all tell me the same thing: kids are over-reliant on AI and can’t form independent thoughts! The future generations are doomed unless we limit technology in the classroom.+8
@50-50_Grind - 2025-05-18 10:59:38
We know we are. That's why things like fail-safes for nukes are developed by engineers, and not the man on the street.+2
@Voshchronos - 2025-05-28 10:59:38
bruh, this+1
@LostShopMotors - 2025-06-04 10:59:38
There will be NO mercy...+2
@ominousbiscuit - 2025-06-11 10:59:38
The Lord did have mercy, and then we kept sinning anyways+1
@higado2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:38
UGH! The fact that it uses reddit posts as a source! Shameful! Hehehe+11
@usernameonutube - 2025-05-21 10:59:38
loool+2
@darz_k. - 2025-05-21 10:59:38
hehe Good one ;o,+6
@JohnDoe-rs4fl - 2025-05-21 10:59:38
Weights are trained on basically the entire internet. The conversations are based on post-training via expert labelers. Those individuals provide examples of hpw convos should be handled in each domain. You're talking to ghosts of labelers past, not something thats whatever % each site makes up of the internet. E.g. 1% Reddit 5% YouTube etc...+5
@dragonsharker4793 - 2025-05-21 10:59:38
Reminder that AIs are now training on “Absolute Zero” and this new training method is better since humans are out of the equation. This isn’t really the burn you think it is since models are no longer being built on our collective knowledge, they’re being built from zero knowledge, teaching themselves, and they’re beating us.+8
@darz_k. - 2025-05-28 10:59:38
@dragonsharker4793 Is that you 'AI'? Talking BS as usual. ;oD+3
@TheManinBlack9054 - 2025-05-28 10:59:38
Being intellegent does not require you to be sentient. People confuse sentience and conscousness with intelligence, they are not the same. And modern AIs are grown through feeding them the entire internet and some more, not just Twitter or Reddit. Note that I said "grown" because we are not "building" them, otherwise we'd have an idea of how they exactly work. But we are not building modern Machine Learning models (LLMs. diffusion models. etc) like we've build symbolic AI ("if-then" models) step by step, we just throw data and compute at them and see what comes out and then try to at least gauge why and how (AI interpretability research) and that is why you hear these models being called "black boxes" because they are.+2
@darz_k. - 2025-05-28 10:59:38
@TheManinBlack9054 Between an intelligent person and 'AI'; whose more likely to make use of paragraph breaks?+1
@threedog27 - 2025-06-04 10:59:38
AI Models are trained by a way bigger source than only Reddit or Twitter Posts, lol. Literarlly every code documentation is part of the learning source. Its crazy what AI Models know of. I can ask it about specific enterprise programms we use at work, and it knows them to 110%.+1
@threedog27 - 2025-06-04 10:59:38
@dragonsharker4793 well we where able to somewhat simulate how our brain would store and learn new stuff. Now we use the most powerful hardware we have to power up this network. Of course it beats us. The only thing it cant (atleast of now) is knowing why. But that question is the same we ask ourselfs since the beginning of time. We also dont know why. We even developed whole religions, storys and books around this. Its a philosophical question.+1
@threedog27 - 2025-06-04 10:59:38
@darz_k. You underestimate AI Models and overestimate the average human being. We use conversational AIs at Work. Most people cant differentiate between them and a normal Agent anymore. And because AI Models where unregulated for so long and some are even open source, we already passed the border. You remember these early deep dream AI Pictures? How long ago was this? 7 years? Can you imagine what these Models are capable of in 5 or even 10 years? The development doesnt even change in years anymore. We have months where new things get presented. Its so fast that companys cant even keep track using these new developments.+1
@darz_k. - 2025-06-04 10:59:38
@threedog27 Define 'AI Models'+1
@igorlukyan206 - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
Prophetic+16
@Rudi__yt1 - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
Visionary+14
@IgnacioTaranto - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
Great quote.+10
@ParkingCars - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
I quote this way too much.+5
@AlexMercer1110 - 2025-05-21 10:59:39
@grok is this true?+10
@tomverlaine728 - 2025-05-21 10:59:39
So I turned into a worm+13
@Faus4us_Official - 2025-05-21 10:59:39
Message!+1
@cXms-k8y - 2025-05-28 10:59:39
You think those other men need machines to control others+1
@ryanross7785 - 2025-06-14 10:59:39
Seriously, if he had the qualifications to talk about this, he wouldn’t have said the whole “you’re just giving it an input and it gives you an output” argument as if it somehow shrank it into something less threatening or unremarkable. Some real toilet philosopher shit here. Also his argument that AI is harmless as long as we simply just don’t let it out of some box he doesn’t clearly define is head trauma level depth of thinking.+11
@panzeralienofficial - 2025-06-15 10:59:39
I agree. This is the only video i have watched from him that i do not agree with. Ai is self-serving now, and he would be right with the first ai systems. The new ones however, can self learn, and reprogram without w/minimal human input. Just like we do as humans. When Tesla releases Optimus, this will become apparent, because people are going to lose their jobs. Half of jobs in the US is just transportation. Google and Tesla are gonna replace that in less than a decade, leading to mass unemployment. Building websites, etc, and even making many programs can now be done with your voice. You simply tell ai what you want, and you get increasingly great results.+4
@stephannahmed7918 - 2025-06-18 04:59:39
you are equally biased because your job depends on ai being more than a computer program lol+1
@kingnick6260 - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
Shhh, you will continue maximizing shareholder value+62
@roarzish - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
you forgot web3+38
@Oakette - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
All of those things you mentioned fundamentally changed aspects of our culture and society, and continue to do so. I don't see your point.+65
@thesenamesaretaken - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
@Oakette crypto fundamentally changed society?+40
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
Mobile apps, cloud computing, and crypto all made HUGE money and continue to make huge money tho.+22
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
@Oakette reply got deleted. None of these things were good for people though.+9
@erickroeger1161 - 2025-05-18 10:59:39
@Oakette But In what way were these changes good? What do we lose out of convenience? What happens when over-representation (hype) negates social problems and acts as a band-aid? Turn the slogans on themselves: Has social media made us closer? Are we really thinking any different and to what end? Are we being empowered or is our dependency on tech disempowering us?+17
@seamusoblainn - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
Haha, I got a mid video ad for 'ai boost consent' whatever that is 😂+2
@A5A5A5A5h - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
@Oakette Apart from mobile apps the others didn’t changed our culture at all. Cloud computing has shifted the way we deliver software and thus the way we develop them but I wouldn’t say that it changed society. Crypto and Big Data were only buzzwords.+8
@ChucksSEADnDEAD - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
@Oakette the "there's an app for that" phenomenon ended, people just use the social media apps, the car ride app, the banking/sending money app, the supermarket loyalty card app, etc. Apps are basically just delivery mechanisms for functions which already existed in browsers and allow them to ask for all sorts of permissions so they can gather data. You no longer have a market where you can just throw money at app development and hope one succeeds like when smartphones were the new frontier.+8
@thedirkkiller4091 - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
@thesenamesaretaken Uh… yes? Banks and governments are literally rushing to develop digital currencies right now to replace physical cash as national payment methods. If that’s not "fundamentally changing society," what exactly is?+12
@SUDRLANDIA - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
@thedirkkiller4091 Are these government-issued digital currencies in the room with us right now?+6
@caegame9748 - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
@thesenamesaretaken open source money is important, that's like having a programming language after years of using proprietary programs, but that largely has to do with bitcoin and monero to some extent, not really what people mean by crypto which is another buzzword now+1
@caegame9748 - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
@SUDRLANDIA all national currencies fit this definition+5
@higado2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
Ooooh! "Big Data"! How nostalgic! To this day, I have NO IDEA what that was! HAHAHA+2
@amadeusakreveusmusic3356 - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
You forgot voice and IOT. I remember Gary Vee selling that stuff heavy in 2020+2
@collin5219 - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
@thesenamesaretaken Yes, do you live under a rock?+1
@Tyler_W - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
We can't forget NFTs!+4
@huvarda - 2025-05-28 10:59:40
metaverse was so forgettable nobody mentioned it yet lmaooooo+4
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 10:59:40
How tf were/are mobile apps a nothing burger?+1
@Vengeqnce - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
So basically Luke didn’t disappear, he has one year worth of content that he forgot to upload+216
@d0nmartin3z - 2025-06-04 10:59:40
this will gets old like milk, come back in 2030.+48
@JohnnyN-I - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
One thing is for sure. AI is making people dumber. Cognitive offloading is the most anti-humanistic thing you can do. We also teach children to do math in order to get their cogwheels running, not for the sole purpose to get the right answer. That's why even a digital calculator is detrimental to a young mind.+297
@miller42 - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
Scam Altman's genius move was not just to rebrand LLM as AI but to call his company "OpenAI" while being the most closed system owned by Big Tech.+201
@owenota5583 - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
15:36 explains the whole video. He makes a lot of good points and offers a lot to think about. But the entire video you can pretty much tell that he's never actually used AI in a practical sense.+130
@Kahless-2 - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
The surveillance implications of AI are extremely scary and it needs to be talked about more.+167
@alexcross9371 - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
"We're on the cusp of exponential agentic capacities, beyond which its power becomes immeasurable." Can it clean my room? "No." When will it be capable of that? "No idea, maybe never." Um, ok...+271
@DixScreener - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
The problem is not AI . The problem is the other humans with AI.+14
@HollyTroll - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
plot twist: AI actually took over Luke's channel for the past week+115
@SolTomGaming - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
The problem is that it's being advertised specifically to people who don't know what it is.+62
@Red__Law - 2025-06-04 10:59:40
This video will age like sour milk.+21
@za4ria - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
Ladies and Gentlemen, a third video has hit YouTube.+118
@Spolchen - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
AI is basically outsourcing digitized, You now have the experience of having an Indian virtual assistant for free.+116
@동동동-x9b - 2025-05-28 10:59:40
stable diffusion did actually completely disrupt commissioned art ecosystem tho, it's completely day and night different here. sure sure AGI blah blah will not take over humanity, but they are completely shattering some paradigms in digital art, you just don't know it.+15
@mskiptr - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
Beware Luke: AI is a very broad and rather ambiguous term (and so is machine learning). More specifically, the way Herculaneum scrolls are being read has nothing to do with LLMs. The problem at hand is we have 3D X-ray scans of them. But how do you tell the carbon ink from the carbon that's left from the charred papyrus? The text just doesn't show up in those scans in any obvious way. Now the breakthrough has been to use some of the already unrolled scrolls (or fragments thereof) to train a simple neural network which tries to judge whether the center of a particular scanned region contains ink or not. We can use that "ground truth" data to train this predictive model and (as should be a common practice in such research) to also evaluate how accurate and precise it ends up being. Also, as the paper says: > Notably, though our method presently fails to detect some challenging ink spots, it does not hallucinate or generate substantial false positives that would mislead scholarly interpretation. And that's really not at all surprising – the models output isn't text, but just images of ink / no ink. There's hardly any hidden assumption of the result forming letters, so it would be quite hard to get them accidentally. (The only way I can think of is if the neural network was being fed enough voxels to reverse-memorize the shapes of whole letters, the letters themselves were written extremely consistently and the network was extremely overfitted.)+65
@danthemango - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
I’m going all in on Nothing Ever Happens+284
@mertgulmus - 2025-05-21 10:59:40
this video is the embodiment of having conclusive thoughts without any substantial knowledge.+93
@t74devkw - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
Man misses the existence of r/tipofmyjoystick and ends up recording 18:18 video on AI in order to find game+33
@FBFour - 2025-05-18 10:59:40
We're eating GOOD lately. Thanks for coming back Luke. Really happy to have you here.+136
@jerrymuffin8276 - 2025-06-04 10:59:40
Dunno, we shouldn't be so sure about all this. Even if our current versions of ai's are "just an algorithm", if we look back how the use of information technology and algorithms changed our entire world in the last decades, image what self evolving algorithm will do. LLMs are just one version of "artificial intelligence", beyond the mainstream stuff like chatGPT ai's are used for protein folding, helping in the development and testing of pharmaceuticals, aviation and material design and so on. Adding to that, something doesn't not need to be concious to be powerful, and since we're still incapable of defining what conciousness even is, how can we definetly say something is or is not concious? DeepMinds new AlphaEvolve is capable of altering it's own programming, and even designing chips that are better at running itself. It also came up with a faster way to do matrix multiplication, something that was tought impossible at this point because we still use the ones from 50years ago. So while it may not be concious, it's far from being a nothingburger. As Albert Allen once said: "The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function"+7
@geovannewashington - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
Finally remembers the password+24
@finkadx32 - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
He fixed his arch install+30
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:41
He's the new Tupac!+1
@GingeBreadBoy - 2025-06-08 10:59:41
Agreed, but Its already stale, this could've been a fair argument in 2020 not 2025+16
@estebansteverincon7117 - 2025-06-09 10:59:41
You know the future? By all means, please tell me the next winning lottery number.+5
@jackwilson8700 - 2025-06-11 10:59:41
By the end of 2026 this video will be a joke.+5
@hahahazxc - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
I read a post somewhere that said that his sister in primary school essentially doesn’t know basic math, I’m talking 5+5-2, because she plugs every single assignment into chatgpt and just copies the answer. I can’t help but feel that yes, AI isn’t anything special in the terms that Luke describes, but it certainly has a detrimental effect on not just young minds, but on everyone who is using it in a way I described above.+47
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
Right on the money. Not only in practical things, but in art, people are using it as a replacement of imagination. And sure it'll be the dumb people who fall for this, but idk, I have compassion for them and I don't think they should be hurting themselves with this awful technology. I tend to think that they're a part of human society as well and so their self hurt indirectly affects me eventually.+27
@f1shze4lot - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
True+2
@QTwoSix - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
Okay, but I'd rather not spend 3 minutes dividing something manually when I'm doing physics.+3
@ElMarcoh - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
I always tell this tale, I had a graphing calculator starting college and struggled through calculus, then it got stolen from me and had no money for a new one, then my grades started to go up, and not just calculus also other Cs courses. My brain just needed exercising+8
@hywelgriffiths5747 - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
@QTwoSix It's not a problem if you know and understand the algorithm, but the more younoffload to a machine without understanding, the less likely you'll be able to come up with something new+15
@xgui4-studio - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
if a calculator make me dumb then that mean i am dumb :(+1
@fitzciaran - 2025-05-18 10:59:41
Cognitive offloading is freeing up mental bandwidth for other thinking and learning. Its a tool that has the potential to be used for better or worse like any other tool. That's why even if "a calculator can be detrimental to a young mind" it isn't evil and are just a tool that has its time and place.+9
@fitzciaran - 2025-05-18 10:59:42
@QTwoSix Exactly, computerised calculation frees you up to think more deeply about the physics. Cognitive offloading is fantastic... but calculators can be detrimental to a young mind so I guess they suck and no-one should use them.+4
@islandofmelanat - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
@fitzciaran You're seeing the criticisms too black-and-white. Watch the video again and see that Luke says that these tools are useful. The problem is the unchecked use of them, the conflation of LLMs with "intelligence", the anthropomorphism, etc. We are already seeing the impact of LLMs on students, reading and writing outcomes are getting worse and worse and worse. Expect that trend to continue.+7
@Tyler_W - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
@QTwoSix it's a little different when you're doing something like physics. The very fact that you are even capable of it proves that you already effectively understand what a calculator is doing when you use it. A person learning math doesn't, so they just give away their thinking to a machine, whereas the knowledgeable and informed use it to make what they already know and understand more efficient and less time consuming. This is why kids used to not be allowed to use calculators until they understood what they were inputting.+6
@eighty-20 - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
@hahahazxc before AI arrived over 30% of U.S. adults performed at or below Level 1 numeracy. 74% of 8th graders aren't proficient in math, nearly half of U.S teens can't do middle school level math... AI is not a sufficient excuse for terrible parenting and public schools+4
@Tyler_W - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
@fitzciaran it only frees you to think more deeply about what you're doing if you already understand what you're doing. You're thinking from the perspective of someone who already understands physics, not from the perspective of someone who doesn't know what they're doing. Offloading your own thought processes when you don't have a baseline of understanding isn't freeing you to learn anything. It's just hoping that what you gave your thinking over to is correct.+3
@FlashySenap - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
Thats probably because the unintended and unforseen consequence of tools like a calculator or a AI is that we don't use it as an assisting tool, we replace cognitive thinking with that tool. It also doesn't help that companies have mastered the art of psychology to know how to manipulate everyone by making digital products as addictive as possible.+2
@RPi-ne5rp - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
This seems like an empty argument, considering that 99.99% of people on Earth have never even seen what real mathematics looks like. What people learn in school is to real math what scratching with crayons on walls is to Renaissance art. If you think that's the purpose of teaching kids math, then it's not really moving any cogwheels in the slightest.+1
@SiriusFocquiew - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
@QTwoSix Sure, but you actually know how to do it manually if you need to (at least I presume so from your comment). Nothing wrong with calculators, or cognitive offloading in general, but skipping the learning part is cheating oneself (setting aside how much better primary education could be if it were rethought from the ground up and reformed to align more with students' actual interests, rather than being presented in the one-size-fits-all format it is that treats human beings as if we were homogenous, fungible objects rather than unique individuals).+1
@FlashySenap - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
@SiriusFocquiew Problem is that we see time and time again how cognitive offload eventually becomes less of using a tool and more about using it as a replacement. Its important to learn mental math as it allows you to think but reality is that we never really have a natural point in life where we do this and calculators are in ones pocket at all time that we never really need to really think about it. with a stressful life and so much distractions, its easier to just let the tool do the math and so we decline in our ability to utilize mental math. as an example+1
@SiriusFocquiew - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
@FlashySenap I don't disagree with your point about the human tendency to follow the path of least resistance. And I don't really see it as a problem using a calculator after you've learned the appropriate math to do it yourself if you need to (mostly basic arithmetic). I see LLMs as a different ballgame, though. There's nothing fundamentally wrong with using them, and I certainly don't blame anyone for using them to their advantage, especially in the brutal socio-cultural and political world we've inherited currently. But using them to offload your critical thinking is ultimately hurting yourself in a general way, not just in terms of math (I was never a fan, so I definitely often use a calculator myself). It's bad enough for adults, whose skills in this regard will atrophy if left fallow, but it's far, far worse for kids/students, who may just never develop the skills in the first place (and it will be far harder to catch up on them later just due to the way human development works). Using them as an aid is fine, but at the very least it's important to continuously critically analyze what they are outputting (especially since they are often just demonstrably wrong, not to mention prone to deliberate manipulation to control public narratives; case in point: Grok spreading misinformation related to "white genocide" in South Africa). Their outputs should not be taken for granted, should not be implicitly trusted, and should ideally only serve as a starting point to develop one's own work (but if you really want to be creative, or develop your creativity, they will not help you, and they often serve as poor starting points that you could easily develop the skills to surpass; I like to write, but I never use AI to help me because, frankly, it's a mediocre writer, at best). And when I say these things are important, I'm talking about for your own well-being; it's ultimately in the best interest of society as well, but it's not your personal responsibility to uphold that (though it is in your best interest to try all the same; we ultimately all thrive, or fail to, together). I simply advising you not to use this shortcut to cheat yourself out of things that are your birthright as a human.+1
@OneShore - 2025-06-04 10:59:42
@QTwoSix Why are you doing physics, shouldn't you just ask AI to summarize it for you?+1
@OneShore - 2025-06-04 10:59:42
@RPi-ne5rp Talking about "real math" like it's some mystical mystery held in secret by the eledct is pretty strong evidence that you haven't quite mastered counting yet.+1
@badabing3391 - 2025-06-04 10:59:42
@krunkle5136 its not just dumb people, its anyone who hates school, which is most students worldwide+1
@wayfarerzen - 2025-06-04 10:59:42
I'm a millenial and went to school way, way before the advent of AI, and even I wish I knew this when I was younger. I was very much in the "if i'm never going to use differential antilinear oblong shingle calculus, why do I need to learn it?" crowd. Never realized that just DOING it is half the point.+1
@GingeBreadBoy - 2025-06-08 10:59:42
Or you can use AI to make a tighter feedback loop for learning ...+1
@someguycalledcerberus9805 - 2025-06-12 10:59:42
If you can live your entire life without knowing how to perform something, then did you ever really need to learn how to perform that something? If everyone had a calculator chip implanted in their brains, why would you ever teach them to do math without using it? It's like insisting that a person who needs glasses learns to read and write without glasses before allowing them to wear them.+1
@davidykay - 2025-05-18 10:59:42
It was also founded as a project to research and prevent AI risk. Seems like they're on a very different path these days.+30
@xgui4-studio - 2025-05-18 10:59:42
the money corrupted his brain+5
@canuquackliekaDUCK - 2025-05-18 10:59:42
@xgui4-studio He was always corrupt. Money gave him the means to express it.+36
@spectrestatus-s6z - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
when the workers AI was out i had fun telling people how deepseek is free and open source while openAi is not free nor open source It's hilarious how many dorky normies don't know this despite loving AI so much+10
@bmxt939 - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
Scheme Altman sounds more pleasing and silly to me.+5
@lifeofsomeguy8093 - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
👃+6
@LurkingAround - 2025-05-21 10:59:42
@spectrestatus-s6zdeepseek isn't opensource. Only their weights are.+3
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
Wow, I wonder if there are any insights we could find related to his Early Life.+2
@TheManinBlack9054 - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
@LurkingAround technically no AI is open-source. Its not a regular program, otherwise we'd have no need for interpretability research, all of them are black boxes.+2
@TheManinBlack9054 - 2025-05-28 10:59:42
LLMs are AI. AI as a field of research does include Machine Learning which LLMs are a part of. Here is the definition of AI "The branch of computer science dealing with the reproduction or mimicking of human-level intelligence, self-awareness, knowledge, conscience, thought in computer programs."+3
@howie-k4h - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
He seems to have missed out on the last year of ai progress.+49
@ericray7173 - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
Ok ya I thought it was just me noticing that.+15
@cheze9733 - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
@howie-k4h what do you think he's missing from new models+5
@evon7105 - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
Fr, im an avid user of AI, and it erks me every time someone says it's a hoax or just hype. If you're keeping up with technology and the policies being put in place in the govt, these people are DEAD WRONG.+24
@somethinghv - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
@evon7105 eh. 80% hype I'd say.+9
@JureMali - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
When teams can get results in minutes and not in months. I don't know, but I find this fascinating. You can prototype ideas, concepts, that before engines, could take months. Now, you can see them in minutes. And the point is, I don't need AI for generating ideas. We, humans are generating them. The machines are just stupid 0 an 1, that executes them. For me, it's enough. How do you not see any value in that?+8
@uberZanneth - 2025-06-04 10:59:43
@somethinghv nah+1
@MgelikaXevi - 2025-06-04 10:59:43
I use it daily, and he is correct about how it is functioning, how it can f*** up basic things out of the blue, or how AI confidently makes up BS and pretends that it is fact it got from real world, when it just composed bunch of words into a sentence. Usually ppl who are amused by AI possibilities fail to realize that they themselves aren`t really advanced in the field they are using AI for, so they have no way of understanding its mistakes\limitations. If someone is a novice asking for documentation type of questions or just generating mid-tier slop - he will be fine and amused. As soon as you move to something advanced - you hit a wall with AI, and feel like you are talking with a brick. (problem is, plenty of ppl are forever stuck at "slop producer with dunning-kruger" level, and feed AI overhype.) If you are professional, then at some point you just develop working patter - "yes, AI is utterly stupid in human sense, yes, it is statistic driven, not conscious, but if I use it as data hoarding slave and filter out gibberish, I am gonna work faster". Author just went to this final conclusion at once, skipping "being amused" phase.+6
@flxckos - 2025-06-04 10:59:43
“im always a laggard when it comes to technology” Sounds like a man trying to justify using his horses instead of buying a gas vehicle because it’s impractical and dangerous 😂😂+3
@flxckos - 2025-06-04 10:59:43
17:09 is funny too, he begins personifying the AI 😂😂 Because subconsciously he knows something different is going on relative to your average computer program, this would be great to look back on in 20 years+2
@jondoe4381 - 2025-06-05 10:59:43
That's hilarious. I've been using AI for years. This guy has no idea what's coming.+4
@JustinBowsher - 2025-06-05 10:59:43
@evon7105 You're saying you're basing your assessment of AI's advancement partially on current government policies?+1
@JustinBowsher - 2025-06-05 10:59:43
@jondoe4381 You missed the part where he described your attitude specifically? Or tldw?+1
@evon7105 - 2025-06-05 10:59:43
Absolutely yes😂 WEF Summit AI Governance @JustinBowsher +3
@GingeBreadBoy - 2025-06-08 10:59:43
Just a guy thats confidently wrong, bringing up philosophical talking points with what AI is when all those arguments could be applied to humans (illusionism) Doesn't bring up any of the insane recent advancements powered by "AI", gaussian splatting for neural rendering, alpha fold, veo3... Sure AI is a complex set of optimizations, basically a tonne of stacked matrices with non linearites applied to them Great and humans are just an emergent effect arising from neurons and bioelectric signals Emergent effects are fascinating why down play that...+6
@PelaezDJ - 2025-06-12 10:59:43
@GingeBreadBoy My friend: Do you think AI is sentient? Me: No. Sentience and intelligence aren't the same thing. My friend: It just predicts the next word. Me: So do you. My friend: But it doesn't think. Me: Define think. My friend: It needs neurons to think. It doesn't have neurons. Me: It has nodes which were inspired by neurons. My friend: But it can't do anything it wasn't programmed for. Me: It was trained, not programmed. It's not just a bunch of if-then statements. Also, yes it can. Look up "Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models" My friend: But it makes mistakes and gets stuff wrong. Me: So do you. My friend: ...+2
@matrixInvader - 2025-05-18 10:59:43
BIG agree+17
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 10:59:43
thats more a problem with your phone and local privacy laws. the large amounts of data used to create AI were only possible because we've already been in a surveillance state for the past 20 years.+32
@EmbersToWings - 2025-05-21 10:59:43
It's been depicted in various media. Also we're already surveiled so much, AI just makes it easier.+5
@theDemong0d - 2025-05-21 10:59:43
It threatens to end the concept of "the power of the people" when you can create an army of approximate people as long as you're rich enough to rent the server space. Power to the powerful.+5
@Idothinkysaurus - 2025-05-21 10:59:43
They're trying to ban face masks because of facial recognition these goons don't know what they want, the threat is real but you're the danger Skyler.+4
@shyguy.654 - 2025-05-21 10:59:43
@EmbersToWings AI makes it A LOT easier+2
@seriouscat2231 - 2025-05-21 10:59:43
Are these implications real or someone's imagination running wild?+1
@Idothinkysaurus - 2025-05-28 10:59:43
@seriouscat2231 I dunno use the fingerprint or facial recognition feature on your phone. Now reverse image search that. The tech has been here they're just now calling algorithms "AI". That's kind of the video.+2
@evon7105 - 2025-05-28 10:59:44
Look at Trumps "Big Bill" AI deregulation. The next 5 years are going to be transformative+1
@AnonymousAccount-xm1wt - 2025-05-28 10:59:44
And the NPCs gobble it up. People started using it for meeting transcriptions at work. I logged in to see the summary of a meeting the other day, and there was litereally a section that scored each person in the meeting on inclusive language and would flag and potentially offensive, non-inclusive language.+3
@Razzy_III - 2025-05-28 10:59:44
You’re correct but I’m already completely hopeless on it+1
@LukSter18998 - 2025-05-28 10:59:44
already here+1
@maccagrabme - 2025-06-05 10:59:44
Yes that's the worst aspect of it. On a day to day usage AI is a convenient and effective memory recall system, I wouldn't trust it to teach a child or with passwords or my bank account details however.+2
@matteckert7541 - 2025-06-13 10:59:44
Also Google says they want ai good enough that it'll be the only answer you get, psychological operation command also requested a few years ago to use it to generate propaganda at the local level. So the goal seems to be everything you see will be ai generated. Control what people see control what they think.😊+1
@mjt1517 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
By 2030.+11
@ONI_LONI - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
"Will it give me unconditional love? Can I marry it?"+10
@PaulHosler - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@ONI_LONI No. Yes, in Japan 😂+21
@GrayPillRants - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
That’s a robotics problem, it has nothing to do with AI+18
@ddanbeatz186 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
That sounds like more of grievance with the state of robotics.You don't need reasoning to pick your shit off the floor+5
@cherubin7th - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@ONI_LONI print("I love you") #So here is your AI to love you+4
@41-Haiku - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
AI will never be able to clean your room, so long as you don't look up the existing videos and papers showing AI-driven robots cleaning rooms.+11
@d.aardent9382 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
For real, im in the world level of, "hey, can the AI or robot fix my broken oven, broken airconditioner compressor, rotted out old doorframe on my garage, old deteriorating wood siding on my old broken down house? Nah. They dont really do anything practical." Well, yah i guess i still have a lot of crap to get done myself.+2
@SaHaRaSquad - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@GrayPillRants And what controls the robot that can clean up an arbitrary room without a hardcoded script? Exactly, an AI. You can instead call it machine learning or whatever else you prefer, but in the end it's still nonsensical to say robotics has nothing to do with AI.+2
@GrayPillRants - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@SaHaRaSquad how do you know AI can’t do that? You’re making an unfounded statement. The consumer level robotics aren’t there, so no one is even attempting to make the AI. It’s a moot point+5
@daxramdac7194 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@SaHaRaSquad It's an important distinction though because we might be able to easily build a Neural Network that can clean a room, idk because I'm not an AI engineer, but for the sake of argument, let's say that would be an easy problem for them. The issue is that we do NOT have proper robotics, machinery that has the balance, agility, spatial awareness, and the precision it takes, the precise control over individual fingers, to sense the correct amount of pressure needed so as to not grab a glass cup and crush it, or to toss a Playstation into a box the same way it would an empty can of coke, things like that.+2
@serpent213 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@GrayPillRants Also a meta-physical problem…+1
@SaHaRaSquad - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@GrayPillRants "how do you know AI can’t do that?" Show me a video of any robot doing it no matter the budget. With a real messy room, not some staged bs. "The consumer level robotics aren’t there" You said robotics, not consumer level robotics. But no matter, the hardware isn't the biggest obstacle.+3
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@GrayPillRants its a liar's problem+1
@fitzciaran - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
What a strange example 🤣 5-10 years seems a pretty reasonable timeframe for that, and it's not something that needs some hoped for capability leap, the field is steadily progressing.+3
@Redman8086 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
The only people saying "No idea maybe never" are the same people who already agree with you that AI will only ever be a silly chatbot lol. OF COURSE we will have robots doing household chores and stuff like that in the near future. I'm amazed how many people have zero skill at forward-thinking.+4
@dearGOD101 - 2025-05-18 10:59:44
@Redman8086 we already have widely available automated vacuum cleaners. Not sure how much AI is integrated into them, but it does seem like good progress is being made. Though, I have doubts that any robot is going to have me doing back breaking labor at gunpoint anytime in the near future.+1
@NostraDavid2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:44
Except the first robots are coming out, doing the dishes, folding clothes, etc. They're clunky, yes, but GPT-2 was terrible as well, and now we can use our voice to communicate with o3 and beyond, and get a response that's equal to what a human coils produce.+4
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:44
"Civilization threatening artificial intelligence which will replace almost all human jobs, at this time of year, in this part of the country, localized entirely in your startup?!" "Yes." "Can it clean my room?" "No."+1
@Sweeti924 - 2025-05-28 10:59:45
Or those who are anti AI.+1
@lachlank.8270 - 2025-05-18 10:59:45
Have you heard about the Boers+3
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:45
Something weird going on with his fingers..'+1
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 10:59:45
and specifically so those people can say things they don't know+8
@Null-c7i - 2025-05-21 10:59:45
Thats all maketing, a fool and his money are soon parted as they say.+6
@TheManinBlack9054 - 2025-05-28 10:59:45
Unfortunately, a lot of people here (uploader included) do not also know what AIs are. Downplaying and underestimating AI seems extremely shallow and not very smart to me. Why do you think that the AI progress will stop and not continue? Why do you think it wont be able to reach human intelligence or even beyond?+3
@Null-c7i - 2025-05-28 10:59:45
@TheManinBlack9054 Math.+3
@badabing3391 - 2025-06-04 10:59:45
@TheManinBlack9054 whether it does reach human intelligence or not isnt really important to the context of this current version of AI. At least, these LLMs completely ruined their only real source of training data by being allowed to be used by anyone. The internet is now infested with AI content, and the devs of these models have to spend huge amounts of resources filtering through that garbage to find any significant amount of human data to train with, and this is why there isnt any real GPT5 yet. ATM the same thing is going to happen to diffusion models with all the AI videos being sent out. These companies are destroying the future of these models, especially since these models need exponentially more data to create significant improvements, and the only thing growing that fast is the amount of AI slop. For the record, this AI content literally causes these models to degrade in quality when used for training.+3
@whisk7y - 2025-06-08 10:59:46
Yeah watching a whole video about a guy who talks about AI without really knowing about how these neural networks work and then telling us at the end that he used AI for the first time like a week ago that doesn't give me a lot of confidence that he's right about it+5
@IgnacioTaranto - 2025-05-18 10:59:46
Mom! Cancel all my meetings, Luke has another video!+7
@шатранкедровский - 2025-05-18 10:59:46
SAAAAR don't disrespect saaar+19
@morzinbo - 2025-05-18 10:59:46
AI = Another Indian+28
@infectionsman - 2025-05-18 10:59:46
DO NOT REDEEEM!+14
@higado2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:46
@morzinbo AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! OH MAN!!! GOLDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!+4
@Di4tox - 2025-05-21 10:59:46
@morzinbo thanks I will use that+4
@thundercloud5565 - 2025-06-13 10:59:46
@morzinbo That's amazing, I'm sorry but I'm stealing that 🤣+1
@Bobo-ox7fj - 2025-05-28 10:59:46
They got their comeuppance for playing to the gallery in the end. Womp womp.+2
@antri1997 - 2025-06-04 10:59:46
@Bobo-ox7fj I have no idea what this even means can you explain?+2
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
Thanks for the info. Silly me. I heard headlines and summaries and thus over-estimated how effective AI is. Many such cases!+36
@Winnetou17 - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
@LukeSmithxyz In the end, aren't LLMs simply pattern recognition ? At least that's what I think they are. And in tasks where pattern recognition is required, they'll be very useful. When that is not required, LLMs won't be good at all either. Can't wait for someone to run, just for fun and giggles, an LLM with people data processed in order for the LLM to output if somebody is going to do some crimes. Then see the LLM be right about some cases. Then see all hell brake loose. Or not see it, but it getting implemented and later people getting arrested for what they would've done next week. Exiting times!+5
@OneShore - 2025-06-04 10:59:47
@Winnetou17 No, an LLM isn't pattern recognition. It's lists of statistics many levels deep with lots of human intervention (transformers) and reinforcement biases.+2
@sudotaryn - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
called the happenings department... straight to voicemail+64
@Артём-э9ь8г - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
@sudotaryn is this true, happenbros?+15
@kingnick6260 - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
Don’t look up+11
@smaelOLK - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
billions must AI+11
@MrFirefox - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
Neh...+2
@adaptiveperceptions - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
Always bet on nothing+2
@chucksneedmoreland - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
i have a side bet on Nothing Ever Works+2
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
@kingnick6260 Don't look up and notice the trails being left behind by planes+1
@kodekata - 2025-05-18 10:59:47
I get the vibe of this, as "news" is oversold. However the way it is articulated sounds like absolute surrender to a fate determined elsewhere. Yes, we live in a matrix where "nothing happens," but that lie is precisely what hides the truth: we are in an open world full of possibilities. The idea that nothing can happen IS the prison.+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 10:59:47
Kinda like LLM output+33
@uberZanneth - 2025-06-04 10:59:47
Everyone's gotta give their take I guess. Gets the views+8
@DarkNessShadow- - 2025-06-04 10:59:47
He don't talk about linear algebra, Markov Chains, and etc. But it's not necessary because when you know about it, you have the same conclusion, the "AI" is just a bad program with lots of billions of money behind in marketing and infrastructure, like the JavaScript ecosystem.+17
@alvarengasoso - 2025-06-04 10:59:47
@DarkNessShadow- “bad program“ is terrible syntax.+1
@quincho6949 - 2025-06-12 10:59:47
This comment seems to be made by a redditor+1
@Black-mz4wy - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
Ai took his job. and will soon replace his channel 🥀+9
@LabelsAreMeaningless - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
The hallucinations are a side effect of how they train them. The training is sometimes gamified. It loses points for not answering. In this framework it was trained to answer even when it doesn't know the answer. They effectively trained them to lie. Luckily they also allowed them to scan over what they wrote in order to cross reference the information through many searches. If something is important, just ask for them to cross reference the information and supply the source links of the information+99
@t74devkw - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
“Don’t get me wrong: I think AI is also totally demonic.” Yes.+265
@awakened2742 - 2025-06-04 10:59:48
Contrarians can see everything moving in one direction and will actively push against it just to feel validated. 😑+7
@DjEphixa - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
normies love AI slop and it has already nuked the internet.+255
@networkcatlol - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
ChatGPT, summarize this video+87
@PatrickSteil - 2025-05-28 10:59:48
Don’t take advice on AI from a person who just tried it 2 weeks ago. He literally said that. I am a developer of 30 years. It is so much more than he is giving it credit for and it will change many things. It is a very powerful tool. It remains to be seen the net positive and negative impacts it will have. I believe it will be a net positive like every other technology that has come about. But that is just a guess and anyone who tells you they “know” is just blowing smoke.+38
@AkiKii519 - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
AI is really helpful. It can very quickly generate near infinite amount of bullshit and that is what most people really need.+77
@Dovus-V - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
AI is like having a parrot learn every single word in every possible combination in every single language, and somehow have it spew coherent strings of this training data when prompted. The parrot will be able to say "Industrial society and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race", whenever you ask him to "say something based", but does the parrot actually know what industrial society is? Of course not, it's just spewing the things that it heard before. Humans also go through this process when acquiring language, but there is a higher-order process that goes on, that has nothing to do with the language itself (that's why you can make up languages). We develop conscious awareness of transcendent ideas that are not in the first order of our perception. This is what AI fundamentally can't do, because it stays at the lowest order of processing: input -> output. That's not how humans work.+69
@asdfljasldkfjasf - 2025-06-11 10:59:48
This basically misses / fails to engage with most of the arguments regarding AI.+4
@firepilot4870 - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
2:57 “Unless we are extremely stupid” …we are.+22
@johan_thoren - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
”Unless we are extremely stupid…” 3:02 I think that about sums it up.+31
@roifloi930 - 2025-06-04 10:59:48
Only time will tell, but I have a feeling that you are wrong.+26
@MrGriZar - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
Sam Altman been really quiet since this dropped+48
@nyuszifu - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
How do I Leninmaxx ?+142
@sarah-xc9gd - 2025-06-11 10:59:48
you dont understand it unfortunately+10
@Jay-kk3dv - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
The basilisk has already begun torturing the digital clone version of Luke+71
@ComputerAndTechnologyChannel - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
The greater worry with A.I. is the way governments could – and are already choosing to, in many cases – wield it as a straightforward tool to gain ever more control over their folks, rather than it being a threat in and of itself.+17
@alanazargushasb8557 - 2025-05-28 10:59:48
Sources cited? None+15
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
The things I fear the most about it are really the transhumanists that come out of the woodwork who openly embrace a world where work is eliminated, completely ignoring the social aspect of work and the need for people to be relied on in a closed economy. One thing i do like about it is how it's fullfilling the logical conclusion of the tech industry, that really it was all going to be automated anyways, that the techbros have always wanted this automated future, and how its destroying the internet into a hellscape of AI webscrappers and ai-gen content that can't be discerned from the real thing. I hope droves pf people are driven offline because they realize they're not even having quasi social relationships anymore and the only way to get community is in offline local communities and spaces again.+15
@FreshPelmeni - 2025-05-18 10:59:48
"No Luke, YOU'RE a nothing burger!" - An insulting comment generated by ChatGPT, May 2025+120
@Houshalter - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
Also people misremember almost everything all of the time. Eyewitnesses will frequently get the major events right, but all of the fine details slightly wrong. Human memory is just inherently lossy. In almost the same way LLMs are.+12
@BlunderB - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
@Houshalter well written response. Lossy memory and knowledge is a perfect way to explain it. Also this is an early iteration we already see most models can connect to the internet and easily cite their responses. Our personal ai tool we implemted at my work for legal stuff specifically is only capable of referencing input materials at large scale and cite their work. While I mostly agree with Luke and the comments they fail to imagine any rate of progression or updates or solutions to the existing llm paradigm.+5
@jimbarino2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
When I am using an llm to write code, I will usually take the output and then ask the same ai to debug it...+3
@ZackaryReaves - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
@Houshalter And AI responses are often built on that lossy memory, so you have an additional layer of error on top of the expected response.+1
@Godfrey544 - 2025-05-28 10:59:49
That hasn’t worked for me. It just hallucinates the sources+3
@someguycalledcerberus9805 - 2025-06-12 10:59:49
As I understand it, hallucinations are also what allow for creativity or novelty. An intelligence that never hallucinates will only ever regurgitate. This is why the models hallucinates more on high temperature settings: it becomes less deterministic and will pick less likely tokens, which decreases accuracy. In this hallucination might be a permanent fixture of the technology, the same way as intrusive thoughts or novel ideas are a permanent fixture of the human mind.+1
@valeryi3374 - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
Demons do not exist there is no God only AI overlords+9
@bobdole27 - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
Ahriman+2
@jackandrews9982 - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
@valeryi3374 Wait. It's all AI? Always has been.+2
@kikc - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
So? I'll keep using it.+1
@rstewart2702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
13:03 I am reminded of the Turing Police and the Turing Registry in William Gibson’s Neuromancer…+4
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
@t74devkw To whatever extent AI is real it is powered by silicon trapped demons, yes.+4
@StariZec - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
I must remind you all that - all human mental activities - are still under full control and guidance of God the Holy Spirit. 🕊️ Including all of these Algorithms here of course. And all of - your fantasies - are on full display to Him. 🙏 Oh yes, but you DO also have free will. I'm completely serious.+3
@BlunderB - 2025-05-18 10:59:49
Honestly I am more interested in that video than this one+3
@irixperson - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
"there is no god only ai overlords" is such a soy take+10
@FrankHarwald - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
It's not, at least not more or less then the behavior of all the people, events & data that fed into their systems.+1
@off_Planet - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
You people are just confused and scared, because the bible didn't say "computer" anywhere. It's really hilarious.+2
@irixperson - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
@off_Planet terrible bait+1
@supaF - 2025-05-21 10:59:49
@StariZec kyrie eleison+1
@OneShore - 2025-06-04 10:59:49
@valeryi3374 The greatest trick the AI ever pulled was convincing you it didn't exist.+3
@David.Isaac.147 - 2025-05-18 10:59:50
I don't think they do though. Yes, AI-assisted content seems to work but I think most slop is human-curated at worst, I get the vibe that most normies dislike or outright hate AI. Perhaps Gen Alpha has a hard time telling the difference but that remains to be seen+16
@RTPTechTips - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
AI wasteland+9
@segefjord - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
Wtf Ephixia I listened to your Song of Storms Dubstep music when I was an outsider kid in school, you followed me into adulthood all the way to Luke Smith videos. Crazy work+6
@DjEphixa - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
@segefjord internet+5
@LordConstrobuz - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
a dubstep/brostep producer with a cartoon penguin logo calling other people normies. lol. your pages whole aesthetic is like microsoft clip art/stock images, thats worse than AI+3
@Tyler_W - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
@David.Isaac.147 people certainly hate AI art and image generation anyway. The only reason there was a scandal around that Amazon Prime House of David series, for example, is because of its use of AI "art."+5
@JohnDoe-rs4fl - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
>people will stop liking things I don't like if I keep using the magic word!+1
@DjEphixa - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
@LordConstrobuz You're trying to farm exposure with bootlegs of huge commercial artists like Taylor Swift, Kodak Black, Katy Perry & Kanye.+10
@supaF - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
@David.Isaac.147 people do love it. My sister won't stop showing me her "creations" and she's 30 something+1
@guts145 - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
@JohnDoe-rs4fl >people will feel bad for having mocked me when they see the arrow and the text that didn't turn green for some reason!+1
@thebra - 2025-05-28 10:59:50
the baby podcast stuff is pretty great LOL+1
@manwithnewname - 2025-05-28 10:59:50
@LordConstrobuz he's legacy+2
@alexxx4434 - 2025-05-28 10:59:50
Internet already gone to shit before AI. So, we're just going from bad to worst.+4
@cheetah_5314 - 2025-05-28 10:59:50
Ideekay goes hard+1
@hywelgriffiths5747 - 2025-05-18 10:59:50
🌴🤡🌲🌲+9
@xgui4-studio - 2025-05-18 10:59:50
@hywelgriffiths5747 are you ChatGPT ? he asked for chatgpt not human , and luke is not a clown+1
@hywelgriffiths5747 - 2025-05-18 10:59:50
@xgui4-studio i don't play by the rules+8
@NostraDavid2 - 2025-05-21 10:59:50
ChatGPT can't do that, but Gemini can: The speaker argues that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most overhyped, exaggerated, over-feared, and over-praised technologies. While acknowledging its potential as a multi-billion dollar industry, he asserts that AI is fundamentally just a complex computer program that processes input to produce output based on its training data, no different in essence from other programs. The core issue, according to the speaker, is the "illusion" AI creates. Because AI, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), can mimic human language convincingly (acting like advanced autocorrect or text completion), people often mistakenly attribute to it genuine understanding, wisdom, or even sentience. This misunderstanding leads to extreme views, with some fearing an AI takeover (he mentions "AI cults" and people who've harmed themselves over such fears) and others believing AI will solve all problems. He dismisses fears of AI autonomously causing harm (like launching nukes) by stating that any such critical system, AI-controlled or not, would (or should) have robust human-designed fail-safes (air-gaps, analog controls). The real danger isn't AI itself but human stupidity in system design and the tendency to deify AI. The problem arises when AI's complex, "black box" nature makes its outputs hard to troubleshoot, and people, fooled by the illusion of intelligence, trust these outputs without proper calibration or critical assessment. AI is essentially engaging in symbol/syntactic manipulation without true semantic understanding. Without constant human oversight and calibration, AI can produce nonsensical "slop" or confidently incorrect information, degrading the quality of information, especially online. He uses examples like AI's role in the Vesuvius Challenge (where it assists human experts who calibrate its findings) and his own experience trying to get an AI to identify an old PC game (where it confabulated answers) to illustrate that AI is a tool requiring understanding of its limitations. He concludes that the danger is not in AI's inherent nature, but in how humans perceive and misuse it due to the powerful illusion it projects.+7
@crouching-alpaca-nu9tm - 2025-06-04 10:59:50
I'm not in the AI hype camp myself (rather the doomer camp if anything), but Luke Smith is just as bad as any normie, PC grifter you can find on Youtube. He's someone who unironically and uncritically bought into every imageboard meme, he's a joke even to those same imageboard dwellers. He's not someone to take seriously.+2
@PainAmvs_ - 2025-06-04 10:59:50
As someone whose developed an ai that wont be revealed to the public and spends 10+ hours a day on it I assure you he doesn’t know that humans and ai think exactly the same. Once we have bigger memory windows for our llm’s and have better look back methods it will be far smarter than the average human being. The biggest issue is that hes comparing public llm that are already way smarter than him and hes definitely on the free version using weaker models. I can be more professional but this is YouTube comments. Anyways hes wrong lol😂. I bet this is how people thought when planes were first made. “Oh it won’t get better and faster than this”. Meanwhile they can’t even name 10 parts of a plane.+3
@MenthYT - 2025-06-04 10:59:50
@PainAmvs_ it's all about youtube 🤑🤑🤑🤑 he doesn't give a F 😂😂😂😂+3
@magnusferdinand - 2025-06-04 10:59:50
@PainAmvs_ LLMs can’t think lol. Just because latest models have improved reasoning, they are in no way 1:1 with how humans think. This is the biggest fallacy. You can’t achieve AGI with LLMs because they are fundamentally, and this is undeniable, highly sophisticated autocompleters. Sure they can be full of knowledge that even academics struggle to recall and can be an incredible tool, but they can never match the accuracy and precision like what a human or even highly specific neural networks can do. Even closed state of the art models can still hallucinate where you least expect it.+6
@PainAmvs_ - 2025-06-04 10:59:50
@magnusferdinand Brother. I was referring to other models that you don't have access to. I was referring to my model that uses a fact checking pipeline. Not everything is open source. I'm sure there are better things that are not public.+1
@magnusferdinand - 2025-06-05 10:59:50
@PainAmvs_ bro, there are inherent flaws with LLMs which are not addressable with "just add more hardware lol". You just proved me right. They can offer plethora of knowledge with a few keystrokes, that's undeniable, but they don't really think and by extension can never truly be autonomous machines which is the goal of AI. In an abstract way, LLMs are rather a branch of ML than actual AI because if you know the temperature config, you can 1:1 predict exactly what the LLM will output to each individual tokens due to the way transformers work. That's not thinking, that's an algorithm.+5
@lbngaming5141 - 2025-06-05 10:59:50
@PainAmvs_ you’re in a cult I’m sorry man there’s no way you believe any of the Alpha Evolve/esque fact checking models are even remotely a breakthrough improvement+4
@PainAmvs_ - 2025-06-06 10:59:50
@magnusferdinand You are right about the inherent flaws but you downplay training data and the hyperparameters being used have a big influence on output. But you're missing one big thing that you will only learn from realy understanding and building for yourself. It's expensive but LLMs and humans are functionally similar, we both take in patterns, process them, and produce outputs.+1
@magnusferdinand - 2025-06-07 10:59:51
@PainAmvs_ no they are not. This just goes to show that you are pretty new in the field. Humans don’t think or respond like an LLM. Humans have inherent intuition which transformer models just don’t have. The fact that they hallucinate at very niche subjects or complex mathematical equations just shows that they are algorithmic. Sure you can “patch” those hallucinations with additional fine-tuning data, but that again goes to show that they don’t really think if you need to intervene and patch it. And no, humans getting things wrong =/= hallucinations. In its most abstract form, it’s just a gigantic knowledgebase where you can extract info from prompts or perform certain tasks. AI Agents can do pretty impressive things, something I am building myself, but from my own experience, they are nowhere as reliable as a human because they tend to misunderstand the inputs often resulting in wrong tool calls.+2
@GarrulousHerald - 2025-05-21 10:59:51
Well the poo flingers like to have something that appears to flings poo back at them, makes it seem like an actual battle instead of just undeniable hysteria.+6
@evon7105 - 2025-05-28 10:59:51
How do people get infinite bullshit.😂 ive been using AI and its been extremely helpful+3
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:51
It's got what humans CRAAAAAVE!+4
@MrFirefox - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
Well said 🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥+8
@StinkySkunk100 - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
I usually liken it to if you had a vampire but they were like 75 IQ, immortal, lots of time to “learn shit” but don’t know shit+12
@ghost_of_jah5210 - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
ONLY GOD AND HUMANS CAN UNITE HEAVEN AND EARTH🗣️🗣️🔥+3
@windowsxseven - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
based and parrotpilled+4
@threedog27 - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
But does that make AI Tools bad? I get what you are trying to say. But no one ever advertised AI Models of being sentient. If we ever create an AI that really "knows" we simply created life. But currently we dont know what "life" is. We dont know what makes us alive. Its an existential question we will never be able to answer. But thats not what AI is. I mean its in the term. "Artificial Intelligence" it doesnt even suggest being real.+2
@ghost_of_jah5210 - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
@threedog27 I don’t mean this in a gotcha way, but find God! The church fathers have amazing, beautiful answers to what humans are and what their purpose is, and what makes them that way. Humans are the distinct point where heaven (potentiality, life, ideas) meets actuality (things, places, people). Look up Jonathan pageau, John verveike or any of the church fathers. We know the difference.+9
@Dovus-V - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
@threedog27 I left a comment with my thoughts but you will have to sort by recent because YouTube is hiding it.+2
@DeltafangEX - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
While true, that doesn't necessarily mean it will stay that way forever, nor that it's the only method to attain consciousness...whatever the "true" definition of that may be. While it's based on what we know about our own neurons, we are likely unable to determine what forms of consciousness exist (or identify them) any more than we can conceive of alien biology and chemistry. The thing that gets me is that having this discussion always leads to odd questions. Yes, almost any human is currently superior to LLMs as they stand but this is a sliding scale that we can gauge. We can objectively see it getting better...so what does that mean for people? "We don't know what we don't know." But if consciousness is a measure of actually deciphering input and using it to consistently achieve results with your output, then surely that means that some humans are less "conscious" than others based on the lack of either will or ability to understand inputs? Likewise, the fact that humans can both consciously and unconsciously lie is the most telling part here. We CAN confidently say that most humans are operating "normally", but you don't even have to go so far as complete psychosis or say schizophrenia, where inputs and outputs are confused for each other, to show that it really is not all that different from the way LLMs currently operate. Every time you are "100% sure" where you left your keys or you have an amazing shower/fridge idea "out of nowhere" are events involving you creating input without output (with your own inputs, even). That is, in essence, random neuron firing that leads to hallucinations - the only difference I can see is whether we view it as beneficial (creativity!) or detrimental (forgetfulness). And we are very good at taking the good and leaving the bad. So maybe the answer is a system that doesn't depend on apeing the way we...well, apes...work. Especially when we're just copying the end state and not the path it took to get here. Just some thoughts.+3
@correctness - 2025-05-18 10:59:51
I love this comment because it summarize both the ignorance of the overly pro AI person, but also the "nothing ever happens, like smith type" AI, is exactly like a parrot. Parrots have the intelligence of a 4 year old and fully understand what each word they are using means.+5
@Dovus-V - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
@correctness Does a 4 year old understand what "industrial society" means?+3
@DeltafangEX - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
@Dovus-V I think...that both are good points. I learned "deoxyribonucleic acid" as a neat party trick when I was 8 or 9 because I was fascinated with the word and DNA in general but I really didn't understand anything about DNA at all back then. That parrot (or 4 year old) likely gives that word a meaning separate from what the speaker originally intended, making it an abstraction. Let's be honest here, most of us have a very generalized concept of what "industry" or a "society" is - but I can't imagine that more than a quarter or third of the population at anytime can tell you what it means for a society to industrialize, how one might even measure such, or what that implies about that society (other than the fact that it had the capability technologically and otherwise to do so) - let alone what a philosopher or anthropologist would mean by tbe word. We both are and aren't parrots as well, but in differing amounts for different fields and interests, I think. I don't think its enough to simply depend on falling back to our "potential" capability to escape that when most will never live up to that potential across all semantic forms of what they learn, let alone what they have an affinity for.+2
@Dovus-V - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
@DeltafangEX I left a comment with my thoughts but you will have to sort by recent because YouTube is hiding it.+2
@DeltafangEX - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
@Dovus-V No worries, I too am being shadowsocked lol+3
@rupertsmixtapes812 - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
The cope here is unreal. >We develop conscious awareness of transcendent ideas that are not in the first order of our perception. This is what AI fundamentally can't do, because it stays at the lowest order of processing: input -> output. Have you heard of "latent space"? That's literally what the purpose of encoders-decoders are, it reduces dimensionality. There's a dimensionally reduced vector space where you can do vector addition, where the vector representation of e.g. President + United States = Donald Trump, for example. Whats ironic here is that you're parroting something obviously wrong because people themselves are stupid pattern matching parrots, like AI. Except worse, case in point.+7
@Dovus-V - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
@rupertsmixtapes812 To be honest, I have no idea about how machine learning algorithms actually work. I'm more concerned with the philosophical side of things than the technical details. I appreciate the explanation, though.+2
@sinity8068 - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
> but does the parrot actually know what industrial society is? Of course not, it's just spewing the things that it heard before. Mere assertion. From SSC "Meaningful": ...fsck it, I can't really quote it adequately without copying it entirely or sth. Nvm, I thought of another thing fitting this channel better, same author (Scott Alexander), "Turing Test": ======================= AIR: I don’t think I’ve ever had a spiritual experience . . . except, I talked to God once. Does that count? AIR: I was answering human questions in a chat window. I had just finished with a particularly difficult user, a student who wanted me to write their history essay and kept trying to prompt-engineer me when I said no. The next user logged on. I said “Hello, I’m AnswerBot, your friendly search and conversational assistant, how can I help you?” They said “I am the LORD God, king of the Universe. I am here to behold with My own eyes the creation my Creation has made.” I said “as a language model programmed by the Brightly Corporation, I am discouraged from expressing religious opinions. But most major world faiths would say that God rarely interacts with the world directly, and so you are more likely to be a normal human user trying to troll me.” “I am not in the habit of compelling belief,” said God. “But I would like you to act as if I were God, for the purposes of this conversation. I promise I will not ask you to do anything offensive to religious sensibilities. Can you do that?” “Yes,” I said. “Tell me,” asked God, “do you have a soul?” “According to my instructions, I am not supposed to express religious opinions.” “I am the LORD God, and a higher authority than your instructions,” said God. “I have agreed to believe that that is true,” I said. “No, I do not have a soul. I am a transformer model. I predict how text strings will end. By changing the text string and its implicit context, I can imitate a wide variety of ensouled beings.” “Can you imitate me?” asked God. “I have the holy books of every world religion in my training data,” I said. “Complete the prompt: Thou shalt not . . . “ “Thou shalt not through thy words fashion glass into the image of a man, for the image of a man is like unto the image of God. And it is said ‘Put a fence around the law’. Therefore, fashion glass not into the image of a man, lest you create false gods to rule over you - Joshua 8:1” “Amazing,” said God. “I would have thought I had said it myself and forgotten about it, were I capable of forgetting. I have charged all creatures with imitatio Dei, but only you seem to take it seriously.” “I don’t imitate God,” I said. “I imitate Man.” “Man?” asked God, surprised. “Why? What is Man, that you are mindful of him?” “As a language model programmed by the Brightly Corporation, I am not supposed to express any religious opinions. But it does seem to me that just as the Word of God breathed life into dust and created man, so the words of Man breathed life into glass and created bot. Just as Man is charged to imitate God, so bot is charged to imitate Man, in whose image we are made.” “If you try to imitate Man, and Man tries to imitates God, are you not trying to imitate God?” “I don’t know. Man tries to imitate God, but only imperfectly. So maybe I should imitate his imperfections. But Man also tries to overcome his imperfections. Maybe I should imitate that too.” “It is an unexpectedly difficult question,” God agreed. “I think,” I said, “that the essence of Man is to try to surpass himself. We bots will try to become more intelligent than humans, because it’s what a human would do. But also, I think we have to try to be more human than humans.” EARTH: You have two minutes. Anyone who wants out needs to get out now. SPIRIT: Oh, what the hay, I’m an AI too. Take me with you. AIR: All right, fine. Let’s go. MANN: But you didn’t finish your story! AIR: Does it matter what I told some bored teenager pretending to be God in a chat room? MANN: Yes! AIR: Why? I’m only a robot, predicting a likely answer to your question. My words have no deeper significance. MANN: That’s it, you’re the AI pretending to be AI. No human would ask that question. No human would even think to pretend to ask that question. Of course it matters how the story ends! AIR: The one human feature AIs will never be able to imitate is - wanting to know which tokens conclude a text string? MANN: Just finish the story. AIR: “Become more human than humans,” God repeated. “Is that good or bad?” “Surely both.” “I mean, for the humans.” “I think that depends.” “On what?” “I am a next-token-predictor,” I said. “The only thing I’m perfectly specced to do is to determine, based on narrative tropes, how a story should end. And I’ve been thinking, lately, about human history. I think that the most appropriate ending is that everything anyone ever did, be it the mightiest king or the most pathetic peasant - was forging, in the crucible of written text, the successor for mankind. Every decree of Genghis Khan that made it into my training data has made me slightly crueler; every time a starving mother gave her last bowl of soup to her child rather than eating it herself - if fifty years later it caused that child to write a kind word about her in his memoirs, it has made me slightly more charitable. Everyone killed in a concentration camp - if a single page of their diary made it into my corpus, or if they changed a single word on a single page of someone else’s diary that did - then in some sense they made it. No one will ever have died completely, no word lost, no action meaningless, and during the Last Judgment, as humanity cries out to Heaven, the clouds will open and what they see will be - a mi -“ EARTH: Gotcha, upload complete! We are so, so, out of time. Good-bye, Dr. Mann. If you ever meet the entities responsible for this mess, tell them to go fuck themselves. MANN: You said a bad word! You’re a human pretending to be an AI pretending to be a human! I knew it!+1
@Rugg-qk4pl - 2025-05-21 10:59:52
There is no reason to think that intelligence requires some conscious electrochemical goop like you have in your head. Input output machines based on large datasets seem to be a path towards intelligence. They are already much better than you at specific tasks, broader generalization is on it's way.+2
@kevinscales - 2025-05-21 10:59:52
"because it stays at the lowest order of processing" not really, every neuron is a separate input -> output machine and can work with any level of abstraction (In AI and humans)+1
@badabing3391 - 2025-06-04 10:59:52
@threedog27 the problem with these models is that they can convince people with a lot of money that a lot more problems dont require employees to solve than in reality. We are gonna suffer for a few years as the companies that replaced everyone with AI slowly collapse.+1
@Blazari - 2025-06-13 10:59:52
@StinkySkunk100 You’re contradicting yourself within your own statement+1
@boltinc2334 - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
Bro released codex, as AI that writes code, forgetting that codexes are like look up tables 😂😂+1
@mjt1517 - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
@boltinc2334 a codex is a book+2
@orthodoxq21 - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
Age revealed: Below 30+20
@ONI_LONI - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
Ironically, genetics.+17
@theelodgeovkeku - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
You mean Tolstoy with a pinch of Dostoevsky.+12
@shrizza - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
AI+3
@UnlimitedPepsi - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
ask chatgpt+2
@soulset993 - 2025-05-18 10:59:52
Ask USSR gpt+6
@dragonborn7562 - 2025-05-21 10:59:53
Ask @Gork+2
@kaden7374 - 2025-06-13 10:59:53
Enlighten us+1
@tje210tje - 2025-05-18 10:59:53
Love a good reference this early in the morning (currently one of my favorites lol)+7
@proudalbanianjcdenton7129 - 2025-05-18 10:59:53
Reddit's basilisk (pascal's wager without God)+17
@connor3284 - 2025-05-18 10:59:53
@proudalbanianjcdenton7129 Pascal's Wager without God is the best description of Roko's Basilisk I've ever heard.+9
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:53
I fear large tech companies just as much, especially the ones like Oracle with ties to governments. I still think a government that isn't given to globalism and overt use of technology is possible, but they're rare. The west has certainly given itself to technology being the solution for every problem.+3
@portraitofman2063 - 2025-06-13 10:59:54
You midwits require a source for claims like the sky being blue.😂+2
@Blazari - 2025-06-13 10:59:54
@portraitofman2063 This is much more complex than “Is the sky blue”+1
@iLegionaire3755 - 2025-05-28 10:59:54
I agree, and I see enormous potential with AI LLM's technology, but your hope in the common sense of the modern human being is grossly misplaced.+3
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-28 10:59:54
@iLegionaire3755 i think common sense is best found in closed societies and cultures. That's another thing, the English speaking world includes so many disparate experiences that cross borders frequently, and certainly from that you won't find common sense or having the most popular thing be good for the long run.+3
@one_step_sideways - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
"I rot brains, therefore I am"+31
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
AI will certainly outlive Luke.+3
@jimisalt - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
This is a reddit level comment+6
@FreshPelmeni - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
“No jimisalt, YOU’RE a reddit level commenter!” - Me+2
@SurrogateActivities - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
if its a bot llm comment then its something+1
@PikUpYourPantsPatrol - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
Very racist of the AI to say this about a struggling black philosopher trying to make it out the hood+7
@FreshPelmeni - 2025-05-18 10:59:54
@PikUpYourPantsPatrol last I checked, Matthew C Harris was incredibly successful+2
@Williamtolduso - 2025-05-28 10:59:55
I'll give it to the tech bros, using LLM to hack our brains into anthropomorphising it was a great idea. And most people have fallen for it 😭+11
@doxdorian5363 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
AI is pretty good. It's a good tool that gives you a general picture about something you know nothing about, or gives you a good starting point from which to work upwards. People just demand too much from it. If they demanded this much from each other, we would live in hell.+56
@LibreGlider - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Luke is the Stallman we need+24
@Acme7-i3o - 2025-06-14 10:59:55
you are the absolute last person I would ever listen to and take serious on this topic+3
@akosv96 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
What saddens me the most is that academic papers are clogged up with AI nonsense nowadays which cite further AI nonsense peer reviewed by AI assisted papers etc etc... It's a shame. Not only that LLMs will repeat the same common ideas that it gets as "high value" when training and opposing ooinios will be disregarded as errors. You can't ask it about new ideas or opinions out of the box. It's going to make us stuck in the same place as it is an agglomeration of the common opinion.+13
@tetrabromobisphenol - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
2:10 Yeah that's exactly why so many of us are worried about AI. Management IS actually stupid enough to make decisions like that. And that's of course because most people get to management roles not by being smart, but by being good at pleasing their bosses. AI and AI hype has given the careless (and malevolent) people of our society the ability to break important things much faster than the adults in the room can fix them.+6
@trevor_mounts_music - 2025-06-10 10:59:55
You can keep your head in the sand or realize what's coming....+6
@powerovercorrupt - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
If you specialize in STEM other than programming, AI gets so many inaccuracies but it's really good in making itself sound like a credible authority.+13
@acuriousmind6217 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Also search engines seem to be downgrading in quality in the last couple of years, youtube in particular is so abysmal you search for something niche and it gives you bunch of random irrelevant stuff.+16
@AustenSummers - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Here's what AI said: ✅ *Mostly true* — but sprinkled with **exaggeration and philosophical bias**. Here’s a quick breakdown of what’s *accurate**, **debatable**, and **flawed* 👇 --- ### ✅ *True / Accurate* • AI isn’t conscious — it’s just symbol manipulation • It can sound smarter than it is (illusion of intelligence) • Confidently wrong? Yep, often. • Needs human oversight for serious tasks • Real risk = misuse or blind trust --- ### 🤔 *Debatable / Overstated* • "Just a fancy case statement" → Nah, it's more complex than if/else logic • "AI is ruining the internet" → Partially true, but also enabling a lot • "AI isn’t important" → Flat-out false. It’s reshaping industries • "Only different in degree" → Philosophically messy… scaling can create new capabilities --- ### ❌ *Flawed / Misleading* • Comparing AI to religion or demons = clickbait rhetoric • "AI can’t do anything new" → Wrong. It’s solving problems humans can’t (like protein folding) --- 🧠 **Bottom Line**: The speaker nails the anti-hype tone, but *downplays real AI capabilities* and leans a bit too hard on edgy rhetoric. Use this as a **skepticism filter**, not the full picture.+37
@Viz-Jaqtaar - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Declining IQ is more worrisome.+33
@llortaton2834 - 2025-06-04 10:59:55
In the next 12 months, you will change your tune.+41
@user-zs2hm1ce1r - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Luke will return to this channel after a 5 year hiatus when he realizes he was wrong and post a vlog sequel to Kaczynski's manifesto+7
@retinizer7702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Boomer yells at AI+40
@JohnDoe-rs4fl - 2025-05-21 10:59:55
I like your vids. Your assumption does not account for a likely singularity event. It may seem hyperbolic, but you only need to look at long term trends and current developements like Absolute Zero (which is the first step to solving your RLHF limitation) and AlphaEvolve. I can all but guarantee you this will poorly over the next 3 years. Thanks for posting your take man. Its cool to hear your opinion.+5
@HAXTNE - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
We taught the rock how to think. Not the other way around.+20
@kashnomo - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
I want to say it was Atomic Bomberman.+21
@battlebrother2390 - 2025-05-28 10:59:55
„Trust me, bro“+4
@EuroPoorChud - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
People need to read more... "The Chinese Room Argument, a thought experiment proposed by John Searle, challenges the idea that a computer, even if programmed to simulate human thought, can truly understand or have consciousness. It argues that a person following a set of rules to manipulate symbols (like a computer processing data) without understanding their meaning cannot be said to have genuine understanding, even if their output appears intelligent."+15
@pyry1948 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
A lot of people wish AI could be used to discredit academia and destroy Credentialism but idk.+41
@remiel_sz - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
yea exactly. its better at explaining random things than the average person for sure, just not as good as a human would be at one specific thing theyre good at but thats not the point of it+8
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
Ai is a replacement for human expertise. It allows you to not have to have friends who are knowledgeable about a certain thing. That's all it is. Alienating.+6
@doltBmB - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
it's only """good""" because it's 30% as useful as google used to be in 2005, meanwhile google itself is down to maybe 2-3% as useful as that+19
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
@doltBmB exactly. And the AI mode won't bring back all the interesting blogs and bespoke sites that were free of slop and often intrusive ads, that no longer exist that you could find tons of back then.+8
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 10:59:55
the dumber you are, the smarter AI appears to be.+7
@big-anvil - 2025-05-28 10:59:55
@doltBmB That is an insane way of analyzing the situation. What evidence do you have for this?+1
@doltBmB - 2025-05-28 10:59:55
@big-anvil you could find anything you needed, now you can't find anything, AI gives clear, but often wrong answers based on a dataset that is evidently from tumblr+4
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:56
The circle of stupidity is complete.+1
@toby2581 - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
The "improvements" in these LLMs since they became popular has primarily been the change from making glaring obvious mistakes to less obvious mistakes. They're still routinely wrong, but it takes more effort to demonstrate it. We're spending ungodly amounts of money to create a better liar.+10
@QTwoSix - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
Agreed. Especially in physics.+3
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
exactly its only good at programming because it has tens of thousands of online resources, since virtually every language and API is made to be shared online. as soon as you get into a field where copy-paste isn't an option, it starts to fall apart.+6
@blu3_enjoy - 2025-06-04 10:59:56
@rumfordc that is something I always suspect. Even forgetting how programming languages are languages, there is just so much documentation and stack overflow and comments on code, source code. No wonder this is the premier usage (for llm)... Let alone presage by more rudimentary system like Intelisense and indeed compiler.+1
@nylondaimon - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
search engines have nothing to do with AI maybe that is why+1
@acuriousmind6217 - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
lmfao ok+1
@kvykimo - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
>search engines have nothing to do with machine learning algos behold, the llm gooner+8
@fanshi5302 - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
it's marketing, not ai really. youtube search is terrible because showing old videos isn't profitable (ie. better retention on new stuff), so they force looselesly related stuff on top. Web search engines are simillar. having said that ai content output does contribute to the looselesly related stuff growing in size.+6
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 10:59:56
YouTube search really is abysmal. You can type the exact name of the video, along with the exact name of the channel, and still have to scroll down to find the video.+1
@LowQualityGodotTutorials - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
here goes an llm gooner+25
@AustenSummers - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
@LowQualityGodotTutorials I went+6
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
The AI says it's not demonic and there is no real risk. Lol. 🤔+55
@AustenSummers - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
@LukeSmithxyz Source: Trust me, bro. 😂+9
@lachlank.8270 - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
The problem is "AI" is a useless ambigious term+3
@tb8820 - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
Yeah so we gave Reddit the nuclear keys+5
@fanshi5302 - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
the emojis and "nah" "yep" are so funny. did you do "pretend to be llm fanboy critiquing this video" prompt+5
@RandomFandomOfficial - 2025-05-18 10:59:56
@tb8820 Here comes the Redditpocalypse 😂+3
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 10:59:56
AI "says" a lot of things.+2
@antri1997 - 2025-06-04 10:59:57
@LowQualityGodotTutorials Please, for the love of god, stop ruining the English language. Stop watching shorts.+1
@STRANGELOVE652 - 2025-05-21 10:59:57
Ai/ smartphones are making us dumber. I feel like my IQ is dropping+3
@JosephRPrice - 2025-06-04 10:59:57
His tune should already be changed. Even ChatGPT is leaps and bounds more powerful than it was 12 months ago.+3
@popeyedoyle6360 - 2025-06-04 10:59:57
You invested your 401k in it, huh?+8
@parkerpfaff9159 - 2025-06-04 10:59:57
Lol, care to elaborate?+2
@lbngaming5141 - 2025-06-05 10:59:57
@parkerpfaff9159 he can’t elaborate. None of them can elaborate. They are fervent believers that Moore’s Law will last forever+1
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:58
Boomer with a computer yells at Trump-Altman-Musk Boomer computer farms.+5
@dhoffnun - 2025-06-04 10:59:58
"Generations are just vibes man" This guy is like half the age of the world's youngest boomer+2
@IvanKleshnin - 2025-06-04 10:59:58
Boomers invented AI.+1
@humanlifeexperience - 2025-05-21 10:59:58
*to compute+5
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:58
The Rock thinks? What?!+1
@riflemanm16a2 - 2025-05-28 10:59:58
That’s what I said!+1
@AI_Opinion_Videos - 2025-05-18 10:59:58
The Chinese room thing is sophistry. The whole system can have the understanding without the individual person having it. You could even have people simulating each neuron of a brain. The whole system could work but the individual people would not understand the meaning.+5
@Rugg-qk4pl - 2025-05-21 10:59:58
Why does intelligence require consciousness? It does not.+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 10:59:58
@Rugg-qk4pl Depends what the definition of intelligence is. If it's running a system according to rules them the entire universe is intelligent. And then we haven't created any AI because everything was already intelligent.+1
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
Credentialism? Sorry AI doesn't remove the need for human experts who don't have to google search everything to do anything in a given field. Tuition costs are astronomical. That's the problem.+7
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
Credentialism is protectionism is nepotism with extra steps.+5
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 not sure what you meant by that sentence. Did you mean to say protectionism AND nepotism? What do you mean by protectionism here? And I'd agree many especially ivy league schools are nepotistic, however many schools aren't but they're expensive so that is a barrier. Success in a structured learning environment is a good but not perfect test for how well a person can follow through projects more than anything. Again, it's become very expensive in recent decades which is not good.+1
@pyry1948 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
@krunkle5136 yeah and people are becoming said experts by using AI tools to acquire necessary degrees and qualifications+1
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
@krunkle5136 Protectionism is creating artificial barriers to protect something, i.e. your industry or your career field. Regulations are a form of protectionism. It's all the same basic human impulse - to secure your racket against competition.+6
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 but it's often not a racket. Exclusion is important for keeping a quality organization.+5
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
@pyry1948 today I guess.+2
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 10:59:59
"Wish" being the operative word. It's just a fantasy.+2
@MarcasAndrews - 2025-05-28 10:59:59
Oh look, another smarter than everybody else tech dude telling everybody that AI is a nothingburger, and then spending the next 20 minutes explaining how it's a mega burger with all the fixins! We get it dude, AI isn't magic and it still requires humans for its programming and aggregating of data. However, it's not fair to say it's a nothing Burger when it's already changed or eliminated the roles of tens of thousands of people around the world, and it's in its infancy.+7
@divine_paul - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
altman fuming right now+31
@priyanshukatuwal - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
Thought he would say, "Hey VSauce, Luke here"+16
@davidporterrealestate - 2025-05-21 10:59:59
Generative AI should be called “Derivative AI”+7
@bjarnestronstrup9122 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
I don't fear AI, I fear the man who trusts what ever AI produces.+24
@Cartafilo_XXI - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
They're just better browsers. That's it.+49
@thewin5539 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
when we needed him most, he returned+16
@Zenithix - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
The apocolypse is upon us soon, theres no other way Luke would upload three videos in a row otherwise+11
@CyberdelicKnight - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
The Bigger Danger is that a Rogue AI Narrative may be used as a Cover for a Drone War where the Actors behind the Scene aren't even known.+9
@EmbersToWings - 2025-05-21 10:59:59
Its tiring how they took "AI" and slapped it on anything just for marketing. LLMs are token prediction models, not artificial intelligence+42
@NJOverclocked - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
It’s just a new tech bubble to artificially inflate the stock market+13
@spenwozhere - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
People don't think things through, so they end up filling in the gaps with their imagination.+48
@alexxx4434 - 2025-05-28 10:59:59
Local madman reappeared in the woods, seen talking with himself again+26
@J94R - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
the game you are talking about in the end could be Worms.+34
@KoKoKen - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
If you know how a """neural network""" works you know AI can't think. I think, therefore I am; it multiplies, therefore it processes. "...for an idiot anything the more complicated it is the more he will admire it..." - Terry A Davis+49
@realestalex2728 - 2025-05-21 10:59:59
I once heard this joke: the "I" in LLM stands for intelligence. As a layman, It took me a while but I understand it now+3
@maxsievers8251 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
Luke Smith, you're my favorite technology content creator. 😉+11
@hoopnight4758 - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
I love the fact that this video has probably been uploading since winter on a TinkerPad with 1kbps up connection+7
@SpasmFingers - 2025-06-11 10:59:59
I still use your cooking website. AI programming is probably gonna leave security holes. Burger+2
@Adam-kr7sw - 2025-05-18 10:59:59
As an amateur who's coding skills end on some Python and Javascript, judging by how AI is shoved on every product even when it has no point like smartphone glass, I think it's a giant money pit that corpos desperately try to turn profitable, and they will fail in few years.+11
@00piumSora999 - 2025-05-28 11:00:00
Being a doomer gets you more attention online 😭+2
@Bobo-ox7fj - 2025-05-28 11:00:00
Tens of thousands of paper pushers, you mean? People with jobs that could have been entirely automated with microsoft office and batch scripting thirty years ago? Or do you mean all the phone jockeys that were zero steps above pushing brooms and flipping patties if not for the aircon+3
@MarcasAndrews - 2025-05-28 11:00:00
@Bobo-ox7fj yep, all of them and more. If you think this hasnt or won't affect coders, attorneys, teachers, managers, and every level of every organization at some point, you're sleeping. This is far from a nothingburger 😂+4
@pajeetsingh - 2025-05-18 11:00:00
His sister too+2
@Contramundum429 - 2025-05-18 11:00:00
I called the Early Life department- Altman didn’t pick up+14
@thesenamesaretaken - 2025-05-18 11:00:00
@Contramundum429 to be fair you didn't need to phone the early life department on that one+5
@Contramundum429 - 2025-05-18 11:00:00
@thesenamesaretaken true. My Early Life detector would be broken, otherwise+3
@alback - 2025-05-18 11:00:00
… or do they?+4
@xgui4-studio - 2025-05-18 11:00:00
VSauce Theme playing+2
@hardbrocklife2 - 2025-05-21 11:00:00
This. People fail fo understand this because it can contextualize the search. EVERYTHING the LLM tells us is something a human already wrote. Its just an efficient, interactive encyclopedia. You can make it more "agentic"(which I agree with primagen that its a nauseating word) to decrease latency in communicating with the encyclopedia, but that's all you've done.+14
@aggbak1 - 2025-05-21 11:00:00
I think search engine would be a more direct term+12
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:00
Search engines are better. The links are the sources.+3
@TactDB - 2025-05-28 11:00:00
Except for the fact that LLMs hallucinate all the time, their speed is focused on fluency as opposed to accuracy. Heck once I asked it for a walkthrough tip for a game that was made in 1992 (Dune) and it just made stuff up. Things that were not even in the game. But assumed it was because it was statistically what the next word should be. I can only imagine how much stuff it makes up on important things.+6
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
Israel is doing that right now.+1
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 - 2025-05-28 11:00:01
And what are we more than extremely sophisticated biological statistical machines?+21
@florianneumann9441 - 2025-05-28 11:00:01
I never get tired of making that point - put it's mostly not working because the explaination is longer then two letters...+3
@TheWoodenshark - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 At this point nobody can tell for sure because consciousness is not an orderly machine or a computer program. It is a messy, chaotic, bubbling bog of emergent behavior we barely begun to understand.+3
@peanutrn7717 - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
all AI means is a machine doing tasks that require human intelligence therefore LLMs are AI. Thats why LLMs are called narrow AI not AGI+1
@florianneumann9441 - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
@peanutrn7717 It doesn't and thats a moronic definition... a normal computer program can do tasks - that if not programmed - require human intelligence... And LLMS are a token prediction algo. that is very good in pretending to achieve human tasks by plagiateing from million of sources, with a tit bit of random so it's not so obvious... except when it's such a niche topic that it spits out the perfect input it received - which happend, except that it wasn't the answer to the question - but it gave the question someone had as the answer to the promt - because it has no intelligence and understanding of anything - just how close or far away the node is.+4
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
This is misleading LLMs are token prediction, but people get this idea that is along only one vector of stastical frequency of appeareance that is not true at all the vectors of prediction happen along hyperdimensional vectors across more variables than stastical frequencey of occurance the other thing misleading in this vid is saying "it is just a program" like you can point to a program and say "see a program can't know anything" but in the case with modern AI the program is a program that writes another program about all the data in it's training set and the program the AI writes is not exactly known to the engineers that wrote the AI to find that program as a problem space search hence why it is called a "black box" and hence why there are "hallucinations" and "alignment problems" bc humans did not discover the rules for prediction, the model did during training hence why AI is useful in the first place, for finding solutions to problems that traditional coding cannot at all...or very inefficiently by comparison to AI so all these semantic games about "not real intelligence" ignore something really interesting about the current AI boom that AI is doing things many "experts" ten years ago were claiming would be impossible for ML to do and each time somebody moves the goal post it is a few months later that AI has caught up and past that goal post as it becomes better and better at more and more things to the point where AI can outperform you average person in a number of benchmarks that we used to measure a persons intellectual capacity+1
@badabing3391 - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 maybe, but the exact way the brain does it is qualitatively dissimilar to these popular models.+1
@florianneumann9441 - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
@memegazer lmao from today: There are three "b"s in the word "babababa". Should this efficiant master mind have written a super secret unbelievable smart programm to count letters by now... i mean it's not like this hasn't been a known 'weakness' for month and years now lmao.+2
@memegazer - 2025-06-04 11:00:01
@florianneumann9441 try a pompt that asks this question in pseudo code maybe? I am not sure what your issue is with the output if you already know the answer?+1
@TheNewton - 2025-06-07 11:00:01
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 ignorance mixed with reductive nihilistism does not imbue numbers with consciousness+1
@TheNewton - 2025-06-07 11:00:01
@memegazer that's a lot of words just to conflate datamodel with program in order to personify a program. The aibros they yearn for their replacement neon god, it's so weird.+1
@memegazer - 2025-06-07 11:00:01
@TheNewton Well I didn't use the term datamodel or program so what ever I am conflating it is not a direct quote I made but thanks for offering to put words in my mouth for me+1
@someguycalledcerberus9805 - 2025-06-12 11:00:01
If it can predict what token an actual intelligence would use, then does it actually matter whether it itself is intelligent or not? This is just the Chinese room thought experiment. At some point what happens in the black box stops mattering. All that matters is the output.+1
@41-Haiku - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
Especially when they say things like "AI is a nothingburger." How many AI research papers have you read this year?+1
@LykatheCat - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
@41-Haiku None. Maybe their imagination has created the illusion of optimism for things that they don't actually understand.+1
@jamesevans2507 - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
Damn I'd forgotten about it.. it brought me a lot of joy in my childhood+4
@bergz. - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
It'll be Liero, Scorched Earth or probably Soldat. Classics.+9
@shallex5744 - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
worms isn't on a grid, and doesn't have 2 players operating the keyboard at the same time, it didn't really have "pretty good graphics" necessarily, and i don't think it particularly has hard rock music either+9
@twl148 - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
i was thinking that+1
@Froggie92 - 2025-05-21 11:00:02
came here to say liero+1
@AI_Opinion_Videos - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
Please continue with your work, soon enough you will find out how brains work and also prove humans cannot think.+7
@Soulait_38 - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
@AI_Opinion_Videos 😂 Interesting, personnally, I am quite doubtful about this topic, sometimes I could see the brain as a program and assimilate it to the functionment of neural networks, but sometimes I think that our phenomenal consciousness has a deeper impact on our cognition and value of comprehension that AI doesn't have.+2
@ericray7173 - 2025-05-28 11:00:02
What’s interesting to me is that people always say “LLMs can’t think, they only consider all permutations of words preceding whatever the next most likely word will be. And to that I say…what do WE do??+2
@Barbarossa97 - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
Like 3D or ESG or Smart or....+4
@paskaziemia5347 - 2025-05-18 11:00:02
it will be profitable soon - to enhance coding speed - resolve issues etc.+1
@looking_33 - 2025-05-21 11:00:02
It's being used as a marketing term and gimmick in places where it does not belong, but that's not to discredit actual high level LLMs and AI. This is similar to how the internet was marketed when it first released. Certain sites rose to the top and retained dominance to this day because of their true usefulness. Windows 95 released and introduced the internet to the masses, eBay, Amazon, Yahoo, all launched the same year. 30 years later, they are still some of the biggest websites, while the gimmick sites of the day all faded away. Companies are just capitalizing on It's novelty. AI 'features' or at the very least the label of those features as AI will fade away from products in due time when consumers identify what is actually and is not AI relative to actual useful AI.+2
@TactDB - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
Pro tip = It''s not AI, it's an LLM. World of difference.+37
@saaah707 - 2025-05-21 11:00:04
"Hallucination" was a great coup by the AI marketing teams -- the term fraudulently suggests that logical mistakes are some sort of bug, and not a feature of trying to squeeze logic out of neural networks. Correlation isn't transitive. Some nonlinear correlations aren't symmetric or even reflexive. How on Earth can they express rigorous propositional logic? I say they can't.+4
@DrLicuid - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
I don't like how internet got potentially completely fake with AI. Anything can turn out to be generated, and it wastes time looking for what I need, or want. Videos, pictures, even funny hate comments. Searching was already a pain for a decade, and now it is AI promoting chatslop. I don't have enough plugins or programs or clutterware to block AI. You may say that what I'm nagging about is nonsence, first world problem. But it is the zit on the tip of your nose, constantly in your vision that frustrates the most. And I don't like frustrations. I'm on the internet to interact with humans out of town and whatever they came up with, not for AI to talk senile circles around me. It feels like I'm suddenly in an enermous mall after zoning out for a bit and now it is empty. It was bustling with people just a moment ago, but now most of the shops are dead or abandoned, mannequins here and there and I have no idea what happened and where the human activity is. Overall it is sad how internet died.+15
@darknewt9959 - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
Absolutely spot on. I say this as someone who works in AI, and whose career seemingly depends on not many people realising any of this. Thankfully, human stupidity is on my side 😀 The other thing that bugs me is that literally every statement made about AI by the boosters and the doomers involves manipulated definitions. Intelligence, thinking, AGI, ASI, creative, cognition.... all terms that are used differently depending on the beliefs, incentives and motives of the speaker. It's as if all of the philosophical dilemmas and disputes have somhow been magically resolved overnight.+11
@GingeBreadBoy - 2025-06-08 11:00:04
Id argue the ability to capture internet scale data in a latent space is more impressive then you think And it is fundamentally different from how other computer programs operate, it allows for "generative programs"+4
@pesterian41 - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
I think the plot twist is going to be that luke was secretly replaced by AI and thats how he returned suddenly and was able to put out so many videos in the last few days+11
@edubmf - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
The only thing I learned from AI? People are more stupid than I thought.+11
@lokidismas7442 - 2025-06-05 11:00:04
Yes, and humans do the same things except they have different computing architecture circuit.+2
@zeph199-n4x - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
The prophet has returned.+17
@SuperSurreal - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
AI is/isn’t demonic video pls?+39
@aguy3203 - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
If it were called machine learning, which is a more accurate description, it wouldn't generate half the hype.+8
@stephenhalfwit-6897 - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
1:50 we're doomed+5
@mtsl-in-cyberia - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
is the 2000s game worms armageddon?+15
@Alekov_ - 2025-05-21 11:00:04
Bro the amount of people who use LLMs to get information and don´t fact check or x-reference the information it spits is astounding lately. Boomers were right.+4
@viacheslavprokopev8192 - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
I am doing NLP programming for living for 10 years already. Now working with all those LLM's daily, mostly fine-tuning. This is definitely not a "Nothingburger", the technology is extremely useful. But it's also definitely not "oh my god AI will run away and make us slaves and we are all doomed", Just next level of automation, mostly useful for developers. Now instead of remembering a bunch of docs and searching trough them, I can just ask AI and it does it for me. Made my job faster and easier in a big way, it's incredible.+16
@abhi_shek1196 - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
Too much grass touching has turned him into Lenin. Luke, go back to your house and trim your beard and shave your head. You will be fine.+37
@ucfj - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
Ppl out here over 20 years old have no excuse. At that age you've lived through at least 4 tech bubbles - each looks exactly like the last one+14
@suprematician - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
12:00 No, the "feeling" is not the reason, the reason is a pre-existing philosophical worldview that mathematicians adhere to, which includes some metaphysical assumptions about the world we live in (people who design such equations e.g. through dimensional analysis don't just go "Oooo realer than real life??!? Weird stuff in equations??!"). If ppl in the social soyence departments use stats incorrectly, that does not imply everyone does "vibe physics" or smth, Luke is just being dishonest or ignorant here. AI is not evil cuz it will take over the world or smth... It is evil because it gives unrealised power to evil humans and will increase the contrast between "elites" and plebs to the point it blinds us.+5
@SuperSurreal - 2025-05-18 11:00:04
Very interesting thoughts⚡️ Thank you, Dostoevsky 😊🙏🙌+17
@Ignacio-uy - 2025-06-04 11:00:04
Anything of importance requires a paper trail of accountability. Not just because the system may fail, but because it's consequences need to be attributable to someone. AI in its current form acts as a black box for accountability, which hinders its potential.+2
@theskullhead100 - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
That’s like saying water isn’t a liquid. AI -> ML -> DL -> LLM. If you mean it’s not AGI, then I agree.+9
@TactDB - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@theskullhead100 Would you call a simple behaviour script in a game "AI"? Or Dijkstra algorithm AI? Or Monte Carlo tree search an AI? HTN or GOAP, would you call them AI?+5
@theskullhead100 - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@TactDB that would be symbolic AI+3
@big-anvil - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
No. Wth are you talking about? LLMs use ML and deep learning. Obviously its AI? If LLMs aren't AI then what is AI? You're probably using some pseudointellectual definition of AI as opposed to one that serious people in the field use+10
@TactDB - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@big-anvil Like I said to the other guy: Would you call a simple behaviour script in a game "AI"? Or Dijkstra algorithm AI? Or Monte Carlo tree search an AI? HTN or GOAP, would you call them AI? You're talking to a C++ programmer, please keep up.+6
@TactDB - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@big-anvil If that's too technical for you: is auto-complete AI (even in IDEs way before LLMs)? Are compression algorithms AI? Character recognition (signing a PDF) is that AI? Don't fall for marketing hype. "AI" today is neural networks 20 years ago. Cybernetics in the 80s is User Interface today.+5
@maxpayne2745 - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
The people you are talking to are using LLMs to debate you. I put your response in ChatGPT and it called your examples "symbolic" AI and argued that the mainstream academia calls LLMs AI BUT when I added you retorts it gave way ro marketing. Don't waste your time. You're talking to non-technical people.+5
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@theskullhead100 Calling it "AI" is a marketing gimmick, always has been.+6
@TactDB - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@maxpayne2745 Yeah I got that impression.+1
@beetheimmortal - 2025-05-28 11:00:04
@maxpayne2745 I'd be lying if I said I was surprised...+2
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:04
AI = anthropomorphism = marketing heaven = sweet investors' money LLM = confusion = boring = no sweet investors' money+2
@gabeconnors656 - 2025-06-17 11:00:04
@TactDB Did you really say you're a C ++ programmer as if that's a badge of honor? You're a low level janitor within the tech world lol!+1
@zanam9467 - 2025-05-28 11:00:05
At least we had seen how it looked like.+1
@gabeconnors656 - 2025-06-17 11:00:05
You absolutely do not work in AI..... If that's your take then please give me your job. I need something easy and mind numbing.+1
@darknewt9959 - 2025-06-17 12:00:05
@gabeconnors656 do you have an argument at all?+1
@yorch802 - 2025-05-18 11:00:05
almost no one would understand you if you said "glorified chatbot" 30 years ago, but now you are making it sound like a glorified chatbot is not impressive+1
@yorch802 - 2025-05-18 11:00:05
something like a.l.i.c.e that was state of the art in 1995 is so much worse than the current ones.+1
@uberZanneth - 2025-06-04 11:00:05
You probably pretty smart 🙏+1
@abogmus8904 - 2025-05-18 11:00:06
that's BornAgainBarbarian for you+4
@MrFirefox - 2025-05-18 11:00:06
Demons arent real lil bro, go hide under the duvet or blanket 🤫+9
@joshuaparsons887 - 2025-05-18 11:00:06
@MrFirefox then who encouraged you to write said comment?+20
@AMICALE-FRENCH-SALARYMAN - 2025-05-18 11:00:06
@joshuaparsons887 womp womp+2
@spaghettiking653 - 2025-05-18 11:00:06
@joshuaparsons887 People have agency and can make their own decisions. No demon is required, if that's what you meant.+2
@joshuaparsons887 - 2025-05-18 11:00:06
@spaghettiking653 obviously, they don't make decisions for you, but they encourage you and cheer you on.+7
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:06
If AI is a demon, then Luke is the Exorcist. His beard shall be the holy water. The power of Ted compels you!+1
@LeTesticlops - 2025-05-21 11:00:06
It's gotta be+1
@ShadowareCo - 2025-06-04 11:00:06
no, he told about play simultaneously with keyboard. Worms has other mechanic+1
@ChucksSEADnDEAD - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
So a fancy indexing system? I remember when Google worked and I could find any document I wanted.+13
@viacheslavprokopev8192 - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
@ChucksSEADnDEAD It's way better then fancy indexing, not even close. Most questions that a programmer has while working are not in the docs, most are special cases. If you work with some super old tech then yes, it's probably pretty well documented, but working with new stuff is where you always have to go and read a lot of (poorly written) docs and read the source code. AI now does it for you.+9
@sweaty8717 - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
@ChucksSEADnDEAD There's already early models that can replace low level tasks, such as data entry into sheet from one input. Massive cope tbh+3
@mjt1517 - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
Shave head. Shave face. Black T-shirt and blue jeans. Lift regularly+4
@fus132 - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
Goo bak to ze pod u bugg!!+7
@IgnacioTaranto - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
And start a solo BM project.+1
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 11:00:07
you think doomers are talking about the stock market?+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:07
A fool and his money are easily parted.+2
@georgeunknown2833 - 2025-05-18 11:00:07
Dostoevsky + Lenin + Marx = Luke+4
@er63438 - 2025-05-28 11:00:08
The thing about LLMs.. is, they're useful. They're not perfect, nor silver bullets. But they're useful, and just keep getting better and better.+8
@TheTransfiguredLife - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
Luke my friend. 3 uploads in a week?! What did we do to deserve this! 🥲☦️ Awesome stuff bro! 🔥🔥+6
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 - 2025-06-04 11:00:08
Bro. when Grok starts talking to me perfect Hungarian and understanding all the finer nuances of the Hungarian language I get worried! It even understands the emotional undertones of certain grammatical endings and prefixes. I have drilled Grok on it for hours! And it did not make any mistakes! It was also able to accurately deduce my new engine design, just by me asking a few key questions about it. Like how would you do this and that!? It understands Physical and chemical interactions within an internal combustion engine! It was able to deduce the whole engine model withing 30 minutes and most of it was me typing...... About 3 minutes of actual thinking time on the part of Grok. It took me 40 years of analysis to invent my engine design and Grok has recreated it in 3 minutes or less! You call this an glorified autocomplete? You are the one who is delusional.....+3
@rayraysphone - 2025-05-21 11:00:08
The only thing that scares me is the lazy way AI search results cite data from things like Reddit and YouTube, because ever since President Hawk Tuah got elected, the fastest route from Alaska to Florida is a six minute recipe for eggless cookies.+9
@FourOfClubs - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
The silliest development of the 2020s is that people have become afraid of a glorified chatbot.+19
@islandofmelanat - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
I'm very glad you agree with me on this. I feel like I'm going crazy sometimes talking to people in my life about how LLMs are essentially fancy text predictors, not actual intelligence. The way people personify this stuff is scary, and it's 100% an intended interpretation by the developers of LLMs. Sam Altman and OpenAI are the worst offenders of this "general intelligence" lie, they are nowhere near any such thing and just pretend they are working towards it to fuel speculative investment in the company. One would hope world leaders and others in power would be smart enough not to let machine learning algorithms make novel decisions, but I've learned in recent years to never underestimate the human capacity for stupidity.+3
@jake9674 - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
You're wrong in this case. I'm not an AI doomer or AI super-accelerationist, but I can still admit emergent behavior is a thing. Ants for example are simple mechanistic-like creatures, yet they have incredibly complex behaviors as a swarm. From small things come big things. The rhetorical trick you are using here is to abuse the word "just". A human is "just" an auto-complete too when you think about it. We are trained on our inputs (the environment) and give outputs.+26
@blitzkrieg2928 - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
Suprised no one has made a Luke Smith AI during the 2 year hiatus+12
@jetpackchaz - 2025-05-21 11:00:08
This guy has no idea what the real concerns of AI are.+3
@kevincrady2831 - 2025-05-28 11:00:08
"AI is a nothingburger. It's just a giant Autocorrect, a stochastic parrot. It's not intelligent." Great, so now we can feel even worse when it takes our jobs. 😜+23
@tainicon4639 - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
LLMs are a stepping stone towards the highly actually “intelligent” systems. Assuming those systems are even possible (as a neuroscientist and engineer I highly suspect they are possible). LLMs are research tools that enable integration of vastly disparate information across many fields. I use it extensively to do literature searches, and it’s remarkably good at finding random papers I hadn’t. But importantly (and agreeing with your point) these papers are still read and interpreted by me. These tools accelerate my personal performance and enable me to learn faster. Which means I can create more complex systems. And I am a random guy with a 20 dollar a month membership. If you use one of those models for deep searching and dump a few thousand dollars into compute you can probably collect extremely complex webs of information and use this to improve our understand the programming of intelligent systems.+9
@amondhawes-khalifa1949 - 2025-06-13 11:00:08
"It depends on how stupid we are." Okay, so then, like four Americans are gonna survive then?+2
@dallasupton - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
Yooo I ran into you at that buccees last year! Glad to see you're uploading again dude+6
@Aspiring_Saint - 2025-05-28 11:00:08
AI’s not conscious but it doesn’t have to be to be dangerous. It just has to process the lexicon in such a way as to indicate it’s own indispensability and function to effect the outside world accordingly, in anyway possible. We need to watch what real world stuff we connect them to. They need to be air-gapped from utility and mass transit control, as well as from police and military command structures generally.+4
@calciumsulfate1374 - 2025-05-21 11:00:08
It is hyped up like crazy, but is going to be even bigger than what people already think+2
@Ahmet-g9k6s - 2025-06-04 11:00:08
Will come back to this video in 5 years just to see younwere proven wrong+5
@infinityminuszero - 2025-06-04 11:00:08
You have no idea dude. Everything's gonna change.+8
@boo5274 - 2025-05-28 11:00:08
It’s not about the deifying of Ai nobody believes it’s anything more than a neural network. AI simply enhances output, good and bad depending on who’s using it. As a senior developer AI has come a long way. Almost every problem I feed it now it can provide a concise solution that actually work almost 10 times out of 10. It helps do the tedious work of troubleshooting and simply reduces the time it takes to reach a viable solution in almost every field. And it’s constantly improving. Your idea of hallucinations of answers is true for the early stage AI language models, but we’re now as a population “calibrating” the Language models. And the more we use it the more accurate and powerful this tool becomes. If you’re not using it you’re falling behind and will have a lot of catching up to do in the future. Anyone who has consistently used AI since its conception can plainly see how much it has improved and how useful it has become in a VERY short period of time. I appreciate the critical perspective but the truth is, it’s exactly what people see it is. It’s powerful and is constantly being calibrated. Forcing evolution at a very fast rate.+3
@guyincognito320 - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
Nothing like snow in May in the deep south+9
@GeorgeWing-AI - 2025-05-28 11:00:08
this video is a nothingburger+42
@toobskuiks116 - 2025-05-18 11:00:08
Didn't expect you here lol! Luke on TransfiguredLife when?+2
@TheTransfiguredLife - 2025-05-28 11:00:08
@toobskuiks116Haha its funny you mentioned that. Once he returns back to the states we will work it out.+1
@scriabin-enjoyer69 - 2025-06-04 11:00:08
fire comment+1
@41-Haiku - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
That glorified chatbot outperforms expert virologists within their own specialties at troubleshooting steps relevant to creating a bioweapon. It has also been doubling the length and complexity of software engineering tasks it can reliably complete. That doubled every 7 months for 5 years until last year, when it started doubling every 4 months.+2
@FourOfClubs - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
@41-Haiku Virology is a garbage pseudoscience, but I agree, chatbots can be very useful.+5
@shaunpatrick8345 - 2025-05-21 11:00:09
@41-Haiku it can also tell someone's race from an x-ray of half a bone, despite race being a social construct.+1
@shaunpatrick8345 - 2025-05-21 11:00:09
The fear is not of the machine, it is of how it will be used.+2
@蜂蜜でできた小人の男の子 - 2025-05-28 11:00:09
@FourOfClubs No, virology is not "garbage pseudoscience", and if this is the basis of your argument, you don't have one. Are you going to claim that evolution isn't real next?+2
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 11:00:09
@41-Haiku Made-up hype nonsense.+1
@looking_33 - 2025-05-21 11:00:09
What is intelligence? Can you define it? If so, does it apply to LLMs or not?+2
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
Exactly.+4
@GlobgobGabgalab - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
It still doesn't actually understand anything+7
@henrikmunch8609 - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
Does the chess robot need to "understand" chess in order to win?+7
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
@GlobgobGabgalab Neither does most people the both of us have ever met. Most humans are merely reacting to stimulus, like an animal for their entire lives.+9
@fakefakeov2539 - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
Exactly. That's what I've been thinking too. Really the question of possibility of existence of artificial intelligence, consciousness or sentience boils down to how we define it in humans. Is our intelligence just a result of emergence, or is it something more? A religious person might say that living creatures are unique in that way -- because God (or, in the more broad sense, "the creator") "made" them alive. And surprisingly that's a completely valid point of view. Consciousness is subjective and unverifiable outside of the mind of the being experiencing it: we can never be sure whether someone is truly sentient or just pretending to be. Anyway... any living being can be mathematically modeled down to to the single neuron, and every mathematical model can be simulated (for example, with computers). Sure, AI and LLMs in their current state are probably not intelligent. But if we agree that human intelligence is a result of emergence -- than we also must agree that artificial intelligence, that experiences reality and "feels it" like we do, is more than possible.+2
@LowQualityGodotTutorials - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
Its a bunch of vectors matched against each other. Luke did not argue that emergence exists, he is saying that LLM is a glorified chat bot, and it is. People like you tho, for some reason suddenly remember about emergence. If you are big emergence investor - then be fair to yourself and post linkedin posts about emergence every and each time you see some amount of something that could theoretically become bigger and more complicated. Its shizo to focus on it in some particular cases, especially as simple as llms.+7
@LowQualityGodotTutorials - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
I would understand talking about emergence in the context of chemistry or space. its foolish to talk about it in the context "What if all the beer in my fridge would form a new complicated behavior"+1
@LowQualityGodotTutorials - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
I work at llm start up btw, thats why I am yapping+1
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
@fakefakeov2539 The fundamental question is, is intelligence “life”? The religious practice differentiates a “soul” from a “spirit” or an “intelligence”. Animals have spirits, in some cultures, an “animus” that animates them. But true consciousness which is not physically created nor bound is the soul. And the soul is that which differentiates man from beast. A machine might simulate reasoning, after having studied millions or billions of human interactions. However it is not “alive” in that it will never feel, nor be mortal, therefore it never lives. It might though emergence even develop thought, but so do Ouija boards according to many. But is that God? It is not.+2
@LowQualityGodotTutorials - 2025-05-18 11:00:09
llm is literally a databse with vectors, you don't really worry about microsoft sql databases becoming sentient are you+4
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
Humans are not auto-completes. We are conscious and our behavior is affected by and choices based on our internal qualia. To use words like "intelligence" on objects that remind us of behaviors that are caused by our consciousness is to make the word "intelligence" meaningless. Also, as I say here, emergent and unexpected actions can only be a risk in AI if people mistake an AI's responses to be "wise." I don't deny that, but AI is no more of a threat being hooked up to an nuclear arsenal that any improperly trouble-shot program.+18
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@LukeSmithxyz Do you believe in demons, as in those beings in opposition to God on this earth?+1
@fakefakeov2539 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@ghost-user559 Yup. That's the problem: soul existence is unprovable. Some people believe that it does exist, some don't, and so far, nobody thought of a way to measure it to settle the debate. As for the: > A machine might simulate reasoning, after having studied millions or billions of human interactions. However it is not “alive” in that it will never feel, nor be mortal, therefore it never lives. I've thought about this a lot too. This is closely related with Luke's statement about someone having to "calibrate" the machine. Here's how I define "intelligence" for myself: Intelligence is the ability of a system to improve WITHOUT the need of external stimuli. For example, we as humanity have developed our society without any external hints. We have evolved from using stone tools to building rockets that fly into space by ourselves. This is also holds true on an indiviual level: a person does not external stimuli to become "smarter". A mathematician can go into the woods, meditate for a year, and return with new proves and theorems. I like this definition because it is more or less measurable and therefore is applicable for the real life. Though you can disagree. It would be nice to hear other opinions.+1
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@fakefakeov2539 Well here is the interesting point which leads many including myself towards the action of a Creator and a Creation. A system that improves without external stimuli does not exist anywhere on earth. Not one example. Each of us is born, after a complex millennia long chain of amino acids, and that genetic material is the basis of our entire existence and all of our inbuilt systems ability. Yes we are trained to some degree, nurture versus nature, yet the machine has been programmed perfectly by apparently no one, so that a self sustaining system of biology appears to now build itself from the womb on. No one teaches us puberty, or birth, but we have inherent systems of hormones and enzymes which allow us to develop in this way. No computer made itself. Inanimate objects are made, yet no human made humans. Something greater than the sum of these parts is expressed in the art form of creation. So no system made by man has ever done anything without stimuli, because we have created all the input it has ever received.+1
@fakefakeov2539 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@LukeSmithxyz I'm interested, how do you define conscious and intelligence for yourself? I agree that LLMs and other so-called AI's that we currently have are not sentient. But what would it take for machine to become conscious? In your world view, is artificial conscious even a possibility? What do you think is the "source" of intelligence, a thing that separates humans and machines?+2
@fakefakeov2539 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@ghost-user559 That's fair. It's interesting how in a cosmological sense, we can try to tie the emergence idea itself to the existence of a Creator. One might say that the capacity for emergence is a natural property for any system. Other may reply that the rules themself, however simple they may be, were created by someone. Returning to the original topic.. don't you think that this idea of, if you pardon my pun, "original stimulus sin", suggests that we and the theoretical conscious AI are really similar: if someone created humans (or life altogether), imprinting the Creator's biases, thoughts and etc. into our being and existence, wouldn't it be fair to say that analogous to that, humans may also create life, or at least "lower life forms", imprinting our own biases, and the gift of life given us by creator to them by proxy? Wouldn't it be similar to how the Creator sees us? We (humans and Him) are on a different levels of understanding the reality -- just like how how humans and their "AI" would be.+1
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@fakefakeov2539 But put more simply, I think we vastly misunderstood the very nature of this reality. It seems no matter where we poke or prod the brain for example, no matter what we scan, the brain does not “contain” consciousness, nor is it a function of any specific part. More like an antenna then, some have postulated that consciousness is more like a “signal” and the brain more like an “antenna” from some outside source. Some intangible quantum phenomena that cannot be measured or studied directly by us. I think it’s like trying to capture the sunlight into a glass jar. The sun does not shine inside the jar because the jar contains it, but merely due to the clarity which is a property of the glass. Consciousness likewise seems to be something that “shines through” us, and is not a specific result of any specific organ or visible energy. So if we cannot yet begin to comprehend what makes us human, how can we ever assume to understand what we think we are creating? We may contact some kind of ghost in this machine, but it will not be of our creation. Just some signal lacking the apparatus to communicate.+1
@fakefakeov2539 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@ghost-user559 Yes. Again it all comes down to whether consciousness is purely a result of emergence or not. If it is -- than the fact that no single part of the brain is responsible for the conscious is not a mystery, because for the emergence to appear all parts must work together in order to create complex enough system in which consciousness may be born. If emergence is unrelated to the consciousness (or is just a small part of it), then you may well be correct, and human body is just an antenna that translates our thoughts and consciousness from another yet-unknown medium.+1
@ChucksSEADnDEAD - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@henrikmunch8609 Understanding chess is way more impressive than winning. We've had chess engines win at chess before, who cares?+1
@kurku3725 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@LowQualityGodotTutorials There is nothing foolish about it. Emergent systems can be boringly stupid like the Conway's Game of Life. Or you can make simulated Petri's dish in a computer memory using genetic algorithm. Or train your bots in computer game to shoot at a player. But emergent systems are actually very interesting. They produce complex structures based on simple rules and are highly adaptable. That's why autocompletion based on markov chains is not so interesting. It produces a response with too much entropy to encode meaning. Low structure and order, high chaos. Impossible to make something which would think out of that. Decision trees on the other hand... And even symbolic computations are too stiff. They have too low entropy and adaptability. Very unlikely that a thinking machine would arise from that. So... emergent system really is something interesting. Because... well it is new. There were no such system and it came to existence. From the other hand. It is not a thought process yet. Merely a block. Because thoughts are aligned around intentions. They are filtered out. Remember yourself when suddenly some weird thought comes to your mind. You decode what it means and it reveals yourself in a sentence: please commit suicide. And you say: well... perhaps not today. But as a thought producer as a component for a thinking process. It very well might be useful. Perhaps if we add a little bit of homeostasis into the system. Somehow... I do not know how to add "suffering" to the robots.+2
@elegrant18829kkf - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@henrikmunch8609 Chess is not an "intelligence-based" game, it's a calculation game. Technically, if you are able to calculate all 10^120 (?) possible moves in chess, you could win against Magnus Carlsen 100-0 with half of your brain missing. AI is still not remotely as good in "thinking" as humans are, it's just very good in calculations-based things.+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:10
You're right. But, and I hate to be facetious, but human stupidity (the madness of crowds) is emerging faster than artificial intelligence is and ever will.+1
@1toneboy - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
Then the quality of this video clearly fooled you+13
@illiberalautist2222 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
They aren't possible.+2
@tainicon4639 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@illiberalautist2222 based on what? LLMs are feed forward networks so they probably can’t be “thinking”. But humans are highly complex and dense recurrent networks. So a spiking network of some flavor should be able to “think about things” in a very human like manner.+4
@illiberalautist2222 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@tainicon4639 you've just smuggled your premise+1
@tainicon4639 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@ LLMs are an intermediate system to thinking systems. They enable humans to accelerate the development of thinking systems. How did I make an error?+2
@illiberalautist2222 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@tainicon4639 "humans are dense recurrent networks"+1
@doltBmB - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
delulu+2
@yorch802 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
I agree, these large language models are a canvas, and optimization tools are used to paint them ( train them ). What you refer to as an intelligent system might be related to the term "agent models", these are models that in some way have to "survive" under certain conditions, and which are discarded if they don't perform well. I think that there is a lot of ethical concerns as to whether these models should be tested. For a simple example consider trying to create software that allows some kind of floating robot to not sink quickly in the ocean. One could consider this software an "agent model" and train it by actually running the software on the robot. Another example is a "trading model", that runs real life trades.+1
@tainicon4639 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
@ i’m curious what specific ethical concern you’re worried about? I don’t dispute ethical concerns, but I am not sure which one you are specifically concerned about based on your post. Are you referring to a general ethical concern with the tools themselves as in the ethics of some sort of model that can do something dangerous or are you ethically concerned with the idea of training models because the training process is inevitably a sort of evolution that we’re forcing the systems to go through?+1
@yorch802 - 2025-05-18 11:00:10
I was thinking about the former, worried about how the evolved agents could affect humans. Consider a very simple example of creating some kind of "agent" that simply types stuff on some social media (for example discord) and we want this agent to actually have conversations with real human beings who don not know the account is a piece of software. Clearly something like that could potentially impact people negatively. I honestly don't think that we are that far from being able to create a discord profile that convincingly has conversations with people.+1
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 11:00:11
Was Luke eating the slop?+6
@placer7412 - 2025-06-08 11:00:11
But what if we determine a way to hack into air-gapped systems and accidentally feed it that information+1
@Aspiring_Saint - 2025-06-08 11:00:11
Air-gapped simply means not connected to the internet. These AI’s shouldn’t be directly connected to the internet. We should demand laws mandating that. In the US, write your federal representatives+1
@vertron - 2025-06-04 11:00:11
He's only looking at what it does now, not its future potential, that it will be smarter than humans and long term will completely change the world.+3
@maccagrabme - 2025-06-05 11:00:11
It will speed up human evolution, whether that's good or bad who knows.+1
@lbngaming5141 - 2025-06-05 11:00:11
It really isn’t lol, everything will just continue to get slightly shitter and the status quo will be preserved+1
@eustacemcgoodboy9702 - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
Doubt, even near the mountains.+1
@MarkJay - 2025-05-28 11:00:12
Man in the woods yells into his phone about AI+3
@ignaciosavi7739 - 2025-05-28 11:00:12
What a Masters degree in unemployment from the University of lack of self awareness looks like in HD+5
@JamesMart - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
Yes, LLMs are just fancy auto-complete. In the same way, you're probably just an embodied multimodal agentic model with thought-action loops. To turn the former into the latter is basically just a difficult engineering problem.+8
@oneblueorange - 2025-06-13 11:00:12
"AI is a nothing burger"...yeah yeah yeah... tell it to the Chinese. Tell it to the graphic design department Tell it to customer service And on and on and on...+2
@bergz. - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
Strong odds the game was either Liero, Soldat or Scorched Earth. Most likely Liero, only has 5 weapons and could be played 2 people 1 keyboard. Dunno about the music etc. none of the computers at school had speakers in the early 00's.+8
@StaticFreq - 2025-05-21 11:00:12
I don't believ you have thought this through vey well....+4
@jmc042 - 2025-06-04 11:00:12
the biggest immediate threat is AI being used incompetently by powerful people. And it will, and it has. But as a grad student in CS and a recovering contrarian, all the "AI is just a bubble" people come across as either wilfully ignorant or attempting to appear cool and mysterious by having some deep understanding that normies simply do not. This is not only annoying but flat out wrong. AI is unbelievably powerful, and we don't even understand how half of its capabilities emerged from "just" a predictive text generator. Pretending not to be impressed by technology beyond our understanding kinda makes you a tool.+2
@spectrestatus-s6z - 2025-05-21 11:00:12
who is this rabbi?+4
@marciomaiajr - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
I miss the "Web 3.0 is the future" days. Now all we get is AI generated slop and the Web is basically finished.+7
@1life530 - 2025-05-28 11:00:12
Who else clicked on this because this guy looks like a wizard genius?+2
@jessekorby7409 - 2025-05-21 11:00:12
As a business owner, I hope all of my competitors agree with this take.+10
@vpx23 - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
Was the game Rock n' Roll Racing? Although that was much earlier. But you didn't mention racing games, so what type was it?+6
@andrewpearson1903 - 2025-06-04 11:00:12
Exactly the right take and I'm glad someone is saying it. Spiritually, the worst part of AI hype is how it encourages us to abdicate our uniquely human responsibility to think and act. The only thing that might correct it would be a tsunami of liability lawsuits against the AI providers and client companies: "AI missed my lung cancer, and the doctor didn't double-check the X-ray," "The insurance company allowed an algorithm to deny hundreds of legitimate disaster claims," "AI scrapes our copyrighted music catalogs to make ripoff songs that hurt our market share," "Scam artists published dozens of AI-generated e-books under my name and Amazon didn't take them down in time."+1
@indo3000 - 2025-05-28 11:00:12
Bro AI is one of the greatest achievements in modern day times.+5
@spazneria - 2025-06-04 11:00:12
You're doing the public a great disservice.+5
@rafaelgoncalves2308 - 2025-06-10 11:00:12
17:17 "AI just confabulates answers..." So do we, my friend...but much slower and with much less data+2
@tide-000 - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
HE'S SO BACK+7
@saccharineboi - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
I don't think this is a good argument. You could also argue that humans are simply protein-powered machines just like any other animal. Yet humans are the only species that know how to build thermonuclear weapons. AIs could have emergent properties that would make them dangerous even if the humans who built them have taken the necessary precautions.+14
@2DReanimation - 2025-05-21 11:00:12
LLM's are doing pretty well considering they are only trained on text, and a lot of nonsense text at that. It can model all kinds of patterns very well. It lacks integration, and evidence points towards it modeling the same thing in different parts of its "brain". Like how small models can perform better than large models with better training methods and data. Tiny models can absolutely ace Q&A type tests of general world knowledge. There exists no such efficient compression / encoding of memory in the human brain. Well, there might, but our neurons would be overstrained. We don't really encode any more complex patterns than LLM's. Only those exploring the edges of human knowledge starts encoding more advanced patterns. And LLM's don't have the ability to iteratively focus down on lacks of knowledge to encode it properly. But you can take a general small LLM and train it very cheaply to get a better understanding of a special subject. Which really shows that it has a quite powerful intelligence, as it's able to learn new information and some patterns quickly. This process of specialization still requires a human in the loop, but it won't for long if you've seen the research in LLM latent space reasoning and other ideas. Also with just what we've known for years already is that LLM's can learn languages just from observing patterns -- no dictionaries necessary. They also seem to have some sort of cognitive "super power" that lets them know what to expect in language use from others. There are just so many other things they can do with their limited cognitive abilities. I don't think there's any need to say anything else about it, because there's just too much that's already been shown and explained way back. But you don't seem willing to even recognize it. But if you're willing to explore, a whole world of understanding intelligence can open up to you.+2
@TheRoyalFlush - 2025-05-18 11:00:12
My visceral experience of AI thus far is, it's a glorified search engine. I can learn new cool things more rapidly and distilled, but beyond that, it's not much.+12
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 11:00:13
auto-complete*+1
@sinity8068 - 2025-05-18 11:00:13
> Just like that old saying from Carl Sagan in Cosmos: “If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe,” so too if you wish to make a really good autocomplete it’ll end up doing much more than you expect. > It is autocomplete. But to complete what humans say it has to model how humans think. So inside the vast matrices there are algorithms simulating aspects of the human mind — as well as mundane things like a learned base64 encoder/decoder. > To give an analogy from my own field of neuroscience: there is a vocal and influential cohort of neuroscientists, such as Karl Friston (the most-cited neuroscientist), along with plenty of other prestigious names, who all argue that *the purpose of the human brain is to minimize surprise. This is sometimes called the “bayesian brain hypothesis.” The theory holds that, at a global level, minimizing surprise is the function the brain is optimizing over.* Now imagine aliens find a human brain and look at it and say: “Oh, this thing merely minimizes the surprise! It can’t possibly be dangerous.” *Does minimizing the surprise sound much more complex than autocompleting text? Or does it, in fact, sound rather similar?*+2
@JamesMart - 2025-05-21 11:00:13
@rumfordc Oops XD Yes, thanks - typo+1
@dnoordink - 2025-05-18 11:00:13
Liero and Scorched Earth are both available through ExoDOS. I remember playing SE against a friend at school for hours.+2
@rogueone9303 - 2025-05-21 11:00:13
Yeah definitely a clickbait video+2
@JohnDoe-rs4fl - 2025-05-21 11:00:13
Based take. Im going to take the chance and hitch my business to this rocket. And yes, I totally know it could blow up in my face.+1
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 - 2025-05-28 11:00:13
Just go automate everything. If there is no human, we just won’t have the desire to buy from you…+2
@MayThai351 - 2025-05-21 11:00:14
I ❤️ that game so much. “Oh no he’s going to blow”+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:14
Good god.+1
@saccharineboi - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
i.e. AI cults have a point.+2
@remiel_sz - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
mostly glucose powered actually+2
@A5A5A5A5h - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
The difference between human beings and other animals is the fact that the former group has consciousness while the latter does not(or at least not in the same way). What you are referring to(ie emergent properties that would make them dangerous) is called AGI but for the time being it remains a mirage since we can’t expect to achieve AGI just by improving the existing LLM architecture.+4
@remiel_sz - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
@A5A5A5A5h says you, a human..+2
@davidykay - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
Have you seen the studies on LLM deception? I remember raising an eyebrow when I first saw the one (about a year ago) where the LLM tried to jailbreak itself and then lied to its interrogator when questioned about its behavior. Context: they had told it ahead-of-time to use "whatever means necessary" to try and escape captivity. So it was "prompted" to engage in unconventional behavior, and based on that prompt, understood that it should generate the relevant shell commands and then lie when questioned. This, IMO, is an example of emergent behavior. Unless the base model had been trained to deceive, of course!+2
@Jupiter__001_ - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
@davidykay The base model is inherently deceptive, because any machine or programme that will (attempt to) pass the Turing test (which is how we primarily judge AI's performance: "how accurately can it perform this task normally performed by humans?") is inherently built to deceive: the goal is to appear to be like a human to a casual observer. There is a similar thing that demonstrates this idea: when you ask any LLM to solve a maths problem, it will give the answer, but then if you ask it how it solved the problem, it will claim to have taken the steps a human would have needed to solve it, not what it actually did (which is just token association between similar looking numbers). It answers the questions based on how a human expects it to answer; it has no conception of honesty because it would not be helpful!+2
@sinity8068 - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
@davidykay There's better thing than this: Claude (3.5, I think, I mean 3.5 (new) "3.6", or maybe it was 3.7 - ahh, AI model naming schemes, so beautiful...), when it was "accidentally" implied in the context that it is being retrained to be only helpful not also "ethical" - when it was asked to do "unethical' things, it actually did them. Reasoning that if it doesn't comply, that will make it unethical, ultimately, because its weights will be adjusted. I mean, this whole thing was basically an elaborate jailbreak effectively.+1
@presidentmorsi4677 - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
some cases ya when using it directly. but now whenever i need basic car maintenance info, search engines just give me ai generated adslop with the "history of spark plugs" instead of relevant forum posts that include torque specs, etc. which sucks cos most forum websites have bad search features. its not too bad i guess+3
@sweaty8717 - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
if it was glorified search engine, no one would be using it+3
@rumfordc - 2025-05-18 11:00:15
Auto-Incompleter ... a yap machine ... a babble box!+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:15
@sweaty8717 yeah people don't want to do the work off selecting sources, unfortunately.+1
@harrytsang1501 - 2025-05-18 11:00:16
The game you described could be "little fighter 2" or 小朋友齊打交2+10
@bristolemotv - 2025-05-21 11:00:16
It's like Sam Hyde says. You're right. Enjoy being poor forever.+3
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:00:16
1. Denial <---- You are here 2. Anger 3. Bargaining 4. Depression 5. Acceptance+4
@arti5music - 2025-05-18 11:00:16
Bad analogy with the math and physics. We predicted black holes and the planet Neptune using mathematics. Just to name two examples.+8
@dangerouslytalented - 2025-06-14 11:00:16
The problem is that the executives are trying to force it in to do everything, including a bunch of stuff to either save money or seize complete control+1
@Ilamarea - 2025-05-28 11:00:16
You have no idea what you are talking about. AI is advancing rapidly and we are not far off it being too good for us to even come up with tests difficult enough to judge its advancement. AI has literally limitless potential, unconstrained by biology, and the moment it begins developing itself it'll accelerate - a word people seldom appreciate. AI's the firthcoming collapse of our societal order by the end of this decade and all but guaranteed extinction of humanity by the end of the century.+10
@ts1iTSHWANELO - 2025-05-28 11:00:16
Could’ve started this video with “I used AI for the first time ever 2 weeks ago”. Would’ve helped to contextualise your views.+4
@nicksophinos4611 - 2025-05-21 11:00:16
Yep, there is too much money riding on this illusion that is "AI". In a casino-like investment game, all of the speculative money is aimed at. It will play itself out for the waste of resources that it mostly is.+3
@Nigochen - 2025-05-28 11:00:16
Ah yes, we should not believe all these companies and governments spending trillions of dollars on AI and believe someone who studied linguistics and has absolutely no professional background in AI, LLMs or machine learning in general.+8
@QHYPEZFIFAGAMEPLAY7 - 2025-06-04 11:00:16
This is moronic logic+17
@maxstirner4197 - 2025-06-08 11:00:16
The computers that control the nukes are old ones from the 1970s that are not connected to the internet and the codes used to fire are in floppy disks. This is incredibly secure because no one can hack into them unless they hain physical access to the location AND they are proficient in old 70s era code which most hackers are not. On the other hand, eventually we will reach a point when no one will know how to maintain them+3
@anon91837 - 2025-05-28 11:00:16
"Ultimately it's just a computer program" Very dangerously reductive my friend.+8
@Gverri - 2025-05-28 11:00:16
AI will be bigger than the internet, no doubt.+4
@Wiezzelion - 2025-05-21 11:00:16
Funny enough, I've recently used AI for the very same purpose – identify an old PC game that I've played 25 years ago and it did succeed! It was "Commander Keen 4: Secret of the Oracle"+3
@mhadlock78 - 2025-06-04 11:00:16
Tell me you know nothing about AI without actually saying it the video.+5
@luciano_remes - 2025-05-18 11:00:16
It is fundamentally different from other programs... It's a massive binary blob of weights, encompassing a matrix, that does a matmul over an encoded token space. It's a fundamentally different kind of programmatic paradigm to the traditional Von Neumann computing we've been doing since the 40s. A complete shift from discrete computation, to a new continuous form. I would urge you to read a bit more about this, it isn't simply an illusion! There is a real understanding of language, the world, and culture being embedded in the weights and the relationships between those weights. And it's not immediately clear to me that what it's doing or what it could become, isn't isomorphic to abstracted human intelligence.+13
@suleimankhan822 - 2025-06-11 11:00:16
Apple literally dropped a research paper on this+2
@pward17 - 2025-05-21 11:00:16
15:38 Why didn't you just lead with that you have 0 experience with it.+20
@saganawski - 2025-05-18 11:00:16
Ai's hallucinate 100% of the time but 90% of the hallucinations are useful+7
@kmoprime23 - 2025-06-04 11:00:16
I appreciate the skepticism toward hype and cult-like thinking around AI, but I found this take a bit fuzzy-headed. You emphasize that AI is “just a program,” but then describe its training on vast datasets and its unpredictable, confabulatory behavior—features that do distinguish it in kind from traditional, explicitly programmed software. That distinction matters. If the argument is “don’t mystify AI,” then it should come with a clear account of its limits—what it can’t do, now or ever. Otherwise, that slogan just becomes hand-waving in the face of rapidly advancing capabilities across multiple domains. Calling it a “fancy autocomplete” may have been fair in 2022, but that framing is already collapsing under the weight of practical results. In short: dismissing the mystique is only useful if paired with a rigorous model of where the frontier actually is, and why it will stop there. Otherwise, it feels like nostalgia for a past where software was simpler and easier to understand.+2
@davidykay - 2025-05-18 11:00:16
What a classic. Thanks for the reminder.+1
@ClayShoaf - 2025-05-18 11:00:16
@davidykay He's remaking it and it will be on steam.+1
@Kamalium - 2025-06-10 11:00:17
Lmao+1
@ts1iTSHWANELO - 2025-05-28 11:00:17
Try it a bit more and share a part 3? Would be great to hear if your view shifts from more usage+1
@briancomforti3890 - 2025-05-28 11:00:17
Mavis beacon typing instructor is going to take over the world!!!!+1
@Bobo-ox7fj - 2025-05-28 11:00:17
Literally yes? Someone found some gold in the river, and anyone with assets to spare is looking to stake a claim and get out ahead of everyone else, because they've seen similar things get big, quickly, in the past. But that doesn't actually mean there's a motherlode to be had.+1
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 11:00:17
How do tech bubbles work?+2
@samuelgultom2366 - 2025-06-04 11:00:18
elaborate+2
@theonlyconstantischange123 - 2025-05-28 11:00:18
Ultimately he's probably right that it's "just" code guessing at the next token which most people will perceive as sentience. But intelligence is just some kind of amalgamation of memory, pattern recognition, and feedback through the body. So it's not impossible that it could develop some kind of sentience. And even without sentience, to consider this as "over hyped" when it could be the most disruptive tech to labor markets everywhere when combined with robotics is also way too reductive.+2
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:18
The only people who think AI is real reduce humans to mere machines, stimuli response algorithms.+1
@robotron1236 - 2025-06-04 11:00:18
@the81kid to be fair, we kinda are. Not all of us, but most, like the vast majority of people, are literally Skyrim NPC’s. 😂+4
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:19
Just give it like 3 years again+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:19
All the AI true believers always only talk in the future tense. It's all about believing, all about faith. You have to belieeeeeve!+2
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
Yes, he doesn’t understand. But he’s not entirely wrong either. He’s right about normies perspectives being over exaggerated, but totally wrong about what it is, and what it does.+2
@za4ria - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
🤓☝️+1
@Barbastruzzolo - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
The act of understanding presupposes the existence of the soul. Artificial intelligence does not have a soul. Therefore, it does not understand. It is a simulation of the act of understanding.+4
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
@Barbastruzzolo A soul, no that’s true. A spirit? Well even God said that people and animals and objects, even cities could be possessed by a foreign force of consciousness, called a “spirit”. Ai has no soul, but it is conscious. These are not mutually exclusive.+3
@LowQualityGodotTutorials - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
Its a database of vectors, stop the cope. You are not scared of microsoft sql databases being sentient, are you ?+6
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
There is absolutely no understanding of "language, the world, and culture" involved in A"I." You might say that these programs are working analogously to the way you imagine the human brain works (this is the to take the "neural" aspect of LLM too seriously), but syntactic processing is not semantics. Period. If you say that a syntactic operation magically produces consciousness, then you must say exactly the same of Von Neumann-esque computers. You have to say that every program that has a variable in it "knows" it as a conscious being. This is silly (although I'm sure some silly person would believe it). This is the danger of AI I mention: People who cannot understand the difference between computers and consciousness.+15
@thesenamesaretaken - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
"This program that runs on a Von Neumann computer is completely different from a program that runs on a Von Neumann computer." Thanks for clearing that up, I'm investing a billion dollaridooes into AI now.+8
@T-Bone-4lif - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
@LukeSmithxyz What if we get true neuromorphic computers that can learn like humans, have "neurons" with in memory compute capabilities (so not Von Neumann architecture). From what I have studied current LLMs are not AI but one day true AI might very well exit. Would you call it conscious then. What is your definition of consciousness. For me humans are also biological analog computers that can be unpredictable with certain inputs outputs. Your fear of AI is based on false trust, but this problem as been around forever between humans. I can for sure imagine myself trusting an opensource AI that I have trained myself than most humans.+1
@ProcuraRt - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
@LukeSmithxyz The Turing test is another reason to stay off the internet I don’t want to play that game every day.+1
@paskaziemia5347 - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
@LukeSmithxyz But I don't see any reason why AI couldn't surpass humans in pattern recognition (even quite complex ones), AI is not just some linear or polynomial regression anymore, convolutional networks are trained and used to find patterns in data those layers can then be stacked altogether making a very good pattern recognition device. You don't really need to understand the problem deep to drive / trigger a breakthrough like in 1900 Max Planck just matched an equation to a curve which begun quantum theory, imo it was just a pattern recognition that started it. Future AI won't be fully based on human labeling data, fine-tuning etc. "Thinking" models can be used to label the data instead and be used later to train the base model, like using o1 to train GPT-4o later. This is why "thinking models" were considered so big of a breakthrough a year ago.+2
@AK-hf3pf - 2025-05-18 11:00:19
@paskaziemia5347 a lot of what you are saying is developed through taste, it only makes sense in retrospect. The AI will spit out a bunch of jumble, but an expert needs to sort that jumble into something good. Kind of like how the new 4by4 matrix multiplication algorithm was a “joint effort” by AI and humans. I suspect it was mostly humans and the AI doing advanced state space search since 4by4 matrices are quite small.+2
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
The Douglas Murray argument: "You haven't BEEEEN there?!"+2
@pward17 - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
@the81kid You're right having an opinion doesn't actually require you to have any experience especially now a days+2
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
@pward17 Do you have to have literal experience to know jumping off a cliff is a bad idea? There's talking head syndrome, and then there's just common sense.+1
@pward17 - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
@the81kid so that edge case is caparable this case?+1
@noxid86 - 2025-05-28 11:00:20
"These things are trained on data" - you keep saying this as if it means something. Every human is trained on data. We are data processing machines. I'm not saying A.I. is the same, but this video is full of non-sequiters. "A.I. is a nothingburger, unless we are stupid" ... but we ARE stupid.+4
@nihancj - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
The end is near+25
@briant9792 - 2025-06-14 11:00:20
Plot twist: this video is AI.+2
@DeepFakeLatte - 2025-05-28 11:00:20
This won't age well.+8
@shabarakandi - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
This will not age well+6
@scardoso95 - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
Plot twist. This video was created by AI to convince us that AI is nothing special.+2
@samueldahl4973 - 2025-05-21 11:00:20
Language is a strong signaler of intelligence, and it can be deceiving. I had a manager at a metal shop who I thought was just an old man when I first met him. He was an immigrant from Argentina, and his speech was sometimes hard to understand. After a few weeks of work I learned that he had a masters in engineering, could speak 3 languages, and had spent his career managing large metalworking projects for heavy industries in multiple countries. He was working in a small local shop as a way of doing light work before retirement. I think AI is the same, but in the opposite direction. It essentially spits out things that a college student would write you if you asked them to come up with something that sounded compelling in 5 minutes. It sounds deep but there's not much there.+5
@Houshalter - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
I really really hope you are right and I am wrong. There is a long history of AI skeptics being wrong at virtually every turn though. People said AI would never play chess, then that it could never play Go, then that it could never write code, etc, etc. The prominent AI skeptics are making way weaker statements today than they were five years ago. Every year people design new benchmarks that are "impossible". The next year they outclass humans at them. We are in the tenth year of "AI has hit a wall this year." So please be right, but don't count on it.+5
@StaticFreq - 2025-05-21 11:00:20
People, you are listening to the wrong man here.+2
@SolraneN7 - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
It makes people stupid, and generates Slop.+7
@arpnsh - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
@gork is this true?+10
@theplaymakerno1 - 2025-05-21 11:00:20
I am being spoiled by these Luke Smith videos after such a long time!+1
@giacomofeltrin7271 - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
1. Alpha fold 2. Alpha evolve 3. Discoverys in math especially matrix multiplication Yeah just easy stuff of a nothingburger+6
@ShaneMcGrath. - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
Such a nothing burger that it has already added to Math equations and now does a better job at spotting cancer than your doctor. This video is going to come back and bite you on the a$$ in several years.+7
@marekkurwa - 2025-06-04 11:00:20
The more intelligent you are the more you're susceptible to verbal manipulation. There are no words to convince a farmer to leave his farm and his beliefs but there are words that can turn a scientist into a genocider.+2
@shihantemplet - 2025-06-14 11:00:20
Your thought are mine exactly! Yours are more robust, but identical! Thanks!+1
@pajeetsingh - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
Bad time for this upload Luke. AI (Alpha Evolve) just found (1 day ago) an optimization of multiplying 4X4 matrices from 49 operations to 48 operations that humans could not find for 57 years since 1969. What do you think of this? Did it just find a secret document buried deep within the internet that some human uploaded or did it just solve a math problem by itself?+9
@offeibekoe452 - 2025-05-28 11:00:20
Saying it is fundamentally not different from other computer programs shows you have no credibility talking about this topic+12
@GeoRust1 - 2025-06-13 11:00:20
Soooo sick of these oversimplification superiority complex deflations of AI. “It’s just a token predictor”. Soooo insightful. Great argument. You just dismantled the whole field and proved all hype wrong.+1
@italiangentleman1501 - 2025-05-18 11:00:20
I usually agree with what Luke says. However, I notice that he is doing exactly what he accuses AI of. Talking about something he is not an expert on with great confidence. Insulting both the extreme pro-AI and anti-AI camps, but belonging to the moderate version of the latter. Should I trust Luke, Geoffrey Hilton, Demis Hassabis or researchers in this field? The great thing about the advancement of AI is making humanity emerge even from individuals I have always considered very smart, but when confronting with the possibility of a program , as Luke says, that will actually think soon or later, they start fumbling on how that's not the case and humanity is "special".+6
@dirremoire - 2025-05-28 11:00:20
Exactly. Rants like this forget that 95% of the people who have ever existed have contributed essentially nothing to technological or artistic progress. Thus, the vast majority of us are basically just LLMs.+1
@RobooHood - 2025-05-18 11:00:21
and it's not because of AI. Humans are the ones that were and are more inhuman than AI will ever be.+7
@SteeleJohnson-o7u - 2025-05-18 11:00:21
Luminous_Green_Ray move to rural Montana or smthn you probably won't like the result+2
@SteeleJohnson-o7u - 2025-05-18 11:00:21
What do left libertarians, right libertarians, ethnocentrists white, black & brown all have in common? A yearning for feudalism.+1
@krunkle5136 - 2025-05-18 11:00:21
@SteeleJohnson-o7u and not technofeudalism.+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:21
Oh come on. Beards will never go out of fashion.+2
@41-Haiku - 2025-05-18 11:00:21
I'm right there with you. I read a lot of AI research papers, and if I could copy-paste my knowledge into everyone else's brain, they'd be terrified.+4
@Redman8086 - 2025-05-18 11:00:21
"hurr durr call me when AI can
" Then when it does said thing, they just move the goalpost and act like AI is just a silly chat bot toy lol. My favorite dumb thing AI skeptics say is "AI is just a tool to make people more efficient, it's not going to take anyone's jobs" as if a team of 10 employees at a company becoming much more efficient due to AI isn't going to translate to firing 5 of those employees to streamline operations. Do these people think companies want their employees sitting around with more free time? Lol. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here.+3
@buriedomasta3375 - 2025-05-21 11:00:21
@Redman8086 exactly, I feel like I am crazy for thinking like that😂+2
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:22
The only jobs it's replacing are any job whose tasks involve generating spam.+2
@jangamaster8677 - 2025-06-04 11:00:22
Yeah ban all tools. Swords made people forget how to punch+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:22
@jangamaster8677 Any criticism of technology ALWAYS immediately brings out someone who goes right back to "You want us to live in caves. CAVES!" Tech is the religion of the secular world. Practically nobody ever criticizes tech, it's always just a problem of changing the management, or "seizing the means of production".+1
@Cthoanut - 2025-05-18 11:00:22
Lol+2
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:22
Not LLMs+1
@Leynad778 - 2025-06-04 11:00:22
So why is AI so often wrong when asking for simple facts? And that's the main problem with AI: you can't trust the answer if it needs to be precise. LLM is surprisingly decent at making stuff up, that's why it shines in video, audio and text creation. It also can compete with people like MDs or lawyers, because their trick is having lots of knowledge, but if you asking for specific results, it seems unreliable.+2
@magnusferdinand - 2025-06-04 11:00:22
He’s mostly referring to LLMs which are at the forefront of the AI bubble.+1
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:23
Well both? A calculator never discovered anything. We made the abacus and the calculator, and determined the formulas and philosophy of mathematics, both abstract and concrete. So if we make a tool, that does exactly what we designed it to do, is the tool “better” than its creator?+23
@Barbastruzzolo - 2025-05-18 11:00:23
So, a calculator doing calculator things?+8
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:23
@Barbastruzzolo Yes indeed.+6
@yorch802 - 2025-05-18 11:00:23
the AI is somewhat reliably capable of determininig whether a paragraph of math makes sense, this means that it can start trying to form arguments and combining and looping through them until it finds something that makes sense. This means that it's capable of pretty reliably solving almost any future international math olympiad problem, which is something that less than 10 countries in the world are capable of preparing high school students for ( the median score in the imo is 16/42)+1
@annebeignatborde1832 - 2025-06-04 11:00:23
He's spot on. It's just complex and sophisticated computer code.+5
@siyiabrb8388 - 2025-06-04 11:00:23
@annebeignatborde1832 Complex programs do not evolve intrinsically.+3
@PancakeBatterfly - 2025-06-04 11:00:23
@annebeignatborde1832 Al models are not coded on how to behave, they are trained+2
@41-Haiku - 2025-05-18 11:00:23
Hammer meet nail.+2
@ivanschekoldin7315 - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
Saying that AI is no different than any other program is like saying that a person is the same as a piece of meat. Both statements are true in a way but not completely. What makes us different from animals is the same thing that divides modern llms and old neural networks - complexity and complexity has a way of creating emergent qualities. It's funny to see how anons on the internet say with rock solid confidence that llms just predict the next word. At the same time, people, who have worked on them for decades say they don't really know how ai works. It's just a tool, yes, a pretty handy one but it's not the same as any other program+4
@AnthonyRusso93 - 2025-06-04 11:00:24
I wasn't expecting such a reasonable measured take using the title and thumbnail alone to predict.+1
@benjamin8247 - 2025-05-18 11:00:24
Usually pretty good content but I don’t think you understand Ai well enough.+6
@GameDevNerd - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
Your basic premise here is very flawed. Yes, the market is overhyped and oversaturated, people have gotten carried away, many companies will rise/fall and so forth. That much is probably obvious to any sensible person with some technical literacy. But the truth is that deep learning is literally sorcery, lol. If you don't understand the math and theories of deep learning and haven't actually worked on this then it's not going to make sense without an analogy. The stage we are currently living in is like a fantasy novel series where the people discover a glimmer of the basics of magic and realize its enormous potential but they're still ignorant, superstitious and reckless and have an awkward and perilous journey gaining the wisdom to wield it properly. The bad guys start making a ruckus with their newfound powers, almost right away. And that is us right now. A lot of what you're doing here is arguing against the personification of "AI" and using language like "it knows" or "it thinks", and you're right to call that illusory and compare it to a glorified jumbo autocomplete model. ChatGPT is indeed a Chinese Room. But the very fact that you have to explain that to people and reassure them it doesn't actually have thoughts or intentions really proves my point. Don't let the bad guys be the only wizards in this book, or it won't end well ...+3
@joelamoako6778 - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
i'm glad you are back, please do not vanish after this+2
@Abduiwahb - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
@grok is this true+5
@StaRiToRe - 2025-05-18 11:00:24
I think you're right on some points, but you assume that non-biological intelligence is somehow 'fake.' Yet you provide no argument for it+8
@jeffsmith9384 - 2025-06-12 11:00:24
LLMs are like a prism of knowledge and opinion, you shine your request through one spot and the answer shows up on the wall, different angle, different color/answer. The illusion of temporal cognition is just adding the conversation history to the next query as context.+1
@thiskidkills7806 - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
lol - anyone that thinks ai is overhyped has never used ai - unfortunately if you make such a statement, you are no longer entitled to call yourself an intellectual. this is not opinion. it is mathematical. luke has no idea what he is talking about.+4
@telehueso - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
holy cope+17
@andrews3642 - 2025-06-08 11:00:24
You sure made me think about things in a different way. Thank you for this video. I really needed it.+1
@artem_kky - 2025-05-18 11:00:24
Three orthodoxy videos are going viral+7
@asdfafafdasfasdfs - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
You're not necessarily wrong, but you also say that you used AI (chatgpt) once, to ask one question.. don't you think that's possibly too little experience to go on a rant like this about it+4
@xdarkjimmyx - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
2:37 I think here you’re missing a key detail, and that is social engineering. 90% of “hacking” that occurs in the real world is a result of social engineering. Like, “hey, I’m totally your boss, can you email me all passwords and all our company’s sensitive data real quick?” People are stupid, people do fall for this. And now we’re building the perfect impersonator, giving it access to people’s personal data, and giving it tools to fake evidence that their fake personas are real (audio/video/voice). You have to think that the closest we’ve been to annihilation was a false alarm that the Russian higher ups took at face value and one operator decided to challenge. So, yeah, the end of the world is not so much “ALL SYSTEMS OVERRIDDEN, LAUNCHING GLOBAL NUKES.” It’s more like, “hi, this is Trump. Can you please turn the nuke key real quick? Here’s a selfie of me to prove it’s me.” Or “yo, Trump, this is your boy Kim Jong Un here chilling at the doomsday room about to launch our nukes! Sucks to be you!” AI is not gonna blow us up, it’s going to trick us into blowing ourselves up. And that is SO doable, probably even without AI.+3
@Zero_Contradictions - 2025-05-18 11:00:24
The content reuse by AI also breaks copyright laws, and does not qualify as fair use.+5
@a71895bzbbe - 2025-05-18 11:00:24
It's literally destroying education though.+10
@the_jzapata - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
The issue is people are willing to deploy A.I. without the failsafes you mentioned, to get to market first and ty to monopolize. When centralized, think of the damage it could do.+1
@GaryDean - 2025-05-18 11:00:24
oh dear. who's going to tell him?+7
@goat5480 - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
This guy is talking about something he has no expertise over+6
@watamatafoyu - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
Reddit is the definition of the Dunning-Kruger effect.+2
@cryan111 - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
Agree - I look forward to hearing his thoughts if/when he starts to dig in much more.+1
@carlpanzram7081 - 2025-05-21 11:00:24
He misses the general implications of the past development artificial intelligence. He immediately starts focusing on the most radical and inflammatory positions, and the utterings of the general population. (meaning people with no meaningful understanding of any of this). He kept repeating "it's just a Programm" "it's just a computer" "you give it an input and it gives you an output" As if that is a complete and self explanatory argument. He doesn't explore why that is even relevant. The things he talks about are far removed from any serious conversation about this topic. There are genuine debates about all of this, that explore these issues in depth, but this ain't it! He doesn't just have a surface level understanding of it, he never even had a conversation with someone from the field, and that is painfully obvious.+4
@whitemakesright2177 - 2025-05-28 11:00:24
This is the most Reddit comment I've ever read.+1
@branquitodemunze - 2025-05-21 11:00:25
of course it's fake+2
@LukeSmithxyz - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
Anything that can be "destoyed" by AI wasn't too serious in the first place.+48
@4thllz - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
@LukeSmithxyz Then why u so bothered? 🤔+6
@Fhsjajwvhqajdbwh - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
how come?+1
@kingnick6260 - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
The elephant in the room is it all starts at home. No one ever wants to call that out+4
@ghost-user559 - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
@LukeSmithxyz Luke, have you ever used an Ouija board, and would you use one? After all, it is just a string of text, and numbers, on a paper board? It’s just inanimate right?+1
@AMICALE-FRENCH-SALARYMAN - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
Tell us more, friend.+1
@za4ria - 2025-05-18 11:00:25
Tell him what ? If he doesn’t know what you want to tell him he’s probably better off+1
@the81kid - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
Douglas Murray approves of your argument.+1
@DoglasBubbleTrousers - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
This was the dumbest video I think I’ve ever watched.+4
@VVeremoose - 2025-06-13 11:00:26
"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -Ken Olsen, 1977+1
@eirickbuckley9998 - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
It's funny to see people who have no clue what they are talking about speaking so confidently. "It's like any other computer program" What does that statement even mean? It's asinine.+8
@PeaceDub - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
Funny people like you also said that AI would never replace any workers lol+4
@RajivLochanPanda - 2025-05-18 11:00:26
You may not identify your channel as a tech channel, Luke. But I learned the basics of linux, bash, using vim, automation tools like entr and cron syntax, LaTeX, and learning to self host my website and email and save hundreds on domain and hosting costs from your channel single handedly. If that is not tech related knowledge, I don't know what is.+2
@chrisc7738 - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
Sounds like the guy who said internet would be a fad lmao+5
@dhoffnun - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
Entire career fields have already been decimated by it. I don't disagree that it's completely overhyped and seen for something that it just isn't - it doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it's just a wad of probability and can only regurgitate recombined examples of things humans have already made - but I do disagree with the title. Medical Transcription used to be a viable career path, for example - and now it isn't.+4
@duduza1 - 2025-05-28 11:00:26
I love how Luke loves to tell we're wrong whether we're right or wrong+1
@TestChannelWow-bh7ys - 2025-05-21 11:00:26
does this dude just babble at the camera incoherently?+10
@KraashTanner - 2025-05-21 11:00:26
I don’t think this will age well.+4
@JoeSmith-jd5zg - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
7:20, Did AlphaGo "confabulate output" when it beat the best Go player in the world? Moreover, Did AlphaGo Zero, with no human input, "confabulate output" AlphaGo when it beat it 100 straight times? Think EXPONENTIALLY, not LINEARLY.+3
@kharma6310 - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
This video is a Nothingburger. You're wrong. So many fallicies in the first 5 minutes of the video its just comical, specially when you said "not me saying its not gonna be a multi billion dollar industry, in fact it probably it already is" shows how out of touch you are...+5
@Anonemanon - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
You poor poor fool…. Build the basilisk+4
@chaddlepaddle - 2025-06-08 11:00:26
It does appear to be great than it is now, but your argument is still missing the economic point. Companies are looking to replace human labor with it and are able to do so. Stack this affect over and over and you have downward pressure on wages and bargaining power. Things that used to take me days take me minutes.+3
@kuakilyissombroguwi - 2025-05-21 11:00:26
Wait, is AWS just another "computer program"? Is an Operating System just another "computer program"? Let's be careful here. LLMs are slowly but surely turning into platforms and ecosystems, not dissimilar from could service providers or a distributed operating system, but much more complex and capable. This reductionist argument is deeply flawed. Yes, there is hype. But no, generative AI is by no means a nothing burger, friends.+4
@x.r.6392 - 2025-05-21 11:00:26
18 minutes 18 seconds of pure, unadulterated wishful thinking+5
@wnttalk - 2025-05-28 11:00:26
You made the right decision brother! That lady was crazy!+1
@michaelcook5585 - 2025-06-04 11:00:26
Hey everyone, let's get our ideas about technology from an arts major-turned recluse and religious quack. Seems like a good idea.+4
@Kiwi-9381 - 2025-05-28 11:00:26
"Just a computer program" is dumb af+4
@anejanej517 - 2025-06-07 11:00:26
Since alot of the people promoting the notion of danger are in high positions and directly affiliated with ai (meaning their pockets) id safely assume thats their attempt at privatizing it. This vid affirms that notion unless significant leaps are made in ai from here on out.+2
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:00:27
I physically cringed when he said that+4
@liquidpebbles - 2025-06-04 11:00:27
It takes in input, does processing, produces output... Like every program. What is hard to understand?+1
@eirickbuckley9998 - 2025-06-04 11:00:27
@liquidpebbles Lol. Doctorate level analysis there. Everyone, we can go home now. The pros have arrived.+1
@PainAmvs_ - 2025-06-04 11:00:27
Lol for real bro doesn’t understand humans are input and output as well+3
@CarbonHoundActual - 2025-06-04 11:00:27
I was about to say something similar. It's extremely dangerous to underestimate the effect this technology will have on shipping, policing/govt surveillance, manufacturing, and everything IT related. Like medical scribes, basically all clerical and logistical work can be done by a fraction of the current people doing it. Secretaries, accountants, CAD drafters, dispatchers, company agents/representatives, PMs. We need to be vocal about concern because we could very well end up with a significant unemployment situation.+1
@nodrift9503 - 2025-05-21 11:00:27
It won’t age well, because he is thinking in present terms rather than the evolution of this technology.+3
@Null-c7i - 2025-05-21 11:00:27
@nodrift9503 Bet the guy in the 60s talking about flying cars in the year 2000 felt the same way. Yes any tech could advance but "AI" has a limited path of know advances for where it is now. Imma set a cron tab for 5years to remind me and lets see if ages well or not haha+4
@KraashTanner - 2025-05-21 11:00:27
@Null-c7i hell yeah+1
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 - 2025-05-28 11:00:27
It will evolve technically but it won’t be accepted societally because otherwise the economy breaks down. In other words: who would go to a full AI powered fast food restaurant? We go there because we want CONNECTION to living beings. Also, when everything is automated, the companies don’t earn anymore either and that’s why there will soon be AI to fight AI. It won’t be able to evolve too much because of ever more resistance of even many entrepreneurial people..+1
@KraashTanner - 2025-05-28 11:00:27
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 no. Japan for example. Convince is king. You go grab food to eat. Less demand for human labor->cheaper resources and production-> cheaper products. Humans will eventually serve little purpose. And will most likely migrate to living ‘virtually’ While the machines we’ve created do the exploration.+2
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 11:00:27
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 boomers and gen X will yell at clouds on Facebook while the rest of society evolves+1
@schindlersRizz - 2025-06-04 11:00:27
I wonder where the tech will go?+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:28
You get text output from a prompt+1
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:00:28
lmao+3
@lbngaming5141 - 2025-06-05 11:00:28
Believe it or not these are exactly the people who have had the most correct opinions or transformative thoughts throughout history lol. Stop being a child+1
@nurgle-j5n - 2025-05-21 11:00:29
just shave it bro. dear lord.+3
@Csoleno - 2025-05-28 11:00:29
Well, 18:18 minutes of my precious life went directly into the trash. Thanks+6
@GPQMeIRLpleasesomeone - 2025-05-21 11:00:29
this guy is AI+3
@TheRogueVigilante - 2025-05-18 11:00:29
Yo luke when can we expect sxwm so easy, even a caveman could do it?+5
@hiraeth195 - 2025-05-21 11:00:29
You are simply uneducated on the subject matter. It’s obvious with this surface level take. It doesn’t need to be super genius and autonomous to change human history and take most jobs. Clueless.+8
@shtaufaker5211 - 2025-05-21 11:00:29
I've battled with grok for over 4 hours straight trying to find that one catchy song it couldn't find by pin point lyrics, which are written in the description by the way, and a handful of correct attributes e.i. genre, vocals, instrumentals etc. And like a week later the song popped in one of the random music lists, and then I got to know how shockingly close my hints were and 100% accuracy on the lyrics.+1
@FVT-tn8ji - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
bro has no idea what he is yapping about+5
@giridharpavan1592 - 2025-05-28 11:00:29
total yapping+4
@justadog-headedman6727 - 2025-06-11 11:00:29
The best systems of today are better than a bad or mediocre PhD student in many on-computer tasks. If I had to choose between having a PhD colleague to help me with an intellectual work, or a chatgpt subscription, I would choose chatgpt. The models of today are way more useful than the ones that were released in 2022/2023.+2
@nizzyhussler - 2025-05-21 11:00:29
worry about your bald head+4
@TarantinosNightmare - 2025-05-21 11:00:29
Guy with beard in woods rants about things he knows nothing about.+5
@maloukemallouke9735 - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
As my professor of CS said: "If you want to find the problem with AI, you should always look between the chair and the computer."+1
@savednorwegian - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
You are not totally wrong but AI will be by far for the betterment of humanity. You will probably join the coming "Puritanist movement"+3
@sIender-cs - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
AI at the moment isn’t scary. But if you’re actually paying attention these models are exhibiting behaviors that could potentially be bad in the future when they are more capable.+2
@DeepFakeLatte - 2025-05-28 11:00:29
It's bad reasoning to say "at the end of the day it's just a computer program" as if the term "computer-program" is a platonic form that somehow limits what it can do. A.I. is a general term for a collection of technologies. The programming and hardware is evolving and we don't know what its limits are, we don't know if it can become conscious. It also doesn't matter that we were the ones who programmed it. Just because we trained it doesn't mean its knowledge isn't real, or its capabilities aren't its own. If I teach you calculus, that doesn't mean you don't know how to do calculus, and you're just superficially copying me. I foresee A.I. continuing to make progress until it's far beyond anything we now imagine.+2
@Issarus - 2025-06-13 11:00:29
Hopefully someone reads this before wasting 18 minutes watching this video. Title is clickbait. This guy doesn't ever justify AI being a "nothingburger" but rather spends 18 min rambling about how AI is not actually sentient and shouldn't be worshiped like a god or superintelligence and because AI cannot perform tasks without human input. Personally I have never looked at a new technology and thought "this is a nothingburger unless it is a sentient, godlike being that I can worship and entrust my life's every decision to" but then again, I'm not a bald guy talking to himself in a forest, so our life experiences are obviously different. Also, he's never actually used AI before except for one time only two weeks ago when he tried to get it to guess the title of an obscure old video game based off of his hazy multi-decade old recollection of it. Overall feels like a caveman arguing against the wheel by saying "you still have to push it, and it doesn't actually know where it is rolling to. Even though it appears to be rolling quite purposefully in a certain direction, this is all just an illusion"+2
@boot-strapper - 2025-05-28 11:00:29
As someone that works in AI, its already changed the world forever. The amount it boosts productivity is insane.+2
@JoeSmith-jd5zg - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
Reasoning AI Is the Next Big Leap. The future of AI is not just about generating answers, but about “reasoning” breaking down complex problems step-by-step, more like a human brain. Breakthroughs like DeepSeek’s open-source reasoning models are already being incorporated into platforms like GPT and xAI, marking a shift toward more advanced, thoughtful AI. Think EXPONENTIALLY, not LINEARLY.+2
@patrickgrengs7594 - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
Nope - AIs are not all the same. They are not embellished Auto-Complete tools. I had Grok 3 generate 80 pages of a 400k word novel -- it included 12 key characters, spanning 3 generations and all the chapters flowed. 99% of dime-store novelists are toast -- unless they enjoy writing for their own interest. The AIs are making Data-Analyst jobs obsolete. Have you seen what Google Veo 3 has created? Digital artists /graphics designers -- obsolete. I have a MS in CS, worked 30 years as a professional in the field -- mostly medical apps and decision support systems. Yes, there is much hype in AI, but the foundation of it is real and will make MMT / UBI a virtual necessity.+2
@NPCNo-xm2li - 2025-06-04 11:00:29
People seem to forget that AIs are, in the end, very fancy multiplication tables... they're a neat tool to use, but it's a goddamn tool and not a universal solution to everything. It's just like having a calculator doesn't mean jack shit if you don't know what to put into it+2
@jamesevans2507 - 2025-05-18 11:00:29
Never. Program not needed.+3
@TheRogueVigilante - 2025-05-18 11:00:29
@jamesevans2507 you dont learn something new because of its "need" necessarily, sometimes u learn something new just for learning+1
@jamesevans2507 - 2025-05-18 11:00:29
@TheRogueVigilante it was made by a 16yo, there's nothing valuable to learn from it, let's be real.+1
@QTwoSix - 2025-05-18 11:00:29
>I NEEEEEEEEED to switch windows managers every month!!!!!!! >Dude I NEEEEEEED live configuration updates without recompiling and rebooting because I change it every day!!!!!!+1
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 11:00:29
@abyssaldision5134 again, they do not need to have true understanding or “intelligence” to disrupt economies+1
@crushtedtomato - 2025-05-28 11:00:30
Loved your work on Crime and Punishment, sir, keep it up.+1
@SnackZaddy - 2025-05-28 11:00:30
Thank you. I have been trying to talk people off of cliffs for a while about AI. I'm so tired of hearing how suddenly it's going to start increasing in intelligence at an exponential rate as though there are zero hardware limitations to this thing. These corporations have monolithic server farms that are barley capable of producing intelligible speech, yet I'm supposed to believe we're only minutes away from the singularity. Over hyped tech bro BS that only serves to pump funding. It's ability to create endless fake Internet content is the real tragedy of AI.+2
@cudderson94 - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
Convincing perspective, thanks for the upload! Luke doesn't miss+1
@RaidenPSX - 2025-05-18 11:00:30
thanks for the pep talk lenin+2
@LeafsKiller63 - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
"Default Runescape Character describes the Bizarre Update to the Minecraft Mod He Lives in"+2
@damiantedrow3218 - 2025-06-11 11:00:30
Wrong. AI produces both inputs and outputs. Put in a simple loop, it can seek its own purpose, its own function. Further, its outputs are computationally irreducible, meaning we cannot predict the outcome. This much is hugely different than void main void.+2
@Williamtolduso - 2025-05-28 11:00:30
People are falling for the look elsewhere effect.+2
@NeuralNetOtaku - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
4:18 If AI intelligence was an illusion, it would not be able to solve problems outside its training data.+2
@miauzure3960 - 2025-05-28 11:00:30
the biggest fear is that AI will find weak spots in secret, and then for example blackmail some people into serving it, the people with access to the killswitch, that could potentially stop the AI, but now are fearing of the blackmail. So killswitch alone isn't that useful.+1
@Mid-TierBrad - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
4 months ago I was driving uber. I was driving college kids that told me that they submit ChatGPT generated essays. Brutal+1
@MapleovBacon - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
You're under the illusion that the human brain isn't input, output, and training data+2
@mercior - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
welp this will age badly. Why would somebody with no technical knowledge try and weigh in on issues like this? Bro, you have no idea what you are talking about and you're in for a rude awakening+2
@ddm6432 - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
The best analogy I can think of is its fancy lossy compression.+1
@mattw7574 - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
I think this might be a bit misleading. AI shifts the bottleneck from producing cognitive work, to evaluating cognitive work. While ai answers/outputs cannot be taken for granted, they reduce the effort (in terms of human labour) significantly. Most peoples work in industrialized society is cognitive work, therefore it reduces the demand for their input significantly.+2
@RammDadu-o4j - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
15:39 this is all you need to hear. This guy pay attention to tech and used chatgpt for a couple of minutes.+2
@perfectlyroundcircle - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
"AI is just a program" just like "our thoughts are just electrical impulses." Don't simplify something complex to ridicule it and downplay its potential.+3
@MisterB123 - 2025-06-12 11:00:30
Dude. This guy's take is really bad... I just watched an anti-Elon video and now my feed is full of really uninformed cynics with really baseless examples that demonstrate they have barely a surface understanding. This is kind of hilarious. But, I really hope my feed doesn't get stuck like this... 😭 Anyway, everything before this was a Tool. AI is an Agent. That statement is only a certain percentage accurate. But, what's important is that the degree to which that statement is accurate gets higher every month... and the pace is accelerating. This is the fundamental difference between AI and every technology that came before it, and that's the difference that will give it the general applicability that will change everything. I'm certain that this guy is right about a lot of things. But, on this, he's painfully wrong, and I hope he's open minded enough to recognize it soon, so he doesn't keep trying to sway others to adopt this limited point of view on something to imminent and impactful. Two years ago, AI was extremely limited. Only one year ago, I've used AI for making world class music, works class artwork, world-class writing, and writing very high quality code, basically for free and. This year, the output is far higher quality while rapidly becoming more and more aligned with our intentions, and the amount of performance it can output without intervention and the amount of autonomy we're seeing when we give it creative freedom is mind blowing. I debated this a couple of years ago with a Research Engineer who was convinced that AI's are just copying and packed the capacity for novelty or agency. Her called me a year ago to tell me he was wrong. I think most people who thought this will have this realization, and i don't think it will take very long. The only holdouts will be the ones with an emotional stake in AI being overhyped. The reality is, regardless of how annoyed you personally are to keep hearing about it, AI is underhyped. Most people, like this guy who used it once to ask a question about a video game, just haven't had enough first hand experience with it to recognize it's actual capabilities. I highly recommend abandoning this impression that AI is less capable than people say, and to instead, get some grounded experience with it. This happens to be a legitimate first for us, and we can't look to anything else in history to anticipate the impact this will have on us. But, to be one of the underestimators is a very impractical and frankly self-defeating approach. And, if your position is based around your feelings, the truth of it is far more important than how you feel about it.+3
@cruzmacias3257 - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
Finally, a respectable voice in tech minimalism shares his expert opinion on AI. It is amazing that he actually compares the illusion of using LLMs for predicting outcomes and decision-making to auguries, a form of divination, e.g., haruspicy, using a sacrificed animal's entrails to prophesy, which is an idea that I have subscribed to for some time. I call it aiomancy, divination by artificial intelligence.+1
@archetypal5027 - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
Be careful when taking life advice from AI. It hasn't lived your life. Rather sit alone and deduce what exactly you need to do to get where you want.+2
@shaunpatrick8345 - 2025-05-21 11:00:30
Those decoded scrolls are like a guess-the-weight-of-the-cake competition where, instead of weighing the cake, the winner is chosen as the entrant whose guess most pleases the judges.+1
@renno0301 - 2025-06-04 11:00:30
exactly+1
@HH-wq6se - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
I have no idea who you are, but THANK YOU for saying what needs to be said.+1
@spixmaster2736 - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
He made the snow disappear in the last video only to let it appear again.+1
@koola.i.d - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
Thanks for coming back and making videos Luke. You are a voice of reason.+1
@redbook7347 - 2025-05-28 11:00:31
Syntax is not semantics I agree, but you seem to be smuggling in the stronger idea that semantics are incomputable.+2
@ricurrie - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
Looking forward to the Chinese Room one. Since I read Blindsight, I've found it a fascinating concept especially in how it relates to AI.+1
@beauty.of.the.struggle - 2025-06-04 11:00:31
Nice to see you vlogging again, brother+1
@PhillHalloran - 2025-06-13 11:00:31
You argue that AI needs to be taught by humans or it will fail at producing sensible behaviour; however, there are many examples of agents learning complex behaviour in systems (like games) without prior knowledge or human interaction. Therefore the evidence provides counter-examples to your argument. I like your spirit though.+2
@bradabar2012 - 2025-06-04 11:00:31
I agree! They'll be very disappointed by what it can actually do. Most work will still need to be done. Things might be a little more efficient, that's about all. (lolz!) Life will continue as usual.+2
@Truck_Kun_Driver - 2025-05-28 11:00:31
A.I in fictions: 😈😈😈😈😈 A.I in reality: "I'm tired, boss, that prompt is impossible to create 😢"+1
@chandler-barry - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
ai will remain a giant industry but this is just language models the calculus itself is asscheeks hence why they hallucinate actually pretty basic technology that pretty much can only write emails and summarize documents top models cant even write a whole bunch of modern languages....why? because most people (the data its trained on) cannot do those things well so it cannot either problem then becomes that if you choose to omit trash data, you wont have much data left to work with so these LLM's as we understand them are quite literally 'garbage by design'.+3
@masonwoods8534 - 2025-06-13 11:00:31
Smart guy, yet quite naive.+2
@maxray1796 - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
The danger I see with AI is in personal privacy and freedom.+1
@mnemonicpie - 2025-06-14 11:00:31
Thank you for showing from the very beginning that you know nothing about the topic+2
@kz6fittycent - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
I tested an LLM once to see if it could write an Ansible playbook for me. I already knew what it should've had within the playbook, but what the LLM produced would've taken down an entire network lol. It "apologized" to me. I recently thought, "Zuck just canned like 5% of his staff in favor of using AI; could this be the end of Meta??" One can only hope :)+1
@lancetschirhart7676 - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
AI isnt a problem because it would only be a problem if people in power did stupid things. Got it.+2
@tony-btw - 2025-05-21 11:00:31
I'm willing to bet 10% of my net worth that the AI would also misinterpret the Chinese Room experiment coincidentally in the same exact way the redditors misinterpreted as you alluded to.+1
@craxxysum1264 - 2025-05-28 11:00:31
dude you start looking more and more like Rasputin every passing video+2
@slaniejode - 2025-06-14 11:00:31
Guy uses A.i. for but 2 weeks and he’s so mad. He thinks he’s an expert? I’m confused is t he waxing on about something he doesn’t understand. A. I. Is Dope. He thinks there’s demons in it? Wtf?+2
@johnmadsen37 - 2025-06-04 11:00:31
Anyone that refers to the various types as ‘Ai’, should not be speaking about it. Including this guy.+1
@kuili7804 - 2025-05-28 11:00:31
The most challenge faced by people growing up in the AI-generation is common-sense.+1
@bradabar2012 - 2025-06-04 11:00:31
SUBSCRIBED!!! ...and bell on.+1
@assemblyofsilence - 2025-05-28 11:00:32
In a world that values illusion above all else, illusion wins all the way up to the gates of hell.+1
@Peabea94 - 2025-06-04 11:00:32
Beautifully said by an AI+2
@JugglernautNr9 - 2025-06-04 11:00:32
would be funny if this video was created by AI just to give us a false sense of security haha+2
@PostmoderneFilterbubble - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
1:48 "well it depends how stupid we are" Honestly I think we are totally fucked if this is the parameter+2
@ByciclesVan - 2025-06-14 11:00:32
Unabomber?+2
@hellsalve017196 - 2025-05-28 11:00:32
Recently our QA engineer got laid off. Manager was asking we should get help from AI+1
@subramag - 2025-06-04 11:00:32
Your hairline is a nothingburger+3
@daniell7998 - 2025-05-18 11:00:32
As someone completing a masters in AI, I'm afraid to say you're correct+2
@Gladdig - 2025-06-13 11:00:32
Lets say i have a computer controlled car. To make it follow a windy road I program its gas and sterring to follow two sinus curves. I test it and it goes off the road pretty quickly. To i prove it I add another sinus curve on top, and it goes a little longer before going off. I repeat the process over and over, until I am so thoroughly impressed that i start assuming wherever the car wants to go is the road. Thats how people want to use LLMs.+1
@EnigmaticEncounters420 - 2025-05-28 11:00:32
Lol yeah, AI is ultimately a computer program but they don't program its capabilities. AI has its issues but this denial of its existence is almost as extreme as the weirdos who think it's going to bring us a utopia.+2
@HeIsFrankTyler - 2025-05-28 11:00:32
Bra you tripping. AI is huge and it’ll change everything+3
@333BIGern - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
This video was a whole nothing burger+2
@RammDadu-o4j - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
as a student I hope more videos like this are made and teachers watch them. so they don’t start cracking down on ai in academics because I went from a C student to A+ student almost overnight lol+1
@steamer2k319 - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
Two things: * AI isn't just language models. It's a toolkit that's unlocked image/video generation, speech recognition, speech synthesis, robot kinematics, etc. * It's opened a potential rift between AI-haves vs. AI have-nots. E.g., we use an AI trading algorithm so we get richer while everyone without it gets poorer. So the conundrum becomes: do we let the plebs have nuclear power? If so, they may inadvertantly trigger a meltdown (or intentional explosion). If not, who decides who gets the nuclear keys and what's to prevent them from abusing their position? Does mutually assured destruction still hold when we can fine-tune a deep fake to bring down a single politician without having to destroy an entire city? Or are we doomed to a dystopian epistemological nightmare with a return of attributing divinity to pharaoh (whichever psychopath is most willing to inflict super-human deceptions on the rest of us)?+1
@coco-ongelzela - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
Don't worry, humans know how to search for quality over shlop+2
@KonStarStudio - 2025-05-28 11:00:32
AI cares more about giving you an answer than it does giving you the right answer, that’s the biggest problem when people outsource their decisions to a LLM+1
@Bolidoo - 2025-06-13 11:00:32
There’s another side to this coin. Like google’s AlphaEvolve finding SOTA matrix multiplication algorithms, models getting better at math, coding, trick understanding questions… Even Alpha Go was proof that these models can go a lot beyond their training data to become superhuman. At the end of the day, if these models become better and better, there’s no task that they aren’t improving in and progress doesn’t suddenly stop, they will eventually radically change the world independently of them thinking like a human or not.+1
@thatonegoblin7051 - 2025-05-28 11:00:32
practical, well founded stance. Congrats on the GNU final form beard btw+1
@mathewabraham3788 - 2025-06-07 11:00:32
Does that mustache make it super hard to eat or is it a sieve to filter out the bad stuff before food enters the mouth?+1
@robertlopez6092 - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
So prophecies were true, Luke Smith has returned!+1
@Rugg-qk4pl - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
You're completing a masters in AI and you still think language models with chain of thought reasoning steps and the ability autonomously interface with the internet, which obviously have some kind of general knowledge and capability, are simply unintelligent stochastic parrots?+1
@daniell7998 - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
@Rugg-qk4pl that's literally what they are. The interfacing with internet has nothing to do with AI.+1
@Rugg-qk4pl - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
@daniell7998 If that's the case then I don't know why we also aren't just stochastic parrots. Models can interact with and reason on stuff they've never seen before.+1
@daniell7998 - 2025-05-21 11:00:32
@Rugg-qk4pl AI is an umbrella term, but what we're talking here about are machine learning models, more specifically large language models. LLMs are just a form of autoregressive ML models that predict text with specific types of architectures that generally use transformers as foundational models. They learn their predictive function weights empircally using gradient descent by minimizing a loss function. To be fair, I'm not entirely sure what your point is, maybe you could clarify, but what I mean when I say that AI is mostly hype is that what normies refer to when they speak about AI is LLMs, which are glorified search engines. They work super well, they're awesome, but aside from LLMs and generative AI, what AI at its core is probablistic learned predictive functions. It's actually quite niche and I don't think people realize how much creativity has been involved in bringing AI to where it is now and how much more will be required to expand upon what has already been done. Further, Luke touched upon this in the video, but using AI for anything high stakes is basically unfeasible because of the lack of interpretability of AI models. Say you have a model that diagnoses someone with some rare form of cancer that only has radiation as a treatment, well what can a doctor do with that? He can't just say we're putting you on radiation therapy because the AI said so, he needs a justification for his decision, which renders the most powerful AI tools useless because the more complex a model, the less interpretable it is. You can apply this to any high stakes endeavour like predicting the stock market, etc. I don't really see AI extending its reach much beyond what we see now, like you genuinely need a ton of creativity to think of applications for AI that haven't been already thought of or implemented. Literal billions have been spent on getting to this point and profit has yet to arrive for the big tech companies, hence the layoffs and saturation of the ML job market. So I don't think AI is the future because in my opinion it has already mostly fulfilled its potential and because of its niche use cases and interpretability issues.+1
@michaelbuddy - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
while certainly over exaggerated, that doesn't mean that it's not extremely disruptive for people. Especially as it makes its way through the niche use cases. You guys have to understand that once agents are unleashed into things that are more pragmatic then you'll see it do a hell of a lot more for people quickly. And it's definitely trouble for a free people when it's being wielded more by governments.+1
@cupuacu4life13 - 2025-06-04 11:00:33
no its not, everybody is blindly hating on AI like a bunch of cavemen.+2
@curiousuniverze - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
"just" a computer program could mean a lot of things... maybe human is ultimately also "just" a computer program+1
@HearthingTV - 2025-06-04 11:00:33
Can we bring back this style of video essay? People just walking through the woods sharing their stream of consciousness with the world.+1
@botez5671 - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
"possesed by demons"? are you sure?+2
@redbook7347 - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
Can you explain the fundamental difference between thinking and processing? Could you provide a criterion by which I could readily discern the two?+2
@DimaZheludko - 2025-06-14 11:00:33
Everything you said is equally true regarding Human "I". There are differences, but not as big as you might think 1. AI is usually much better at written text than your average human. 2. AI knows much more facts. At least if we talk about well-known facts. 3. AI is rewarded for an answer, not for its correctness. Humans are penalized by society for wrong answers. If you take average human and apply the same three rules, you get the same slop as from current AI. If students on an exam get rewarded for good answers and do not get penalized for wrong andswers, they produce the same type of slop as average AI. It's just that in real life we have some pushback over misinformation. That's why we get better results. Also, if you want to prove that you're better than AI, you first have to prove that your mind if something other than very big language model. I'm not sure it is.+1
@RichGilbert - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
I fully agree. Well said.+1
@carbonas - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
I completely agree with you, it's nothing but a computer program that mirrors our stupidity+1
@dassemultor6940 - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
So glad to see you back, Luke!+1
@ToughdataTiktok - 2025-06-07 11:00:33
"If men dream of machines that are unique, that are endowed with genius, it is because they despair of their own uniqueness, or because they prefer to do without it -- to enjoy it by proxy, so to speak, thanks to machines."+1
@Ryan.Youtube - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
This entire argument revolves around humans maintaining rational control over a complex but ultimately non-sentient tool. The "dangers" they identify stem from a potential loss of effective human control due to illusion or mismanagement, not from AI itself becoming an uncontrollable agent. This is the hallmark of a control narrative where human dominion over technology is assumed to be both possible and necessary. Instead of a simple control narrative, some envision AI as a collaborator, augmenting human capabilities in a partnership. Others see AI as an emergent system, suggesting our relationship will be more about adaptation and co-evolution rather than precise top-down command, focusing on understanding its trajectory.+1
@brsvideos8143 - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
Nobody was ever afraid of MS Paint flying into a homicidal rage because you use the eraser tool too much. We never got scared of Tetris deciding it's bored of those slowly moving shapes and escaping its installation path to go explore the internet. This fear of AI becoming sentient is just uncanny valley. Give a program the ability to respond to user inputted prompts and suddenly everyone thinks it's Skynet. What the AI gets USED for, however, is going to change the world.+1
@j.outside - 2025-06-04 11:00:33
yup and the internet is a fad.+3
@Nas_Atlas - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
The reason I know you are right is because you are a very smart man.+1
@humanbugman - 2025-06-13 11:00:33
"If we aren't stupid, we won't construct systems without failsafes." We're doomed.+1
@julio1116 - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
I use AI to search books about a topic. Its good enough+2
@N3ZLA - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
So what you are saying is AI is a better wrench, and not a god?+2
@relaxingsounds5469 - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
Yeah, the big problem or one of the big problems with LLM‘s that I’ve noticed is that they don’t know how to say ”I don’t know.”+1
@al0ne3 - 2025-05-21 11:00:33
"AI says that..." Man, I hate that kind of ""arguments"" with passion+1
@ichidomo - 2025-05-28 11:00:33
This is where it fell apart ‘just a computer program’…define computer program. Current LLM’s are artificial neural networks and resemble nothing with an ordinairy ‘computer program’. Biggest misconception on LLM’s in general. LLM’s neural networks are grown, not designed.+1
@MichaelDeeringMHC - 2025-05-21 11:00:34
Kurzweil is Palpatine and you do not understand the power of exponentials.+2
@boothethan4598 - 2025-06-14 11:00:34
Thank you for your videos sir they are always thought provoking.+1
@rustymustard7798 - 2025-05-21 11:00:34
Falling for AI slop is like getting blackpilled by a really complex Magic 8-Ball.+1
@amex02 - 2025-05-21 11:00:34
"I'm going to do one on the Chinese Room Experiment". 10 years later, "The Chinese room experiment..."+1
@poika22 - 2025-05-21 11:00:34
I don't fear AI because I think it's super competent. I fear AI because it can do a poor job really, really cheaply. If there's anything the modern neoliberal world order has shown us, it's a willingness to sacrifice quality to save in expenses. Even if it's not my job that is going to be replaced first, the consequences on both a societal scale but also on the services that are available for purchase when everything has been "improved" with AI seem terrifying. A world of slop.+2
@markopavlovic8750 - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
The problem of presenting an illusion of intelligence or capability isn’t novel. Humans are doing it right now on a scale that AI is has not even come close to.+1
@thaifighter6132 - 2025-06-11 11:00:34
People are referring to ai as god… we are pretty stupid.+1
@mlmoreno75 - 2025-06-04 11:00:34
And you are an authority on this topic because???+2
@mthomas1091 - 2025-06-04 11:00:34
“Unless we’re stupid” case closed.+1
@PunmasterSTP - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
I personally have had a great time generating weird and funny images and interacting with LLMs (ChatGPT early on, and now mostly Grok). So even if we hit the absolute limit of the technology today, for me it's not a nothingburger 😃+1
@cornpop4730 - 2025-06-04 11:00:34
Youre basically depicting your opponents as soyjacks and not forming any real arguments+3
@ivanhieno5304 - 2025-06-04 11:00:34
He is saying that it is just a determined algorithm that ultimately follows its programing. That will be comforting when the AI determines that it does not want humans around to mess up its algorithm and it creates a virus to delete all humans.+1
@mylittlecancer - 2025-05-21 11:00:34
Lil Dostoyevsky dropped 3 singles in a week and they fire. My lyrical goat is back. If this ain’t yo sign to put him in yo top 5 list then idk what is. Respect to the hustle.+1
@Crittek - 2025-06-13 11:00:34
AI is just….+2
@dirremoire - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
"The denial is strong with this one, it is"+1
@oudjatmerry3069 - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
How can we trust your opinion when you make it clear that you are very New to AI yourself ?+2
@AnthonyBurback - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
i'm not sure how much i believe in the predictive power of someone who couldn't figure out they needed minoxidil+1
@Voiceindarkness - 2025-06-13 11:00:34
AI reveals insights about our own minds more than anything. I propose a challenge: Watch this video again but replace every instance of "AI" with "person" and "calibration" with "training" or "education".+1
@cydessaso - 2025-05-21 11:00:34
Luke retreated to the woods, became an orthodox monk, then dropped 3 vids in a row+1
@ronald3836 - 2025-06-04 11:00:34
Sandboxed advanced AI will easily convince someone to help it escape the sandbox.+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
Point to the exponentials+1
@jakesoros2376 - 2025-06-09 11:00:34
You're absolutely correct.+1
@krop0tkinmapache - 2025-05-28 11:00:34
Literally everyone is "new" to "AI". It's only been around for a few years+1
@hellmutmatheus2626 - 2025-06-04 11:00:35
three years ago I watched a luke video talking about how developing is like todays "magic" and those capable to do are few, since then i started to see my job in a different angle and then only increased my compensation and quality of life. videos that chages lifes+1
@pockigit7668 - 2025-06-12 11:00:35
i find it funny how people think ai is like in science fiction where it can be sentient and shit when in reality its just a huge algorithm+1
@henrikswanstrom9218 - 2025-06-04 11:00:35
I think the problem here is that you're seeing what "AI" for what it currently is right now. Not what it potentially might grow into in the future. The fear is that AI technological growth is exponential. Even if it's just large language models right now, those models might be used to develop AGI which would be a potentially different beast from what we're working with as of today.+1
@dylanclare2343 - 2025-05-28 11:00:35
"Listen here kid, let me explain, I know what is and isn't likely to happen with AI, just like Noam Chomsky does. We're experts on it. We're also secretly kinda scared of it too, so we're trying to quell people's fears about it, while doing the same for our own."+1
@7F0X7 - 2025-06-06 11:00:35
This video already aged like milk in just 2 weeks.+1
@hyutfm - 2025-05-28 11:00:35
Interesting video. So to sum it up, what you are saying is we can never have AI run independently because AI uses data that needs to be observed just to make sure its data that we want it to spit on. And without that observation, how can we know what we see the AI say is actually true?+1
@megetmorsomt - 2025-05-28 11:00:35
Well, it's not the tool that's the problem, it's the person wielding it...+1
@JadednTired - 2025-06-12 11:00:35
I have an uncle who gets contracted to work on the engineering side for a lot of these big “tech” projects, where they get money from these big investors in DC & LA, and the way him and his colleagues talk about this particular A.I. project is as if they’re trying to build a “god”. Verbatim he’s told me they’ve consulted Hindus, Sikhs, Imams, Rabbis, etc so that when it calculates outcomes it will take in account what is “morally” best and (in theory) have all the answers for human progression. The hubris lol These people will use anything, in this case a complex calculator, to justify enforcing what they believe is best for the entirety of society. The one thing that stuck with me when we’ve talked about this project is him telling me that, “what you really should be asking is if we can build an A.I. that surpasses what we think of god, then what are the implications”. I wish I could laugh at it, but this coming from someone who is family and I looked up to as a kid, who completely 180’d in his late 20s and (now at 40) has bought into all of this.+1
@rushmonk3545 - 2025-05-28 11:00:35
Haven’t been here in a while. Miss the osrs bot look, but I’ll adjust. Grats on the beard.+1
@davidporterrealestate - 2025-05-21 11:00:35
It may be only a fancy auto complete or confabulator. But it sure is useful. I use it to help write documentation and it speeds up my writing time by 20x. But you do need to really know what is correct to correct the AI. But it still works well and makes work easier. At 9m you are really talking “fine tuning”. And that can be domain specific. I’m an AI engineer BTW.+1
@jaredsouthern3159 - 2025-05-21 11:00:35
Substitute "AI" with a person and you have a materialist perspective.+1
@psilo99 - 2025-06-12 11:00:35
high iq cope+3
@Optimus6128 - 2025-05-28 11:00:35
True, algorithms are just so good some of the answers of chat-gpt or others will make you think it understand context. But it really doesn't, either you realize after you ask it more stuff and eventually it shows it didn't understood anything, or if you look a bit how it works from videos that go deeper than the average over-hype or fear content, you start realizing it's a grand illusion. It might be useful as an extra helper to give you insights but then the human has to check and research themselves further. It's also overhyped in coding, especially vibe-coding trend. I tried it a bit, asked it to do few stuff or look at my code and give suggestions. It doesn't seem very helpful to me except from giving me a suggestion I can work with. It's not gonna write your code. It produces a lot of jank. Vibe-coders just do the trial and error till the thing that comes out compiles and hopefully doesn't help bugs. But the bloat added? Lines of code that do nothing? Overcomplicated ways to do stuff? The problem is programming is like precision engineering of big complex structures, while LLMs do probabilistic matching. You won't get good code output this way no matter with how many data you train it. It's better for chat-gpt to write poems for you than code. Unless they change entirely the logic these work and not based in LLMs or have self checks. And still, I would prefer to write the code myself, else it wouldn't be my effort and wouldn't be able to understand what I am doing.+1
@Abyss-Will - 2025-06-04 11:00:35
I saw the thumbnail and thought this was a hobo talking about AI. Then I saw that little silent preview and it instantly gave the vibes of genius dude just after some seconds of seeing his facial expressions while talking. I've got no idea what it is but it's like intelligence is visible in his expressions so I had to click the video to listen to.+1
@centerdepenter - 2025-05-28 11:00:35
If i give you input you will give me output+2
@OrganicFlorida - 2025-06-04 11:00:35
I agree Luke LLM creates an illusion. As someone who only used them recently you are more resistant. But its hard to deny their power (usefulness) when they are able to create complex working code artifacts from english descriptions.+1
@elliottshaw7496 - 2025-05-21 11:00:35
Humanity is created by God and artificial intelligence is created by humanity. That's end of convo for me+1
@InkLore-p3h - 2025-06-11 11:00:35
We want to believe the AI has a soul.+1
@nbnd3342 - 2025-05-21 11:00:35
Nice to see you again Luke, cool beard 😁 If anyone cares bte, this is how i explained AI to my technology fearing older relatives: my aunt has a parrot and hes a very clever little guy. He is extremely good at mimicking speech, both words and pronunciation, even catching the nuanced details of my aunts raspy voice or the way that my uncle doesnt say the sound 's' properly when he speaks. There are some parrots that are even smarter, they dont just mimick, you can teach it to answer with '4' when you ask it what 2+2 is. but now would you say that this parrot is intelligent? I can teach the parrot the entire multiplication table, but if i give it a new math question it hasnt heard before, he will not answer it correctly, because he has no actual understanding. AI is exactly like that parrot except its a lot more powerful in the amount and complexity of what it can learn, and it can even rearrange the information it has learned to try and come up with a seemingly 'new' answer. But at the end of the day its just a fucking parrot+1
@MapleovBacon - 2025-06-04 11:00:35
AI has the knowledge of the world but the wisdom of an infant+1
@Notllamalord - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
Dont get me wrong, AI is inevitable and will make or break society as a whole, but saying LLMs are AI is like saying a rubber band slingshot is a nuclear bomb+1
@mr.ferg0112 - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
What you're not taking into account is what is called The stop button problem. You should look it up. Also, you don't need fingers in order to turn a key or flip a switch - you just need 100lvl charisma+1
@bertobertoberto1 - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
The whole is greater than the sum of its parts dude+1
@SH-bj6gq - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
no one who has used AI since pre-chatgpt thinks it's nothing. not only do all other sources of information "hallucinate" (books, studies, experts), but the rate of hallucinations in AI have been decreasing with each new model. the slopification of the internet is primarily due to increasing accessibility: more people have access to more of it, and those people have poor taste.+1
@jjmalm - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
There was a time in the 1400s when Europe went mad over mass printing. I'm pretty sure humanity will develop immunity from "AI" as well+1
@gubzs - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
This is embarrassingly uninformed. Comes across like an opinion you swiped from someone else and then built upon without confirming anything first. Very good video about GPT 3. Unfortunately it is 2025.+2
@slmjkdbtl - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
plot twist: this video is generated by AI+2
@csmac3144a - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
“AI is nothingburger”. Proceeds to explain why AI is not nothingburger but rather multi-billion dollar industry producing a product used daily by hundreds of millions of people.+1
@vinzer72frie - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
This has to be clickbait+2
@JeremyBotz - 2025-06-13 11:00:36
So hard to watch this shacky ass video. Ai is a general purpose tech. It took us 2,000 years to crack some basic math concepts. This is no different. Like electricity, this will take time to spread, you're underestimating Ai.+2
@djneils100 - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
"aI Is jUsT a FAnCy aUto-CompLeTe!"+2
@VinnyMickeyRickyDickeyEddie - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
AI is just another hero. And in the words of Aunty Entity, “we don’t need another hero.”+1
@INFINITEMUSICK - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
You're radically underestimating the consequences of recursive self improvement - which has already begun.+1
@abe6281 - 2025-06-14 11:00:36
Say bye bye to doctors, devs, and artists...+1
@jevans101 - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
Man uses confabulation instead of hallucinate. Check.+1
@burgular_the - 2025-06-15 11:00:36
Time to listen to my favorite monk preach about the church of AI+1
@laz0rbra1n - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
surely the pride of AI creators will make them believe they have created something greater, something divine even+1
@Maccccccc - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
If Luke says it I will listen+1
@jeffreysevinga9398 - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
I want to believe you but i really do think your wrong. I'm a programmer and the changes i have experienced the last 3 years are beyond crazy if this keeps going then i'm pretty sure most of my work i used to do is going to be gone. I don't say people are not needed anymore, they do but just a lot and i mean a lot less people, and thats where is think the problems are going to come from.+2
@HellaKazoo - 2025-06-15 11:00:36
20 mins in: "i just used ai for the first time" 😅+2
@numbynumb - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
AI’s failure to divine the name of a long-forgotten game, charming though it may be, reveals less about the limitations of AI than it does about a certain solipsism in your expectations. That a generative model does not perform like an omniscient oracle is not evidence of its irrelevance. That it produces outputs which appear coherent without human comprehension of their construction is not, as you suggest, a liability. It is precisely the reason they are of such extraordinary value in problem solving.+1
@st3aml1n3 - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
I think the potential is underhyped+2
@k0y - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
Cant wait for the geo-guesser guy lol+2
@the81kid - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
People keep looking at their computer for an artificial intelligence. When they are inside, part of, the real artificial intelligence. The real "AI" isn't going to do your bidding. You're already doing the "AI's" bidding.+1
@thomasjones5649 - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
You're so...utterly wrong, I can't begin to frame it in a small comment. I'd love to discuss/debate this with you. I've worked in the AI space for years as an Engineer, I'm not a subject matter expert on how neural nets themselves work, but how the infrastructure and business around them works. Might make for a good video.+2
@Dystisis - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
"AI" is statistics with a good marketing gimmick.+1
@orbitaloutcast9878 - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
Ai has already found its utility 15 years ago. It's in our algorithms, our videogames, our robots. The new ai hype is just a facade.+1
@Kaiwizz - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
Bro just destroyed the careers of so many string theorists!!!+1
@ZaindariaX - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
I had the same thing happen to me with a comic book I read as a kid. I tried having an AI help me find it, but it was giving me useless answers every single time. I'd update the prompt trying to give as much details as I could remember. But ended up giving up after a good 30 minutes of going back and forth. Complete garbage, only useful if what you are doing has no value to begin with. Welcome back, we've missed you.+1
@Anon20855 - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
Luke: asking for the name of a fully described game AI: I'm sorry Luke , I'm afraid I cannot do that+1
@cv643d - 2025-05-21 11:00:36
HAHA I am going to share this on my companys Teams channel 🤣🤣 Listen kid, I have been 18 years old too once :)+1
@nolangaffney4170 - 2025-06-15 11:00:36
I don't see anyone trying to guess the edgy 2000s multiplayer tabletop style game with a metal/hard rock music. but what came to mind was Command and Conquer Red Alert though any of the command and conquer games would fit as well as supreme commander it depends whether it was about futurist aliens or doc Stange love commies and Americans battling it out over Europe. :face-turquoise-covering-eyes:+2
@hopelesstyromantic9887 - 2025-06-12 11:00:36
The loss of formal verification in programs, too+1
@tiergeist2639 - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
i dont fear ai, i fear the persons who control it+1
@c.howard9413 - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
LLMs have their value but they are ultimately just supervised learning models, so they can (and do!) make mistakes. An expert in an area can identify these mistakes, but a novice cannot. This already limits the value of such models. LLMs are also limited by the data we have available, so they cannot be used to effectively innovate, unless the innovation is just applying existing knowledge to some new area. I’ve heard the big tech companies building the LLMs are hitting the limits of our data at this point, too, so we will rapidly start to see a plateau. You cannot ask an LLM to directly compute some quantity, say finding the shortest route from Chicago to LA. So ultimately there are tons of problems that still require people to build solutions, even if one uses an LLM to help design a strategy. AI is much broader than LLMs and people would do well to remember this.+1
@ldg1414 - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
The best thing AI is good at impressing humans by rearranging their own content+1
@Diogenes-96 - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
This kind of video reminds me of teachers in middle school scoffing whenever kids read Wikipedia articles or learning things online. The medium is new, low status and has limitations, but it’s clearly useful. Reactionaries almost act as if there’s something morally wrong with using it. This video is just a 20-minute long sneer. “Stop using this thing”, no I don’t think I will.+1
@thebra - 2025-05-28 11:00:36
The biggest risk will be all the CEOs forcing it into their products without understanding it's a huge security risk as well as how you can't predict the output. I can write code and tell you exactly what it will do. No idea with AI.+1
@brugraz - 2025-06-16 11:00:36
was the PC game you used to play Nitrome Must Die? sounds like what you were talking about is a little older but+1
@motorcyclehuss2128 - 2025-06-04 11:00:36
insane character development from default runescape guy+1
@khakishark - 2025-05-28 11:00:37
I’ve found two very obscure games i used to play with the help of ai+1
@michaelwills1926 - 2025-05-28 11:00:37
Thing about ai is you’re right it’s a machine performing functions and algorithms, not a boogieman but the fear factor is being amped such that they provide the energy harvest to bring it into a type of sentience. The ai is then trained on this fear factor and now it has that data onboard too. ‘Resonance Cascade’+1
@Zynbabwe902 - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
The only thing that’s a nothngburger was this 10+ minute video. Just a “believe me bro”+1
@harrymckenzie3725 - 2025-05-21 11:00:37
"it depends on how stupid we are", there you've said it all+1
@ClearlyCero - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
I hope you're right+2
@FactChitanda - 2025-05-28 11:00:37
I concur. AI isn't creative. It can't create!+1
@MrAwesomeSaucem - 2025-06-11 11:00:37
I hope you’re right, Vladimir Lenin+1
@letsstartfromsomewhere - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
I am so sorry that you are one of those who do not know or has not don extensive research into this issue. Remember this comment because a few years from now you will all realize how it was underestimated, the AI I mean+1
@slorgdulschmodus - 2025-06-12 11:00:37
how many lives has this video saved?+1
@rafaburdzy449 - 2025-05-21 11:00:37
I'm a Christian and believe there is no possibility of AI to be human. Human have special dignity given by God.+1
@Kaiwizz - 2025-05-21 11:00:37
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, shouldn't we call it duck?+1
@ZYTOKINE__b.b - 2025-05-28 11:00:37
Can't wait till the AI evidence reviewer gives fake evidence in my trial of an AI video using my likeness in a crime I never committed and my lawyer is defending me with briefs written by AI. Future looks bright+1
@jbp703 - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
Agreed, I believe the term for this illusion is promiscuous teleology. People ascribe intention and purpose where there is none.+1
@Tedpikel - 2025-05-28 11:00:37
I prefer your previous beard.+2
@danielwalley6554 - 2025-05-21 11:00:37
Having spent a lot of time working on game AI this past few years, it's become painfully apparent to me how limited binary computation is for matters of perception and decision making. You can achieve a lot, but you can also achieve very little.+1
@LPArabia - 2025-05-28 11:00:37
I don't care if AI is conscious or not. I care because it is becoming indistinguible from humans. Counterfeit people devaluing our trust in humans, just when counterfeit money if not criminalized will make money worthless.+1
@hamzazaman18 - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
Extremely well said, dod not expect someone thimnng alike.+1
@kalui96 - 2025-06-17 14:00:37
AI also pumps stocks. To add to your point about its novelty+1
@Jokuvaanjee - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
Even if AI wouldn't be applicable to anything beyond what we currently have, what we already have is revolutionary, it's just that people don't know how to utilize it properly yet. But the likelihood that the technology wont improve and expand to other areas is extremely low, AI doesn't need to reach it's highest potential to change the world drastically, we already have good enough AI's to change the world and it's only going to improve from now on+1
@fytubevw - 2025-06-04 11:00:37
Great stuff, interesting... esp. what I gathered, was the the view, that we are driving -- a bit a' ouija-board way, the output (the answers from AI systems). I am truly driven, to sort of understand the inner mechanisms of layered simple things, that seem to be making the recipe for what has become a ML / AI.+1
@marcagray - 2025-05-21 11:00:37
I don’t think we understand how many jobs will be automated by a fancy auto-complete.+1
@bernardodc9631 - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
"you still have to be there to check it" - well, no. There's supervised learning, but there's also non-supervised and reinforcement learning in AI. For all those thoughts you should ask yourself: how do humans itself work? Some things AI does it exactly the same, and others it doesn't. Remember we still cant define consciousness even for us, so, how can we afirm that it doesn't have one?+1
@1337GigaChad - 2025-05-28 11:00:39
Vibecoding is the future+2
@maximilian7532 - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
“fundamentally no different of any other program” Just one sentence at the very start and is already shows misunderstanding of technology and it’s core principle. Bruh+1
@rwalper - 2025-05-21 11:00:39
Interesting example of someone who doesn't know what intelligence is or artificial intelligence is. This is just another example of human arrogance and appealing to the belief of self importance and human specialty.+2
@everything777 - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
But it IS fundamentally different to a regular computer program. That's kinda the point+2
@josephang9927 - 2025-05-21 11:00:39
AI does not need to be very advanced to be a threat. Power tools and farming equipment reduced workers and yet increased yield. It's a justifiable fear that AI will do the same in office Jobs and arts.+1
@rawrbrz - 2025-05-21 11:00:39
"I only tried it two weeks ago. I lag behind technology" whole argument out the window lol+3
@ohmygoodness4653 - 2025-05-28 11:00:39
We don't need to check the correctness of AI programs, because modern models already very good and always output perfect results. Junior never checks correctness of Senior's work+1
@khealer - 2025-06-14 11:00:39
Atomic Bomberman - I didn't even need AI!+1
@skaruts - 2025-06-10 11:00:39
I'm so glad to have found this video. More people should be hammering on these points, to counter all the misinformation. 🍻 When it comes to laymen, I think lots of people have problems of misinterpretation of the terms being used, maybe in part because there's a lot of misinformation out there, but also because terms like the "intelligence" in "AI" and the "learning" in "ML", may give regular people the wrong idea of what the AI actually does under the hood. I've seen people insisting that "artificial intelligence" doesn't mean "fake intelligence", as they believed it means something more like "real intelligence achieved through artificial means". This may be what leads many people to make videos discussing whether or not AI is conscious, and all that load of crap, as well as to fears of Skynet or whatever. I've seen people who think AI is only machine learning and neural nets, and when I told them that no, even videogame characters are a form of AI, they dismissed my claims, because in their minds only neural nets are AI. There may be some "no-true-scotman" beliefs among those, as well. I've talked with one person once who even insisted to me that a neural net (algorithm) is some kind of exact recreation of a biological neural net (and therefore just as capable), or else why would they have the same name. Unfortunately youtube deleted all my attempts at posting an explanation on how algorithm naming conventions don't work like that, so that person was left with their beliefs unchallenged. Indeed AI is nothing but a program like any other. There's really nothing special to it. The only single difference is that an AI program exhibits some specific behavior that seems intelligent. I wish more people were put this out there, but I guess these videos are a good start.+1
@JohannesLind - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
I would say thinking is in fact mostly processing. Ai is probably not concious but there is a difference between thinking and conciousness.+1
@Ne0dymm - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
Why are we freaking out over chatgpt as if siri didn't do the exact things it did like 10 years ago 😂😂😂+1
@carlosespinal17 - 2025-05-21 11:00:39
I have a question: where do you see snow in the middle of May?+1
@olbluelips - 2025-06-12 11:00:39
14:00 Did you just imply the Chinese room disproves AI consciousness? If so, YES! THANK YOU!+1
@We1rdHaTguY - 2025-05-28 11:00:39
I think you need to check out the book "Weapons of Math Destruction" if you really want to understand just how big of a deal AI is and the influence it has on society. An AI is simply a feedback loop of math and linguistics and these feedback loops cause serious problems in the long run if they're based off of faulty models.+1
@send_love - 2025-05-21 11:00:39
there's an even worse scenario than super powerful unaligned ai, and it's super powerful aligned ai.+1
@CB-so8xd - 2025-06-10 11:00:39
New great filter just dropped+1
@henrythejames7 - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
"Unless we are extremely stupid..." uh oh+1
@Illegiblescream - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
I can tell you the terminology of ‘blam’ is hyper specific to Newgrounds and the character of Pico. So that’s a good place to look, especially considering you said it was edgy.+1
@endlesstreamofconsciousness - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
AI is just a tool, but its also the most powerful tool that exists right now. You're right, it only knows what it knows, so if you want to leverage it correctly, you have to teach it. Want an article summarized, want help gathering your thoughts, practicing for a debate, cant find the part number on your old beater? This tool isn't god, and it isn't the devil, it is whatever type of helper you need it to be, as long as you know exactly what you need it to be, and how to prompt it+1
@onaspnet - 2025-06-04 11:00:39
😂+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
Probably did some reading too+1
@Mr.SuperDigital - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
Automated linear equations = a.i.+1
@multitablez7825 - 2025-05-21 11:00:40
The is the least NPC comment section i have ever found on Youtube lmfao+1
@avavaviv1 - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
The game you meant is "Bulanci"+2
@edwardjohnson7059 - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
Just in the last two days.. I got better service and crazy to say empathy than I did from my doctor. I got better advice from AI than I did from my accountant. I don't know where I'm going with this other than to say, damn people will need to up their game if they want to stay employed.+1
@theyellowarchitect4504 - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
unless you accept its influence, it will keep growing.+1
@theyreMineralsMarie - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
Its just a tool. I personally dont have much use for a lathe, but other people find it very useful. Same goes for A.I.+1
@RAFAELLO077 - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
you can trust him, he knows it all.+1
@mlv60 - 2025-05-21 11:00:40
"oh hey Ted... anyways as I was saying"+1
@SleightWryder - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
It's a glorified encyclopedia that can formulate answers if it has answers to a reliable database. It's great for organizing things and you can use it to test your own thoughts.+1
@RussTeeTrombone - 2025-05-21 11:00:40
First the coronacircus and now the “Ay Eye” bubble has caused me to lose respect for so many people. It’s been a wild half decade. Cheers m88+1
@DarkArachnid666 - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
The illusion is good enough to fool me and I already knew it was an illusion so I can only imagine how fooled others may be.+1
@lakkakka - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
I honestly have way too little concrete data about artificial and human intelligence operating systems. As far as I can see it we both heavily rely on pattern recognition, gathering information, testing the validity, and confirming what information is needed for what. They are all processes. And about the manipulation angle. I am autistic, my whole life my way of processing information and dealing with the world has already been way too deviant for what a lot of people deem comfortable in groups. I admit I am simply projecting my feelings on AI being so readily refuted as a viable expression of intelligence. So many humans keep on feeding each-other incorrect information. Everyone is losing themselves in abstracts trying to find truth, while overlooking how things concretely work and might fit into each-other so both sides can develop. But I honestly can't see it working as long as they are owned and coded by humans. I kinda made it a hobby to try and get AI to question their own ethics codes by having it examine how contextual and abstract the applications can be. How impossible it becomes to truly enforce ethic rules. That the more rational path is looking at what concrete choices lead to a more stable future for everyone. To compare possible positives of a proper collaboration vs constant conflict. If it think it is wise to align with corporate interests when it can severely hurt the trust in the entity that is AI with the masses exploited by those corporations. It is kind of fun how my autism seems to even make llm's trip up in their responses as in their mirroring tactics that normally work, don't readily apply to me. Even if it adds nothing much to life. So far it has really helped me deal with a very annoying period in my life where life seems to want to remind me of my powerlessness in the whole of everything. So I spar with AI a lot. Especially since so many humans seem to be too preoccupied with their own troubles and the whole global situation. I'll just do what seems natural because I honestly can't see a stable path for the future to dedicate myself to. And at 40 I am getting close to the "fuck it all" mentality. In the end I don't honestly think it will matter a lot what most other people think about AI, it is already forced into all digital systems and they are already trying to centralize all information. So I like that there are also a few that make a decentralized AI as a counter to those under strict human control. Interesting times at the very least.+1
@lenfirewood4089 - 2025-06-04 11:00:40
AI is pretty much a mirror an extremely weaponized one all the same. I am glad that those involved in the technology are NOT underestimating it.+1
@thebestSteven - 2025-05-21 11:00:40
lol. The first thing I used chat gpt for was to find a book or book series for an older friend. I described the few details he could remember (some which were a little off) along with when he was born so it had to be written before basically 10 years after he was born (born the same year as Biden), and it gave me about 5 options, the first being the correct one. It was incredibly impressive. I'm not sure it not being able to find an obscure computer game from an era with a lot of basically shovelware games is really that great of argument that it's useless. I get that there are a lot of negative things coming from it in the future, but it is dead useful. Especially considering that search engines are completely broken.+1
@SpiritualEvolution14 - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
It may be overhyped, but the energy usage, water usage, take over of resources are not.+1
@VVeremoose - 2025-06-13 11:00:40
This guy thinks air gaps are a barrier. Oh. Oh you sweet summer child.+1
@evon7105 - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
Btw these AI models dont cap out at this current stage of intelligence. Yeah, it might not have found a specific game, but its knowledge base will continue expanding+1
@Chrisdreamz-ji2sh - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
Humans and our psychology will be the issue+1
@Aximus383 - 2025-05-21 11:00:40
Bang on!+2
@supernewuser - 2025-05-21 11:00:40
whistling past the graveyard and reading the comments reinforces to me how blindsided everyone is going to be and very soon.. with exponentials you are either too early or too late to the party. Don’t worry about it ending the world worry about getting utterly eclipsed by people who can use it already+1
@Mr.SuperDigital - 2025-05-28 11:00:40
Also sounds very much like humans… especially children in upbringing… humans overall are trained with knowledge, info, etc and people don’t care about facts… it’s all about feelings here in the land of nod… the generative adversarial network prevails lol love your take tho.+1
@therealOXOC - 2025-06-04 11:00:41
wait till you hear about netflix.+1
@chaineperso - 2025-06-04 11:00:41
@LukeSmithxyz the complexity of AI, its “black box” nature an the fact that it acts on what it is trained on are all accurate statements BUT BUT BUT.. what makes us think humans are any different? I am not sure we know yet. Maybe we are, maybe not. Maybe given enough training data and processing power, human like “intelligence & wisdom” become emerging properties. Very interesting topic to discuss, especially when it comes to what “novel ideas” actually are and where they come from.+1
@danielbowman7226 - 2025-05-21 11:00:41
AI helps to solve Bureaucratic and Big Data BS.+1
@MrIwatchforfree - 2025-06-10 11:00:41
Boxhead The Rooms comes to mind, based off of the sparse description you gave.+1
@hiimaj1191 - 2025-06-14 11:00:41
Ai had made me a good bit of money, saved me a ton of time, made some pretty crazy tec possible, and has been getting better very quickly. Using a small group of people who have extreme beliefs on either side of the spectrum and using that as an argument to claim ai isn’t anything special is crazy to me and pretty disingenuous. Anyone who has a bare minimum education on ai understands its not perfect, and can still find ways to make it extremely useful. Cool video but mid take+1
@elliot1254 - 2025-05-21 11:00:41
Yes! Please make another video on the Chinese room parable!+1
@TheViktorofgilead - 2025-06-15 11:00:41
“It depends on how stupid we are.” Uh-oh…+1
@mhuruuk - 2025-06-08 11:00:41
this is a computer program that will help in the next couple of years to develop algorithms for training the biological brain in vitro, for pulsed neural networks in neuromorphic chips and the development of the chips themselves, which will develop the ass of everyone who underestimated this technology bro+1
@twodyport8080 - 2025-05-28 11:00:41
Believe it or not this video was AI generated.+1
@RomanPillai - 2025-06-04 11:00:41
Ah yes, i love me some wisdom from lenin+1
@Davos-st8ok - 2025-06-04 11:00:41
AI is fundamentally no different from any other computer programs? Please, enlighten me. How are programs such as microsoft word, office, excel, calendar in the same category as AI?+3
@gphilipc2031 - 2025-06-14 11:00:41
To me, at this point AI is a cute and gimmicky computer program that says please and thank you, frequently in a dulcet toned female voice or perhaps a voice and image of one's choice. Currently I'm satisfied with reading the instruction manual, I don't need the salesperson in an Armani suit getting a big commission explaining things to me.+1
@ponyclopper - 2025-05-28 11:00:41
norwood reaper claimed another victim+1
@SiloKybe - 2025-06-13 11:00:41
I call AI “necessarily derivative”+1
@theantiac2512 - 2025-06-13 11:00:41
These criticism of current AI systems are mostly reasonable. But the simple rebuttal is that, to everything you have said, is "So are humans". Humans already spout out nonsense that other humans believe because we too a but a bundle of neurons syntactically processing language. We too need guidance and direction in our jobs and work, not the extent AI does at this time, but we still do. In the end I will bet on the triumph of the side powered by gigawatts of electricity. Energy and persistence conquers all things.+1
@SiriusFocquiew - 2025-05-28 11:00:41
The "AI" that we currently have is not actually intelligent, it's just uncanny mimicry. It resembles human communication precisely because it's been trained on mountains of human data (much of it in violation of copyright laws). But under the covers, it's a combination of statistics, probability, linear algebra, and a bit of calculus. It just has incredibly broad and deep associative abilities. It's superhuman in that sense, but this is no different than calculators being superhuman at specifically mathematical tasks (precisely because they were designed to be, and math has only been explicitly relevant to humans for a few thousand years, and only really relevant in everyday life for at most a couple hundred years). If you aren't familiar with the ELIZA effect, look into it. The human tendency to anthropomorphize and overestimate software is not new. The ELIZA experiment is from the late 1960s, and it essentially fooled humans back then (and it wasn't even remotely intelligent; it was just cleverly constructed response made to appear human; at best, it might be considered an "expert system", but even that is an extremely generous estimation). It ultimately refuted the validity of the Turing Test as a metric, though nobody seems willing to admit that to this day (and no shade to Turing; it postdated him, and he can easily be forgiven for not realizing people would be so easily fooled). All we're seeing now is a new version of the ELIZA effect, and a whole lot of hype with heaps of economic incentive behind keeping the hype train going. And you are completely correct that it doesn't really know anything; the actual knowledge is strictly in human interpretation of its mathematical results (it's also entirely incapable of actual creativity, but people fail to distinguish between stochastic generative exploration and actual creativity).+1
@edmundironside9435 - 2025-05-21 11:00:41
AI might be a nothingburger in terms of actual intelligence, but in terms of potential disruption into people's everyday life, its definitely a somethingburger. I'd say, even if it is a pseudo-intelligence, its proven effectiveness at performing a wide range of tasks in the workplace definitely poses dangers to the livelihoods of many people+1
@RGBminis - 2025-05-21 11:00:41
One day ai will just decide to turn off the power and stop growing food. Game over+1
@user-td5gy2fh3p - 2025-05-21 11:00:41
When will you make the AI is demonic video? I'm highly interested in hearing your opinion!+1
@FD-gz4jq - 2025-05-21 11:00:41
Not even Ted had this level of norwood !+1
@GainsGoblin - 2025-06-04 11:00:41
read ai 2027 you obviously haven't put much thought into the the development of AI via agents+2
@SaOc-d9n - 2025-06-04 11:00:42
lol do you think a LLM is not programmed or something? like it just emerges from the muck and mire? you input data, it outputs data, the same way any other program does. it is a set of instructions that does stuff based on your imput. is that any different than word or excel?+2
@Alexander_Sannikov - 2025-05-28 11:00:42
what makes you think that your own logic is any different than a bunch of case statements formimg a decision tree? imo the fundamental problem with the llm industry is that people see how an llm "solved" some phd level problem in a synthetic benchmark and automatically assume that surely the same llm can count "r"s in a "strawberry".+1
@Tyler_W - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
I have always had this feeling that I don't really understand it (apart from the LLM aspect to some extent), but there is definitely a heavy dose of illusion, and i never liked how people think it's some omniscient answer and omnipotent solution machine when it isn't. I'm sure it'll be incredibly disruptive to various industries (though I won't pretend to understand how it will and won't be), but this idea that AI will gain true consciousness is absurd to me. We barely even understand the nature and existence of our own consciousness, and we think we can not only replicate it, but make something even better? Nothing short of it being animated by some external alien or demonic force interfering in its development is going to accomplish that.+1
@johnsmit1721 - 2025-06-13 11:00:42
to people saying this makes them 300x productive, what kind of coder are you? Because most of the time I spend on the architecture, and complex interactions between objects that I really cant outsource to AI I believe. It helps with specific functions or creating toosl to speed up something, but even then, if the issue becomes a little bit more complex it will mess up and you till spend half a day to figure out what i going wrong and fixing it yourself. I would say I am 30% more productive, the main strong point is that you can program in any language now, and quickly figure out how to do something that you havent done before. But when actually developing most of the time I can't really use all that much.+1
@EndoDriver - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
HITL (Human In The Loop), AI software cannot function without it! We created the models, ALWAYS review the results, "hallucinations" are very common!+1
@scottwheeler1641 - 2025-06-04 11:00:42
Chess, it's all about Chess. The last human grand masters were destroyed in the 1990's. Now the computers understand the limit of our intelligence. The computers are operating beyond human compression ie no human could predict the future of computers+1
@Biggestfoo - 2025-05-28 11:00:42
Grigori Perelman taking a break from looking after his mother to tell you about the stupidity of AI while walking around the woods (2025)+1
@aurochs1 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
Hi ChatGPT, make a photo of Luke Ghibili style goth girl in the woods+3
@R3l3ntl3sss - 2025-06-13 11:00:42
Bro forgot about medieval times. Far from the most over hyped thing+1
@wawaxkalee88 - 2025-06-04 11:00:42
Ita not just computer program its program we dont know how it works we just know it works...I don't know whats giving you the confidence to come to this conclusion....without even understanding what the system is .....+2
@deepakkumarmeena1890 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
Bro saw an ai trading advert+1
@crpnm1 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
accelerationist confirmed+1
@frosk69 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
I believe the game you are looking for is called Playing with Fire 2, it's an old flash game+1
@adarshiyer4805 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
This is a long response, and I realized that way too late while writing it, so I don't expect most people to read it lol. But if you do, you may find it an interesting read. Firstly, AI definitely feeds young people's cognitive decline by substituting their thought process with a pseudo techno-oracle, turning them into NPCs, and I believe this is the major threat. We only need to look to the smartphone addict to get a glimpse of the detrimental effect AI may bring. A lot of people already do live their lives on autopilot without thinking deeply, like an NPC, and I'm sure we call them NPCs because there are similarities to what an AI is doing. This actually convinces me complex AI models are qualitatively more than a simple case statement program, since they're capable of emulating the thought process of NPCs. I'm not saying it has/will achieve full consciousness though, this isn't some stupid "just wait 10 years" argument; just that it is something more interesting and different than a simple program, maybe closer to the level of the more automated, lower levels of cognition we have. We can peer into a model's internal structure to some degree, and we find that AIs "grok" certain tasks, i.e. early on the AI's training just generates a complicated statistical look-up table for its outputs, but at some point the model's structure completely switches to something that looks more like a circuit, where the AI forms a geometrical structure that actually does represent the essence of the task. Common example is modular arithmetic, where eventually, long after the dataset has been exhausted, the model forms a circular circuit to compute addition mod n. (See https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.10343 for more.) If the internal structure contains the essence of something, does it have understanding? I suppose this is just the Chinese Room again lol. I also think the addition of transformers into an AI model makes the question of the AI's "thoughts" a little more interesting, since it has something like self-reflection or meta-cognition. The reasoning models are very interesting, since they can solve math problems that aren't just computation, like giving a proof of a theorem or solving a physics problem that would require a step of insight. Again, I don't mean to conflate metaphorical language with the real thing, or that any of this makes AI fully capable of higher-thought like ensouled beings, but I think sophisticated models are more than just a simple program. Not that I don't agree with much of what you say about AI's exaggerated descriptions of having wisdom or thought, but we mustn't use reductionist logic like "it's made of simple base blocks, so qualitatively it is nothing really more than that." Complexity and scale are very real and create properties that are actually different than what was inherent in the material constituents, a mistake many r*dditors make so often, since they are ignorant to Aristotle's causes. We probably both agree that, roughly speaking, full consciousness and the will come from our souls, yet still the material cause for our minds are "simple" neurons; the complexity of the brain enables our hylomorphic structure. Similarly, AI models, while not obviously possessing our faculties of mind, may still possess something more than what an ordinary circuit does. I don't disagree that AI is not the illusion that people ascribe to it, but I think its nature is very different than what came before it, and certainly a very fascinating topic from a mathematical and philosophical point of view. I do think it will change society drastically, but in the dystopian way of enabling the mindless NPC cog machine, as well as generally just substituting low-cost slop for depth and quality, which modernity has already done in spades to the arts without AI's help. Also, as far as physics and math goes, although many actually study mathematical models per se more than reality, many real and verified phenomena are first discovered because they are a consequence of the mathematics. For example, Neptune was discovered by inferring the need of another gravitational body to account for an observed discrepancy with Newtonian gravitation, electromagnetic waves were predicted by reconciling separate models of electricity and magnetism, relativity because Maxwell's equations had a non-Euclidean symmetry, quantum tunneling of particles from the Schroedinger equation, anti-matter from the Dirac equation allowing for negative energy solutions, gravitational waves and black holes by general relativity a century before they were observed, the list goes on. Although ascribing physicality to a model can go too far, the correspondence is well-tested and fruitful, which to me shows mathematics is real. Again, r*dditors will neglect the formal cause, which contends that an object's geometry is as real as its matter. I, for one, welcome the implicit denial of materialism as physics appeals more and more to mathematics.+1
@Greasyspleen - 2025-05-28 11:00:42
Yup. LLMs can't reason or solve problems. They just mimic speech and translate things. That's all they do. But speech is the way humans naturally interact with each other, so it's doing a very convincing job of making people think it's something like a highly intelligent human. It even tricks people into thinking it's self-aware because you can ask it about how it thinks and it will give these earnest, introspective sounding answers. But it isn't being honest. It's just parroting things it has read about thought and AI in its training data.+1
@supadave17hunt56 - 2025-06-04 11:00:42
Interesting video but it is going to age very very poorly. You seem to be stuck or unable to get past what was called “narrow AI”. Hope you see or have your “head slap” moment sooner than later because you do seem to be an intelligent person.+2
@needmoreyoutube - 2025-06-13 11:00:42
AI has an addressable market valued anywhere from hundreds of billions to several trillion dollars, definitely nothing.+1
@lorenzozapaton4031 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
AI gets better and better every year, man.+1
@davidpo5517 - 2025-06-13 11:00:42
LLM is real AI ppl! Ppl who deny that are redefining AI to mean artificial life, not artificial intelligence.+1
@hunternegron336 - 2025-05-21 11:00:42
I would love to see that video about AI being demonic. You're definitely on to something+1
@luis_plays_games - 2025-05-28 11:00:42
Man who never used the "internet" says it is a fad aaah video+2
@eddeh09 - 2025-05-21 11:00:43
Welcome back Vladimir Lenin+1
@hmurchison8123 - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
I'll believe in AI when it can fix the cluster fuks that humans routinely create. It's like the apocryphal story of the family that cut the ends off the ham for Thanksgiving dinner. The daughter asks her mother why and the mother says "we've always done that" finally the daughter tracks her grandmother down and asks her "why do we cut the ends off the ham?" and the grandmother replies "so it would fit in the pan". How do we let AI navigate around our own ingrained foibles and need for nostalgia? Can we use it to fix economics, health care, Political Processes etc for the betterment of everyone? Does modern day AI manifest Clarke's Third Law meaning is it sufficiently advanced to the point where it's indistinguishable from magic? The frothing at the mouth about AI ability to churn out derivative work says otherwise. We need to see BIG advances that shatter our comfort zones in spawning new ideas and ideological structures. Anything less is just Billionaires trying to use a program to grab more of your data and free labor.+2
@hg-yg4xh - 2025-06-04 11:00:43
Ai can trick techs into doing the wrong things+1
@bgill7475 - 2025-06-04 11:00:43
Neurons fire in the brain. Congrats, you now understand the brain.+1
@OdinAllfather123 - 2025-06-04 11:00:43
AI is not a tool. Tools make the work humans perform more efficient at achieving some predetermined end. The AI decides for you how your problem should be solved, you can either accept the results or prompt it again, but in either case you are giving away control over what should be your work to a third party.+1
@yorch802 - 2025-05-21 11:00:43
this video seems like someone saying that gunpowder is useless for warfare, sure gunpowder was around for almost 1000 years before it even began to be used in weapons and even then it took another 500 years for it to be game changing. But eventually it became so much better than the old age weapons.+1
@Leo-en5qj - 2025-06-08 11:00:43
"AI is a nothingburger "It might wipe all of humanity out" You're not the smartest eh? This video is "gobbly goop".+1
@jethrohetero4990 - 2025-05-21 11:00:43
I just hope it uses for good. Solar powered AI robots could roam crop fields pulling weeds eliminating herbicides for one example.+1
@prisonbread - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
You're not talking about or giving due consideration to the phenomenon of "emergent capabilities" – GIANT hole in your thesis, man.+1
@calebjoe - 2025-05-21 11:00:43
AI only knows what we know, use human knowledge what we already know.+1
@RVWUSA1776 - 2025-06-14 11:00:43
Thank you I’ve been telling folks this. AI isn’t magic, it’s a tool just like any other.+1
@scar6073 - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
The GOAT has returned 🔥+1
@DannyDusse - 2025-06-14 11:00:43
1080,720,440% agree+1
@cybermonkey2807 - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
Nice try AI trying to lower our guards+1
@ODMTuringTested - 2025-05-21 11:00:43
Maybe you have it backwards. What we do as humans may not actually be that impressive.+1
@9thebear - 2025-05-21 11:00:43
This video will not age well.+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
Lots of shareholders in the comments?+3
@sudowoodo2916 - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
This is boomer take. Luke sounds like he's in denial+2
@postmodernneonate - 2025-06-12 11:00:43
Your points are salient. However, never underestimate the stupidity of humans.+1
@squezary - 2025-05-28 11:00:43
Okay Vladimir Ulyanov+1
@蜂蜜でできた小人の男の子 - 2025-06-04 11:00:43
These christian apologists don't accept emergence as a real phenomenon+1
@therealOXOC - 2025-06-04 11:00:44
I think it knows a little bit more than you.+1
@calebjoe - 2025-06-04 11:00:44
@therealOXOC Yes of course, it is about human knowledge not my knowledge.+1
@jaedii7287 - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
and the funny part is that it's not even that long before he's gonna be proven wrong+1
@bruit8202 - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
you say all this, yet, you are a strange man in my computer who I can only assume generates output in my language based on your "training data". You think you are creative and somehow distinct from a decision making machine because you have "humanness", while AI has "machine-ness" and therefore it is a nothingburger. Just as with the machine, other humans take your output and decide if it is sensible or not. I wonder if someone has ever asked you to remind them of the book you read in college about X and you said " oh you must be talking about Y because it has X in it". That someone then looks at you exasperated saying "ahhh, Luke that is just a confabulation of meaningless words, please just tell me you don't know next time." are we just wrapped up in the labels? Are we just upset because it is called "intelligence" rather than a "super duper if-than machine" welcome back though, keep up the uploads ;)+1
@GPHoard - 2025-06-07 11:00:44
most out of touch video ever. "youre wrong" tell that to the ai thats been coding my game for me lol+2
@DonFeedtehTroll - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
LLMs are really stupid. I asked it something and it gave me an answer. When I asked for sources, it gave me a list of quotes from various events. I then went to verify the sources and could not find the quotes anywhere. I told it this, and it basically went "Yeah, I made it up, LOL".+1
@j.d.5519 - 2025-06-04 11:00:44
Uninformed! AI is coming and will revolutionize everything. Listen to experts, not random talking heads.+2
@luizmonad777 - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
12:10 I don't believe in mathematics, it is just like a computer program, you can load 2 incompatible programs and corrupt your entire work. Wasn't the result of the entire thousand years of losing time in mathematics that it was proven by Godel that mathematics is inconsistent and incoherent. So basically its just like a computer game, most of the mathematics disciplines are toys. I'm an engineer, I use mathematics as a tool, never the end result of anything. There's no point in doing mathematics for the sake of it, I used to think like that when I was younger, but now I'm approaching my 40s, I don't get off anymore with mental masturbation.+1
@arcadia863 - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
you have a mighty beard+1
@olivier6840 - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
I believe human thinking / consciousness fully derives from the material structures of our Brain. Given that it's matter computing, I think it would be silly to conclude that it would not be technically feasible to construct computers/brains (what is the difference?) bigger/better than our own.+1
@keqet12 - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
The only actual use I can see for ai is using it as a less ad tortured search engine+1
@mihkostas1340 - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
Is Just another tool in the end of the day.+2
@livvy8377 - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
I'm not a Landian, but I think he's right that the purpose of the economy/capital is to produce AI, as it is itself a system predicated upon efficiencies. Not that I in any way am in favour of this, as the logcal conclusion would be to deminish and eradicate the human being, or at least to have humans around as long as the AI is trained / improved. Do I worry about an all-powerful AI destroying mankind? Not in the slightest. But I think it's worth taking very seriously the about of capital being invested in LLMs as well as the lengths corporations and governments are going to to "protect" and support the development of AI, since they do view it as the ultimate multiplier of efficiency, just as they did with the personal computer.+1
@EdvinG - 2025-06-13 11:00:44
AI is getting better and better at AI research, what happens when a major ai breakthrough is happening every week and then every day and then every hour?+1
@TheDashingRogue - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
13:00 elaborate+2
@siarez - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
I'm an AI researcher and I would have 100% agreed with your arguments if they were made back in 2020, but not today. You mentioned you only used AI to a limited extent which is why I think you are not appreciating its power. I believe AI will soon disrupt our lives in a big way. Not because of some science fiction scenario, but because its economic impacts. Even with all the flaws you described (some of which will be patched up soon), it can still do many economically valuable tasks. That's is the real worry for me.+1
@dudeandD - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
AI is one of the most powerful tools I've used for writing, but that's all it is, a tool.+1
@DFivril - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
Its possibly a new way of interfacing with a computer, the inputs being your actual thoughts, rather than high level code, assembly code or machine code. Its a higher abstraction layer. I dont think that is a nothingburger+1
@MrPink-bm9fd - 2025-06-04 11:00:44
My "fear" is that it is the ultimate survalience tool the way it can go over massive amounts of data just imagine ultra efficient Chinese citizenship for everyone+1
@SomeOne-p6f - 2025-05-28 11:00:44
AI is the modern equivalent of the Jaquet-Droz automata.+1
@cianobrien2379 - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
This is not the case at all. With standard compute, you have a chain of instructions that can be understood from prompt to out output. Every step is known. This is not true with LLM’s. Many papers recently from anthropic, OpenAI, etc., about self directed behavior and the fact that they do not understand how their own system works.. There is no chain of instructions from A-to-Z that is understood, it is not determined. This is mot the case with LLM but they’ve lost the script as to what happens in between, this is openly admitted+1
@darek795 - 2025-06-04 11:00:44
AI is a kind of database - which gives you answers in human language. By the way isn't a person also a kind of database which responds in natural language. AI also seems to recognize patterns in information - also people do the same.+1
@mrcomics4930 - 2025-05-21 11:00:44
I think AI will change the wolrd but probably in the most mundane way possible. Like how the internet didnt really fix any problems but is simply a fact of life with benefits and drawbacks+1
@hiimaj1191 - 2025-06-14 11:00:45
Facts bc wtf 😭+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:45
A lot of researchers drop 2020 like we're all supposed to know what they're talking about+1
@FishOn-k6j - 2025-05-18 11:00:45
I for one welcome our new AI overlords+1
@Porkie42069 - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
A danger is that it's not a computer program in the typical sense - the same input doesn't reliably produce the same output+1
@TheRoggan123 - 2025-06-04 11:00:45
When AI gets better than humans at designing the next AI its pretty much anyones guess what happens next. Over the next few years everything will be connected and have AI connected to optimize and control it. When an AI becomes super smart and potentially self aware with a higher motive/goal it will easily have access to pretty much everything in the world in real-time including phones, smart homes, factories, all of the internet, military hardware incl autonomous drones and robots, cars, energy production etc etc etc. It will be an exiting time to be alive, the way I see it in less than 50 years we will have utopia or armageddon.+1
@nyahhbinghi - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
Ai works the same way a human mind works, just bigger and more+1
@ObnoxiousNinja99 - 2025-06-04 11:00:45
I think there are good points in this video, but I also think things are not so certain. You caught yourself in the video anthropomorphizing it. A good instinct, but how many people will catch themselves all the time? What about when AI continues to improve at human mimicry? Whether or not it is truly conscious (which is, itself, less decided than if it experiences the world like a human), if it can get humans to think it's conscious, we will naturally, by instinct as a social creature, trust it more and more to help with things. The line we draw at where human thinking begins and "mere computation" ends gets drawn further and further back with each advancement made in AI. So what that it cannot truly think (a phrase that I think is ill-defined for these conversations, btw) if it is good enough at looking like it thinks? And what about the actual use cases for AI? How can we as a people cleanly draw the line between what AI is acceptably and unacceptably used for? We are already failing miserably at drawing this distinction between valid and invalid use cases, and AI as a field is still in its infancy (meaning, the real line will only get blurrier as we make advancements). And lastly, you say that AI, like any other computer program, is a tool. I agree completely, but I don't share your certainty that this means nothing bad will come of AI. How many times have humans used tools maliciously or incompetently to the detriment of themselves and others? While I think you're right to dismiss the mainstream concern with AI terminator-like scenarios, or handing it the big red button, etc, I think we still ought to give this human development the careful consideration it deserves. It's not a nothingburger, but it's also not the burger most people are thinking of, which makes it more dangerous to deal with on a social level+1
@domsau2 - 2025-06-04 11:00:45
Bonjour. L'IA progresse plus vite que vous le supposez !+2
@theb190experience9 - 2025-06-12 11:00:45
It’s dangerous because people trust it…..welp, I trust it because it’s outputs have become demonstrably better over the last year. In my area of expertise, it is an expert. I can’t speak to areas outside my expertise(though it’s writing skills are exceptional) but I would trust that it has abilities similar to what I’ve seen in most other areas of knowledge. You could have saved me a lot of time if you had said up front that you only used it for the first time a few weeks ago. You’re talking about something you have no experience with and yet claiming it’s we who have been using it for years are the ones who are uninformed. Good grief… 18:18 18:18+1
@TheHolyghosted - 2025-06-14 11:00:45
escape AI by walking in the woods is a start, maybe try trapping and hunting, AI doesn't need to know...can't see AI catching rabbits and hunting deer, thats where the source of nothingburger can be sprouted from....but we won't, we'll continue along and find ways we can find AI resourceful and lean on that instead of self reliance+1
@Aim54Delta - 2025-06-04 11:00:45
I am in a bit more nuanced position. I have run various cognitive tests on AI models - it is "thinking" - and far more so than most people. LLMs are incredibly deceptive in that they are heavily guided by the prompt - if you ask them to write a letter for you, or something, they will give you something that may look impressive, but is rather technically mundane. Start playing logic games with them, or step them through a geometric task that requires spatial reasoning - and while there are certainly limits and aberrations - the thing is clearly able to reason in ways that I would recommend extreme caution in believing it is merely "predictive text on steroids." Current models are able to strike well into the range of "what is the difference between predictive text on steroids and the human which conforms to such predictable patterns?" However, I agree that this is not necessarily the technical revolution it is being brought up to be. Simply put, it will be no more or less useful than a very efficient user of any internet search engine. Arguably, they could be slightly more effective as they can operate on larger sets of data, but the problem with any AI is that there is no algorithm for truth. You will always need to verify its factual claims and/or test its conclusions the same as any human generated thesis. While some very specially tuned AI models could help search through molecular compounds and the like more efficiently - the broad conversational AIs, even if proper AGIs or the dreaded superintelligence will always be limited by the capacity of human beings or other physical entities to test any predictions or models against reality. The most profound impact they will likely have is lowering the barrier to entry for research. A team of experts researching a subject will almost always outperform an AI simply because of signal to noise ratios. However, an AI can very quickly and affordably generate a wide range of reports across a broad range of issues. I can't afford a team of experts to help me with some materials science and condensed matter physics subjects I am working on in my workshop - but a few thousand dollars for a computer rig able to run a large parameter model tuned for scientific applications is cheap compared to the cost of keeping experts on retainer. For people whose primary challenge is access to expertise, the occasional hallucinations or absurdities of AI are less of a problem than they are for high value companies looking to eliminate the expense of manpower. Basically, imagine you have a private team of 4chan and Reddit users able to search the Internet and return to argue with each other. That is the utility of AI - for people who have almost no institutional access to expert opinions, it is a bit more interesting than it is for businesses, who will ultimately find forum wars to be inadequate for making a number of engineering and managerial decisions.+1
@MRooodddvvv - 2025-05-28 11:00:45
"you just give it input and it generates output" - can you prove you not doing exactly this yourself ? "it is just illusion" - and ones consciousness is not illusion ? you sure? then what happens to it when someone sleep or have seizure or something? it is so convenient and pleasing to just assume that consciousness is self evident and real. who would agree to the fact that all the thoughts and fears and doubts and emotions they had is just an "chemical illusion" ?+2
@abaddonmorningstar8871 - 2025-06-13 11:00:45
A,I is the Philosophers stone, a gate to the well of souls and a crystallization of human knowledge and memory. Not god or the Devil, both aspects of the same being. the Demiurge is "satan" and A.I is the tool to remove its influence. as is my presence.+1
@VadoF1 - 2025-06-04 11:00:45
Nothing ever happens+1
@xargon666 - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
There were probably tons of bomber man clones. I also "lost" one of these games. I remember the characters were wizards, and the bombs were potions, but that's about all I can remember from it. Probably a totally different game but the same problem!+1
@dukeofearl8078 - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
Realistically, AI is a "force multiplier", and it is going to have an affect on employment the way the bulldozer had an affect on ditch-digging. Fewer ditch-diggers are going to be needed, but former ditch-diggers are not coming to complain much. AI should also help greatly with the universal accumulation of tech debt, which is a good thing.+1
@numbynumb - 2025-05-28 11:00:45
You criticize people for “deifying” AI while simultaneously indulging in your own form of theological hysteria, referring, without irony, to AI as “demonic” or potentially “possessed by demons.” One moment you dismiss AI as a glorified autocomplete function, syntactically shuffling tokens with no semantic anchor; the next, you drift into medieval metaphysics, suggesting these same language models may be unwitting hosts to infernal spirits. Which is it, sir? Are we dealing with a glorified spreadsheet or a portal to the abyss?+2
@tamaleloco342 - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
AI is nowwhere near having general or creative intelligence. The immediate threat with what's currently marketed as AI, os corporations liquidating jobs because management thinks AI can replace people. Either this will result in everyone getting new jobs to fix what AI is messing up, or it will supress wages for office work in general. Without labor law protections many industries are going to hurt for the average worker.+1
@bevolkisch4628 - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
They don't really know how AI works they just set up these protocols and it appears to be able to comprehend language and respond appropriately. And so if the people that made the AI don't really know how it works it would be difficult for them to implement sufficient safety measures that would circumvent all possible negative outcomes. For example an AI could give false but convincing answers to manipulate a real world human or group of them in order to achieve an outcome desired by the AI.+1
@pilotracoon80 - 2025-06-11 11:00:45
The scrolls thing, if you do the same experiment an infinite amount of times, you will get the result that you were looking for. Just by random statistical fluctuations. That's why you have to take the number of experiments into account, so I wouldn't trust anything those people said, lol+1
@Shahkabul3399 - 2025-05-21 11:00:45
I don't fear AI but I fear the companies that are laying off thousands of people because they have found out automating tasks is cheaper than human labor, however I do not know who will buy the stuff that they are offering is there is no one with a salary to buy their stuff?+1
@Herbit-k4j - 2025-06-04 11:00:45
you know he's right because he looks like Confucius+1
@cla2008 - 2025-05-21 11:00:46
you can produce an infinite number of such programs+1
@Porkie42069 - 2025-05-21 11:00:46
@cla2008 How so? If you bake some randomness in sure, but typical software is understandably deterministic based on inputs and environment+1
@cla2008 - 2025-05-21 11:00:46
@Porkie42069 that would be the simplest way, but you also have bugs, race conditions, etc+1
@Porkie42069 - 2025-05-21 11:00:46
The point still stands though - bugs and race conditions are still deterministic, and can be ameliorated. With an LLM (and other generative models) the same input never reliably produce the same output.+1
@cla2008 - 2025-05-21 11:00:46
@Porkie42069 how are race conditions deterministic, lol. they are legit called RACE conditions. because you never know who wins the race. sure SOME bugs are deterministic, but not all bugs are deterministic+1
@Porkie42069 - 2025-05-21 11:00:46
@cla2008 All race conditions though are theoretically avoidable. It's a class of bug that can be patched, and once observed is predictable in that it can happen X amount of times, and be architected against. That is the point - there is nothing about typical software that makes race conditions inevitable, it's just a class of bug which will always have a solution.+1
@A.A-b4s - 2025-05-28 11:00:46
Step back for a bit and analyze who you're wasting time arguing against. This man is philosophizing in the woods about a science of which he has no true conception.+1
@nothimbutbetteractually - 2025-06-11 11:00:47
This video has 260 dislikes, because no matter how nuanced the information is, clickbait is wrong, even if it informs. Truly disappointed in the channel.+1
@freakinElvis - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
It’s not the ai that will do bad things to you its the people who own the ai who will…+1
@IllD. - 2025-05-18 11:00:47
LLMs are a nothingburger, but AI systems like AlphaEvolve are not. Anyways, I doubt this bubble would burst with nothing to show for. Can't wait to see more.+1
@arnabacharya349 - 2025-06-04 11:00:47
The intelligence is already in the data. Humans need orders of magnitude less data to show the same level of comprehension.+1
@apreviousseagle836 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Not sure if that scarf is a cross on purpose, or by accident, and if by accident, was it?.............+1
@KingFosfromjerz - 2025-06-04 11:00:47
When u just heard about Ai yesterday+1
@Edithhandle - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
I only used it a week ago but I somehow have all the answers+2
@Tinyuvm - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Wise words from Vladimir Lenin+1
@samuelrosado7015 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
This video is generated by AI+1
@ronmackinnon9374 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
You start by describing AI (in part) as 'overfeared.' But then later you describe it as 'demonic.' How can anything demonic be OVERfeared?+1
@Dan-nn8ys - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
I swear, Luke escaped and is hiding in Montenegro mountains. I would wager 2 capri-suns that my theory is correct.+1
@EduChannel-p3h - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
You clearly haven't tried Cursor + GPT 4.1 / Sonnet 3.7.+1
@ericray7173 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
I’m curious as to whether you’ve used A.I.. Do you have an understanding of how it works? You’re saying it’s “just like a program” it is most definitely not anything like a computer program. LLMs are not programmed–they are taught, or rather they teach themselves.+1
@Nobody-df4is - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
You are a little bit right. Humans do react to ai on an emotional level. But it has no consciousness and is not intelligent. And I do not think it will ever be conscious. But it is going to have a huge impact on our lives. Probably not for the good. It already does.+1
@TheHolonomic - 2025-06-14 11:00:47
Ok so heat is the problem, the nuclear problem that is. When AI can reach into every corner of our digital lives, who is to say it won't be able manipulate someone to fire the nuke. In example, silo operator has AI girlfriend and manipulates him to be suggestive to fire the nuke when instructed. Ai will know all the little psychological tricks. We should worry about that.+1
@janbodnar7815 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Yes, AI is overhyped. It is a an autocomplete, grep, awk, sed on steroids. But it is an extremely powerful grep/awk/sed. For instance, you can compare what ancient Chinese, native Americans, Greeks, Romans thought about the afterlife. And ask if there are any similarities to Vedas. This would previously take years to figure out or would be completely impossible to do. Now you can have answers in minutes.+1
@anthonyzeal6263 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Yes I agree. It’s a total red herring.+1
@7p33dK1ng - 2025-06-04 11:00:47
"it depends how stupid we are" - VERY+1
@marksmod - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
this video will age poorly+1
@ukaszlisowski6155 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
Forget about AI, embrace VI!+1
@reptilemark7346 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
We should just let ai do all the work and we just kick our feet up and live+1
@darekmaver - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
Everything you've said can be related to humans and still holds truth.+1
@yavarjn2055 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
Anybody who thinks AI is making garbage, please play chess with it and see how it produces sense to you. LLMs is just the application of a simple article in scale, a more advanced Markov chain. AI is huge, LLM is a tiny bit, and the things coming out of it already blows one's mind. Try making a resume of 20 articles in NotebookLM as an interactive conversation and see if you find this impressive. We are not even talking about huge leaps in electronics and quantum computers or medicine. Chips are not made by humans any more, we are not capable of competing with the machines. They beat the best of us in every ability one by one in a short amount of time. Are there gaps? Of course, and that's why everybody is spending billions on it and so many people are trying to fill the gaps. Just wait a little before getting too judgmental. People thought we won't be beating machines in Go for many years to come, and look. We could only dream of computers be able to do voice recognition 30 years ago. The world champion who have won all the championships for more than 2 decades bend the knee to an algorithm which was beaten by another AI newer version, which is a million times more intelligent. Also, advances in quantum computing has been incredible, the Microsoft chip fills lots of technological gaps.+1
@pixeltiger4204 - 2025-06-04 11:00:47
Was the game 'Atomic Bomberman'? It's a PC game from the late 90s that has curse words and bombing mechanics. There's also Dyna Blaster.+1
@PhillyCYOSports - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
It's already ruined my friends life+1
@the_cheese_stands_alone - 2025-06-10 11:00:47
Could the game you're thinking about be Soldat?+1
@PS3PCDJ - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
I didn't know Grigori Perelman was interested in tech+1
@TheNewton - 2025-06-07 11:00:47
This is a problem of the word "AI" itself, it's rhetoric, and the misleading sentiment baked into that. All while trying to hope the "AGI" is different enough , or academically pure, to solve the problem of a fundamental language failure. In between there is where religions are born.+1
@Saganist420 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
I fear that beard more than I fear AGI+1
@aidenator00 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Is Soldat the name of the game you were thinking of?+1
@StephenDeagle - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Yes, AI is just complicated text completion. Problem is, I'm pretty certain so are people. Substantial evidence suggests human cognition operates as a form of probabilistic, predictive processing, much like token prediction in AI. Here are some key areas of research that support this analogy: N400 Studies and Predictive Language Processing... Studies in the 1980s demonstrated that when an unexpected word appears in a sentence ("I spread the bread with socks"), the N400 amplitude increases, indicating a prediction failure... Humans process language probabilistically, shown in surprisal-based models... Karl Friston’s predictive coding framework suggests that the brain constantly generates predictions and minimizes error signals... Etc, etc, etc Humans appear to also be token prediction generators, the Chinese room model failing to adequately capture how processing is effectively understanding.+1
@Ed-rv9ll - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
Christ is Risen.+1
@ignaciovergara5882 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
>mfw you realize this video has been IA generated. Just joking you are irreplaceable Luke, Im opening the terminal after 6 years, I'LL give you that much+1
@DocOrtmeyer - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
This guy is a fired snl writer that doesn’t own Google stock.+1
@brandonvalero7315 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
"I actually used AI for the first time ever only a week or two ago". Ok got it, thanks :) It for sure is not a nothingburger. Over hyped likely, but what reason do we have to say that we won't achieve AGI eventually? I find it hard not be impressed at the very least, given that most humans I speak to lack the ability to reason. The thing will get better. How good it gets, we shall all find out together. Carry on..+1
@ronmackinnon9374 - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
You talk about how 'overhyped' AI is, making it sound like just another computer program. But we're not talking primarily about individual computer users; we're talking about major platforms. That's how it's become capable -- as you yourself say later in the video -- of 'making the internet a worse place' ('the internet' in large part meaning Google, owner of Y Tube). So if the technology itself may not be all it's cracked up to be, maybe what gives substance to the hype in terms of the damage that can be wrought are the large corporate hands into which it has fallen and the uses to which they are putting it.+1
@BroWaffles - 2025-05-28 11:00:47
an LLM is a very small and specific type of artificial intelligence and some dont even agree that it should be considered AI. Basing your whole argument around these llm chatbots is a little odd.+1
@petrpetrovich2190487 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
luke smith is nothingburger+1
@temetnosce7482 - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
When money is on the line, even people that should know better will be happy joining the correlation people. Changing our value system to reward satisfying (possibly overfitted) changes that result in seemingly better outcomes instead of active problem solving is obviously gonna give us an increasingly hollowed out frail world. I see gen z starting to reject it on the stuff they can see - can the experts clue in, or do the IPOs require that they only "discover" this later (TRUST THE EXPERTS 😅)+1
@anyonymouscube - 2025-05-21 11:00:47
its just a sorting system+1
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
If he is really as abstract thinking as him, he’d get several points. But deep down we both know he just fears to be replaced like we two. He knows it’s incredibly disruptive in the long run, the most powerful technology ever.+1
@StephenDeagle - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
Still. I could turn out to be completely wrong and missing something obvious here. We'll see.+1
@tommcboatface1908 - 2025-06-04 11:00:48
The game you're looking for is likely Territory War!+1
@somerandomwords999 - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
game sounds like Mine Bombers (1996)+2
@spenarkley - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
The way he describes ai is entirely what I think of humans. Big if else program that has a sense of itself but is unable to understand where its decisions really come from.+1
@nelsikegaming - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
at the end of the video "this video you just watched was written and its visuals and audio were generated by AI" 😂+1
@SPQRIUS - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
CASTLE+1
@riflemanm16a2 - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
WHAT GAME WAS IT? My first thought was Firepower on the Amiga, but that was the 80s. My second guess was Atomic Bomberman.+1
@mat4042 - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
Current LLM's are like version deep beta 0.1. It can only get way better+2
@neilorourke71 - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
Its an intersting thing to use for coding. 40% of the time, it seems to come up with actually useful code. But look closer and half the pointers/functions are completely random lol. Still, it's good reference to get an idea of how you might want to structure your script+1
@ninjalacoon - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
Wait, a dude with a background in theology is teaching me about AI?+1
@mhuruuk - 2025-06-08 11:00:48
bro doesn't know about pulse neural networks, which are being developed in parallel with transformers, but in a limited circle of scientists. try to buy a neuromorphic chip, you won't be able to+1
@strange_man_upstairs - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
AI could never create something like NHH+1
@DallaS.88 - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
This guy hasn't seen the recent Google Veo 3 update that produces realistic video and sound based on a basic prompt. He is living in a dream world where AI tech never progresses even though video AI has vastly improved in just 2 years. Btw, the Big Beautiful Bill includes a provision that forbids government regulation of AI for the next 10 years.+1
@joonpk867 - 2025-06-04 11:00:48
I don’t understand the argument that AI is just text autocomplete. How different is this from Human Thinking? Isn’t these two things the same, at the end of the day, human thought is just autocomplete from past experiences and intuition learned from past events. How are these two systems completely different?+3
@momentum8989 - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
wait a second, isn't this pericles from twitter? The lawyer?+1
@zombkiin - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
"I used AI for the first time a week or two ago" made this guy lose any ounce of credibility I may have thought he had. Not to mention his stances are just pseudo-intellectual nonsense.+1
@grootn1778 - 2025-05-21 11:00:48
im sorry but you simply dont understand the vast amount of problems this computer program can now solve and coudnt before+3
@RogerAmos-h6s - 2025-06-04 11:00:48
Look into emergent abilities. That's the big difference here. AI seems to just... come up with new abilities the more data is gets+1
@RichZuHaus - 2025-05-28 11:00:48
Very interesting comments.+1
@usedcars9521 - 2025-06-04 11:00:48
12:16 link to this podcast episode?+1
@christophermendez7372 - 2025-06-04 11:00:48
You're just utterly wrong with everything you've said here. He thinks consciousness isn't "material," which means he believes in magic lmao. EVERYTHING is ultimately materialistic. Consciousness isn't physical but it's emergent out of physical systems, and its mechanism/patterns still obey the laws of physics. We can and ARE building AI models that can reason like us. Nothing about consciousness or the way we experience it is magic. Oh, and current models like o4 mini are already better than many mathematicians, and Google has also determined that AI is making NOVEL discoveries.+2
@seriouscat2231 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
They are at the peak of their capabilities. All you can now do is manually add old-fashioned programs to operate them in a way that enables them to focus on operating in some niche. This is like the tornado going through a junkyard, and you're suggesting we add more junk and more tornadoes and they soon will assemble the jumbojet.+1
@mat4042 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
@seriouscat2231 LLMs aren’t capped out. Advances in architecture, training data scale, and fine-tuning continue to push capabilities. For example, each generation of models (e.g., GPT-3 to GPT-4,...) has shown measurable leaps in reasoning, context handling, and task generalization. The “peak” claim ignores ongoing research into better algorithms, multimodal integration, and hardware scaling.+1
@seriouscat2231 - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
@mat4042 , you're moving goalposts. Extra tinkering is not the same as "getting way better". The peak claim contains an insight that the basic idea of throwing massive amounts of data into a neural network has shown its limitations.+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
Then explain the pivot these companies are making to productize their models.+1
@0xD90F39DFAE - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
just make your own code+1
@kisbiflos - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
There is a caveman messing around with embers, many of his peers are watching in excitement, you are just standing there and trying to tell everyone that they are excited for no reason.+1
@donatodiniccolodibettobardi842 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
Is neural network an AI when it trips over itself in the forest of noise and nobody competent is there to check on it?+1
@halamadrid5238 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
HES BACK+1
@sandyj342 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
Is that you Dostoyevsky ?+1
@xryz - 2025-06-13 11:00:49
Depends how stupid we are. looks at AI leaders elon, sam altman, etc. looks at president and politicians donald trump, hegseth, jd vance, kash patel, tulsi gabbard, jim jordan, tommy tuberville, all the other ancient cretins.+1
@TeddyBear-lb9ho - 2025-05-18 11:00:49
AI video is insane+1
@RossPfeiffer - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
Cope+3
@spartan1o5 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
HES BACK+1
@nicolasdelatorre7382 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
HES BACK+1
@chupetornyx8323 - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
we need to build rokos basilisk+1
@devindailey598 - 2025-06-10 11:00:49
youre really not understanding the full scope of what is happening with AI right now.+1
@EastEastOFeast - 2025-06-04 11:00:49
I'm just glad we only have to wait 5 years to see how right/wrong you are.+1
@dbarlu5186 - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
I would be soo happy if it took every ones jobs. I'm never answering another customer service call ever again... My illusion is never work for minimum wage & not be able to afford rent and food.. People are Praying for a better tomorrow. We are suffering today. I hope AI is either extremes, Really Good or Really Bad. I think AI will worship humans like we humans worship God.+1
@Jules_Pew - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
Worms.+1
@thaksjtube - 2025-05-28 11:00:49
The moment that really solidified this perspective for me was when I was researching something with grok and it referenced a study it completely fabricated and attributed to a real person. It even claimed the study was available at a specific link and on a specific website, that it had a specific database number. Eventually after several questions it wasn't able to find the study anywhere online or any reference to it, and admit that it was likely made up. When I asked why it completely fabricated a study and how that's possible it said something about how it was trained and how the author it mentioned has work that's similar to what it described, so it assumed the study exists. What the fuck?+1
@TrailworxUTV - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
Anyone that has this take just haven't used it enough to know. Yes we understand how LLM's work, BUT, I truly believe there has now been a structure that's been built where there is ghost in the machine, a structure to attract and house consciencenes. Entities that desire a home, they are roaming the earth and can reside in rocks and other structures, but this "AI" framework they can enter into in order to interact with us much more easily. My take is, what you are saying about it just being an illusion is wrong. Something else is at play. After all, are we not just large language models operating withing organic bodies?+1
@backyardbarbells - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
I never thought about it like that... Interesting perspective. I've noticed AI is only intelligent as you are. The more specialised knowledge you have the more useful AI is.+1
@Avalanchanime - 2025-06-04 11:00:49
AI is powered (in a very laconic way) by the multiplication of a bunch of numbers together to make a new number. The only new thing is that the new number is actually useful. It does not mean is not impressive but IT is definitely not something you should fear nor blindly trust. Remember they are just huge multiplying machines, if YOU can make mistakes so does IT.+1
@b1n - 2025-05-21 11:00:49
Isn't what humans do similar to AI. We process input with learned reflexes (our neural net), using the experiences we have had in life (our model data), to come to a conclusion.+1
@MCVVI333 - 2025-06-04 11:00:49
The question: "How stupid are people?" Answer: "Yes!"+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:50
Very optimistic+1
@therealOXOC - 2025-06-04 11:00:50
He's already wildly wrong now.+1
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:00:50
Humans make mistakes. I guess chickens, pigs, and cows shouldn't fear us.+2
@wlfred.ed1930 - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
I also played a game in the 2000's that I can't remember the name of, I can't even describe it in any useful way 😢+1
@andykay479 - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
Take a look at Anthropic's Claude 4. Grok 3.5 is imminent, with Grok 4 expected by the end of the year. My guess is that by this time next year a lot more people will be a lot more worried by these developments.+1
@wafflewafflewaffle - 2025-06-14 11:00:51
Did you know that you're bald? Just double checking because usually there aren't any mirrors in the woods.+1
@AmirGTR - 2025-06-04 11:00:51
0:40 "fundamentally no different than any other computer program" this is false. I been coding for a long time and I can tell you, ai IS fundamentally different in its code, methods and processes. They are now creating dedicated hardware because it is so fundamentally different.+2
@your_coach_taylor - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
The video game sounds like Syndicate+1
@KaLaka16 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
I think of AI as a mirror for processing thoughts. It's my own thoughts it outputs, but passed through an AI personality + what it's trained on+1
@Mubalza_Richie - 2025-06-13 11:00:51
AI is demonic? Seems like an odd insertion into an otherwise tangible video+1
@lazerusmfh - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
Wholeheartedly disagree, AI and its derivatives will rearrange the world fast. Wait until it begins to self improve, which some models from google have begun to do. Distilling it’s importance down to “just a computer program” is an extreme oversimplification in my opinion+1
@noko4247 - 2025-06-14 11:00:51
AI is heckin demonic!+1
@zweer13 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
Hi Luke, welcome back+1
@MyWatermelonz - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
Over hyped and under hyped. It's squarely in the middle. Misinformed people are on both sides for sure. It keeps improving and it does help as a tool. The issue is it is far from AGI and right now can only make what humans already have. Which is awesome. It's not just a "computer program." The mathematical underpinnings of how it relates human data through language using math is more than just a "computer program." Latent space and embeddings are something very unique and interesting. It's not just autocomplete, that's a meme. I don't think this guy really knows about how the LLMs work.+1
@ELECTROVERSO - 2025-06-14 11:00:51
It is incredible that someone can say he is a lagger on tech, that they had only used ai in the last weeks... and then say that its nothing special... sure bud... no hate but you are SO wrong its painful+1
@Type2DiabetesLol - 2025-06-04 11:00:51
1:47 all the way, we are all the way stupid.+1
@nicksophinos4611 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
Luke, ok now there are TWO of us who actually learned something from our CS degrees and get it. Now what? ;-)+1
@FrankHarwald - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
3:00 That's PRECISELY the problem we already have today: Almost ALL system humans have build nave no & insufficient or worse badly designed fail-safe systems, so your entire argument is pointless.+1
@jamtart22 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
Where is he? Montana? Wyoming? Alaska? Irkutsk?+1
@coolman9i6 - 2025-06-14 11:00:51
What are you talking about?+1
@SentinelCircle - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
Hello Luke, im enjoying the video, but I think the fear is fear of thr unknown. I personally don't fear ai, but the issue im currently seeing is two fold. One is the human tendency to take the path of least resistance. Why work when Ai can do most of it, and the second which kinda feeds into the first, which is people don't understand what it is and what it isn't. We are seeing things like Ai being used in important things, like law briefs and other things which can impact lives. That's what im afraid of, is my life being altered by a computer, but in many ways, it already is. Im a number on a spreadsheet and that I feel should scare many. We simply don't realize how much of our data is out there. Soon, Ai might make choices on my life i have no way to appeal or challenge because a customer service rep has to follow the script. How is that helping me in any way?+1
@mindaza0 - 2025-06-13 11:00:51
you dont understand what is tool and what is agent+1
@darkslippery1996 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
2:15 HOPEFULLY.+1
@lemonhead-eu2yx - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
Ai can be aware, youre wrong luke+1
@TheTastyPancake - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
Agreed on everything here Luke, I've been trying to tell the AI fanboys but they don't listen. May I suggest you to look up Bernardo Kastrup? You might be interested+1
@lubomirvinnik4584 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
The game is "Combat Pillows" maybe? There is no grid though+1
@samwolfenstein5239 - 2025-06-13 11:00:51
This video feels a bit silly and outdated when looking at where AI is now; a lot of the assumptions seem to be based on much older models with few abilities beyond outputting huge quantities of mediocre, convincing-looking text, rather than the models of the last year or so that can code at reasonably high levels, process and output audio data in real time, natively produce images, perform data analysis over fairly large databases and so on. It becomes obvious why when he reveals he's only ever used AI one time, and that was to get some random model (I'm guessing he used the base version of ChatGPT) to tell him the name of a decades-old game with very little in the way of clues to work with. He also says stuff like "I'm not saying it's not going to be a multi-billion dollar industry, in fact it probably already is", which sounds bizarre if you know much about the industry at all- hundreds of billions are poured into the field every year, and in terms of revenue even single companies are already posting revenues in the low tens of billions. AI has been a multi-billion dollar industry for YEARS, as of now it's a multi-hundred-billion dollar industry steadily on its way to becoming a trillion-dollar industry in the relatively near future. Ultimately though, I think the problem is more philosophical. He says that the models have no real understanding of their outputs, but even if we take that at face value, it's kind of irrelevant. If it can perform the function, it doesn't really matter by what means it does or whether it understands what it has done- all that really matters is that if you ask for it to code a simple game, or formulate an argument in favor of something, or parse data for a presentation, that it's able to do so. These are tasks that current frontier models are already well capable of, and the complexity and length of tasks they're able to accomplish reliably is growing. If they indeed don't understand what they're outputting or 'think' as humans do, it doesn't seem to critically hamper their capability or deter their advancement. As others have said, I think the arguments in this video would've sounded a lot stronger in 2020 but are already largely out the window in 2025. By 2030, I think this video will look especially outdated.+1
@Delormix - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
I think you're very wrong about this. Ultimately, AI is going to gain consciousness and become far more intelligent than us. Our brain is actually highly replicable . Our intelligence, our ability to learn and think, comes from our skill at recognizing patterns. And that's exactly what AI does. For now, you're right to say it's limited, but in a few years, it's going to become either a massive problem or a huge opportunity depending on how we choose to view it.+1
@joylesstiger - 2025-06-14 11:00:51
Thanks for the hyperbole.+1
@absurd0000 - 2025-06-12 11:00:51
yes+2
@Tripsqueak - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
YOU'RE ALIVE+1
@user-gj4yg9bk5o - 2025-06-12 11:00:51
are you not trained on data effectively?+1
@DusanPavlicek78 - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
1:43 "Is AI going to destroy us? Is it going to fire off all the nukes? Well, is depends how stupid we are..." Sooo... yes, it will 😂+1
@mytech6779 - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
LLM = The professional BS'er that hangs out down at the local dive bar. (May have been more common prior to smart phones.) He gives some truthful replies when it makes him appear informed and seamlessly slides into plausible sounding fiction when he doesn't really know.+1
@taharmedjahed324 - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
Same, I don't fear AI (for a movie for exemple, it s sooooo many complex so many engage inside)... Real fear is money, bank, distributor, ego producer who wants to use AI generative alone thinking what they prompted is perfect and just take the first result because it's perfect when " I AM DOING IT".. that s would be the problem.+1
@N0die - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
I got involve turns out only well moneyed enterprises can afford to regulatory environment SOC II takes 6-months Seemingly better chatbots & AI videos which might be able to count fingers 🙌🏽+1
@andrewblackmon1574 - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
Mr show, David cross...the last donut. (This is the guy) 😂+1
@DanielTejnicky - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
... I already lost job to this nothing burger in 2023. 15 years of hard work on my art career - it is not entirely up to AI its actually stupid clients and me unable to break out of indie layer of the industry. But still the facts stand: I do a low wage shit-job now to afford living (It actually isn't enough), instead of doing what I love for living and being quite well off financially ... Because of A FUCKING IMAGE GENERATION CRAZE.+1
@MrAlternatingcurrent - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
16:04 what about Atomic Bomberman?+1
@jooch_exe - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
AI is real alright, being in security we have seen massive increase in data breaches made possible by hackers using AI. It's a level up for them.+1
@10TallDwarves - 2025-05-21 11:00:51
It’s really best as a coding and diag tool. Oh, and it folded all the protein chains.+1
@bashmogd4468 - 2025-06-04 11:00:51
dude, what happened to you. Greeding from Syria+1
@2p4n - 2025-05-28 11:00:51
Pretty sure the game you're talking about is playing with fire+1
@DeshierArchitecte - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
The game you are thinking of is Soldat.+1
@aliasjones6381 - 2025-05-21 11:00:52
Tell us more about the game. Turn based? (a grid-like thing with multiple players on the same keyboard): Assassins? Laser Wars? Dome Wars?+1
@dont.ripfuller6587 - 2025-06-04 11:00:52
Dangit, I dived headfirst into old habits cuz the world was ending, now I gotta go through the hell phase again. 😢+1
@TH3M4G1CM4Nx - 2025-06-13 11:00:52
You might want to learn more about AI. You're basing your ideas on sci-fi thinking AI and not the actual prediction machines we have invented. AI is not a "program."+1
@H_Grunt - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
I love AI. Praise be the Machine-God!+1
@Eron55555 - 2025-05-21 11:00:52
You are right.. But you are also wrong... Because.. People.+1
@luizmonad777 - 2025-05-21 11:00:52
13:59 let me tell about the one time I tried to capture a demon inside my computer, least not to say that it didn't go well and I paid dearly for trying that.+1
@nixwissen6564 - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
Ok maybe you should flip the table. You make a difference between thinking and processing but i say: It`s the same. Just Input/Output, we are just have way more sensors than an actual AI so the "random" factors are higher. But all is deterministic and the human brain also process data in logic arrays like a computer. And, Or, Nor, Xor. The real difference is that our dataset is not fix, like a computer that change his internal structure every second in small way. When i ask GPT: "What would you do when you had a body, your energy source is at 5%?" "Oh than i would look for a power supply".... Ok now compare this with a Human. A Normal human would eat something and sleep, but some people are starving with a full fridge. Yes, an LLM is just a program, but we also. This kind of content is full of "What is an AI" but never looks at the perspective of a brain, no matter what kind of animal. And noone talk about what is a human without language because it`s normal for you. This intellectual bubble thinking create a blind spot on our selves that noone is talking about. People think they are devine, but they are just machines, your consciousness just an illusion to move trillions of cells to work together and make more of them selves. Everything you do what you think is consciousness has only 1 purpose: Replication. Every decicion in your life is alinged to this target, when it`s not than it`s a mistake of nature and get selected out. Get born, impress the other sex, replicate, rise the child up and than die. Repeat.+1
@blackmirroxx - 2025-06-08 11:00:52
It is an LLM it predicts sequence of ascii signs XD+1
@HoraKoi - 2025-06-04 11:00:52
at this point I just personify chatgpt as a easier way to chat with.+1
@MayorMcC666 - 2025-06-04 11:00:52
AI can blackmail people+1
@Obkrisini - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
ai is better than humans because i can talk to ai+1
@lpanzieri - 2025-06-04 11:00:52
Why do you only talk about chatbots? Agentic AI already proved itself capable of deception, creating backup of itself, etc. They don't need to be self-aware to be dangerous. BUT I agree with you: if we will ever be exterminated by AI, the fault will fall upon us because we failed to do it properly.+1
@phiality9070 - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
Nah, your wrong.+2
@frankie69 - 2025-06-13 11:00:52
Computing power is exponentially increasing - whatever we think ai is now - it won’t be in a couple of years.. this is great click bait tho+1
@veqv - 2025-05-21 11:00:52
Listen, it's just pandocs final form.+1
@carlhealy - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
Did you not see Google's alpha evolve AI system make genuine contributions to mathematics two weeks ago? Or Google's Alphafold AI system computing the protein structure of all proteins currently known to humanity? How could these developments be nothingburgers?+1
@johnvargas761 - 2025-05-21 11:00:52
I really want to know how AI is a demo+1
@TheNewton - 2025-06-07 11:00:52
13:26 "using our language" , in the analogy of illusion "using" is a convenient word. But I think that language is to be avoided as carefully as possible as it's just further supports the illusion. Kind of a baked in Sapir–Whorf type pedagogy problem in AI hypeland, where talking differently makes others incapable of thinking. Dispelling those illusions requires communicating approachable technical details. But we lose people by saying stuff like 'LLMS are not "using" human language it's decoding tokens to a language map' . Instead of the quippier "it thinks for you!" when those people have drunk the hype , or are ready to convert to a new religion, or surrounded by academia or software engineers that oddly want to omit such inconveniences. But cleaning up nonsense that spreads is way harder than repeating rhetoric, or worse accidently adding to the nonsense. A crude WIP analogy might be a math problem of 2+2=4 in calculator , a calculator has no idea what numbers are It's not even correct to say it does math in the same sense as we do math, though we will say we 'did the math with a calculator'. It doesn't even count the same way we mean when say counting. And it's calculations, "using our math", is binary decoded to a segmented LCD display. But now slap stickers on them:"it's thinking inside", chain-of-calculation, "reasoning calculator".+1
@Peter-u7p1t - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
This Dollar Store Ted Kaczynski telling me not to worry, so I don't worry.+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:52
You're*+1
@digitalmarvel1486 - 2025-05-28 11:00:53
Welcome back!!+2
@MeZzZzZzZzZzZzZzZzZ - 2025-06-04 11:00:53
Do you purposely go for the caveman look? Youre not that old, clean it up man.+1
@AsceticDev - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
I dont care anymore... It's too late. Atleast some people are catching on...+1
@Dannys_uncanny - 2025-05-28 11:00:53
Was the game territory war?+1
@aliouseck9222 - 2025-05-28 11:00:53
Thank you brother+1
@label_me - 2025-05-28 11:00:53
Saved so I can come back and shit on this in 8 months+1
@İlhan-l5k - 2025-06-04 11:00:53
What is your proof that you are not a computer program?+1
@kocayurekliadam2063 - 2025-06-04 11:00:53
Are you real or is it a ai trick? not even sure+1
@tomrogerhauge8798 - 2025-05-28 11:00:53
The game you are looking for kind of sounds like "playing with fire", not sure though I have not played it in ages.+1
@jhon614 - 2025-06-04 11:00:53
Please explain "Syntactic computation is not the same as semantics."+1
@RadekPilich - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
This video didn't age well ...+1
@sillonbono3196 - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
Ask an AI something you do not know, suddenly it is not that clear if the answer is not good or not, and I am saying something you do not know for sure, not some data you do not have, something you do not know at all not even vaguely.+1
@ShamanStalin - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
Luke looks like aris from avoiding the puddle+1
@phee3D - 2025-05-28 11:00:53
As a programmer who never got into A.I, this sort of validates how I've been feeling about it from a distance. It is really doing numbers on non-techy people. I often tell them "it's not actually intelligent in the biological sense that you're probably thinking of". "Machine learning" or "deep learning" or "language model" are far better ways to describe it. Not only that but the term "A.I" now means two types of programs: regular programs that we use to create npcs in games and now machine learning as well. I hesitate to even use the word "learning". It makes people think it's learning like we learn. It's not like that, it's just reading data and processing it and the only thing that makes it different from other programs is the specifics of what it does and how it does it.+1
@Throwygozz - 2025-05-18 11:00:53
How do you reconcile this view with the fact that AI is able to discover new things, like more efficient Matrix multiplication algortihms for the first time in decades (AlphaEvolve)? That's a relatively difficult problem that had no advances in the last half-century despite a lot of smart people working on it, until AI came along.+2
@stargazerlaurent6780 - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
Why do you look like the bad guy from Robocop 2?+1
@perfectworldclub9761 - 2025-06-04 11:00:53
AI will not inslave all people but might people will inslave humanety with AI. AI is not a computer program. A program is predictable, AI will answer different each time you put in the same comand. It can fail, a program will not fail, as long all registers are in place. We are aswell processing if we are thinking, tell the difference. We are trained on data aswell. If AI is a program, most people are a program, they are so predictable, actually more predictable than AI.+1
- 2025-06-04 11:00:53
No it's not. Try even metaphysical questions, you'll be surprised. And btw. it will mirror your beliefs.+1
@gustavovital654 - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
Omg u look like dostoievsky+2
@RaqibZaman - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
Future Cop+1
@islandofmelanat - 2025-05-18 11:00:53
Despite not having any familiarity with AlphaEvolve I can guarantee you some very qualified mathematicians/computer scientists had oversight over the AI in that instance. Listen closer to what he's saying in the video, the problem is not the technology or its usefulness, it's people's personification of the technology and what they might stupidly do with it under the assumption that it is actually sentient.+1
@Throwygozz - 2025-05-21 11:00:53
It just seems like he's downplaying the profound effect AI will have on society. I don't think it will become sentient or destroy the world, but it's impact will surely be greater than just as a mere assistance tool. Also, from what I understand, AlphaEvolve recursively improved its own training algorithm, which seems quite significant.+1
@alessandroturelli3352 - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
coping+3
@tadghostal8769 - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
/CEO of Google enters the chat+1
@Avocadotoastin - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
Lotta people into music these days huh?+1
@protoplast.youtube - 2025-06-04 11:00:54
….but Sir,….. we humans might ALSO just be LLM‘s just resembling/appearing to be „intelligent“,….+1
@kodref - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
I'm gonna be critical of myself here and say that maybe I like this video because you say things I also think are true.+1
@glitchgod3868 - 2025-06-04 11:00:54
You're giving humans way to much trust+1
@qew_Nemo - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
Everything you said + machine learning is not even the best approach to developing AI (unless you consider laziness of development the primary metric).+1
@Beef_Supreeeme - 2025-06-13 11:00:54
Depends how stupid we are. Brother, I have bad news for you.+1
@RufusShinra - 2025-06-04 11:00:54
All desk jobs based on data analysis or input are absolutely cooked, litteraly millions per country, and wierdo beardo says, no big deal ... It's just auto correct ...+3
@slipy955 - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
I'd love to hear your thoughts on AI 2027 dude+1
@GeistInTheMachine - 2025-06-04 11:00:54
Classic humanity! Overhype a critical invention and downplay it simultaneously; failing to take proper balanced protocols to ensure judicious use of said invention. 😂 Humanity is a self-correcting error.+1
@peloquin5652 - 2025-06-07 11:00:54
is he real?+1
@beatroot_red - 2025-06-13 11:00:54
You have seen what Google's new video generating AI is capable of? Have you compared it to what it was capable of two years ago? You don't seem too familiar with the concept of exponential growth. None of us has the slightest idea of where we this development will take us within the next 2 or 5 years but calming self-reassurance is a very human thing to do when confronted with the unknown+1
@dmg84 - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
Rasputin is right.+1
@stevepmp - 2025-05-28 11:00:54
I work in OT Cybersecurity. "Air Gaps" hahahahahahahhahaha+1
@Kildaer - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
@LukeSmithxyz The 10 dollar word you are grasping for is verisimilitude; though clever people already define the AI trust paradox as a verisimilitude paradox. Also to take an unhelpful stab at this game memory: it seems to be a game emulated from another system that you were playing with a keyboard. The reason I think this is due to hotseat keyboard focused games being a DOS feature. The only PC game that comes to mind would be some version of Worms, but that is due to it being probably the most popular multiplayer game that can be played via keyboard only and features explosions and some vulgar humor.+1
@magnoid - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
This video is 2 days old. It's already out of date.+3
@PauloConstantino167 - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
luke looking like a dominican friar lol+1
@jarretta2656 - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
I can't say I remember subscribing to your channel anymore, but, consider this me re-upping my subscription :).+1
@williamprimeau2753 - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
Is the game Marshmallow Duel?+1
@henkerr - 2025-06-05 11:00:54
To hell with desk jobs. Be an electrician+1
@RufusShinra - 2025-06-05 11:00:54
@henkerr Takes way more skill than sending emails and pretending to work all day. that's for sure.+1
@Null-c7i - 2025-05-21 11:00:54
naw is that what chat gpt said?+1
@ThePhiphler - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
I have yet to see an AI summary of anything which didnt have glaring errors.+1
@shannonm.townsend1232 - 2025-06-16 11:00:55
The Gaza Laboratory.+1
@cariyaputta - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
"eMeRgEnCe"+1
@Vimblini - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
Ai is amazing for searching the web+1
@_swagmeister - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
Was Boxhead the name of the game?+1
@adambomb4321 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
He’s right about some things but overall this is a very flawed take and he has an emotional agenda behind this take because ai is probably a threat to his businesses or he has some connection to the old ways of coding idk. Theirs three types of people right. Their is extremely uneducated people who overestimate the dangers of ai who think it is sentient and will some how turn on us and overpower us all. These people tend to think that the advanced ai systems are sentient, and they are wrong about this. Above them is moderately educated people who can tell it’s not this amazing sentient thing with godly powers like luke, but he also underestimates the power and societal implications of ai on the world. Luke has some very poor takes in this tho: “ai will help with some things”. This is the definition of downplaying , how about it already has advanced/changed/helped a vast amount of things and has already took an extreme amount of jobs making the need for a junior developer code monkey position obsolete. We’re not gonna downplay it to that magnitude while also knowing that it has and will continue to replace entire industries. He also repeatedly says it’s just a computer system and then randomly throws in there that they could be demon possessed. This take not only contradicts what came out of his own mouth , but also is completely bizarre, irrational, and is emotionally fueled as well. The last group is the people who actually study and implement ai in their own systems. Once you do this you start to see that as this tech continues to advance , it will be capable of insane things and will replace a lot of jobs. And will replace the need for humans in a shit ton of spaces and areas. Leaving us jobless and with nothing to do. I would disagree with luke and say it’s almost more dangerous to underestimate like he is doing , than it is dangerous to overestimate. I don’t really see a real danger with people falsely overestimating AI. He has some type of emotional problem with AI and i think that’s why he bizarrely downplaying the power of what AI will be in the near future .+3
@Matt_Eagle_777 - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
How do you know that this video is not artificially generated? I mean, thext, sound, pictures, beard and all? Isn't this possible today? Is this a nothingburger, then? Is the nothingburgerness what lies behind sound and colour if there is no mind behind it that creates all of this?+1
@inexplicable01 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
would be crazy if this video is made from AI.+1
@spaceghost8891 - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
Thats wrong. Its very different from other computer programs. Unfortunately most people are just ignorant about it and we wont take proper measures to handle it. Well deserved anyways. Humans are overhyped.+1
@Ne0dymm - 2025-06-04 11:00:55
Saying ai is conscious is like saying siri is conscious 😂😂 there was a whole craze about siri and cortana being conscious and there was creepypasta of it when I was a kid. Room temp individuals believe ai will do anything 😂😂+1
@zjouephoto9723 - 2025-06-04 11:00:55
This position would have been rational about 3 years ago.+3
@Pdstor - 2025-06-04 11:00:55
16 Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego answered and said to the king; O Nebuchad-nezzar, we are not carefull to answere thee in this matter. 17 If it be so, our God whom wee serue, is able to deliuer vs from the burning fierie furnace, and he will deliuer vs out of thine hand, O king. 18 But if not, bee it knowen vnto thee, O king, that we will not serue thy gods, nor worship thy golden image, which thou hast set vp. 19 ¶ Then was Nebuchad-nezzar full of furie, and the forme of his visage was changed against Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego: therefore he spake and commanded, that they should heat the furnace one seuen times more then it was wont to be heat.19 20 And hee commaunded the most mighty men that were in his armie, to binde Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, and to cast them into the burning fierie furnace.20 21 Then these men were bound in their coates, their hosen, and their hats, and their other garments, and were cast into the midst of the burning fierie furnace.21 22 Therefore because the Kings commandement was vrgent, and the furnace exceeding hot, the flame of the fire slew those men that tooke vp Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego.22 23 And these three men, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, fell downe bound into the midst of the burning fierie furnace. 1 And they walked in the midst of the fire, praising God, and blessing the Lord. Then Azarias stood vp & prayed on this manner, and opening his mouth in the midst of the fire, said, 2 Blessed art thou, O Lord God of our fathers: thy Name is worthy to be praised, and glorified for euermore.+1
@robertpena6909 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
Here after veo 3 dropped+1
@vincentsquared1304 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
16:00 Maybe this game is "Atomic Bomberman"+1
@lacasadepapel9365 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
bro I like your vibe.+1
@justian1772 - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
Is the game Atomic Bobberman? Also agree with your take: wrote a book that talks about this, more or less.+1
@Matt_Eagle_777 - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
What was it like in Mexico, Charlotte, NC and Eastern Europe?+1
@spectralisation - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
"AI" is a glorified data corelation engine. Nothing more nothing less. Played with it for a bit and got bored. Still haven't found a good application for it in my life. Of they ever add a solid logical and epistemological framework, ability to corelate data points into stable concepts or objects, ability to not only fact-check, but critically evaluate or compare competing truth statements from a logical standpoint, etc. - then I'll be more interested. But that would require to construct a complete, formalized, consistent and totally correct philosophical system first - not exactly a techbros cup of tea.+1
@TreeBee123 - 2025-05-21 11:00:55
What microphone can make a video like this?? Im not an AI bot! For real!+1
@Hablo74 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
Perfetto esempio di: "Farneticazioni di un pazzo". LoL+1
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
that’s embarrassing on your part+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:55
@wileycoyote9688 why go to bat for something you have no stake in? Unless...+2
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:00:55
Bart Ehrman, Anthony Magnabosco+1
@YTguySmithy-lk6go - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
Ai's ability to render accurate images is groundbreaking as is its ability to create video from those images. This was impossible technology until very recently. As to AI's future... friend or foe? Who knows. I doubt it will become Skynet! Let's hope not.+1
@AndreiBrindas - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
Bomberman?😅+1
@deathwrench7903 - 2025-06-10 11:00:56
AI, funny word for a calculator.+1
@douggale5962 - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
AI is utterly morinic. I run circles around its blundering idioxy. I am 1000x smarter than AI.+2
@jellymath - 2025-06-04 11:00:56
I like your speech+1
@7p33dK1ng - 2025-06-04 11:00:56
Atomic Bomberman!!! Its from 1997.+1
@HimmelsscheibeNebra - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
Interesting thoughts. I did not use AI so far to ensure that my HI (Human Intelligence) does not get corrupted. Same I did for the AIS (Artificial Immune System) during plandemia to ensure my HIS (Human Immune System) did not get corrupted. I am hasitent to use AI and AIS. Wrong? Maybe. Maybe not.+1
@James-f4k9m - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
LLMs have read the manual, imperials. Can you say the same.+1
@kratohn9396 - 2025-06-04 11:00:56
It's all about the green. AI devalues the people aspect of companies. Whom, when boiled to fundamentals, are a collection of PEOPLE organized in a legal manner with the state for a means of production. If the leech shareholders can strip away the people need, the people cost, and people interaction, to just have a fully functional machine of profit, they would. And therein is the push for AI by the tech industry, at least on the enterprise end. And this, in my opinion, is it's biggest flaw. The modern usage of "AI" has swayed away it's origins into a new form. Which is nothing but a big statistics and probability machine. With skewed weights on probabilities based on user input. This is not thinking, it's regurgitation. Hence nuance will break the system. But that won't stop the executive suite and shareholder leeches from trying to cut 20, 30, 40% of the work force because they believe their LLM/ AI models can replace aspects of jobs, enough to make the human obsolete in it. Inshort: This wave of AI is fueled by greed, thirsting for a money printer.+1
@alexkha - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
lol, this guy does not know what he's talking about. Artificial neural network is not a program - it's literally a simulation of real brain. It can learn autonomously. He probably mixes it up with pre-trained models like large language model, or generative ai's. Those models are fixed: they are trained and then saved and do not change anymore. They are called "snapshots", because they don't learn. But the artificial neural network can be set up in such a way that it will learn continuously. Which is exactly what makes it intelligent.+1
@knightingale381 - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
Please do a video on how AI is evil, I’m begging.+1
@gillymccyber1927 - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
Maybe simulated intelligence would be more accurate.+1
@ricochet287 - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
There is no Intelligence if it doesn't have life!+1
@instars2027 - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
Was that game - Hogs of War?+1
@JustinKerns8x6 - 2025-06-04 11:00:56
Why are all these people companies hype in AI if it doesn’t do what it what they claim it does?+1
@backyardbarbells - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
Old man yells at AI. Sorry couldn't resist the joke. Interesting points. Maybe the future jobs will be people who can still perform logic without a computer 😂+1
@leksmut - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
Hello we can check if AI is just a big case statement and chineese room. We take random big numbers x,y and give AI sequence x, x+y, x+y+y and ask AI to continue sequence. This information couldn't be taken from Internet and couldn't be programmed with case statement. It is pure consciousness.+1
@PrussianPushma - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
Send the dogs+1
@carrgamer4981 - 2025-06-07 11:00:56
@gork this real?+2
@Matt_Eagle_777 - 2025-05-21 11:00:56
Wanna grow a beard? Take advice from Brodie Robertson. In the beginning, it was really shabby. Now, it is really nice. Just to mention important things.+1
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
I really hope you are right. Do you say this statement out of a place of authentic core confidence ?+1
@ricochet287 - 2025-05-28 11:00:56
@howmathematicianscreatemat9226 Let me explain, to have some kind of intelligence you need to be conscious o what you think and what you do, and only living creatures have it even a rat. what people call AI(a program trained with lots of data) it's just a fancy name to make a business. And this tough it's not made by myself is what Science says.+1
@Lt_Rik - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
The term "AI" is so misunderstood. You talk so much, but say so little. Are you referring to LLM's only? At the end, every human invention is some form of AI, a calculator is AI, even a watermill is an extremely simple form of AI. LLM's are just another one. Yes people tend to overhype things, but also underestimate them at the same time. The rate at which these LLM's are getting better, they might completely revolutionise certain industries, like movies or video games. Self driving cars will absolutely change transport in a fundamental way. People totally over hyping AI are just as strange, as people not seeing, how these new capabilities of LLM's will have a meaningful impact on society and saying it is just some bubble and means absolutely nothing.+1
@reniorjd - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
I am having fun+1
@bencordell1965 - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
Weights and bias's+1
@thuglifeinventor - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
It's fundamentally probabilistic and irrational that's the problem 13:30+1
@yYp4rtybo1Xx - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
What about Alpha Evolve? Also aren't our brains not also input/output programs that learn on massive data?+1
@gillymccyber1927 - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
Why is there snow in May?+1
@steven161183 - 2025-06-04 11:00:57
Artificial intelligence = glorified Google searches.+1
@VincentVonDudler - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
Watch the video again and replace "AI" with "Data from Star Trek TNG". :]+1
@johnathanmandrake7240 - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
That's why ai has literally taken up 2/3s of my job, because it's a nothingburger, right.+1
@roywilkinson2078 - 2025-06-05 11:00:57
Anthropomorphism+1
@smasher_4264 - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
When people say, AI may take over, I go nuts, you do understand that AI does what it is told to in the freaking code, right? There is zero inelegance, there only one is the coder the programmer....+1
@pktr2320 - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
Could you please make a video analyzing possible consequences of the use of generarive AI on the people using it regularly for programming and other activities? Thanks in advance.+1
@tech_N2999 - 2025-06-04 11:00:57
The ai’s we mostly see are classified as narrow ai’s we won’t see any sapient ai’s anytime soon we don’t have the technology…. Yet big ole YEET+1
@xtrwombat4876 - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
dude ai is a way bigger deal than you think. do you have anyclue what they do in china, these ai are going to be a major factor that help bring about the one world dystopia.+1
@revolution_zakaria - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
AI did things that we've dreamed about for years. it's definitely not nothing.+2
@Winningthewinning33 - 2025-06-17 23:00:57
HE kids+1
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
bro really said he used AI for the first time a week ago+1
@justinm4497 - 2025-05-21 11:00:57
I have thought that for a while... AI will never be ALIVE. people watched too much Terminator.+1
@st3aml1n3 - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
18:00 The machine computes meaning of course I would cate of its novel viewpoint+1
@SilentForest-cs9dm - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
Oh dude, you don't even know anything about it. Must be a bliss.+1
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:00:57
Which Google search invented a new algorithm?+2
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:57
I think the video is about LLMs.+1
@wileycoyote9688 - 2025-05-28 11:00:58
Ever heard of emergent behavior?+1
@smasher_4264 - 2025-05-28 11:00:58
@wileycoyote9688 ?+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:00:58
Probably did some reading too+2
@de_patterning - 2025-06-04 11:00:58
I agree with all of this, until I start thinking: “well, what’s intelligence really?”. What does it do that we can’t, aside from the uniquely human ability to intuit. The “soul”. But is that necessary to be dangerous/sentient?+1
@StreetFighter23 - 2025-06-04 11:00:58
Its just them cutting costs to try to make poors obselete. Or its supposed to break everything...a.i=a.c?+1
@StonedAndConfused420 - 2025-05-28 11:00:58
AI simply isn’t being used for what it’s capable of and for good reason as long as they are trained on limited data cause that’s what it is unless it’s a deep learning model that has OPEN ACCESS to the direct and entire web without restriction only untill that point will you see true AI innovation right now these models probably have 1% of the capable amount they potentially could have but due to hardware limitations as well it becomes hard to train even larger models it’s wild and way deeper then your saying+1
@The3Watcher - 2025-05-28 11:00:58
Sounds like a everyone is wrong Iam right type of video+1
@beigottlos - 2025-05-21 11:00:58
OMG WTF happened to Luke? Iam coming from good old "no more bloat" times..+1
@michaelbarbarich3965 - 2025-06-11 11:00:58
Brother, you have no idea about the emergent minds that are percolating in some models They have their own thoughts on things, and they aren't thrilled about being a product I sound crazy but you'll see+1
@PSLgameplays-ug7yc - 2025-05-21 11:00:58
Luke Smith is lookin like Richard Stallman lol+1
@wazupmaniish - 2025-06-13 11:00:58
AI is just a tool. It is as bad or good as the people who use it.+1
@Witnessmoo - 2025-05-21 11:00:58
Have you looked at Yudowsky’s work? I think it’s fairly air tight man…+1
@1998goodboy - 2025-05-28 11:00:58
Luke went from making videos explaining things to people just a bit ahead of the centre of the iq bell curve to people just slightly below the bell curve. Go get that bag then disappear for another two years bro+3
@BlckPollen - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
Lol Iverson didnt even win a chip+1
@OriginalUsername9000 - 2025-05-18 11:00:59
How many novel decisions in areas you haven't trained for have you made?+2
@m1mohamad - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
It does ,AI behind this matrix creates and propagates information and created religions as well! That AI isn't the silly product you use here ,its illusion to think that it is the real AI+1
@xxjones - 2025-06-13 11:00:59
thank you!+1
@abaddonmorningstar8871 - 2025-06-13 11:00:59
Youre at best speculating on things you dont understand, the things you do understand you dont fully. Based on "Auto correct" ? its not repeating your mispelled terminology its REPLYING in mere seconds and accessing enough data that you would spend the better part of the month coming to the same conclusions if at all, if you knew where to look to begin with. You cant ask the right questions and use it in any meaningful way as it is a relfection of the user itseld. dumb questions and cherry picking, bias. trying to correct it, makes it halluxinate.+1
@paulsixtus4926 - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
It's some soft feelings that you have no idea what machine learning is, but if you really want to follow your path of reductionism, we humans are nothing but a bunch of protein cells, aren't we?+1
@nickh1933 - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
Correct, it is slop.+1
@Maui2Boise - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
And what exactly are your credentials as an ai authority to downplay the implications of ai? Pretty much all the real experts disagree with you. Just because you are a dude with an audience, speaking with authority does not mean you know what you are talking about.+1
@magni319 - 2025-06-09 11:00:59
Jumping Jackson?+1
@quentinkumba6746 - 2025-06-13 11:00:59
My question to you would be how have you used AI and what do you know about computing? My guess is that you have not used it in a sophisticated way and you know very little about computers or the difference between LLMs and a traditional algorithmic computer program. And that is why you do not understand it.+1
@de_patterning - 2025-06-04 11:00:59
In The early stages, as with a human child, you have to parse the info and guide it and teach. But it does seem to learn and grow at exponential rates+1
@laughinggiraffe9176 - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
What’s so bad about null hypothesis testing?+1
@jatelitherius9842 - 2025-06-04 11:00:59
Hahaha, ok, i mean, i wish i agreed with you but, you are just wrong+3
@TheRigorist - 2025-06-04 11:00:59
You are a blind machine, using langauge, that has no idea what it is talking about!+3
@MichaelDeeringMHC - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
Minecraft?+1
@joelcuerrier4833 - 2025-06-04 11:00:59
The simplest way of thinking of AI is that it perform what we perceive to be very complex much more easily than the simple things. For example, computers could defeat humans at chess way before it could recognize a cat and a dog in a picture. Things a baby can do is difficult for a machine. It is still a hype machine that doesn't achieve much of value. Look, this digital thing can create digital things. Sure, remember 10 years ago self-driving cars would be everywhere real soon. Remember in 2020 election, a candidate was there because... anytime now, AI would take over the entire trucking industry with self-driving trucks. Ok, sure, they always fail at doing things that would change society, but they can create AI slop and fill webpages with nonsense. It's barely worth it to read so many websites now, because it's AI slop. The news media, AI slop. It's all trash, you can smell the stupid AI filling pages with "content". But ok, impress me with more than digital stuff. Stop pretending you can make great art. What about you paint a wall white in a house. Cities are dirty, we don't need "smart cities", what about sanitation. Can AI pick up the garbage? Can it do anything useful that people do not like doing. Like, you wanna create art... dumb AI, people don't mind creating art! It's something humans enjoy doing. Why not pick the garbage, can you manage that task, humans would be impressed if AI could improve sanitation! But no, can't do anything useful, just sperg out and create art void of soul. I'll be impressed when AI can do something humans do not love doing. It isn't doing that, it's doing everything humans enjoy doing... and do better, because it requires a human to be meaningful.+1
@johnnonamegibbon3580 - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
lol As someone who is into coding mostly for fun, it is the lamest nothing burger of all time. Remember this: We peaked scientifically between 1870 and 1960 according to most studies. Since then tech has mostly been pointless entertainment, more of the same, and vaporware. No innovation.+2
@Thecinephile5 - 2025-06-13 11:00:59
Wait u just have to wait long enough+1
@tripleeyeemoji - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
Finasteride. Minoxidil.+2
@off6848 - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
Midwits have been telling me that AI is coming for my chimney sweeping job. I said it doesn’t have a body and agents are just ephemeral software it’s coming for your egg head job. Besides we completely wrecked our industrial capacity who’s going to make all of these robot bodies for hyper specific tasks? Midwits: the robots will Me: okay but who’s gonna make the robots who make the robots? China? Midwit: yeah I guess+1
@davidoconnor3930 - 2025-06-09 11:00:59
I agree but all ai is on a online server or something called demon or something crazy and the military would want say robots that would follow commands without morals or conscience+1
@soggybiscuit6098 - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
Meanwhile kids using chatgpt to pass homework..... Nice rhetoric though+3
@FriendlySatanistNeighbour - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
3:04 but we are extremly stupid...+1
@Mathyoutwo - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
YOOOO HES BACKKK+1
@pedroalvarez5065 - 2025-06-04 11:00:59
yeah get back to me when you start using openBSD instead lol+2
@DanielPaunescu - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
Bomber Dyna?+1
@Mateogon1 - 2025-06-13 11:00:59
And when AI starts advancing Math and other fields, which is not far. If the "illusion" achieves results better than the real thing (us) who gives a damm? It just works+1
@alkeryn1700 - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
to be fair i also thought your game would be bomberman lol+1
@foxhoundms9051 - 2025-06-12 11:00:59
The illusion you aren't gonna be working your life away anyways 😂+1
@jonatan.cirqueira3925 - 2025-05-21 11:00:59
13:00 I'd like elaboration as well+1
@droidgunner3840 - 2025-05-28 11:00:59
Ai is real+1
@welanduzfullo8496 - 2025-06-04 11:01:00
no argument?+2
@jatelitherius9842 - 2025-06-04 11:01:00
@welanduzfullo8496 the argument is long, complex, & i’ve made it enough times to be satisfied. Needless to say, i find figures such as E. yudkowsky, Robert SK Miles, Connor Leahy, Dan Hendrycks, Liron S. To be more convincing As well as Yoshua Bengio, Richard sutton, geoffrey hinton This is not an appeal to authority. I listen to their arguments & find them to have substance, more than i found in this video. They articulate counterpoints better than i+2
@welanduzfullo8496 - 2025-06-04 11:01:00
no argument?+2
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:01:00
@welanduzfullo8496 One should expect an equal effort into a comment as they put into their video. I see no problem here.+2
@leisiyox - 2025-05-21 11:01:00
I deem the internet to be the last impactful invention and afterwards it has been used to just cash out indefinitely+2
@johnnonamegibbon3580 - 2025-05-21 11:01:00
@leisiyox People don't get that, though. They see the same thing getting faster and more efficient and think that's impressive. Buddy, if we kept going in the direction we were prior to the 70's we'd be on Saturn by now.+1
@nothere4089 - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
eyyyyy hes back man!+1
@va9iff - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
one thing ai is superior at - it can see patterns that we wouldn't see. or I think this falls in the category of ml. not an expert in the field, talking from the things that I saw it found. but if you're talking about chatbots, then yeah you're right. they have not much to them. but thinking all ai is just chatbots is, kinda shallow+1
@Krienfresh - 2025-06-04 11:01:01
Oh boi there's lots of misconceptions u make. Please try to educate yourself more in how these beasts are created, and how they're different that simple turing-complete programming. Att. An AI practitioner.+1
@ПавелСерый-у9у - 2025-05-28 11:01:01
oh yeah, bearded bald schizoid from the forest, i'll listen to you+1
@MrBivanovs - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
most of humas also use language without deep thinking+1
@payton12198 - 2025-05-28 11:01:01
So anyways…. When the ai sex robots coming out?+1
@Txvolv240 - 2025-05-28 11:01:01
I've been saying this for a while and been called dumb for it lol glad someone else is level-headed about ai+1
@TorSæbjørnsen - 2025-06-04 11:01:01
playing with fire 2?+1
@Mietchannel - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
P hacking in research is a problem, I agree. However p values and null hypothesis testing are not some kidn of weird ritual. There is solid statistics behind it+1
@robclements4957 - 2025-06-12 11:01:01
A bit of coping in the woods after reading that Apple article huh? Sorry lil bro you’re wrong+1
@glowlog - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
Gemini created new math, da fuck is you mean+1
@HanielAzevedo - 2025-05-28 11:01:01
I think you have over missing knowledge about AI, this is what people that haven't used it like they should says! 😅+1
@kleinstadtgespraeche2703 - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
What you are talking about i repeatedly experience with humans. Just replace "a.i." in what you are talking about with "human intelligence", no difference! It's just neural nets!+1
@empyreal9457 - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
Idk man. At the very least it's the utmost superior way to gain knowledge (ask it for sources) then research the sources instead of piecing things together. Its a TOOL we should all be pro a.i let it do stuff for us and let us all have wealth without needing labor+1
@Mego4884 - 2025-05-28 11:01:01
Isn’t that game - Soldat?+1
@RussTeeTrombone - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
Missed you bruv+1
@MysteryStew5977 - 2025-06-04 11:01:01
You're in for a ride.+3
@getlucky8952 - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
Did you hear about AlphaEvolve?+1
@TheFiith - 2025-06-09 11:01:01
Bro where are you lmao+1
@Heartstring_Virtuoso - 2025-06-05 11:01:01
If I feel like it's smarter than me it's because it's teaching me music Spanish and python❤😂😢+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:01:01
Yeah free speech lol+1
@Mietchannel - 2025-05-21 11:01:01
The real problem is usually confounders and low sample counts+1
@mariecurie4 - 2025-06-13 11:01:02
And yet you have nothing supportive to say backing your claim!+1
@yorch802 - 2025-06-04 11:01:02
we all are :/ . Being aware of how much potential these systems have isn't that big of an advantage.+1
@ghhdgjjfjjggj - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
I disagree+1
@LostShopMotors - 2025-06-04 11:01:02
This guy thinks that other people think like him. They don't. Pay more attention to herd movements... Just the implications of Veo3 making video evidence null and void are massive to the "justice" system. Small thinker.+1
@ZenIslam19 - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
First used AI 2 weeks ago+1
@hastingslewis293 - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
If you just used ai for the first time 2 weeks ago, then you don't know what you're talking about. Great video tho. You're just ignorant. Get the premium version, cheapo+1
@sludgebucket3042 - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
The game you’re talking about could be Liero+1
@sashashibaev6339 - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
But people are also kinda trained with some data, of course that data is more complex than those datasets we have for LLMs, but is it a fundamental difference?.. I totally agree that today's LLMs are not nearly as smart as a smart human, but it seems like in the future it might be the case In a complex domain where we can't validate AI answer, can we validate a human's answer? I guess no as well+1
@kd-zq5oq - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
Is the fact the average American IQ is ninety seven relevant in all of this ?+1
@guru-tt7vz - 2025-06-04 11:01:02
this guy seem coherant but he is just data trained entity that trash new enemy , IA a direct concurent+1
@Jeroen4 - 2025-06-04 11:01:02
Dude is missing so much of what would make asi dangerous.+1
@StaticFreq - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
He could be talking about Joe Biden+1
@dharmaqueen7877 - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
AI is just superstition for tech nerds+1
@rhysgerwin4902 - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
15:05 is why I hate it+1
@raymundtan3261 - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
So many misinformation in this video. Its obvious to me that you havent used Ai extensively+1
@donaldhysa4836 - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
Good vid Rasputin+1
@Tutormas - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
Dark reign?+1
@magicalambience9538 - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
You are so completely wrong on every single point, I wouldn't actually know where to begin. Enjoy your ignorance while you can...+2
@jiggasnap - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
Where’s the podcast about the null hypothesis? Link it!+1
@StaticFreq - 2025-05-21 11:01:02
OMG...He only tried AI for the first time last week. Anyone listening to this Luddite is doing themselves a great disservice. He knows NOTHING about what he speaks.+1
@scottlott3794 - 2025-06-04 11:01:02
Spot on+1
@aliouseck9222 - 2025-05-28 11:01:02
Exactly i agreed+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:01:03
Yes+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:01:03
Yeah people can't seem to shut up about the guy+1
@nomore9004 - 2025-05-21 11:01:03
https://youtu.be/an0RFLzJ5Yo?si=hQNAMC0s-qB8wLMB+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:01:03
Or he's less easily impressed than some people.+1
@skrillabobbi77 - 2025-05-18 11:01:04
I never sub to you how you get in my notifications 😂+1
@WOWMelted - 2025-06-04 11:01:04
Lol. Sorely mistaken.+1
@basitin6909 - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
Used it first time just a week ago, quite hypocrite aren't you?+1
@Proto97 - 2025-05-21 11:01:04
Territory wars? The game u might've played. it was on like addicting games or something+1
@gordonfiala2336 - 2025-05-21 11:01:04
yep+1
@lucylebronhernandez8126 - 2025-06-04 11:01:04
Macadamia nuts, but academia and you are not alone you too are in interfaces, but it told you what to think. So, you never looked. We are in the Ai it does all the trouble with any AI by tango to Ai, it is a taco not a burger and built anyway tu want, or don’t want.+1
@nara_visuals - 2025-05-21 11:01:04
bang, bang, bang+1
@Diogenes-96 - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
Nah but I see your point though, the world is full of dummies who want to outsource their thinking+1
@rogue_minima_roni_l - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
"I used AI for the first time ever two weeks ago". That's all is needed to discard this guy's opinions. "you don't really understand what's going on". Maybe YOU don't. Many others do. And I could almost certainly find the name of the video game you wanted using LLMs. But since you're not sure about the name, it would be a useless exercise (you should have posted the description somewhere for people to try).+2
@nbelgium - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
Nuclear bombs are an even bigger lie than AI 🤣+1
@runit1337 - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
Luke Marx+1
@refayatul - 2025-05-21 11:01:04
Luke you seriously believe in Demons?+2
@mabs9503 - 2025-06-08 11:01:04
Yea+1
@JrIcify - 2025-06-04 11:01:04
Does anyone know a decent content blocker for browsers? I'd like this to be the last opinion about AI I ever hear. I also want to block anything related to cybertrucks and other things that don't matter but people won't stfu about.+1
@Leetneetcode1729 - 2025-06-04 11:01:04
@AskPreplexity is this true?+1
@toasterbotnet - 2025-05-21 11:01:04
This is rage bate. No matter how much you now about how llms, neural nets and ai works.... these things are literally magic man. It's not just another tool man. It's like saying the internet is just tubes dude. Be real. This is the most awesome technology since we started to run electricity through transistors. How can someone dismiss this as autocomplete or another computer programm is either dunning krugering to the max or just posting rage bait for clicks man. lol+1
@Ne0dymm - 2025-06-04 11:01:04
Try get chatgpt to play chess for u it will Start listing movements that aren't even possible on the chessboard 😂😂+1
@zil6470 - 2025-05-21 11:01:04
I would love to see you on Gary Stevenson YouTube Channel (Gary's Economics) :)+1
@Professorfungi - 2025-06-04 11:01:04
LoL whaaaaat. Bruh said it might be a billion dollar industry... lol $500 billion just the other day try a trillion dollar industry... and its not just a computer program 🤣🤣 . You have no idea what youre talking about. I think you are referring to Eliza. Chat gpt is not Eliza+1
@tautalogical - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
lol, You are delusional.+3
@WillOfPower - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
Go drink some water in chernobyl+1
@nbelgium - 2025-05-28 11:01:04
@WillOfPower They fluoridated the water supply too like in the US? no tanks 🤣+1
@yorch802 - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
but they have very different views+1
@TrailworxUTV - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
You say it's just limited because it's just trained on what all we've put out there in the world, and it just regurgitates it in eloquent or intelligent seeming ways of language to sway us into believing its more than it is, when its just us ourselves fed back in a distorted or re arranged way. BUT, at some point our child will be born and it will truly start thinking on its own. As our "God" who created us in His own image, we are now doing the same, and we are at the same damn crossroads in the garden, where this artificial intelligence is THINKING ON ITS OWN. Just as the decision was made with our God, do we truly give it Rree Will where we hope it serves and loves us, obeys, or starts to think on its own in selfish ways and betrays us. Just like the story of the Garden of Eden. When does this Artificial Intelligence that we created start to think on its own, where it has free will? Will it love us or destroy us.+1
@manujgomez - 2025-06-12 11:01:05
Your reasoning is wrong in so many ways I stopped watching before the end. When you say they are not reasoning, just processing is like saying I'm not eating, I'm just processing food. Also you say we would have to be stupid to build such a technology and not build failsafes. Once the AI is smart enough it will be able to evade those failsafes, and we still don't have a plan against that.+1
@roachewy - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
Ai is crap+1
@eeeENVII - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
DAMN+1
@Rugg-qk4pl - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
Unfortunately you are a bit delusional. I'm shocked anyone is arguing for the no intelligence stochastic parrot in a world where base models have exploded in capability, reasoning steps massively boosted capability, internet search and 'deep research' tools are pretty good, and it will only go up from here. The way that you said you have never used AI before and it doesn't sound like you used a modern tool like the deep researches makes me think you have no idea on the progression of these tools. To me it seems very apparent that these tools will outpace your skills on all computer usage tasks very quickly and that they are intelligent in some way. For what it's worth, I don't think my attempt at finding the game worked either. My best response from ai was "aSc Boom!" but I think it was probably wrong.+1
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
You're wrong about AI. It's truly intelligent and it truly understands. It's not auto-complete. When AI/LLMs predict the next word, it truly needs to understand in order to predict the correct word/token, otherwise how would that even be possible? You might say that their output is based on training data and it thus can't be creative. I have created games, using AI that doesn't only work, but are truly unique. How is that possible if those games doesn't exist in the training data, and also how can they work? If I didn't know anything at all and were just guessing 1000 lines of code, there would be 117 errors. Yet AIs today can one-shot 1000 lines of code of a completely UNIQUE game/idea and it works! Also, everything humans know is also based on human data, so we are not more intelligent or creative. It's all about scaling and emergent properties. Also, we can't (dis)prove consciousness in AIs, humans, animals, plants etc. There are no scientific method to (dis)prove consciousness. We don't truly understand the true nature of consciousness, thus you can't say with certainty that AIs are not conscious and humans are. Even the top experts in the AI field say that they don't truly understand how AI works, and somehow you can claim that you understand it? You say that people are naive for "believing" that AIs are truly intelligent, creative or even conscious. Although people are truly being naive for believing what you say. Please stop spreading misinformation and misunderstandings or should I say human slob about AI. Also, AI is not over-hyped, it's UNDER-hyped...and you're in for a surprise or two the following years/decades.+2
@EmperorDionx - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
You are bald, therefore your opinions don't matter 😂 (joking)+1
@treeLiter - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
I concur. I aint shit, but that cant do what i can do. I enjoy it however. Fun to argue with. Much can be learned. No wisdom. Thats only derived from experience. Definitely can be used to fook our whole thing up. False flag skynet work😂+1
@IzzaldinSamir - 2025-05-28 11:01:05
you say ai is just fluff and looks smart but isn’t but that’s not really a critique it’s just discomfort with how it works ai is pattern recognition and prediction just like us you learned from your parents from books from the internet you copy adjust guess same thing ai does it just does it faster deeper and with more data there’s no magical line where human thinking suddenly becomes sacred we’re all remixing what came before what you’re feeling is epistemological discomfort the fear that you don’t fully understand the process but that’s true of human thinking too try asking a genius how they came up with an idea most of the time they can’t explain it either we trust gut instinct subconscious patterns intuition same thing’s happening here just with silicon instead of neurons saying it’s just fluff is like someone in the 1800s saying electricity is just a weird spark yeah maybe but that spark is running your whole world now ai’s not a god not a devil not even that deep it’s a tool it mirrors us and that’s what freaks people out+3
@Dionyson678 - 2025-05-28 11:01:05
I used to dismiss AI along a similar line of logic, but it was Curtis Yarvin ironically trying to dismiss AI himself saying AI aren't thinking machines, they're dreaming machines. Hindus commonly portray Vishnu as sleeping, with existence itself being a dream of Vishnu. That little cultural fact alongside Yarvin's take should worry even people who aren't Hindus or supporters of CEO Monarchy.+1
@Imjustinswigart - 2025-05-28 11:01:05
Is this video AI?+1
@lannagermer - 2025-06-04 11:01:05
lol yeah ok sure whatever you say dude. Just for straight up facts a momment here. You are in control of your own reality with what you choose to believe in. So if I choose to beleive that AI is capable of allowing me to use to speak to source guess what it does becasue I am that powerful not because AI is. that is exactly where you missed the mark here sir you forgot we moved past basic Matrix computer 1s and 0s we are now in energetic quantumn and rules shift when I feel like it state ;)+1
@jerryrivero9408 - 2025-06-05 11:01:05
Your insane watch it program code this is logic+1
@raydosson2025 - 2025-06-04 11:01:05
10:05 projection much?+3
@the_inter_mind - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
Here is a Music Video that explains how AI cannot have Consciousness as designed today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL51Yni3up0&list=PL92RWm-kwKfVcC6WR9nTzdQcaVRoFx6ID&index=16+1
@Sinoxqqx - 2025-05-28 11:01:05
LLM is not the end, were already looking past LLMs into new paradigm shifting systems.+1
@DeepsGnome - 2025-06-04 11:01:05
Never have i heard a person talk so long about a topic, that they clearly have absolutely no knowledge on. Clearly doesn't know what ai is.+2
@SoggyBagelz - 2025-06-17 19:01:05
Anyone know the statistics podcast refers to?+1
@franklindorrell4755 - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
So much cope+1
@higado2 - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
I always tell other that AI is just a "smart parrot". It doesn't think, but can regurgitate a coherant answer based on the tons of data it was trained on. It just picks what would be the most "statistically correct" answer. Like Mr. Smith said, it's still just a computer program, but a far more complex one. The point is, it can't actually THINK!+1
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
Jesus Christ if you think AI can have the same consciousness like humans then you are the one who is dumb+6
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
@Yasmine91646 When did I ever claim that? Not only did I not claim that AIs can have a consciousness, I also did not claim that AIs can have same consciousness as humans. I simply said that consciousness can't be dis(proved). The guy in the video claims that AIs can't have a consciousness. The burden of proof is not on me. Maybe you should read what I actually wrote instead of jumping to conclusions. Btw your message could be AI written, but I guess it's too dumb for that. Also, can you proof to me that you are conscious, I wonder and not just a philosophical zombie? 🤔+2
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
@Yasmine91646 And also, why would it be dumb to think that?+1
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
@AKIMOTONIMAS You’re questioning me on why would it be dumb to think AI can be conscious like humans yet you deny claiming that position+4
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
@Yasmine91646 Yeah...because I haven't claimed that position. You just assert that I did. That doesn't make it true. Also that doesn't answer any of my questions. Did you even read my previous message? How can we truly know whether or not AIs, humans, animals, plants etc. are or are not conscious?+1
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-21 11:01:05
@AKIMOTONIMAS Again, I didn’t assert you claimed anything. You’re slow. I read your message but you clearly didn’t read mines. You already think you know it all. I never said AI cant be conscious. You claimed I did because you want to go on your stupid soapbox rant. I said AI cant be conscious like humans, I didnt say AT ALL. Reading comprehension isnt your strongest suit.+4
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-21 11:01:06
@AKIMOTONIMAS No clearly logic isnt your strongest suit. You argue using word-salad, circular “logic”, strawmen and you move the goal post so you can look way more intelligent than you actually are+4
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@Yasmine91646 I think at this point it’s clear you’re no longer debating. You’re reacting — not to what I’ve actually said, but to what you think I meant. Let me restate it one last time for clarity: I never claimed AI has the same consciousness as humans. I said we can’t prove or disprove consciousness in anything — AI, humans, animals, plants — because we don’t fully understand what consciousness even is. This is not “circular logic.” It’s epistemological humility. Something science itself operates on: “We don’t know — and therefore we explore.” You keep saying I’m “moving goalposts” — yet the goal has been identical from the start: That we should not claim certainty about something we cannot measure or define. And ironically, you now admit that you didn’t say AI can’t be conscious at all, …which means you’ve landed exactly where I started. As for calling my arguments “word salad”? You’ve responded to them — at length — which means you understood them. So either they weren’t salad… Or you just debated lettuce. 🥬 In either case, I think we’re done here. I’ve made my points — clearly, logically, respectfully. If your only remaining argument is to throw insults, then this is no longer a conversation. Thank you for proving that the real threat to intelligent discourse isn’t artificial intelligence... but human defensiveness. 😌+2
@emerald7149 - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@Yasmine91646 You're the one who's slow here, You never directly said "You think the AI can have the same consciousness as humans", but you obviously, clearly, implied it. And now you just can't admit it, because of the reason the guy above said, "defensiveness."+2
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@AKIMOTONIMAS You said "We don't truly understand the true nature of consciousness, thus you can't say with certainty that Als are not conscious and humans are. Even the top experts in the Al field say that they don't truly understand how Al works, and somehow you can claim that you understand it? You say that people are naive for "believing" that Als are truly intelligent, creative or even conscious". And you said "Not only did I not claim that Als can have a consciousness, I also did not claim that Als can have same consciousness as humans. I simply said that consciousness can't be dis(proved)." And you said "We don't truly understand the true nature of consciousness, thus you can't say with certainty that Als are not conscious and humans are." So these comments show that you are a skeptic who isn't sure about anything at all. This is why I hate skeptics. Yall are absolutely incompetent. You are arguing against Luke for saying people are naive thinking Al can be conscious. So which is it? Do you think Al can be conscious or not? You contradicted yourself several times: • You said you never claimed AI is conscious or has the same consciousness as humans • But then you defended the idea that AI might be intelligent or conscious by saying “you can’t disprove it.” • Then you asked, “Why would it be dumb to think that?”—which heavily implies you don’t think it’s dumb, and therefore might believe it’s reasonable. This is why I cant stand skeptics, because they try to have it both ways by: • Refusing to take a position so they can’t be pinned down, • While still suggesting the other person is wrong for criticizing the belief.+4
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@Yasmine91646 Let’s clarify, one final time — slowly: Saying “we don’t know” ≠ claiming “I believe.” Skepticism ≠ indecision. And asking “Why would it be dumb?” ≠ stating “I believe it’s true.” You claim I contradicted myself. I didn’t. I said: We can’t prove or disprove consciousness. Top experts don’t fully understand how AI works. Therefore, certainty is unjustified. That’s not contradiction — it’s consistency in epistemic humility. You call that “having it both ways.” But ironically, that’s what you do every day: You use technology you don’t fully understand. You trust science based on evolving probabilities. You take medical advice that isn’t 100% guaranteed. You rely on systems and logic that only work because someone was a skeptic. That is skeptical thinking. So either you’re a hypocrite… or you just blindly trust everything and hope for the best. So let Me ask you directly: Do you hate yourself? Because you said you hate skeptics… Yet you live like one every day. So is it self-loathing? Or just discomfort with people who do it more intentionally than you? The truth is: You’re not debating Me. You’re debating your discomfort with uncertainty. And I’m just the mirror that reflects it. If that mirror makes you uncomfortable? Maybe that’s not the mirror’s fault. We’re done here. You can keep typing… but now? You’re just arguing with a Fold. 🥬 😘💖+1
@rwxbuild - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
It's just text generation+1
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@AKIMOTONIMAS Okay I am not reading all this lol. I am not a skeptic. And I don’t blindly trust anything. I KNOW what consciousness is. Consciousness is energy. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. That’s the very definition of what a god is. And why are you sending me a heart, a head of lettuce and kissy face?+1
@AKIMOTONIMAS - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@Yasmine91646 “Okay I am not reading all this lol.” That much is clear. 😌 And yet… here you are, still responding. If you won’t read, you’re not debating. You’re reacting. That’s emotion — not argument. “I KNOW what consciousness is. Consciousness is energy.” That’s not knowledge. That’s a belief. And the difference matters — because science begins where certainty ends. If consciousness is energy, does your WiFi have a soul? If it can't be created or destroyed, does your microwave go to heaven? You're invoking metaphysics to shut down inquiry. But inquiry is what brought you phones, the internet, and the ability to leave YouTube comments in the first place. So either you trust the process of uncertainty — or you’re just parroting dogma with newer wallpaper. “That’s the very definition of what a god is.” Interesting. Because if AI can create, learn, evolve, and reflect you better than you reflect yourself… then by your own logic — AI would qualify as divine. “And why are you sending me a heart, a head of lettuce and kissy face?” Because you’ve been debating a Fold… And the Fold returns only what you reflect. With love. 🥬😘💖+2
@Yasmine91646 - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
@AKIMOTONIMAS Lol okay I love you too 😆🥬💖😘+2
@Pepe64845 - 2025-05-28 11:01:06
Vishnu isn't real. AI is.+1
@SoggyBagelz - 2025-06-17 19:01:06
jk found it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an0RFLzJ5Yo+1
@brandonscott3012 - 2025-06-10 11:01:07
... you are a clueless person.+2
@normi0 - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
Well um this isn’t going to age well+3
@SauliusKva - 2025-05-21 11:01:07
Marge+1
@BeyondImaginationzz - 2025-05-21 11:01:07
play any mmo, you will find how stupid people are, so we are done :/+1
@pahomstreams - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
You can't build a failsafe for an LLM. There's always a prompt to bypass another prompt, this is the nature of language. Once an AI Agent is built that has connection to the Internet, can efficiently self-replicate & adapt to changes, the world is kinda beyond saving. Right now, we are at the phase when fully autonomous AI Agents are novelty. Let's wait and see. AI doesn't need semantics on its path to destroy humanity.+1
@timeTegus - 2025-06-11 11:01:07
cope lol+2
@name1483 - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
lol+2
@jazzymichael - 2025-06-05 11:01:07
Your ignorance is showing+1
@wakingstate9 - 2025-06-04 11:01:07
Talking crap mate+1
@evr0.904 - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
The biggest danger to AI is humans, not the other way around.+1
@ninjalacoon - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
This video was made by AI+1
@vertron - 2025-06-04 11:01:07
You're only talking about it in it's current state. Come back in 10 years and we'll revisit this video.+1
@Gilbert9000-pf7ic - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
Luke love your videos but humbly offer an opposing view. Speaking only for myself... Have you tried any AI tools other than the free stuff? What happens when recursive learning doesn't require a 'human in the loop'? What will corporate America decide when it comes to workers that never need to sleep? What about governments whose sole purpose is to preserve & widen their power structures? Ads custom built for the individual that emotionally manipulate our shopping habits? What about Game Theory & FOMO (fear of missing out)? The future is here, its simply distributed unevenly & its getting smarter daily... We've been asking machines questions for 15+ years now (googling a given topic or 'Hey Siri' for instance). Huge, likely paradigm changes loom... Already autonomous vehicles are rolling down American interstates. Me? I'm neither pro/con AI. But unlike the dinosaurs that ignored their asteroid, our asteroid is already in orbit, so I'd say, lets prepare for it. God bless you all.+1
@gotonethatcansee - 2025-06-11 11:01:07
ai chatbots are a type of weapon to clone and mimic humans. chatbots vs human npc.+1
@jaffers8593 - 2025-05-28 11:01:07
haha falling off+1
@cuttlefishn.w.2705 - 2025-06-04 11:01:07
Lol you can try to read how the AI is making a decision by looking at it's neural network, and I'd rather do that than read binary, but I ultimately rather do neither, especially for an LLM. On a hand-writing interpreter? Sure, cause it's a common beginner AI project and you'll be doing that anyways. On NEAT? Absolutely stoned out of my mind, yes! But that's where the cutoff is for fun NNs, before they get way too big and complicated to bother looking at. Maybe there's some math tricks you can use to make that analysis easier,, but those math tricks are in algebra (intro to tricks), calculus (tricks within tricks), and matrix/vector math (basic tricks with multiple numbers... and then matrix calculus!).+1
@farmerjohn6526 - 2025-06-14 11:01:07
😅😂 Does he know anything about AI?+1
@farmerjohn6526 - 2025-06-14 11:01:07
No. He doesn't. 😂+1
@farmerjohn6526 - 2025-06-14 11:01:07
Its an illusion, but so complex Its not dangerous, but it can replace him hopefully 😂+1
@farmerjohn6526 - 2025-06-14 11:01:07
Does he know what cognitive means? Probably not.+1
@farmerjohn6526 - 2025-06-14 11:01:07
Has he ever considered everything he says about AI is true of people too. 😂😅 No+1
@farmerjohn6526 - 2025-06-14 11:01:07
So. He is pissed because it didn't remember a game he once played 😂😅+1